Critical review of 'pentafecta' outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres

Quadrifecta outcomes and their predictors following robotic radical prostatectomy: a study of newly established robotic center in India

Active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), and radical radiotherapy (RT) are the three options for localized prostate cancer. Only a few studies have been conducted in developing countries or in centers in their initial learning curve that predict the outcomes of RARP. Therefore, this study aimed to present data from a novice center; how we started and progressed, and to compare our results with the rest of the world. This is a retrospective analysis to study the outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and to identify the predictors of quadrifecta outcomes, i.e., the patients who were continent, did not have complications, were biochemical recurrence free with at least 1 year of follow-up and had negative surgical margins. In our data, we excluded the erectile function as one of the parameters as the majority of our patients were not sexually active or did not want to discuss this parameter. Seventy-two patients were included in this study, and 50 (69.4%) of these achieved the quadrifecta outcomes. Of all the factors, studied, seven factors were statistically significantly different between Group I (quadrifecta achieved) and Group II (quadrifecta not achieved), namely, BMI, co-morbidities like CAD, COPD, ASA grade, pre-op D'Amico risk stratification groups, clinical staging, positive lymph-node status, and hospital stay. With this study, we reported outcomes of RARP in a newly established robotic center and the results were fairly comparable with the well-developed center in India and abroad, emphasizing the short learning curve, and so, the requirement of establishing more robotic surgery centers in developing as well as developed countries.

An artificial intelligence method for predicting postoperative urinary incontinence based on multiple anatomic parameters of MRI

Background

Deep learning methods are increasingly applied in the medical field; however, their lack of interpretability remains a challenge. Captum is a tool that can be used to interpret neural network models by computing feature importance weights. Although Captum is an interpretable model, it is rarely used to study medical problems, and there is a scarcity of data regarding MRI anatomical measurements for patients with prostate cancer after undergoing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). Consequently, predictive models for continence that use multiple types of anatomical MRI measurements are limited.

Methods

We explored the energy efficiency of deep learning models for predicting continence by analyzing MRI measurements. We analyzed and compared various statistical models and provided reference examples for the clinical application of interpretable deep-learning models. Patients who underwent RARP at our institution between July 2019 and December 2020 were included in this study. A series of clinical MRI anatomical measurements from these patients was used to discover continence features, and their impact on continence was primarily evaluated using a series of statistical methods and computational models.

Results

Age and six other anatomical measurements were identified as the top seven features of continence by the proposed model UINet7 with an accuracy of 0.97, and the first four of these features were also found by primary statistical analysis.

Conclusions

This study fills the gaps in the in-depth investigation of continence features after RARP due to the limitations of clinical data and applicable models. We provide a pioneering example of the application of deep-learning models to clinical problems. The interpretability analysis of deep learning models has the potential for clinical applications.

Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels > 0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications ≤ 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p < 0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p < 0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p < 0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p < 0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.

Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is increasingly being used, but results of pertinent studies on perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes comparing the Retzius sparing approach with standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remain inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of RS-RARP compared with standard RARP, in terms of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic search using multiple databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central) until March 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies were eligible for study inclusion. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were respected. Studies were critically appraised for the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were continence/potency recovery, as well as positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. Secondary outcomes included total intra- and perioperative complication rates.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Four RCTs and six prospective observational studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that PSM rates in ≤pT2 tumors were statistically significantly higher, following RS-RARP as compared with RARP (risk ratio [RR]=1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]=[1.01-1.91]). PSM rates in ≥pT3 tumors tended to be higher following RS-RARP (RR=1.36; 95% CI=[0.74-2.50]), although statistical significance was not reached. Immediate continence recovery was higher and significantly advantageous for RS-RARP (RR=1.81; 95% CI=[1.26-2.60]). Continence recovery also tended to be higher at 3 and 6 mo in the RS-RARP group (RR=1.57; 95% CI=[0.69-3.58] and RR=1.22; 95% CI=[0.89-1.66], respectively). The urinary continence recovery at 12 mo was similar in both groups (RR=1.14; 95% CI=[0.98-1.32]). A meta-analysis of included studies showed no significant difference concerning the return of erectile function and major complication rates between RS-RARP and RARP (RR=1.05; 95% CI=[0.76-1.45] and (RR=0.79; 95% CI=[0.07-8.74], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Available data suggest a statistically significant advantage in favor of RS-RARP in terms of immediate urinary continence recovery. PSM rates in localized ≤pT2 tumors are statistically significantly higher following RS-RARP. Potency and serious complication rates appear to be similar.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our meta-analysis of the current evidence shows a significant advantage for Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) over robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in terms of immediate urinary continence recovery, but positive cancer margins are higher following RS-RARP. There was no significant difference in the preservation of erectile function and overall postoperative complication rates between both the techniques.

Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy

Urinary incontinence is a common and predictable consequence among men with localized prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Despite advances in the surgical technique, urinary continence recovery time remains variable. A range of surgical and patient-related risk factors contributing to urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy have been described, including age, BMI, membranous urethral length and urethral sphincter insufficiency. Physical activity interventions incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance training and pelvic floor muscle training programmes can positively influence the return to continence in men after radical prostatectomy. Traditional approaches to improving urinary continence after radical prostatectomy have typically focused on interventions delivered during the postoperative period (rehabilitation). However, the limited efficacy of these postoperative approaches has led to a shift from the traditional reactive model of care to more comprehensive interventions incorporating exercise-based programmes that begin in the preoperative period (prehabilitation) and continue after surgery. Comprehensive prehabilitation interventions include appropriately prescribed aerobic exercise, resistance training and specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and exercise training programmes. Transperineal ultrasonography is a non-invasive and validated method for the visualization of the action of the pelvic floor musculature, providing real-time visual biofeedback to the patient during specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and training. Importantly, the waiting time before surgery can be used for the delivery of comprehensive prehabilitation exercise-based interventions to increase patient preparedness in the lead-up to surgery and optimize continence and health-related quality-of-life outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Postoperative peripheral neuropathies associated with patient positioning during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP): A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature concerning postoperative peripheral neuropathies associated with patient positioning during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review on articles published from January 1, 1990 to March 15, 2020 was performed in accordance with the PRISMA declaration (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis). The electronic search was done searching through the Cochrane Registry, PubMed/EMBASE, Medline, and Scopus. Relevant papers addressing postoperative peripheral neuropathies related to patient positioning during RARP were integrated into the analyses.

RESULTS

After screening 4975 articles, one randomized controlled trial and five retrospective studies with a total of 63,667 patients were included in this review. Peripheral neuropathies of the upper extremities were documented in three articles with a total of 15 patients, peripheric neuropathies of the lower extremities were reported in five articles with a total of 76 patients. Analysis of the data was exploratory, since screening techniques, systematically reporting, and description of positioning techniques was not standardized or not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of peripheral neuropathies at RARP varies between 1.3% and 10.8%. Lower extremities are more affected than upper extremities and the most important risk factors are intraoperative time duration, patients comorbidities, and ASA score. High-quality prospective randomized studies to better assess the impact of patient positioning during RARP on the development postoperative peripheral neuropathies are needed.

Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy (RP) has undergone a remarkable transformation from open to minimally-invasive surgery over the last two decades. However, it is important to recognize there is still conflicting evidence regarding key outcomes. We aimed to summarize current literature on comparative effectiveness of robotic and open RP for key outcomes including oncologic results, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, safety and postoperative complications, and healthcare costs. The bulk of the paper will discuss and interpret limitations of current data. Finally, we will also highlight future directions of both surgical approaches and its potential impact on health care delivery.

A scientometric study of the top 100 most-cited publications based on Web-of-Science regarding robotic versus laparoscopic surgery

Minimally invasive surgery includes traditional laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery. Although many studies related to robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery have been published, when doing our search, scientometric studies that focus on related robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery were limited. In this study, we aimed to analyze and review the research hots and research status of robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. We searched publications that involved robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in the Web of Science database from 1980 to May 23, 2020. The top 100 publications were published in 2012 with the number of 17 and citations ranged from 618 to 64. Published across 34 different journals, namely European urology (n = 17) and others, the greatest contribution among 36 institutes was made by the Cleveland Clinic (n = 11). Of the top 100 publications, a total of 429 unique words were identified and the most frequently occurring keyword was laparoscopy (n = 33). The co-occurrence of keywords in the top 100 publications indicated that the study of diseases mainly focused on prostatectomy, complications, prostate cancer, retropubic prostatectomy, nephron-sparing surgery, lymph-node dissection, total mesenteric excision, sexual function, rectal cancer, and assisted distal gastrectomy. In recent years, comparative research on robot and laparoscopic surgery has decreased and most studies focus on cancer.

