1
|
Duarte EG, Lopes CF, Gaio DRF, Mariúba JVDO, Cerqueira LDO, Manhanelli MAB, Navarro TP, Castro AA, de Araujo WJB, Pedrosa H, Galli J, de Luccia N, de Paula C, Reis F, Bohatch MS, de Oliveira TF, da Silva AFV, de Oliveira JCP, Joviliano EÉ. Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery 2023 guidelines on the diabetic foot. J Vasc Bras 2024; 23:e20230087. [PMID: 38803655 PMCID: PMC11129855 DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The diabetic foot interacts with anatomical, vascular, and neurological factors that challenge clinical practice. This study aimed to compile the primary scientific evidence based on a review of the main guidelines, in addition to articles published on the Embase, Lilacs, and PubMed platforms. The European Society of Cardiology system was used to develop recommendation classes and levels of evidence. The themes were divided into six chapters (Chapter 1 - Prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 2 - Pressure relief from foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 3 -Classifications of diabetic foot ulcers; Chapter 4 - Foot and peripheral artery disease; Chapter 5 - Infection and the diabetic foot; Chapter 6 - Charcot's neuroarthropathy). This version of the Diabetic Foot Guidelines presents essential recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with diabetic foot, offering an objective guide for medical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliud Garcia Duarte
- Hospital Estadual de Urgência e Emergência do Estado do Espírito Santo – HEUE, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Vitória, ES, Brasil.
| | - Cicero Fidelis Lopes
- Universidade Federal da Bahia – UFBA, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Salvador, BA, Brasil.
| | | | | | | | | | - Tulio Pinho Navarro
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Faculdade de Medicina, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
| | - Aldemar Araújo Castro
- Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas – UNCISAL, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Maceió, AL, Brasil.
| | - Walter Jr. Boim de Araujo
- Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular – SBACV-PR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
- Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, Hospital das Clínicas – HC, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
| | - Hermelinda Pedrosa
- Hospital Regional de Taguatinga – HRT, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| | - Júnio Galli
- Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, Hospital das Clínicas – HC, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
| | - Nelson de Luccia
- Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas – HC, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| | - Clayton de Paula
- Rede D’or São Luiz, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| | - Fernando Reis
- Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto – FAMERP, Hospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil.
| | - Milton Sérgio Bohatch
- Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto – FAMERP, Hospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil.
| | | | | | - Júlio Cesar Peclat de Oliveira
- Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular – SBACV-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UNIRIO, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
| | - Edwaldo Édner Joviliano
- Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular – SBACV-SP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
- Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP, Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Finco MG, Cay G, Lee M, Garcia J, Salazar E, Tan TW, Armstrong DG, Najafi B. Taking a Load Off: User Perceptions of Smart Offloading Walkers for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using the Technology Acceptance Model. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:2768. [PMID: 36904971 PMCID: PMC10006940 DOI: 10.3390/s23052768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
People with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly prescribed offloading walkers, but inadequate adherence to prescribed use can be a barrier to ulcer healing. This study examined user perspectives of offloading walkers to provide insight on ways to help promote adherence. Participants were randomized to wear: (1) irremovable, (2) removable, or (3) smart removable walkers (smart boot) that provided feedback on adherence and daily walking. Participants completed a 15-item questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Spearman correlations assessed associations between TAM ratings with participant characteristics. Chi-squared tests compared TAM ratings between ethnicities, as well as 12-month retrospective fall status. A total of 21 adults with DFU (age 61.5 ± 11.8 years) participated. Smart boot users reported that learning how to use the boot was easy (ρ =-0.82, p≤ 0.001). Regardless of group, people who identified as Hispanic or Latino, compared to those who did not, reported they liked using the smart boot (p = 0.05) and would use it in the future (p = 0.04). Non-fallers, compared to fallers, reported the design of the smart boot made them want to wear it longer (p = 0.04) and it was easy to take on and off (p = 0.04). Our findings can help inform considerations for patient education and design of offloading walkers for DFUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. G. Finco
- Interdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gozde Cay
- Interdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Myeounggon Lee
- Interdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jason Garcia
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Elia Salazar
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Tze-Woei Tan
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - David G. Armstrong
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Bijan Najafi
- Interdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Gooday C, Jarl G, Caravaggi C, Viswanathan V, Lazzarini PA. Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020; 36 Suppl 1:e3274. [PMID: 32176441 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the use of offloading interventions to promote the healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes and updates the previous IWGDF guideline. We followed the GRADE methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the PICO format, to conduct a systematic review of the medical-scientific literature, and to write recommendations and their rationale. The recommendations are based on the quality of evidence found in the systematic review, expert opinion where evidence was not available, and a weighing of the benefits and harms, patient preferences, feasibility and applicability, and costs related to the intervention. For healing a neuropathic plantar forefoot or midfoot ulcer in a person with diabetes, we recommend that a nonremovable knee-high offloading device is the first choice of offloading treatment. A removable knee-high and removable ankle-high offloading device are to be considered as the second- and third-choice offloading treatment, respectively, if contraindications or patient intolerance to nonremovable offloading exist. Appropriately, fitting footwear combined with felted foam can be considered as the fourth-choice offloading treatment. If non-surgical offloading fails, we recommend to consider surgical offloading interventions for healing metatarsal head and digital ulcers. We have added new recommendations for the use of offloading treatment for healing ulcers that are complicated with infection or ischaemia and for healing plantar heel ulcers. Offloading is arguably the most important of multiple interventions needed to heal a neuropathic plantar foot ulcer in a person with diabetes. Following these recommendations will help health care professionals and teams provide better care for diabetic patients who have a foot ulcer and are at risk for infection, hospitalization, and amputation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicco A Bus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David G Armstrong
- Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California
| | - Catherine Gooday
- Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Gustav Jarl
- Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Carlo Caravaggi
- Diabetic Foot Department, IRCCS Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Peter A Lazzarini
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kosmopoulou OA, Dumont IJ. Feasibility of Percutaneous Bone Biopsy as Part of the Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in a 100% Neuropathic, Grade 3 IDSA/IWGDF Population on an Outpatient Basis. INT J LOW EXTR WOUND 2020; 19:382-387. [PMID: 32000545 DOI: 10.1177/1534734620902609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of percutaneous bone biopsy in an ambulatory setting as part of the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) on an outpatient basis. DFO may complicate some cases of apparently nonsevere foot infections in patients with diabetes and greatly increase the risk of a lower extremity amputation. It has been suggested that bone culture-based antibiotic therapy is a predictive factor of success in patients with diabetes treated nonsurgically for osteomyelitis of the foot. It is recommended to identify the causative microorganism(s) by the means of either a surgical or percutaneous bone biopsy taken appropriately to select the proper antibiotic therapy. Percutaneous bone biopsy in patients not requiring surgery is, however, not performed in everyday practice as it should be according to the current recommendations. In the present retrospective study, we report a series of 23 consecutive patients with a suspicion of DFO in whom 28 bone samples were collected by percutaneous biopsy at the bedside in an outpatient setting. The percentage of positive cultures was in accordance with that reported in the literature. The mean number of isolates per specimen was 1.04. After a mean 12-month follow-up, the remission was almost of 78%. No adverse event related to the bone biopsy was noted. After a 1-year follow-up, no recurrence was recorded among the patients in remission. The results of the present study suggest that bedside percutaneous bone biopsy performed in the ambulatory setting is a valuable and safe tool in the management of DFO on an outpatient basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isabelle J Dumont
- Brugmann University Hospital-Site Victor Horta, Brussels, Belgium.,Centre du Pied, Ransart, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dumont IJ, Lepeut M, Segalen C, Guillemin Y, Gouze JN. Use of GBT013, a Collagen-Based Dressing, for the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2018; 108:419-429. [PMID: 34670344 DOI: 10.7547/16-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The number of people with diabetes is expected to reach 592 million in the year 2035. Diabetic foot lesions are responsible for more hospitalizations than any other complication of diabetes. The aims of this study were to examine for the first time a new biocompatible and biodegradable tridimensional collagen-based matrix, GBT013, in humans for diabetic foot ulcer wound healing and to evaluate its ease of use to better define a protocol for a future clinical trial. Seven adult patients with a diabetic foot ulcer of grade 1A to 3D (University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification) were treated using GBT013, a new collagen-based advance dressing and were monitored in two specialized foot care units for a maximum of 9 weeks. Five of seven wounds achieved complete healing in 4 to 7 weeks. Nonhealed ulcers showed a significant reduction of the wound surface (>44%). GBT013 was well tolerated and displayed positive wound healing outcomes as a new treatment strategy of chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marc Lepeut
