Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage

Single- versus multi-port robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes and analgesic requirements

Evidence supporting the safe use of the single-port (SP) robot for partial nephrectomy is scarce. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing robotic assisted SP vs multi-port (MP) partial nephrectomy (PN) in a time-matched cohort. All patients with clinically localized renal masses who underwent robotic PN from January 2019 to March 2020 were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to SP vs MP approach. Postoperative analgesia was administered in accordance with department-wide opioid stewardship protocol and outpatient opioid use was tracked. Total of 78 patients underwent robotic PN with 26 patients in the SP cohort. The majority of renal masses had low-complexity (53, 67.9%) R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores, without a significant difference between the two cohorts (p = 0.19). A retroperitoneal approach was performed in 16 (20.5%) patients overall, though more commonly via the SP robotic approach (13 vs 3, p < 0.001). Mean operative time for SP cases was 183.9 ± 63.5 min vs 208.6 ± 65.0 min in the MP cohort (p = 0.12). Rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy was 3.8% vs 9.6% for SP vs MP cases, respectively, (p = 0.37). The majority of patients were discharged on postoperative day one (67.9%) irrespective of operative approach (p = 0.60). There were no differences in inpatient milligram morphine equivalents administered (MME, p = 0.08) or outpatient postoperative MME prescribed (p = 0.21) between the two cohorts. In this retrospective single-institution study, SP robotic approach offers similar short-term perioperative outcomes to MP platforms for minimally invasive, nephron-sparing surgery. Using the SP system was not associated with a reduction in postoperative opioid analgesic requirements.

Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: An Overview of Hot Issues

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are attracting increased attention from urologists. They can achieve the same effect of oncology control as radical nephrectomy; moreover, they can offer better preservation of renal function, thus obtaining long-term living benefits. The indications are also expanding, making it possible for larger and more difficult tumors. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches, with their individual advantages and limitations. In addition, the renal tumor scoring systems have been widely used and studied in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. In -order to better preserve renal function, the zero-ischemia technique is widely used. The application of intraoperative imaging technology provides convenience and greater benefits. Besides, whether minimal invasive partial nephrectomy can be performed without stop antiplatelet treatment is still disputed. Clinicians perform substantial exploration and practice to achieve the "trifecta" of surgery: complete resection of the tumor, maximum protection of renal function, and no complications.

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is a recommended type of treatment of localised renal tumors. Real-time intraoperative imaging technique, such as fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) administration helps to improve intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent PN. Our work presents results of patients who underwent robotic PN with ICG navigation. A total of 37 patients underwent robotic PN with application of ICG between April 2015 and May 2019. A total amount of 5 mg of ICG was applied intravenously, and then robotic PN was performed with fluorescent imaging. ICG was used by the surgeon's decision according to unfavourable anatomical properties of tumor or to high R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. An exact border between perfused and nonperfused tissue was detected, and exact tumor's branch of the renal artery was clamped. Robotic PN with ICG-fluorescence imaging navigation was performed in 37 cases with a preoperative average diameter of tumor of 31 mm. The mean surgery time was 133 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 190 mL. Arterial clamping was performed in 35 cases. The mean duration of warm ischemia was 14 minutes. Application of ICG enabled specific tumor-supplying vessel clamping in 25 cases. Two complications of grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification occurred intraoperatively, and one complication of grade III was observed. Renal function changes showed favourable results for the cases with superselective clamping. Finally, an administration of ICG eases superselective clamping of tumor-specific branch of renal artery and helps to preserve normal renal function with acceptable oncological results.

Single-port robotic partial and radical nephrectomies for renal cortical tumors: initial clinical experience

To describe our institution's initial experience with radical (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) using the SP robotic system. The recent FDA approval of the da Vinci^® SP robotic platform has led to its use in minimally invasive approaches to urologic malignancies. There are little data on its feasibility and safety after implementation for radical and partial nephrectomy. All patients who underwent PN or RN using the SP system at our institution were reviewed. All PNs were performed off-clamp. Patient demographics, preoperative imaging, operative approaches, and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Sixteen patients underwent PN (n = 13) or RN (n = 3) utilizing the SP robotic system between January 2019 and June 2019. Average age was 58.6 ± 13.9 and 61.0 ± 1.7 years in each group, respectively. A retroperitoneal approach was performed in 7 (53.8%) PN patients and 1 (33.3%) RN patient. A transperitoneal approach was performed in 6 (46.1%) PNs and 2 (66.7%) RNs. Mean operative time and median estimated blood loss for PN was 176.9 ± 64.0 min and 200 (50-800) ml compared to 176.3 ± 73.8 min and 50 (50-400) ml for RN. There was one operative conversion (7.7%) to an open approach in the PN group. Length of hospital stay postoperatively averaged 1.9 ± 1.3 days and 3.3 ± 1.2 days for patients undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy, respectively. SP partial and radical nephrectomies through transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches appear to be feasible surgical techniques in the management of cortical renal masses. Off-clamp PN is also a feasible approach using the SP system. However, further study is needed to establish its safety and use in renal surgery across multiple institutions and larger patient cohorts.