Longitudinal analysis of trifecta outcome in Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To analyze the trifecta outcome (continence, potency, and cancer control) longitudinally using robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHOD

We prospectively obtained 1-year longitudinal Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) data (preoperative and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RARP) from 291 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon. Continence was defined as the use of 'zero or one pads'. Potency was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections firm enough for sexual activity or sexual intercourse. Continence and potency were subjectively determined from patient-reported outcomes (EPIC question nos. 5 and 18). The biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels of > 0.2 ng/mL after RARP. Outcomes of the pentafecta were complications and positive surgical margins combined with the trifecta outcomes.

RESULTS

Trifecta was achieved in 4.6, 5.6, 8.1, and 9.6% of all patients at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Pentafecta rates were 2.3, 3.0, 5.1, and 6.1%, respectively. Trifecta rates in the nerve-sparing (NS) group were 12.5, 12.7, 18.9, and 23.6%, respectively. The BCR-free rates maintained a high level and were 94.4, 93.9, 93.9, and 90.9%, respectively. Continence rates were improved to 55.2, 75.5, 81.6, and 85.0%, while the potency rate was extremely low at 7.5, 7.8, 9.8, and 10.9%. Even in the NS group, potency rates remained low at 18.1, 18.6, 21.9, and 26.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This longitudinal analysis of trifecta outcomes may be beneficial and should be used when counseling patients with clinically localized PCa.

[Pre-, intra- and postoperative predictors of functional outcome following radical prostatectomy]

Maintaining continence and erectile function is crucial for quality of life after radical prostatectomy. This review provides an overview of available evidence concerning preoperative risk stratification as well as intra- and postoperative factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy.Current data indicate that patient factors including age, baseline erectile function, prostate size, body-mass index and comorbidity status are valid predictors of functional outcome after prostatectomy. While surgical methods do not seem to have any influence, intraoperative procedures like nerve-sparing techniques, the extent of pelvic floor reconstruction as well as surgeons' experience have a significant impact on postoperative potency and continence. Rehabilitation consisting of pelvic floor training and use of PDE-5 inhibitors also contributes significantly to the recovery of erectile function and urinary continence.In summary, numerous adjustments of treatment can help to improve functional results and thus the quality of life after prostatectomy. A careful preoperative selection of suitable patients by urologists and integration of knowledge of periprostatic nerve and fascial structures into the surgical procedure are decisive factors.

Utility of a Pigtail Cope Loop Catheter for Bladder Drainage in Treating a Large/Persistent Urethrovesical Anastomotic Leak Following Radical Prostatectomy

Background: A large or persistent urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after a laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) although infrequent can be a difficult complication to treat. We describe a simple technique to facilitate resolution of a urethrovesical anastomotic leak by exchanging the in-place bladder Foley catheter for a pigtail drainage catheter. Case Presentation: Between 2014 and 2019, we had three patients who had a large/persistent urine leak after a radical prostatectomy (one laparoscopic and two robot assisted). All three patients had a wide bladder neck requiring bladder neck reconstruction with ureteral orifices close to the anastomosis. The bladder Foley catheter was exchanged to a pigtail Cope loop catheter™ (14F) or an Origin™ self-retaining drainage catheter (16F) under flexible cystoscopic guidance over a guidewire. Placement of a Cope loop bladder catheter stopped anastomotic leakage expeditiously with no need for further intervention. At minimum 3 months follow-up none had bladder neck stricture with 0-1 pad urinary incontinence. Conclusion: Drainage of the bladder through the use of a loop pigtail nephrostomy catheter can be useful in rapidly resolving a large persistent urethrovesical anastomotic leak.

Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

Background

To compare the postoperative continence and clinical outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RS-RALP) with non-RS RALP for patients with prostate cancer.

Methods

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register from 1999 to 2019 for studies comparing RS-RALP to non-RS RALP for the treatment of prostate cancer. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data.

Results

A total of seven studies involving 1620 patients were included in our meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in positive surgical margins (PSM), bilateral nerve-sparing, postoperative hernia, complications, blood loss, or operative time. Postoperative continence was better with RS-RALP compared with non-RS RALP (OR = 1.02, OR: 2.86, 95% CI 1.94–4.20, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

RS-RALP had a better recovery of postoperative continence than non-RS RALP. The perioperative outcomes were comparable for the two methods.

Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of tumour location zone on positive surgical margin (PSM) status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 203 consecutive patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RS-RARP at our centre were divided into three cohorts according to the tumour zonal origin described on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical and pathological characteristics were compared among the three groups. The associations of clinicopathological variables with PSM status after RS-RARP were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The rates of PSM in patients with transition zone (TZ) and mixed origin tumours were significantly higher than in patients with peripheral zone tumours (P < 0.01). Of the PSMs in patients with TZ and mixed origin cancers, 42.0% and 40.9%, respectively, were located at the anterior part of the gland. On multivariate analysis, presence of a TZ tumour was significantly associated with a higher PSM rate after RS-RARP (P < 0.01). Sub-analysis showed that high-risk patients with TZ tumours had a higher risk of PSM after RS-RARP (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Presence of a TZ tumour is an independent risk factor for PSMs after RS-RARP. Preoperative identification of TZ tumours might aid surgical planning for the Retzius-sparing technique, especially in high-risk patients.

Lessons learned from 12,000 robotic radical prostatectomies: Is the journey as important as the outcome?

Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standardized treatment for localized prostate cancer, which provides better functional outcomes and similar oncological outcomes compared to open approaches. Here, we share our experience of 12,000 RARPs by describing the outcomes of the procedure in terms of positive surgical margin (PSM), continence, and potency as well as by presenting our detailed surgical technique with recent modifications. On cancer control, the PSM rates were 5.8% and 26.1% in T2 and T3, respectively. On the premise of not compromising oncologic outcomes, a tailored approach to individual patients is essential. Even if an extracapsular extension is suspected, neurovascular bundle (NVB) tailoring can be applied using an anatomical landmark to preserve maximal nerve tissue with a negative margin. We developed a nomogram as a useful tool for deciding the degree of tailoring. For improvements of functional outcomes, we used athermal retrograde early release with a toggling technique, wherein the nerve dissection from the bottom helps with blood loss and allows for smooth NVB releasing. Additionally, we recently performed a new minimal apical dissection/lateral prostatic fascia preservation technique. As a result, our 1-week continence rate was 37% and the 6-week rate was 77.6%. In addition, the potency rates in our study were 69%, 82%, and 92% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively (preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores >21 & bilateral full nerve spared).

Venous thromboprophylaxis in urological cancer surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major complication of cancer and its treatment, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The appropriate choice of thromboprophylaxis method and duration is, therefore, of utmost importance. We conducted an extensive review of the literature concerning VTE in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancers. Special attention was paid to risk factors, different types of surgery (transurethral, pelvic, abdominal-open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted) and different medications used (heparins, vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants). Original papers, reviews and guidelines were identified in Medline database. The available data were then summarised for the purpose of this article. Venous thromboprophylaxis is obligatory in urological cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Unless individual contraindications are recognised, the available guidelines should be followed. The variety of clinical scenarios and patients' comorbidities necessitate cooperation with other specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, etc.) in choosing the optimal management. Thrombosis risk must be carefully weighed against bleeding risk.

Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is widely used in the urological field. This systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to assess the clinical and surgical efficacy of the three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic system in comparison with two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy for treatment of different urological conditions.

METHODS

Following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic literature search in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBase was carried out to identify relevant studies published up to May 2018. Articles published in the English language of both randomized and observational studies comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic systems in urological surgeries were included. Level of evidence and quality assessments of all included studies were conducted. Interested data were extracted for comparison and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our literature search generated 17 studies comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic systems in different urological surgeries. Of these, 13 studies containing 548 and 449 patients operated on with 2D and 3D laparoscopic systems, respectively, were included for meta-analysis. These 13 studies were divided into three groups according to surgical type. Group 1: Partial nephrectomy (PN); operative time (p = 0.19), estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.51), dissecting time (p = 0.58), and suturing time (p = 0.28) were not statistically significant between 2D and 3D laparoscopic systems. However, warm ischemia time during PN was significantly shorter during 3D laparoscopy (p < 0.00001). Group 2: Pyeloplasty; this procedure showed no significant difference between the two systems. Group 3: Radical prostatectomy (RP); shorter operative time (p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (p = 0.001) were associated with the 3D laparoscopic system.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional laparoscopy mainly improves the depth of perception, leading to better visibility, which is important for some complex urological surgeries such as PN, pyeloplasty, and RP. Based on our findings, 3D laparoscopy seems to provide better clinical and surgical outcomes in some urological procedures compared with conventional 2D laparoscopy.

Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficiency, safety and clinical outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) in comparison with the standard RARP.

Methods

A systematic search from Web of Science, PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was performed using the terms “Retzius-sparing”, “Bocciardi approach” and “robot-assisted radical prostatectomy”. Video articles and abstract papers for academic conferences were excluded. Meta-analysis of interested outcomes such as positive surgical margins (PSMs) and continence recovery was undertaken. A comprehensive literature review of all studies regarding Retzius-sparing (RS) approach was conducted and summarized.