- Centre Hospitalier de Roubaix, Roubaix, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bus SA, van Netten JJ, Kottink AI, Manning EA, Spraul M, Woittiez AJ, van Baal JG. The efficacy of removable devices to offload and heal neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcers in people with diabetes: a single-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J 2017; 15:65-74. [PMID: 29057609 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-removable offloading is the 'gold standard' treatment for neuropathic diabetic plantar forefoot ulcers. However, removable offloading is the common 'standard of care'. We compared three removable offloading devices for ulcer healing efficacy. In this multicentre, randomised controlled trial, 60 persons with neuropathic diabetic plantar forefoot ulcers were randomly assigned to wear a custom-made knee-high cast [BTCC (bivalved TCC)], custom-made ankle-high cast shoe or a prefabricated ankle-high forefoot-offloading shoe (FOS). Primary outcome was healing at 12 weeks. Dynamic plantar pressures, daily stride count and treatment adherence were assessed on a randomly selected subset (n = 35). According to intention-to-treat analysis, 58% of patients healed with BTCC [OR 0·77 (95% CI 0·41-1·45) versus FOS], 60% with cast shoe [OR 0·81 (95% CI 0·44-1·49) versus FOS] and 70% with FOS (P = 0·70). Mean ± SD peak pressure in kPa at the ulcer site was 81 ± 55 for BTCC, 176 ± 80 for cast shoe and 107 ± 52 for FOS (P = 0·005); stride count was 4150 ± 1626, 3514 ± 1380 and 4447 ± 3190, respectively (P = 0·71); percentage of 2-week intervals that patients wore the device <50% of time was 17·3%, 5·2% and 4·9%, respectively. Non-significant differences in healing efficacy between the three devices suggest that, when non-removable offloading is contraindicated or not available, each can be used for plantar forefoot ulcer offloading. Efficacy is lower than previously found for non-removable offloading maybe because suboptimal adherence and high stride count expose the patient to high repetitive stresses. These factors should be carefully considered in decision making regarding ulcer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicco A Bus
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap J van Netten
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Anke Ir Kottink
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Manning
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arend-Jan Woittiez
- Department of Nephrology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Jeff G van Baal
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Role of Pressure Offloading on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing and Prevention of Recurrence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 138:179S-187S. [PMID: 27556758 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increased plantar pressure is a causative factor in the development of plantar foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus, and ulcers are a precursor of lower extremity amputation. METHODS In this article, the evidence is reviewed that relieving areas of increased plantar pressure (ie, offloading) can heal plantar foot ulcers and prevent their recurrence. RESULTS Noninfected, nonischemic neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcers should heal in 6 to 8 weeks with adequate offloading. Recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews show that nonremovable knee-high devices are most effective. This is probably because they eliminate the problem of nonadherence with the use of a removable device. Studies show a large discrepancy between evidence-based recommendations on offloading and what is used in clinical practice. Many clinics continue to use methods that are less effective or have not been proven to be effective, while ignoring evidence-based methods. Strategies are proposed to address this issue, notably the adoption and implementation of recent international guidelines by professional societies and a stronger focus of clinicians on expedited healing. For the prevention of plantar foot ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients, 2 recent trials have shown that the incidence of recurrence can be significantly reduced with custom-made footwear that has a demonstrated pressure-relieving effect through guidance by plantar pressure measurements, under the condition that the footwear is worn. CONCLUSION This review helps to inform clinicians about effective offloading treatment for healing plantar foot ulcers and preventing their recurrence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Piaggesi A, Goretti C, Iacopi E, Clerici G, Romagnoli F, Toscanella F, Vermigli C. Comparison of Removable and Irremovable Walking Boot to Total Contact Casting in Offloading the Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulceration. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37:855-61. [PMID: 27083507 DOI: 10.1177/1071100716643429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its efficacy in healing neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), total contact cast (TCC) is often underused because of technical limitations and poor patient acceptance. We compared TCC to irremovable and removable commercially available walking boots for DFU offloading. METHODS We prospectively studied 60 patients with DFUs, randomly assigned to 3 different offloading modalities: TCC (group A), walking boot rendered irremovable (i-RWD; group B), and removable walking boot (RWD; group C). Patients were followed up weekly for 90 days or up to complete re-epithelization; ulcer survival, healing time, and ulcer size reduction (USR) were considered for efficacy, whereas number of adverse events was considered for safety. Patients' acceptance and costs were also evaluated. RESULTS Mean healing time in the 3 groups did not differ (P = .5579), and survival analysis showed no difference between the groups (logrank test P = .8270). USR from baseline to the end of follow-up was significant (P < .01) in all groups without differences between the groups. Seven patients in group A (35%), 2 in group B (10%), and 1 in group C (5%) (Fisher exact test P = .0436 group A vs group C) reported nonsevere adverse events. Patients' acceptance and costs were significantly better in group C (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that a walking boot was as effective and safe as TCC in offloading the neuropathic DFUs, irrespective of removability. The better acceptability and lesser costs of a removable device may actually extend the possibilities of providing adequate offloading. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Piaggesi