[Standard surgery for small renal masses (<4 cm)]

BACKGROUND

Several new treatment strategies have emerged in the treatment of small renal masses (<4 cm in diameter). Active surveillance and ablative techniques have been introduced but it remains unclear which patients will benefit the most from these new treatment options. A surgical approach remains standard of care. In recent decades, radical nephrectomy has been replaced by nephron-sparing surgery for the management of small renal masses.

RESULTS

In addition to the open partial nephrectomy, which is considered the standard approach, the number of surgeries performed using minimally invasive techniques is increasing. Recent data show that there might be some benefits such as less blood loss. The disadvantages shown by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy such as prolonged warm ischemia, longer operation times, and postoperative renal impairment might be negligible for the robotic approach. Therefore, current guidelines allow these approaches in addition to open partial nephrectomy if sufficient surgical expertise is given.

The margin strategy in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery clamping: Anatomical basis, surgical technique and comparative outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possibility and efficiency of a modified margin strategy in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery clamping.

METHODS

Seventy-six cases of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping in Shanghai Changhai Hospital between July 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant clinical data were recorded including baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and surgical outcomes (segmental artery mobilization time, operating time, warm ischemic time, estimated blood loss, complications, and so on). A comparative analysis between standard technique and margin strategy was performed.

RESULTS

In 38 cases, margin strategy to mobilize segmental artery was successfully performed. In the other 38 cases, the surgery was performed in traditional method. The use of new strategy led to a shortened segmental artery mobilization time (5 min vs 12 min, p < 0.001). There was no difference in terms of perioperative complications between the two techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The margin strategy is a practical method in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery clamping. It provides a simplified way of finding segmental arteries. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Comparison of selective and main renal artery clamping in partial nephrectomy of renal cell cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing the efficiency and safety of selective renal artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping (MAC) in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell cancer (RCC).

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, a literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure were conducted to identify relevant studies published through December 2017. Outcomes of interest included baseline characteristics and perioperative surgical variables.

RESULTS

In all, 14 studies involving 2824 RCC patients comparing SAC and MAC were included in this meta-analysis. No differences were detected in mean patient body mass index (P = .08), tumor size (P = .22), baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = .60), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .97), or RENAL score (P = .70). The mean age was significantly younger in the SAC group compared with the MAC group (P = .002). There was no difference between SAC and MAC groups in terms of warm ischemia time (P = .31), transfusion rate (P = .18), length of hospital stay (P = .47), or postoperative complication rate (P = .23). Although SAC had longer operating time (OT) (P = .04) and more estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = .0002), a lower percentage decrease in eGFR in the SAC group was found compared to the MAC group (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PN with SAC had longer OT and higher EBL. SAC was more frequently used in younger patient. SAC offered better renal function preservation when compared with MAC for RCC. Given the inherent limitations of the included studies, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to verify these findings.

Off-clamp partial nephrectomy has a positive impact on short- and long-term renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ongoing efforts are focused on shortening ischemia intervals as much as possible during partial nephrectomy to preserve renal function. Off-clamp partial nephrectomy (off-PN) has been a common strategy for to avoid ischemia in small renal tumors. Although studies comparing the advantages between off-PN with conventional on-clamp partial nephrectomy (on-PN) have been reported, the impact on short- and especially long-term renal function of the two surgical methods has not been discussed seriously and remained unclear. Our purpose is to evaluate the impact on short- (within postoperative 3 months) and long-term (postoperative 6 months or longer) renal function of off-PN compared with that of on-PN.

Methods

We comprehensively searched databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, without restrictions on language or region. A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the included studies were performed to assess the impact of the two techniques on short- and long-term renal function.