Results

From 2010 to 2017, 11 original articles about RS-RARP approach were retrieved. Of that, only four studies comparing the RS-RARP approach to the conventional RARP were comparable for meta-analysis. Faster overall continence recovery within 1 month after the surgery was noted in the RS group (61% vs. 43%; p = 0.004). PSMs of pT2 and pT3 stages were not significantly different between the groups (10.0% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.39 and 13.1% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.56, respectively). Of all the studies, only one reported sexual recovery outcomes after RS treatment in which 40% of the participants achieved sexual intercourse within the first month.

Conclusion

Though more technically demanding than the conventional RARP, the RS technique is a safe and feasible approach. This meta-analysis and literature review indicates that RS technique, as opposed to the conventional approach, is associated with a faster continence recovery while PSMs were comparable between the two groups. The limitations of observational studies and the small data in our meta-analysis may prevent an ultimate conclusion. Future well-designed RCTs are needed to validate and confirm our findings.

Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy, Single Site Plus Two Model

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a feasible procedure of robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy single site plus two model to overcome the limitation of traditional single-port laparoscopic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive cases of robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy single site plus two model between November 2015 and April 2016 in our institution were included. We analyze the surgical and continence outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty cases were included in the analysis. All cases successfully completed without any necessity for conversion to a standard laparoscopic approach or open surgery. The average age is 64.3 ± 8.2 years and average body mass index is 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m². Eight focal positive margins (40%) (5 in T2 and 3 in T3a disease) were encountered and all occurred at the apex. For continence outcomes, 9 (45%) patients need average 0-1 pads/day and 2 (10%) patients need average 3 pads/day after surgery, but most recover after several months. No intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications were recorded, excluding blood transfusion in one case.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy single site plus two model is technically feasible and safe in our experience. It can also be performed in patients that have previously received intraperitoneal abdominal surgery using the extraperitoneal approach. We can take this procedure into account for minimal invasive surgical option.

Pentafecta Rates of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience after 150 Cases

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy with a flexible camera was developed to overcome the main limitation of traditional laparoscopic surgery, which is two-dimensional (2D) vision. The aim of our article is to present the largest casistic of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) available in literature and evaluate our results in terms of pentafecta and compare it with the literature.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent LRP with 3D technology between March 2014 and December 2015. Total operative time (TOT), anasthomosis time (AT), blood loss and complications were registered. All patients presented at least 3 months of follow-up. Surgical outcome was evaluated in terms of Pentafecta.

Results

One hundred fifty consecutive patients underwent 3D LRP. Mean follow-up was 16.9 months. Mean age was 67.7 ± 8.3 years (range 50-76). Mean preoperative PSA value was 8.3 ± 5.8 ng/ml and mean bioptic Gleason Score (GS) was 6.6. We had a mean TOT of 158 ± 23 minutes and a mean AT of 25 ± 12.6. Mean blood loss was 240 ± 40 ml. Eighteen (12%) postoperative complications occurred. Pathologic results: pT2 in 91 patients (58%) and pT3 in 59 (39.3%). Pentafecta was reached by 31.3% of patients at 3 months and 51.6% at 12 months.

Conclusions

Our oncological and functional results are comparable to those present in literature for laparoscopic and robotic surgery. We believe that our findings can encourage the use of 3D laparoscopy especially considering the increasing attention to healthcare costs.

Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

We sought to investigate the impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length (MUL) on urinary continence using 3 Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2013, 190 men with RARP underwent preoperative and postoperative MRI. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy or who were lost to followup were excluded, leaving 186 patients eligible for analysis. Preoperative MUL was estimated from the prostate apex to the penile bulb, while postoperative MUL was estimated from the bladder neck to penile bulb. Patients with no pads or protection were considered to have complete continence. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors associated with urinary incontinence at six and 12 months.

RESULTS

Age was commonly associated with urinary incontinence at six and 12 months. In addition, diabetes mellitus (DM) was another factor associated with urinary incontinence at 12 months. When adjusting these variables, preoperative MUL ≤16 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14; p=0.022), postoperative MUL ≤14 mm (95% CI 1.16-9.80; p=0.025) and percent change of MUL >18% (95% CI 1.17-7.23; p=0.021) were significantly associated with urinary incontinence at six months. However, at 12 months, preoperative MUL ≤13.5 mm (95% CI 1.85-19.21; p=0.003) and postoperative MUL ≤13 mm (95% CI 1.24-13.84; p=0.021) had impacts on urinary incontinence, but not percent change of MUL.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative and postoperative MUL were significantly associated with urinary continence recovery after RARP. Therefore, efforts to preserve MUL are highly recommended during surgery for optimal continence outcomes after RARP.

[Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Bibliography search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, Pubmed) selected according to the scientific relevance. The research was focused on continence, potency, les dyserections, couple sexuality, incontinence, treatments of postoperative incontinence, dysrection and trifecta.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy is an elaborate and challenging procedure when carcinological risk balances with functional results. Despite recent developments in surgical techniques, post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (pRP-UI) continues to be one of the most devastating complications, which affects 9-16% of patients. Sphincter injury and bladder dysfunction are the most common causes or pRP-UI. The assessment of severity of pRP-UI that affects the choice of treatment is still not well standardized but should include at least a pad test and self-administered questionnaires. The implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter AMS800 remains the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe pRP-UI. The development of less invasive techniques such as the male sling of Pro-ACT balloons has provided alternative therapeutic options for moderate and slight forms of pRP-UI. Most groups now consider the bulbo-urethral compressive sling as the treatment of choice for patients with non-severe pRP-UI. The most appropriate second-line therapeutic strategy is not clearly determined. Recent therapies such as adjustable artificial urinary sphincters and sling and stem cells injections have been investigated. Maintenance of a satisfying sex life is a major concern of a majority of men facing prostate cancer and its treatments. It is essential to assess the couple's sexuality before treating prostate cancer in order to deliver comprehensive information and consider early therapeutic solutions adapted to the couple's expectations. Active pharmacological erectile rehabilitation (intracavernous injections or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors [PDE5i] on demand, during in the month following surgery) or passive (daily PDE5i after surgery) might improve the quality of erections especially in response to PDE5i. Unimpaired aspects of sexual response (orgasm) may, when the erection is not yet recovered, represent an alternative allowing the couple to preserve intimacy and complicity. Androgen blockade is a major barrier to maintain or return to a satisfying sex. Trifecta is a simple tool to present in one way the results of radical prostatectomy: in case of bilateral neurovascular preservation, Trifecta is 60% whatever the surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Radical prostatectomy is an elaborate and challenging procedure when carcinological risk balances with functional results. Various treatments of postoperative incontinence and dysrections exist. Functional disorders after surgery have to be treated to ameliorate quality of life of patients.

Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Measurement and Continence Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Membranous urethral length (MUL) measured prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) has been identified as a factor that is associated with the recovery of continence following surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the effect of MUL on the recovery of continence following RP.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to September 2015 was performed. Thirteen studies comprising one randomized controlled trial and 12 cohort studies were selected for inclusion.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Four studies (1738 patients) that reported hazard ratio results. Every extra millimeter (mm) of MUL was associated with a faster return to continence (hazard ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.08, p<0.001). Eleven studies (6993 patients) reported the OR (OR) for the return to continence at one or more postoperative time points. MUL had a significant positive effect on continence recovery at 3 mo (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14, p=0.004), 6 mo (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.0001). and 12 mo (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22, p=0.006) following surgery. After adjusting for repeated measurements over time and studies with overlapping data, all OR data combined indicated that every extra millimeter of MUL was associated with significantly greater odds for return to continence (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A greater preoperative MUL is significantly and positively associated with a return to continence in men following RP. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of MUL is recommended prior to RP.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We examined the effect that the length of a section of the urethra (called the membranous urethra) had on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy surgery. Our results indicate that measuring the length of the membranous urethra via magnetic resonance imaging before surgery may be useful to predict a longer period of urinary incontinence after surgery, or to explain a delay in achieving continence after surgery.

The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China

To analyze the learning curve for cancer control from an initial 250 cases (Group I) and subsequent 250 cases (Group II) of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a single surgeon. Five hundred consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received RALP and were evaluated. Surgical parameters and perioperative complications were compared between the groups. Positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were assessed as cancer control outcomes. Patients in Group II had significantly more advanced prostate cancer than those in Group I (22.2% vs 14.2%, respectively, with Gleason score 8–10, P= 0.033; 12.8% vs 5.6%, respectively, with clinical stage T3, P= 0.017). The incidence of PSM in pT3 was decreased significantly from 49% in Group I to 32.6% in Group II. A meaningful trend was noted for a decreasing PSM rate with each consecutive group of 50 cases, including pT3 and high-risk patients. Neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation was significantly influenced by the PSM in high-risk patients (84.1% in the preservation group vs 43.9% in the nonpreservation group). The 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year BCR-free survival rates were 79.2%, 75.3%, and 70.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the incidence of PSM in pT3 was decreased significantly after 250 cases. There was a trend in the surgical learning curve for decreasing PSM with each group of 50 cases. NVB preservation during RALP for the high-risk group is not suggested due to increasing PSM.