- Sezione Dipartimentale Piede Diabetico, Dipartimento di Area Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Goretti
- Sezione Dipartimentale Piede Diabetico, Dipartimento di Area Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Iacopi
- Sezione Dipartimentale Piede Diabetico, Dipartimento di Area Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giacomo Clerici
- Centro per la Cura del Piede Diabetico, Istituto di Cura Città di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabio Romagnoli
- U.O.C. Centro Piede Diabetico, Istituto nazionale ricovero e cura anziani, Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabrizia Toscanella
- U.O. Piede Diabetico e ferite difficili. Casa di cura accreditata Villa Tiberia Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vermigli
- Centro Regionale Specialistico per la Diagnosi e Cura del Piede Diabetico. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bus SA, van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG, Lewis JEA, Caravaggi CF, Cavanagh PR. Footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32 Suppl 1:99-118. [PMID: 26342178 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Footwear and offloading techniques are commonly used in clinical practice for preventing and healing of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes. The goal of this systematic review is to assess the medical scientific literature on this topic to better inform clinical practice about effective treatment. METHODS We searched the medical scientific literature indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane database for original research studies published since 1 May 2006 related to four groups of interventions: (1) casting; (2) footwear; (3) surgical offloading; and (4) other offloading interventions. Primary outcomes were ulcer prevention, ulcer healing, and pressure reduction. We reviewed both controlled and non-controlled studies. Controlled studies were assessed for methodological quality, and extracted key data was presented in evidence and risk of bias tables. Uncontrolled studies were assessed and summarized on a narrative basis. Outcomes are presented and discussed in conjunction with data from our previous systematic review covering the literature from before 1 May 2006. RESULTS We included two systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 32 randomized controlled trials, 15 other controlled studies, and another 127 non-controlled studies. Several randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias show the efficacy of therapeutic footwear that demonstrates to relief plantar pressure and is worn by the patient, in the prevention of plantar foot ulcer recurrence. Two meta-analyses show non-removable offloading to be more effective than removable offloading for healing plantar neuropathic forefoot ulcers. Due to the limited number of controlled studies, clear evidence on the efficacy of surgical offloading and felted foam is not yet available. Interestingly, surgical offloading seems more effective in preventing than in healing ulcers. A number of controlled and uncontrolled studies show that plantar pressure can be reduced by several conservative and surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS Sufficient evidence of good quality supports the use of non-removable offloading to heal plantar neuropathic forefoot ulcers and therapeutic footwear with demonstrated pressure relief that is worn by the patient to prevent plantar foot ulcer recurrence. The evidence base to support the use of other offloading interventions is still limited and of variable quality. The evidence for the use of interventions to prevent a first foot ulcer or heal ischemic, infected, non-plantar, or proximal foot ulcers is practically non-existent. High-quality controlled studies are needed in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Bus
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R W van Deursen
- School of Health Care Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - D G Armstrong
- Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - J E A Lewis
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and Cardiff School of Health Science, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | - C F Caravaggi
- University Vita Salute San Raffaele and Diabetic Foot Clinic, Istituto Clinico Città, Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - P R Cavanagh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Centre, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bus SA, Armstrong DG, van Deursen RW, Lewis JEA, Caravaggi CF, Cavanagh PR. IWGDF guidance on footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32 Suppl 1:25-36. [PMID: 26813614 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S A Bus
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D G Armstrong
- Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - R W van Deursen
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - J E A Lewis
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and Cardiff School of Health Science, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | - C F Caravaggi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Diabetic Foot Clinic, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - P R Cavanagh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Oliveira ALM, Moore Z. Treatment of the diabetic foot by offloading: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2015; 24:560, 562-70. [DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.12.560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. L. Martins de Oliveira
- Staff Nurse, Professor and Head of the School of Nursing and Midwifery The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
| | - Z. Moore