Results

A total of 23 retrospective studies and 2 prospective cohort studies were included. The pooled postoperative short-term decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly less in the off-PN group (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 4.81 ml/min/1.73 m²; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.53 to 6.08; p < 0.00001). The short-term increase in creatinine (Cr) level in the on-PN group was also significant (WMD: − 0.05 mg/dl; 95%CI: − 0.09 to − 0.00; p = 0.04). Significant differences between groups was observed for the long-term change and percent (%) change of eGFR (p = 0.04 and p < 0.00001, respectively) but not for long-term Cr change (p = 0.40). The postoperative short-term eGFR and Cr levels, but not the postoperative long-term eGFR, differed significantly between the two groups. The pooled odds ratios for acute renal failure and postoperative progress to chronic kidney disease (stage≥3) in the off-PN group were found to be 0.25 (p = 0.003) and 0.73 (p = 0.34), respectively, compared with the on-PN group.

Conclusions

Off-PN exerts a positive impact on the short- and long-term renal function compared with conventional on-PN. Given the inherent limitations of our included studies, large-volume and well-designed RCTS with extensive follow up are needed to confirm and update the conclusion of this analysis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-0993-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with prior superselective embolisation as treatment for giant renal angiomyolipoma

OBJECTIVE

Cases of giant renal angiomyolipoma (>9cm) are a therapeutic challenge due to their low frequency and large size. The treatment objective for patients with renal angiomyolipoma should be complete tumour extirpation, with a nephron-sparing surgical technique, without complications and using a minimally invasive approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We present 3 cases of giant angiomyolipoma (10 12 and 14cm) treated with a combined approach: superselective embolisation and subsequent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, in 3 separate hospitals.

RESULTS

None of the cases required conversion to open surgery. One of the 3 patients underwent arterial clamping, and none of the patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach provides a procedure with the criteria of minimal invasiveness, nephron sparing, little bleeding and reduced warm ischaemia time.

Role of Clinical and Surgical Factors for the Prediction of Immediate, Early and Late Functional Results, and its Relationship with Cardiovascular Outcome after Partial Nephrectomy: Results from the Prospective Multicenter RECORd 1 Project

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the predictors of short-term and long-term renal function impairment after partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data on 769 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were prospectively recorded at a total of 19 urological Italian centers from 2009 to 2012 in the RECORd 1 (Italian Registry of Conservative Renal Surgery) Project. We extracted clinical data on 708 of these patients who were alive, free of recurrent disease and with a minimum 2-year functional followup.

RESULTS

Of the patients 47.3% underwent open, 36.6% underwent laparoscopic and 16.1% underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84.5 ml/minute/1.73 m² (IQR 69.9-99.1). Immediate (day 3 postoperatively), early (month 1) and late (month 24) renal function impairment greater than 25% from baseline was identified in 25.3%, 21.6% and 14.8% of cases, respectively. Female gender and the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent predictors of immediate, early and late renal function impairment. Age at diagnosis was an independent predictor of immediate and late impairment. Uncontrolled diabetes was an independent predictor of late impairment only. Open and laparoscopic approaches, and pedicle clamping were independent predictors of immediate and early renal function impairment. Overall 58 of 529 patients (11%) experienced postoperative cardiovascular events. Body mass index and late renal function impairment were independent predictors of those events.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically modifiable factors were significantly associated with worse immediate and early functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy while clinically unmodifiable factors affected renal function during the entire followup. Late renal function impairment is an independent predictor of postoperative cardiovascular events.

The effect of zero-ischaemia laparoscopic minimally invasive partial nephrectomy using the modified sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique on long-term renal functions

Introduction

Laparoscopic minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is the preferred technique in renal surgery, especially T1 phase kidney tumours, and it is recommended for the protection of renal functions in methods that do not involve ischaemia.

Aim

To evaluate long-term renal functions of zero-ischaemia laparoscopic MIPN patients who underwent a modified sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique.

Material and methods

In a total of 17 renal units in 16 patients with kidney tumours that were determined incidentally and did not cause any complaints, the masses were extracted via laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) using the modified sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique. Creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values of the patients were measured preoperatively and on the first day and after 12 months postoperatively, and the results were compared.