Using imaging biomarkers to improve the planning of radical prostatectomies

OBJECTIVES

This exploratory pilot study aimed to evaluate whether adding imaging biomarkers to conventional staging improves complete excision rates after undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in the United Kingdom for patients who have not undergone population prostate specific antigen screening. We primarily considered estimates of lesion volume and location based on computer-aided analysis of ultrasound (US) raw radiofrequency (RF) data acquired during trans-rectal ultrasound. The imaging analysis device used had been shown to accurately detect tumor loci within the prostate in previous studies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

US raw RF data were collected from motorized trans-rectal ultrasound of 68 consecutive men with operable prostate cancer. In this cohort (group 1), locations and volume measurements of lesions suspected of harboring cancer on US raw RF data analysis by prostate HistoScanning, were added to conventional presurgical staging.The unexposed control group comprised 100 men who underwent conventional presurgical staging only (group 2): 50 were operated before and 50 operated after group 1 recruitment. Changes to pre-operative surgical planning and positive lateral margins of RP prostate pathological specimens were the primary outcomes. Data were collected using a Microsoft Excel database and analyzed using Stata.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were comparable. In group 1, consideration of the additional imaging biomarkers led to changes in 27 (19.9%) operative surgical plans. Absolute rate reduction of a positive surgical margin (PSM) attributable to the imaging-biomarkers was 13.3% (P = 0.029). For stage pT3, PSM rate was reduced from 45.8% (n = 44) to 21.2% (n = 11) (P = 0.0028).

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining quantitative measurements of preoperative imaging biomarkers appears to improve PSM rates of patients undergoing RP. The greatest PSM rate reduction was observed for pT3 tumors.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients

OBJECTIVES

To examine biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients, and to develop a risk stratification model for biochemical recurrence.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 784 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy. The relationships of biochemical recurrence with perioperative findings were evaluated. The prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence-free survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model analyses.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 80 patients showed biochemical recurrence. The biochemical recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.2%, 85.2% and 80.1%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the prostate-specific antigen level, prostate-specific antigen density, biopsy Gleason score, percent positive core, pathological T stage, pathological Gleason score, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. In multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.4 (P = 0.0011), pathological T stage ≥3a (P = 0.002), pathological Gleason score ≥8 (P = 0.007) and positive surgical margin (P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The patients were stratified into three risk groups according to these factors. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 89.4% in the low-risk group, 65.6% in the intermediate-risk group and 30.3% in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

The prostate-specific antigen density, pathological T stage, pathological Gleason score and positive surgical margin were independent prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence. The risk stratification model developed using these four factors could help clinicians identify patients with a poor prognosis who might be good candidates for clinical trials of alternative management strategies.

A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

The idea of performing a laparoscopic procedure through a single abdominal incision was conceived with the aim of expediting postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical feasibility and safety of single-port urologic procedures by using a novel robotic surgical system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a prospective institutional review board-approved, Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term Study (IDEAL) phase 1 study. After enrollment, patients underwent a major urologic robotic single-port procedure over a 3-wk period in July 2010. The patients were followed for 3 yr postoperatively.

INTERVENTION

Different types of urologic surgeries were performed using the da Vinci SP Surgical System. This system is intended to provide the same core clinical capabilities as the existing multiport da Vinci system, except that three articulating endoscopic instruments and an articulating endoscopic camera are inserted into the patient through a single robotic port.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The main outcomes were the technical feasibility of the procedures (as measured by the rate of conversions) and the safety of the procedures (as measured by the incidence of perioperative complications). Secondary end points consisted of evaluating other key surgical perioperative outcomes as well as midterm functional and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study. Eleven of them underwent radical prostatectomy; eight subjects underwent nephrectomy procedures (partial nephrectomy, four; radical nephrectomy, two; and simple nephrectomy, two). There were no conversions to alternative surgical approaches. Overall, two major (Clavien grade 3b) postoperative complications were observed in the radical prostatectomy group and none in the nephrectomy group. At 1-yr follow-up, one radical prostatectomy patient experienced biochemical recurrence, which was successfully treated with salvage radiation therapy. The median warm ischemia time for three of the partial nephrectomies was 38 min. At 3-yr follow-up all patients presented a preserved renal function; none had tumor recurrence. Study limitations include the small sample and the lack of a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the first clinical application of a novel robotic platform specifically designed for single-port urologic surgery. Major urologic procedures were successfully completed without conversions. Further assessment is warranted to corroborate these promising findings.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A novel purpose-built robotic system enables surgeons to perform safely and effectively a variety of major urologic procedures through a single small abdominal incision.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02136121).