- Professor and Head of the School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Senneville E, Tone A, Valette M, Nguyen S. Response to Comment on Tone et al. Six-Week Versus Twelve-Week Antibiotic Therapy for Nonsurgically Treated Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Multicenter Open-Label Controlled Randomized Study. Diabetes Care 2015;38:302-307. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:e145. [PMID: 26294781 DOI: 10.2337/dc15-1076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Senneville
- Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France
| | - Alina Tone
- Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France
| | - Michel Valette
- Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France
| | - Sophie Nguyen
- Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tavakoli M, Petropoulos IN, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy to assess diabetic neuropathy: an eye on the foot. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013; 7:1179-89. [PMID: 24124944 PMCID: PMC3876361 DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Accurate detection and quantification of human diabetic peripheral neuropathy are important to define at-risk patients, anticipate deterioration, and assess new therapies. Easily performed clinical techniques such as neuro-logical examination, assessment of vibration perception or insensitivity to the 10 g monofilament only assess advanced neuropathy, i.e., the at-risk foot. Techniques that assess early neuropathy include neurophysiology (which assesses only large fibers) and quantitative sensory testing (which assesses small fibers), but they can be highly subjective while more objective techniques, such as skin biopsy for intra-epidermal nerve fiber density quantification, are invasive and not widely available. The emerging ophthalmic technique of corneal confocal microscopy allows quantification of corneal nerve morphology and enables clinicians to diagnose peripheral neuropathy in diabetes patients, quantify its severity, and potentially assess therapeutic benefit. The present review provides a detailed critique of the rationale, a practical approach to capture images, and a basis for analyzing and interpreting the images. We also critically evaluate the diagnostic ability of this new noninvasive ophthalmic test to diagnose diabetic and other peripheral neuropathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitra Tavakoli
- Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester and Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Center, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Retrospective and prospective studies have shown that elevated plantar pressure is a causative factor in the development of many plantar ulcers in diabetic patients and that ulceration is often a precursor of lower-extremity amputation. Herein, we review the evidence that relieving areas of elevated plantar pressure (off-loading) can prevent and heal plantar ulceration.There is no consensus in the literature concerning the role of off-loading through footwear in the primary or secondary prevention of ulcers. This is likely due to the diversity of intervention and control conditions tested, the lack of information about off-loading efficacy of the footwear used, and the absence of a target pressure threshold for off-loading. Uncomplicated plantar ulcers should heal in 6 to 8 weeks with adequate off-loading. Total-contact casts and other nonremovable devices are most effective because they eliminate the problem of nonadherence to recommendations for using a removable device. Conventional or standard therapeutic footwear is not effective in ulcer healing. Recent US and European surveys show that there is a large discrepancy between guidelines and clinical practice in off-loading diabetic foot ulcers. Many clinics continue to use methods that are known to be ineffective or that have not been proved to be effective while ignoring methods that have demonstrated efficacy.A variety of strategies are proposed to address this situation, notably the adoption and implementation of recently established international guidelines, which are evidence based and specific, by professional societies in the United States and Europe. Such an approach would improve the often poor current expectations for healing diabetic plantar ulcers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrospective and prospective studies have shown that elevated plantar pressure is a causative factor in the development of many plantar ulcers in diabetic patients and that ulceration is often a precursor of lower extremity amputation. In this article, we review the evidence that relieving areas of elevated plantar pressure (off-loading) can prevent and heal plantar ulceration. RESULTS There is no consensus in the literature concerning the role of off-loading through footwear in primary or secondary prevention of ulcers. This is likely due to the wide diversity of intervention and control conditions tested, the lack of information about off-loading efficacy of the footwear used, and the absence of a target pressure threshold for off-loading. Uncomplicated plantar ulcers should heal in 6 to 8 weeks with adequate off-loading. The total contact cast and other nonremovable devices are most effective because they eliminate the problem of nonadherence to recommendations for using a removable device. Conventional or standard therapeutic footwear is not effective in ulcer healing. Recent United States and European surveys show a large discrepancy between guidelines and clinical practice in off-loading diabetic foot ulcers. Many clinics continue to use methods that are known to be ineffective or have not been proven effective, while ignoring methods that have been demonstrated to be efficacious. CONCLUSIONS A number of strategies are proposed to address this situation, notably the adoption and implementation of recently established international guidelines, which are evidence-based and specific, by professional societies in the United States and Europe. Such an approach would change the often poor current expectations for healing diabetic plantar ulcers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Cavanagh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6500, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|