Vincristine-induced acute neurotoxicity versus Guillain?Barr� syndrome: a diagnostic dilemma

Toxic Neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview and update on the most clinically relevant toxic neuropathies.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Broadly, toxic neuropathies were previously quite rare with the notable exception of neuropathy from alcohol or older chemotherapeutics. The development of newer therapies, particularly immunotherapy to treat malignancy, has resulted in a substantial increase in the occurrence of toxic neuropathies that require timely recognition and treatment. The understanding of other toxic neuropathies continues to evolve, such as statin-induced neuropathy, which new evidence suggests is much less common than previously suspected.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Toxic neuropathies can be caused by medications, supplements, and recreational substances that injure peripheral nerves. Medications have evolved in the past 2 decades, as have the types of neuropathies that can be seen as related toxicities. In some areas of medicine, new classes and generations of drugs are associated with a lower incidence of toxic neuropathy.

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI-related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.

Acute lumbar polyradiculoneuropathy as early sign of methotrexate intrathecal neurotoxicity: Case report and literature review

Acute paraplegia after treatment with intrathecal methotrexate requires a complete spinal cord neuroimaging as well as electrodiagnostic examination. The absence of lumbosacral F waves motor responses without demyelinating findings may indicate early direct root toxicity. Early electromyography (EMG) screening could be a valuable tool for detecting peripheral neurotoxicity.

Neurophysiological and clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in cancer

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant toxicity of cancer treatment, with the potential to affect long-term function and quality of life in cancer survivors. There remains a lack of consensus around optimal assessment techniques. While current approaches to CIPN assessment are focused on clinical grading scales, it is becoming increasingly evident that a more comprehensive multimodal assessment package is necessary to accurately characterise the impact of CIPN as well as gauge the utility of neuroprotective mechanisms. Neurophysiological techniques provide objective biomarkers and may enable early detection of toxicity while patient reported outcomes are necessary to determine the significance of symptoms to individual patients. In addition to providing an objective assessment, clinical neurophysiological techniques provide important insights into the contributory pathophysiological mechanisms of CIPN with different chemotherapy agents. There is a paucity of implementation of these techniques in the clinical trial setting. The present Review aims to facilitate the use of neurophysiological studies as part of comprehensive assessment packages for the monitoring of CIPN by summarising current understanding of neurophysiological changes that underlie the development of neuropathy, clinical presentations and patient reported outcomes as well as advantages and limitations of current techniques for the neurophysiological assessment of CIPN.

Long-Term Effects, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and Risk Factors of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathies: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Neurotoxic anticancer drugs, such as platinum-based anticancer drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and proteasome/angiogenesis inhibitors are responsible for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The health consequences of CIPN remain worrying as it is associated with several comorbidities and affects a specific population of patients already impacted by cancer, a strong driver for declines in older adults. The purpose of this review is to present a comprehensive overview of the long-term effects of CIPN in cancer patients and survivors. Pathophysiological mechanisms and risk factors are also presented. Neurotoxic mechanisms leading to CIPNs are not yet fully understood but involve neuronopathy and/or axonopathy, mainly associated with DNA damage, oxidative stress, mitochondria toxicity, and ion channel remodeling in the neurons of the peripheral nervous system. Classical symptoms of CIPNs are peripheral neuropathy with a “stocking and glove” distribution characterized by sensory loss, paresthesia, dysesthesia and numbness, sometimes associated with neuropathic pain in the most serious cases. Several risk factors can promote CIPN as a function of the anticancer drug considered, such as cumulative dose, treatment duration, history of neuropathy, combination of therapies and genetic polymorphisms. CIPNs are frequent in cancer patients with an overall incidence of approximately 38% (possibly up to 90% of patients treated with oxaliplatin). Finally, the long-term reversibility of these CIPNs remain questionable, notably in the case of platinum-based anticancer drugs and taxanes, for which CIPN may last several years after the end of anticancer chemotherapies. These long-term effects are associated with comorbidities such as depression, insomnia, falls and decreases of health-related quality of life in cancer patients and survivors. However, it is noteworthy that these long-term effects remain poorly studied, and only limited data are available such as in the case of bortezomib and thalidomide-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Guillain-Barre Syndrome in a Patient with Primary Extranodal Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Paraneoplastic, Drug Induced or Coincidental?