Results

The differences between the pre- and postoperative values were statistically significant (p = 0.033, p = 0.045), but the changes in postoperative creatinine and eGFR values were clinically insignificant. While the differences between preoperative and first-day postoperative creatinine and eGFR values were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.039, p = 0.042, respectively), a statistically significant difference was not detected between preoperative and 12-month postoperative creatinine and eGFR values (p = 0.09, p = 0.065, respectively). The global percentage of functional recovery was measured as 92.5% on the first day and 95.9% at the 12^th month.

Conclusions

The modified sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique is an effective, reliable method for avoiding complications and preserving renal functions and nephrons in appropriate patients.

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Narrative Review and Comparison with Open and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Kidney cancer ranks among the top 10 most prevalent cancers in Western society, ∼90% of which are renal cell carcinomas. There has been a paradigm shift in the management of small renal masses with strong emphasis now placed on nephron-sparing surgery and increased utilization of laparoscopic approaches to partial nephrectomy. In this review, the current state of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is discussed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The PubMed database was queried using the MeSH terms "laparoscopy" and "nephrectomy," as well as the search term "partial." A search was performed filtering for "clinical trial," "review," "humans", and "English."

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Articles that discussed intraoperative techniques, functional and oncologic outcomes, and a comparison between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and LPN were synthesized.

CONCLUSION

LPN reduces ischemia time, affords equivalent functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and equivalent complication rates compared with open partial nephrectomy. Future advances in laparoscopic technique and advancements in robotic technology offer potential to improve surgical and patient outcomes.

Early clamp release during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Implications for preservation of renal function

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative warm ischemic time (WIT), associated with hilar clamping during partial nephrectomy (PN), is an established modifiable risk factor for renal dysfunction. We assessed early clamp release (ECR) as a strategy to reduce WIT and assess its impact on renal function and bleeding.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent minimally invasive PN by a single surgeon at our centre since December 2011. Comparing the standard technique to an ECR modification, WIT, complications, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and change in differential function as demonstrated by MAG-3 nuclear renography were assessed. Followup blood work and renograms were performed at 6-12 weeks postoperatively and compared to baseline in 70 patients (35 ECR: 35 control).

RESULTS

The ECR and control groups were similar in age, sex, and tumour size, with only patient weight being higher in the ECR group (91.6 vs. 81.6 kg; p<0.05). WIT was significantly lower in ECR group compared to control (18.8 vs. 31.5 minutes; p<0.05). Although there was no significant difference in change from baseline eGFR in the early postoperative period (Day 3) or in followup (6-12 weeks), the control group had a significantly greater loss of ipsilateral renal function from baseline compared to the ECR group (9 vs. 4% change; p<0.05). Blood loss and complication rate were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECR technique offers a safe, reproducible alternative that reduces WIT during laparoscopic PN. ECR demonstrates a reduction in overall ipsilateral renal dysfunction, without increasing complication or intraoperative bleeding risk.

Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures

PURPOSE

In recent times there has been a trend in mininvasive renal tumour surgery. Very limited evidence can be found in literature of the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for highly complex renal tumours. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and safety of LPN for renal tumours of high surgical complexity in our single-institutional experience, comparing perioperative and functional data between clampless and clamped procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 68 patient who underwent a clampless LPN (Group A) and 41 patients who underwent a clamped LPN (Group B) for a renal tumour with a R.E.N.A.L. NS ≥ 10. Intraoperative and post-operative complications have been classified and reported according to international criteria. Kidney function was evaluated by measuring serum creatinine concentration and eGFR.

RESULTS

Group A was found to be similar to Group B in all variables measured except for WIT (P = 0) and blood loss (P = 0.0188). In group A the mean creatinine levels were not significantly increased at the third post-operative (P = 0.0555) day and at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.3047). Otherwise, in the group B the creatinine levels were significantly increased after surgery (P = 0.0263), but decreased over time, showing no significant differences at 6 month follow-up (P = 0.7985) compared to preoperative values. The same trend was seen for eGFR. Optimal Trifecta outcomes were achieved in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clampless LPN represents a feasible and safe procedure, even for tumours with high surgical complexity, in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. When compared to clamped LPN, it results in better preservation of immediate post-operative renal function.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) compares favorably to traditional open nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in terms of oncologic and surgical principles for kidney tumors. Studies have shown the modality to be feasible with similar oncologic efficacy and superior renal functional outcomes compared with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for tumors. The main advantages of LPN include marked improvements in estimated blood loss, decreased surgical site pain, shorter postoperative convalescence, better cosmesis, and nephron preservation. This review article evaluates the literature regarding LPN and discusses the main steps of the operation, the perioperative workup and management, surgical complications, and its role in the surgical management of kidney masses.

