Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors 7cm and above. Perioperative outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess and report the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy )LPN) for T2 renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing LPN for clinically localized renal masses ≥7cm between the years 2005-2016. Descriptive analyses were generated for demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative variables (operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), intra-operative and post-operative complications (IOC and POC) and pathologic variables (pathology, subtype and Fuhrman grade).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients underwent LPN for a T2 renal mass at our institution between 2005 and early 2016 of which 19 were males. The mean age was 66 (52-72). All procedures were transperitoneal with 16 on the right and 11 on the left. Median operative time was 200 minutes (IQR 181-236) and median WIT 19 minutes (IQR 16-23). EBL was 125mL (IQR 75-175). One case was converted to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy due to suspected tumor thrombus in the renal vein. Surgical margins were positive in one renal tumor in a patient with multiple tumors. There was a total of 2 IOC (7.4%) and 3 POC (11%) classified as Clavien grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this series is the first to describe the outcomes of LPN for cT2 renal masses. In our series, LPN for larger renal masses appears feasible with favorable perioperative outcomes. Additional data are needed to further explore the benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches to larger renal masses.

Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard of care for the treatment of localized renal tumours and is increasingly performed for larger and more challenging lesions. Aim of this review is to analyse the outcomes of partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1b renal tumours greater than 4 cm in size.

RECENT FINDINGS

No randomized trial has compared the outcomes of partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy for T1b renal tumours. However, several single, multi-institutional and population-based studies consistently showed similar cancer-specific survival rates for open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and radical nephrectomy for tumours greater than 4 cm in size. A decreased loss in renal function was observed with partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy for T1b tumours. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for tumours greater than 4 cm in size was shown to obtain similar short-to-intermediate-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and OPN in experienced centres, but is associated with longer warm ischaemia time and higher complication rates. The initial series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy show similar perioperative results and decreased warm ischaemia time compared to LPN, whereas the oncological outcomes are still immature.

SUMMARY

Partial nephrectomy for T1b renal tumours achieves comparable oncological outcomes and better preservation of renal function compared to radical nephrectomy and should be performed whenever technically possible. OPN remains at present the gold standard technique. LPN represents an alternative to OPN in centres with advanced laparoscopic expertise. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has the potential to overcome the drawbacks of pure laparoscopic surgery, but larger series and longer follow-up are needed to further define its role in the management of T1b tumours.