Neurological involvement is observed in 5%-25% of patients with lymphoma being either the first presentation of the disease or emerging during its course. However, Guillain-Barré syndrome is rarely reported. In this article, we present a case with intestinal lymphoma developing Guillain-Barré syndrome during the course of the disease. A 66-year-old male patient with primary extranodal intestinal lymphoma developed quadriparesis, sensory deficits and autonomic dysfunction while receiving chemotherapy. The findings of clinical, electrophysiological and laboratory examinations were consistent with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Guillain-Barré syndrome can potentially be fatal and mimic chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity, especially in patients with lymphoma, and therefore, must be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a critical analysis

With a 3-fold increase in the number of cancer survivors noted since the 1970s, there are now over 28 million cancer survivors worldwide. Accordingly, there is a heightened awareness of long-term toxicities and the impact on quality of life following treatment in cancer survivors. This review will address the increasing importance and challenge of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity, with a focus on neuropathy associated with the treatment of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, testicular cancer, and hematological cancers. An overview of the diagnosis, symptomatology, and pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy will be provided, with a critical analysis of assessment strategies, neuroprotective approaches, and potential treatments. The review will concentrate on neuropathy associated with taxanes, platinum compounds, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide, and bortezomib, providing clinical information specific to these chemotherapies.

Vincristine-related neuropathy versus acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether electroneurography could help in differentiating between vincristine-induced neuropathy and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. We performed electroneurography in 7 children from September 2006 to March 2009 admitted to receive chemotherapy including vincristine for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in whom severe acute limb weakness developed, suggesting vincristine-induced neuropathy. Three of 7 patients had electroneurography, suggesting acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. They received intravenous immunoglobulins without discontinuing chemotherapy, and within 10 days their electroclinical conditions improved. Although electroneurography showed only absent F waves, preventing us from reaching a definitive neurophysiological diagnosis of acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, children's presenting clinical manifestations, their disease course, and rapid and complete recovery after intravenous immunoglobulins argued strongly in its favor. A prompt, correct differential diagnosis of vincristine neuropathy and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving vincristine is essential to improve disease outcome and prolong life expectancy.

Efficacy of vincristine administered via convection-enhanced delivery in a rodent brainstem tumor model documented by bioluminescence imaging

PURPOSE

Brain stem gliomas account for 20% of childhood brain tumors. Presently, there is no effective treatment for these tumors, and the prognosis remains poor. One reason for this is that chemotherapeutic drugs cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. In this study, we used a rodent brainstem tumor model, monitored both qualitatively and quantitatively, to examine the effectiveness of vincristine (VCR) administered via convection-enhanced delivery (CED).

METHODS

C6 rat glioblastoma cells, transduced with an oncoretroviral plasmid containing a luciferase coding sequence, were inoculated into Fischer 344 rat brainstems. Tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence intensity (BLI), and tumor volume was calculated from serial histopathologic sections. Therapeutic efficacy of VCR delivered via CED was assessed. Intravenous (I.V.) and intraperitoneal (I.P.) drug administration were used as a comparison for CED efficacy.

RESULTS

BLI monitoring revealed progressive tumor growth in inoculated rats. Symptoms caused by tumor burden were evident 16-18 days after inoculation. BLI correlated quantitatively with tumor volume (r(2) = 0.9413), established by histopathological analysis of tumor growth within the pons. VCR administered through CED was more effective than I.V. or I.P. administration in reducing tumor size and increasing survival times. TUNEL assay results suggest that VCR induced glioblastoma cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

VCR administered by CED was effective in reducing tumors and prolonging survival time.

Neuromuscular complications

Although direct neoplastic involvement of muscle tis-sue is surprisingly rare, considering the large amount of body mass that is represented by muscle tissue, the most important and unresolved muscle effect is muscle cachexia.Other associations, such as inflammatory, paraneo-plastic, toxic, and several extremely rare associations,have been described. Drug-induced toxicity and radiation recall syndrome need to be taken into consideration when muscle symptoms appear in patients with cancer.

Acute onset flaccid quadriparesis in pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma: vincristine induced or Guillain-Barré syndrome?

Immunological involvement of peripheral nervous system in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is very rare and it may be difficult to differentiate it from vincristine-induced neuropathy. We report clinical and electrophysiological findings of an 8-year-old male with NHL who developed acute onset fulminant motor sensory autonomic neuropathy during induction chemotherapy which included vincristine. Characteristic clinical picture and nerve conduction studies favored Guillain-Barré syndrome. The patient improved rapidly with intravenous immunoglobulin and supportive care. It is possible that an immune mechanism damaged the peripheral nervous system in the patient without ruling out the adverse effects of vinca alkaloids.

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in a neonate with congenital acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We report the case of a 46-day-old boy with a fulminant vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy after treatment for congenital acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Flaccid paralysis developed at the end of the first phase of induction, requiring intubation and ventilation for 51 days. Treatment was initiated with levocarnitine, N-acetylcysteine, and pyridoxine and progressive reversal of the neuropathy occurred over the next 4 months. Potential differences in pathogenesis and presentation of vincristine neurotoxicity and Guillian-Barre syndrome in the neonate are discussed.