Analysis of urological procedures in men who died from prostate cancer using a population-based approach

Prostate Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Massive Intractable Bleeding from Prostatic Neoplasms: A Case Report and Systematic Review

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and hematuria are common symptoms in men with neoplasms, mainly affecting the elderly population. Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) is a minimally invasive procedure that has shown promising results in managing LUTS and massive intractable prostatic hematuria in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa). A few studies, however, have provided valuable insights into the durability and efficacy of PAE focusing on the long-term effectiveness, quality of life, and cancer-specific control of hemostasis and urinary symptoms. As a result of concomitant cardiovascular conditions, these patients often take anticoagulants or antithrombotics, which can worsen their hematuria and clinical status. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered a very high-risk procedure, even without massive bleeding, and requires discontinuation of vitamin K antagonists and antiplatelet therapies. Such patients usually have their surgery postponed, and PAE should be considered a safe alternative treatment. We aimed to report a narrative review from 1976 to June 2023 of the current state of PAE for massive and intractable hematuria, highlighting recent developments in this technique, including prospective cohort studies, and focusing on long-term outcome, safety, and complication management of patients with prostatic neoplasms who develop significant hemorrhagic symptoms. Additionally, we present a case report and a simple algorithm for treating intractable bleeding in a 92-year-old man with PCa and massive hematuria.

Oncological Outcomes of Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy in Ireland: A Single Surgeon's 5-Year Experience

Objectives  There is a little published data on the outcomes of radical prostatectomy in the Irish context. We aimed to determine the 5-year oncological results of open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) performed by a single surgeon following appointment. Methods  A retrospective review of RRPs performed between 2011 and 2016 was conducted. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters (clinical stage on digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, biopsy Gleason's score and MRI [magnetic resonance imaging] findings), pathological variables (T-stage, Gleason's score, nodal status, and surgical margin status), and treatment decisions (lymphadenectomy or adjuvant radiotherapy) were recorded. Oncological outcome at last follow-up was ascertained. Results  265 patients underwent RRP between 2011 and 2016. Median age was 62 years (range: 41-74). Mean follow-up was 32.24 months (range: 8-72) months. Pathological disease stage was T2 in 170/265 (64.15%), T3a in 65/265 (24.53%), and T3b in 30/265 (11.32%). Final Gleason's score was upgraded from diagnostic biopsy in 16.35% (43/263) and downgraded in 27% (71/263). Pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 44.25% (118/265) patients. A positive surgical margin (PSM) was seen in 26/170 (15.2%) patients with T2 disease and in 45/95 (47.37%) patients with T3 disease. Of the 265 patients, 238 (89.81%) were disease-free at last follow-up, of whom 24/238 (10.08%) had received adjuvant and 17/238 (7.14%) received salvage radiotherapy. Adjuvant/salvage treatment was ongoing in 19/265 (7.17%) of patients. Conclusion  Good oncological outcomes of RRP in the Irish context are seen in this 5-year review, with the vast majority of patients experiencing biochemical-free survival at most recent follow-up.

Comparison of Surgery and Radiation as Local Treatments in the Risk of Locoregional Complications in Men Subsequently Dying From Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Late locoregional complications in prostate cancer (PCa) affect quality of life and require medical interventions. Our objective was to compare late locoregional complications in men dying of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) who previously received external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to radical prostatectomy (RP). No group without previous primary local treatment was included.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The cohort consists of CRPC patients who died between 2001 and 2013 and who underwent previous EBRT or RP. The Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec administrative databases were used to identify late locoregional complications (urologic procedures, minor rectal procedures, and other major surgical procedures) and PCa-related hospitalizations occurring in the last 2 years of life. Multivariable logistic regression and negative binomial regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 1189 patients; 535 (45%) and 654 (55%) received EBRT and RP, respectively. Overall, 46.4% of patients experienced at least 1 late locoregional complication. Primary local treatment type was not associated with the odds of late locoregional complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72, 1.16). RP was associated with greater odds of PCa-related hospitalization (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.23, 2.17) relative to EBRT, as were the usage of a CRPC treatment (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.83, 5.53) and the occurrence of a late locoregional complication (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.05, 3.69). For the number of PCa-related hospitalization days, RP was not found to be significant (rate ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90, 1.32).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort, the risk of late locoregional complications in CRPC was not associated with the type of primary local treatment (RP or EBRT).