Selection of personalized laparoscopic partial nephrectomy based on tumor characteristics: A preliminary study in a single center

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and therapeutic outcome of a personalized laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) selection scheme designed according to tumor characteristics.

METHODS

We included 187 patients in this study with clinical T1 renal tumors who were diagnosed between March 2012 and February 2014. 93 patients underwent the personalized LPN on the basis of tumor characteristics (Group A, n = 93), including no renal arterial clamping LPN, selective renal arterial clamping LPN and main renal arterial clamping LPN, and the other 94 patients underwent LPN with main renal arterial clamping (Group B, n = 94). Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, perioperative data and renal function parameters were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

85 patients in Group A and 90 patients in Group B completed the designed surgery without conversion. Compared with Group B, the operation time was longer in Group A (110.2 vs. 122.3 min, p = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss was increased (127.8 vs. 151.1 ml, p = 0.017), and there was less reduction in GFR 12 months postoperative (7.6 vs. 5.1 ml/min, p < 0.001). The study was limited by the relatively small sample size and long-term postoperative renal function is still awaited.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of our study showed that, although the intraoperative blood loss was greater, there was a less decrease in GFR 12 months postoperative in personalized LPN group.

Robotic surgery and hemostatic agents in partial nephrectomy: a high rate of success without vascular clamping

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has been proposed as a technique to overcome technical challenges of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We prospectively collected and analyzed data from 31 patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy with systematic use of hemostatic agents, between February 2009 and October 2014. Thirty-three renal tumors were treated in 31 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications, or blood transfusions. The mean size of the resected tumors was 27 mm (median 20 mm, range 5-40 mm). Twenty-seven of 33 lesions (82%) did not require vascular clamping and therefore were treated in the absence of ischemia. All margins were negative. The high partial nephrectomy success rate without vascular clamping suggests that robotic nephron-sparing surgery with systematic use of hemostatic agents may be a safe, effective method to completely avoid ischemia in the treatment of selected renal masses.

Zero ischemia robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in Alberta: Initial results of a novel approach

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy remains the standard of care in early stage, organ-confined renal tumours. Recent evidence suggests that minimally invasive surgery can proceed without segmental vessel clamping. In this study, we review our experience at a Canadian centre with zero ischemia robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of zero ischemia RAPN was performed. All surgeries were consecutive partial nephrectomies performed by the same surgeon at a tertiary care centre in Northern Alberta. The mean follow-up period was 28 months. These outcomes were compared against the current standards for zero ischemia (as outlined by the University of Southern California Institute of Urology [USC]).

RESULTS

We included 21 patients who underwent zero ischemia RAPN between January 2012 and June 2013. Baseline data were similar to contemporary studies. Twelve (57.1%) required no vascular clamping, 7 (33.3%) required clamping of a single segmental artery, and 2 (9.5%) required clamping of two segmental arteries. We achieved an average estimated blood loss of 158 cc, with a 9.2% average increase in creatinine postoperatively. Operating time and duration of hospital stay were short at 153 minutes and 2.2 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Zero ischemia partial nephrectomy was a viable option at our institution with favourable results in terms of intra-operative blood loss and postoperative creatinine change compared to results from contemporary standard zero ischemia studies (USC). To our knowledge, this is the first study to review an initial experience with the zero ischemia protocol in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies at a Canadian hospital.

Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcome

Introduction:

Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a technically challenging procedure. Advanced skills are needed to accomplish tumor resection, hemostasis, and renorrhaphy within short ischemia time in RPN. Off-clamp RPN with zero ischemia may decrease the risk of ischemic reperfusion injury to the kidney. However, the off-clamp technique has been associated with an increased risk of blood loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of our modified off-clamp technique utilized in certain RPN cases.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 81 patients underwent RPN between September 2009 and July 2013 for renal masses. We studied a subgroup of patients who underwent off-clamp RPN with zero ischemia time. The off-clamp technique was utilized for exophytic, nonhilar tumors that have a base of 2 cm or less. We developed a novel technique to avoid ischemia reperfusion renal injury while minimizing blood loss in certain cases of RPN.