The need for a post-operative thromboembolic event registry? A five-year retrospective tertiary institution study of venothromboembolic events within 30 days of major urological surgery

Background:

Recent evidence has suggested that the use of extended (≤ 28 ± seven days) post-operative low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy following major abdominal/pelvic surgery can significantly reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). However, there is still significant discordance as to optimal LMWH duration among general and urological surgeons. There is marked variation over prescribing practices within urological surgery, and prospective studies have not reached a consensus. We aimed to determine if there was a significant prevalence of symptomatic thromboembolic events post-major urological surgery.

Materials and methods:

A five-year retrospective audit of major urological cases undertaken in our institution sought to examine the number of vascular complications encountered within 30 ± seven days of surgery by patients on standard thromboprophylactic therapy.

Results:

A total of 439 major surgical cases were carried out, of which 79% were oncological. Ninety-three per cent of patients had at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor. There was one post-operative clinically evident DVT (0.22%) and no PEs in this cohort.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that symptomatic thromboembolic events post-major urological surgery may be infrequent. However, there is the need for a comprehensive multi-centre prospective study to examine for thromboembolic events post-discharge. As such, we must recommend careful patient selection in determining who would benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: 5-year oncological and biochemical outcomes

PURPOSE

We investigated oncological outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy more than 5 years previously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2002 and August 2006 we prospectively followed 435 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Five patients were excluded from analysis, including 4 lost to followup and 1 with prior therapy. Biochemical recurrence was denoted as 1) adjuvant therapy or 2) 2 prostate specific antigen values above 0.2 ng/ml. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, and patient and tumor characteristics were investigated.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD patient age was 61.4 ± 7.1 years. A total of 289 patients (63%) had 5 or more years of followup and 4 (1%) were lost to followup. Median time to biochemical recurrence was 18 months (range 1 month to 9.1 years). Four patients (0.93%) died of prostate cancer. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 84.9% (95% CI 81.4-88.4). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 94.4% (95% CI 91.7-97.1) for pT2 disease compared to 63.8% (95% CI 53.4-74.1) and 47.1% (95% CI 27.3-67.0) for pT3a and pT3b, respectively (p <0.001). Patients with a Gleason score of 3 or less + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 4 or greater + 4 experienced a 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 97%, 86%, 62% and 43%, respectively (p <0.001). Patients with positive margins had a 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 60.7% (95% CI 48.7-72.7) compared to 89.6% (95% CI 86.3-92.9) in those with negative margins (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This represents the third report of the oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, demonstrating a 5-year biochemical recurrence rate of approximately 14% and just below 1% prostate cancer specific mortality.

Risk and prevention of acute urinary retention after robotic prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Acute urinary retention after catheter removal is a recognized complication following open or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We evaluated patient and surgery related risk factors to determine whether acute urinary retention could be prevented. To our knowledge this has not previously been investigated for prostatectomy done by any technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed a single surgeon, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy database of patients treated between February 2008 and June 2011 for acute urinary retention after catheter removal, which was routinely performed 3 to 7 days postoperatively. We compared the characteristics of patients with and without acute urinary retention.

RESULTS

Of 1,026 patients 25 (2.4%) experienced acute urinary retention. There was no difference between patients with and without acute urinary retention in mean age, body mass index, blood loss or prostate size, and no difference in the frequency of bladder neck reconstruction or nerve sparing. The catheter was removed an average of 4.1 vs 5.7 days postoperatively in patients with vs without acute urinary retention. Of 25 patients with acute urinary retention 22 (88%) underwent catheter removal on postoperative day 3 or 4. Although only 3 of 381 patients (0.8%) had a leak on cystogram on postoperative day 3 or 4, the acute urinary retention rate when the catheter was removed on day 3 or 4 was 5.8% (22 of 381). This was several times higher than the rate in patients who retained the catheter for greater than 4 days (3 of 645 or 0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute urinary retention develops infrequently after robotic prostatectomy. No patient related risk factors were identified beyond catheterization time. Although the catheter may be removed after 3 or 4 days with rare leaks, the acute urinary retention risk was much less when the catheter was left in place at least 5 days.