Treatment outcomes amongst previously antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients starting lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens at the Royal Free Hospital*

Observational study to evaluate clinical outcomes after first-line efavirenz-or lopinavir-ritonavir-based HAART in treatment-naive patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes after first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with a regimen including either efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naive adult patients in routine clinical care.

METHOD

An ongoing prospective, observational follow-up study included all patients starting their first antiretroviral therapy (ART) with any of the studied regimens from July 1998 to July 2004. The follow-up period was finalized in September 2006, when all patients completed an observation of at least 96 weeks. Mortality rates, CD4 counts, viral suppression (HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL), and discontinuation of any component of the regimen were compared at 48 and 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Despite the worst immunological status of the LPV/r group patients at baseline, this regimen was at least as effective as the one based on EFV not only in terms of treatment durability but also in terms of virological responses, nevertheless with an apparently quicker immune recovery. In general terms, both regimens present similar tolerability and safety outcomes except for the higher risk of increasing triglyceride (TG) levels in the LPV/r group. Low durability was observed in both regimens.

CONCLUSION

In a routine clinical care setting, initial HAART containing LPV/r seems to present an effectiveness, tolerability, and toxicity similar to the one containing EFV.

Response to efavirenz-containing regimens in previously antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive patients: the role of gender

BACKGROUND

We investigated the role of gender on response to efavirenz (EFV)-containing regimens in previously antiretroviral-naive patients.

METHODS

All previously antiretroviral-naive individuals from the Royal Free Hospital in London starting EFV from 1996 onward were included. Treatment failure was defined as the first of 2 consecutive viral load measurements >500 copies/mL more than 24 weeks after starting EFV. Standard survival methods were used to assess time to discontinuation and to treatment failure.

RESULTS

Ninety-six women and 337 men were included. Women were mostly of black African ethnicity (64.6%) with a heterosexual risk (94.8%), whereas men were mostly white (66.8%; P < 0.0001) with a homosexual risk (71.2%; P < 0.0001). Women had lower CD4 counts when starting EFV (median [interquartile range [IQR] = 126 [36, 220] cells/mm for women vs. 190 [109, 268] cells/mm for men; P = 0.0003). After 48 and 96 weeks, 38.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.8% to 48.7%) and 56.3% (95% CI: 45.8% to 66.9%) of women had discontinued EFV compared with 28.3% (95% CI: 23.4% to 33.2%) and 41.8% (95% CI: 36.3% to 47.3%) of men (P = 0.005). The percentage experiencing failure by 48 and 96 weeks when ignoring treatment changes but censoring at the date of discontinuing all treatment was 1.3% (0.0%, 3.9%) and 4.4% (0.0%, 9.3%) for women compared with 3.8% (1.6%, 6.0%; P = 0.49) and 5.8% (3.0%, 8.6%) for men. Median (IQR) CD4 count increases at 48 weeks were +166 (+89, +239) cells/mm for women and +176 (+93, +263) cells/mm for men.

CONCLUSIONS

Women seem to have comparable virologic and immunologic outcomes to first-line EFV-containing regimens compared with men, although they are more likely to discontinue the drug.