Results:

Of the 81 cases of RPN, we reviewed and adopted the off-clamp technique in 34 patients (41.98%). Utilizing off-clamp RPN resulted in an average blood loss of 96.29 ml and 1.56 days (range: 1-3 days) of hospital stay and minimal change in serum creatinine.

Conclusions:

Off-clamp RPN is safe and feasible approach to excise certain kidney tumors. It carries the benefits of RPN and prevents ischemia reperfusion renal injury.

Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of a novel valveless trocar system (VTS) on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed of 792 patients undergoing RALP. Preoperative patient variables, tumor characteristics, and perioperative variables were collected and analyzed. The first 150 patients were excluded from analysis to account for the learning curve of robotic surgery. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to assess factors affecting operative time (ORT).

RESULTS

A total of 257 and 385 patients underwent RALP utilizing the VTS and conventional insufflation, respectively. There were no significant differences in American Society of Anesthesiologist score, body mass index (BMI), prostate volume, final Gleason score, estimated blood loss, and complications between the cohorts. The only difference noted was a significantly shorter mean ORT in the VTS cohort (149.5 vs. 170.1 min, p < 0.0001). In light of this finding, further analysis was performed to identify associations with ORT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that VTS, BMI, final Gleason score, prostate volume, surgeon, and node dissection were significantly associated with ORT. The use of the VTS decreased mean ORT by 23.2 min when controlling for confounding factors (p < 0.001). The performance of a nerve sparing operation was found to decrease ORT by 15.9 min (p < 0.001), though more often performed for lower-risk disease.

CONCLUSION

The use of a novel VTS demonstrated decreased ORT in patients undergoing RALP when controlling for confounding factors. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate its ultimate benefit in various surgical cohorts.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal tumour enucleation with local hypotension on demand

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for peripheric cT1 renal tumours and is usually performed under warm ischaemia. However, it is important to reduce ischaemia time as much as possible to avoid renal damage. The aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of our technique and to evaluate short-term functional and oncological results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2010 to December 2012, 54 consecutive patients with T1a-T1b renal tumour were enrolled in a high-volume tertiary institution. All patients underwent laparoscopic enucleation with controlled selective hypotension on demand. Karnofsky performance status scale, R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score and Clavien-Dindo Classification were used to assess patients' status, to stratify patients according to kidney disease and to evaluate complications, respectively. Renal function was evaluated with serum creatinine (sCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preoperative and 3, 5, 7 and 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

All the procedures were completed laparoscopically. Renal hypotension was necessary in 3/54 cases. Mean intraoperatively blood loss was 210 ± 98 ml. Renal carcinoma was found in 87 % patients. Margins revealed to be positive in 5.5 % cases. Mean hospital stay was 7.2 days. Grade IIIa and IIIb postoperative complications were 5.5 and 11 %, respectively. At 3 months, increase for sCr was 0.04 mg/dL; eGFR reduction was 1.2 ml/min. At a median follow-up of 20 months, there was one local recurrence that happened in a positive margin case.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results proved laparoscopic enucleation with controlled selective local hypotension on demand to be a feasible, safe and effective technique for T1 renal tumours.

"Off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy" laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation: initial experience and perioperative outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe our initial experience of "off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy" laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (OCNR-LPN) with perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2012 and March 2013, 24 consecutive patients underwent OCNR-LPN at our institution. After the renal mass excision, biologic hemostatics such as FLOSEAL™ and TISSEEL™ (both from Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL) were used, and the perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia were sutured for reapproximation.

RESULTS

All 24 consecutive patients underwent OCNR-LPN successfully. The warm ischemic time for all cases was 0 minute. Thirteen patients were noted to have a low (4-6) RENAL nephrometry score (RNS), and 11 patients had a moderate (7-9) RNS. The mean tumor size among this cohort was 2.9 (range, 1.2-6.0) cm, and the mean estimated blood loss was 243 (range, 50-700) mL. The mean hospital stay was 6.9 (range, 5-10) days. The mean percentage of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate change increased by 0.9%. No positive surgical margins were noted, and 2 patients with Grade III complication by the Clavien-Dindo classification were treated by endoscopic or radiological intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

OCNR-LPN with the perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation technique is feasible. Our initial experience with OCNR-LPN demonstrates encouraging results of minimal renal function loss and complications.

Hilar clamping versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1b tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An off-clamp, or zero-ischemia, approach to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has been a proposed means of preserving global renal function by preventing ischemia to normal renal parenchyma. However, for clinical stage T1b tumors this provides a unique challenge as the large size of these tumors further complicates an already difficult procedure. This review provides an overview of outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies performed with or without hilar clamping for clinical stage T1b tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of data for laparoscopic partial nephrectomies for this larger tumor size. The feasibility of performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 cm in size has clearly been demonstrated. Not unexpectedly, using an off-clamp technique during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has variably shown increased intraoperative blood loss when compared to hilar controlled procedures. This does not, however, seem to translate into increased risk of transfusion or loss of visualization leading to compromise in oncologic outcomes. Lastly, some data suggest improved short-term and long-term preservation of renal function as estimated by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

SUMMARY

With accumulating data pointing to the long-term health benefits of nephron sparing surgery over radical nephrectomy and its oncologic equivalency confirmed, there is an increased push to perform partial nephrectomy for larger tumors. As demonstrated in the setting of a solitary kidney, every minute of warm ischemia counts and ischemia is an important modifiable variable that impacts renal function. As such, off-clamp dissection has potential advantages. The reviewed data show that foregoing hilar clamping for T1b tumors is not only feasible, but is likely beneficial with respect to renal function and does not appear to carry an increased risk of transfusion despite increased blood loss.

Factors Influencing the Operative Approach to Renal Tumors: Analyses According to RENAL Nephrometry Scores

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) and operative approach for renal masses.

Materials and Methods

This study included 206 consecutive patients who underwent renal tumor surgery between January 2008 and October 2012. We divided the patients into four groups by surgical approach: open radical nephrectomy (ORN, 53 patients), laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN, 83 patients), open partial nephrectomy (OPN, 31 patients), and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN, 39 patients). We retrospectively assessed the RNS for each surgery group and evaluated the relationship between this score and operative approach.

Results

The mean RNSs of the ORN, LRN, OPN, and LPN groups were 9.75, 8.35, 6.72, and 5.76, respectively. When the RNS was analyzed according to nephron-sparing, the mean RNSs of the RN groups (ORN and LRN) and the PN groups (OPN and LPN) were significantly different (8.89 and 6.09, respectively; p<0.001). All the individual components of the RNS were significantly different between RN and PN. In the RN groups, the criteria for open versus laparoscopic surgery were based on tumor size ('R' score=2.43 for open, 1.54 for laparoscopic, p<0.001) and tumor location relative to the polar line ('L' score=2.55 for open, 2.09 for laparoscopic, p=0.006). In the PN groups, the criteria for open or laparoscopic surgery were based only on exophytic/endophytic property ('E' score=1.87 for open, 1.41 for laparoscopic, p=0.046).

Conclusions

The RNS was significantly different in all surgery groups. The decision to take a laparoscopic approach was primarily influenced by the R and L scores for RN and by the E score for PN.

Current Status of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

<p>Recently, nephron-sparing, minimally invasive surgery of small renal masses has become popular. The most typical surgery is laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). However, due to technical difficulties, the indications for LPN had been limited to small, exophytic, and peripheral tumors. This paper introduces current status of oncological outcomes and technical considerations.</p>

Selective clamping under the usage of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-surgeon matched-pair study

PURPOSE

To present a single-surgeon matched-pair analysis to show the feasibility of combining the technique of selective clamping with usage of near-infrared fluorescence imaging in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and to investigate short-term renal function outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients underwent selective clamping partial nephrectomy with the application of indocyanine green (ICG). Out of this cohort, a matched-pair analysis for R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry parameter was employed for 15 exactly matching partners. Demographic, surgical, pathological and kidney function data were collected for the initial cohort, and matched-pair comparison was made between the subgroups retrospectively.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without clamping of the hilum was possible in 21 patients; in one patient, main artery clamping was necessary due to bleeding. Mean clinical tumor size was 37.7 mm. Mean selective clamping ischemia time was 11.6 min with an estimated blood loss of 347 ml. No intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complications (n = 4), including two major urological (urinoma, late-onset acute hemorrhage) complications, were found. There were no side effects of ICG administration. Matched-pair analysis for 15 patients showed similar demographic and surgical data without any significant differences in tumor characteristics. Comparing short-term renal function outcomes, significantly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction in the selective clamping group with an absolute loss of 5.1 versus 16.1 ml/min in the global ischemia cohort (p = 0.045) could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective clamping of the tumor feeding vascular branches is a promising technique for reduced ischemic renal trauma. This may lead to improved kidney function preservation.