Xeomin in the treatment of cervical dystonia

The Necessity of a Locally Active Antidote in the Clinical Practice of Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy: Short Communication

Recently, it was demonstrated that copper complexes and 3,4-diaminopyridine can effectively reduce the activity of the botulinum neurotoxin light chain. The aim of the present study was to indicate that treatment with an antidote may have a major influence, not only on the extremely rare disease of botulism, but also on the much more frequently occurring side effects experienced during BoNT therapy. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who were regularly treated with BoNT for various indications. The percentage of patients with clinical signs of overdosing was determined. In patients with facial dystonia, double vision and ptosis occurred as side effects. In patients with cervical dystonia, neck weakness and dysphagia were observed as the most frequent side effects. In oromandibular and oropharyngeal dystonia, abnormal tongue movements and dysphagia occurred frequently. In writer’s cramp and mild post-stroke hand spasticity, severe paresis of the injected and non-injected finger muscles was observed. Additionally, in the BoNT treatment of pain syndromes (such as tension headaches or migraines), neck weakness may occur. Across all indications for clinical BoNT applications, clinical signs of BoNT overdosing may occur in up to 5% of the BoNT-treated patients. Therefore, the development of an antidote for BoNT overdoses would be very much appreciated and would have a major influence on the management of BoNT therapy.

Frequency and risk factors of antibody-induced secondary failure of botulinum neurotoxin therapy

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of neutralizing antibody (NAB)–induced complete secondary treatment failure (cSTF) during long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment in various neurologic indications.

Methods

This monocenter retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 471 patients started on BoNT therapy between 1995 and 2015. Blood samples of 173 patients were investigated for NABs using the mouse hemidiaphragm test (93 with suspected therapy failure, 80 prospective study participants). The frequency of NAB-cSTF was assessed for various indications: hemifacial spasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. A priori defined potential risk factors for NAB-cSTF were evaluated, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors.

Results

Treatment duration was 9.8 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5–30 years; adherence, 70.6%) and number of treatment cycles 31.2 ± 22.5 (3–112). Twenty-eight of 471 patients (5.9%) had NAB-cSTF at earliest after 3 and at latest after 103 treatment cycles. None of the 49 patients treated exclusively with incobotulinumtoxinA over 8.4 ± 4.2 (1–14) years developed NAB-cSTF. Independent risk factors for NAB-cSTF were high BoNT dose per treatment, switching between onabotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT formulations (except for switching to incobotulinumtoxinA), and treatment of neck muscles.

Conclusions

We present a follow-up study with the longest duration to date on the incidence of NAB-cSTF in patients treated with various BoNT formulations, including incobotulinumtoxinA. Whereas the overall risk of NAB-cSTF is low across indications and BoNT formulations, our findings underpin the recommendations to use the lowest possible dose particularly in cervical dystonia, and to avoid unnecessary switching between different formulations.

High Botulinum Toxin-Neutralizing Antibody Prevalence Under Long-Term Cervical Dystonia Treatment

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies in a large cohort of long-term treated patients with cervical dystonia (CD) still responding to repetitive injections with botulinum toxin (BoNT).

METHODS

Consecutively recruited CD patients (n = 221) under long-term BoNT treatment (≥2-21 years) underwent a clinical examination at the same time blood samples were taken for neutralizing antibody determination. Collected data included demographics, mean dose of the last 10 botulinum injections, treatment duration, Tsui score for CD severity, and patients' subjective impression of treatment effect. Blood samples were screened for antibody presence by ELISA; positive samples were further analyzed by mouse hemidiaphragm test. The two laboratories performing antibody testing were blinded to the coded samples.

RESULTS

Antibody status could be determined for 212 patients; 39 (18.4%) were ELISA positive and 31 (14.6%) additionally positive in the mouse hemidiaphragm test. Patients with positive neutralizing antibody titers had significantly higher Tsui scores and were treated for a significantly longer time with significantly higher doses. There were no differences between male and female patients and between onabotulinumtoxinA- and abobotulinumtoxinA-treated patients. When BoNT preparations had been switched during the last 10 injections, a significantly higher proportion of neutralizing antibody-positive patients was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutralizing antibody prevalence in long-term treated, still responding CD patients is substantially higher than suggested by follow-up studies with a shorter time frame. It should therefore be emphasized that antigenicity of BoTN preparations is still a relevant problem and should be taken into account in long-term treatment decisions.

Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia: the science of dosing

The first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD) is botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), which has been established as a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy. However, this treatment is also complex and challenging to apply in clinical practice. Approximately 20% of patients discontinue therapy due to treatment failure, adverse effects, and other reasons. In addition, expert consensus recommendations are lacking to guide physicians in the optimal use of BoNT-A for CD. Among the issues still to be clarified is the optimal dosing frequency. The generally accepted standard for intervals between BoNT-A injections is ≥12 weeks; however, this standard is based primarily on the methodology of pivotal trials for the BoNT-A products, rather than on evidence that it is optimal in comparison to other intervals. While some retrospective, observational studies of BoNT-A used in clinical practice appear to support the use of ≥12-week dosing intervals, it is often unclear in these studies how the need for reinjection was determined. In contrast, a prospective dose-ranging trial in which patients were allowed to request reinjection as early as 8 weeks showed that about half of patients receiving abobotulinumtoxinA, at the currently recommended initial dose of 500 U, requested reinjection at 8 weeks. Moreover, results from an open-label, 68-week extension phase of the pivotal trial of incobotulinumtoxinA showed that 47.1% of patients had received reinjection at ≤12 weeks. Ongoing studies, such as the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of BOTOX® Efficacy (CD PROBE), may help clarify this question of optimal dosing intervals for BoNT-A in CD.

Differential characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in the management of glabellar frown lines

Objectives

This review examines the pharmacologic and clinical characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®/Xeomeen^®/Bocouture^®/XEOMIN Cosmetic™; botulinum toxin type A [150 kDa]), which is free from complexing proteins, and discusses its efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Differences between incobotulinumtoxinA and other commercially available botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products that have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Administration, and other regulatory agencies for this indication are also discussed.

Findings

IncobotulinumtoxinA differs from other commercially available BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, minimizing foreign protein load. IncobotulinumtoxinA is commonly used at a 1:1 dose ratio with onabotulinumtoxinA and displays comparable efficacy and safety; furthermore, it is associated with early onset and long duration of effect, and high levels of subject satisfaction. In terms of practical considerations, incobotulinumtoxinA does not require cold storage and demonstrates low spread, enabling precise treatment and good tolerability.

Conclusion

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for glabellar frown lines. It differs from other BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, which is relevant clinically, as this reduces the foreign protein load and minimizes the risk of neutralizing antibody production. In practical terms, incobotulinumtoxinA has a long shelf-life, remaining stable without the need for refrigeration, and due to its limited spread is a precise localized treatment.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Comparative evaluation of the potency and antigenicity of two distinct BoNT/A-derived formulations

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) are unique botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A)-derived drugs. IncobotulinumtoxinA utilizes the naked 150 kDa holotoxin portion of BoNT/A, whereas onabotulinumtoxinA uses the complete native 900 kDa complex as drug substance. On the basis of purportedly similar pharmacological characteristics, these formulations were evaluated for potency by LD₅₀ and mouse Digit Abduction Score (DAS) bioassays. DAS was also used to assess antigenicity. Full-range DAS dose-response profiles were achieved with four lots of each product, with similar observations between lots for a given product. Between products, however, the mean DAS potency of incobotulinumtoxinA (ED₅₀ range 7.0-10.2 U/kg) was significantly lower than that of onabotulinumtoxinA (ED₅₀ range 4.4-6.4 U/kg), consistent with lower measured potencies in the LD₅₀ assay for incobotulinumtoxinA (potency range 62-82 U). In assessments of DAS duration of effect at similar unit doses, the observed lower potency of incobotulinumtoxinA translated into decreased peak efficacy and dose effect over time (i.e. shorter duration). In contrast, at equi-efficacious doses yielding near-maximal DAS responses, both toxin formulations were uniformly inhibited in a statistically significant manner when preincubated with rabbit-derived, onabotulinumtoxinA-neutralizing antibodies, supporting the position that inhibition of 150 kDa holotoxin serves as the common basis for neutralization and, therefore, incobotulinumtoxinA would not be expected to be effective in onabotulinumtoxinA-immunoresistant subjects (and vice versa). Further, with lower lot-to-lot relative potency, incobotulinumtoxinA is not dose-equivalent or interchangeable with onabotulinumtoxinA, suggesting that various aspects of drug product formulation may influence observed pharmacology.

Current and future medical treatment in primary dystonia

Dystonia is a hyperkinetic movement disorder, characterized by involuntary and sustained contractions of opposing muscles causing twisting movements and abnormal postures. It is often a disabling disorder that has a significant impact on physical and psychosocial wellbeing. The medical therapeutic armamentarium used in practice is quite extensive, but for many of these interventions formal proof of efficacy is lacking. Exceptions are the use of botulinum toxin in patients with cervical dystonia, some forms of cranial dystonia (in particular, blepharospasm) and writer's cramp; deep brain stimulation of the pallidum in generalized and segmental dystonia; and high-dose trihexyphenidyl in young patients with segmental and generalized dystonia. In order to move this field forward, we not only need better trials that examine the effect of current treatment interventions, but also a further understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia as a first step to design and test new therapies that are targeted at the underlying biologic and neurophysiologic mechanisms.

A guide to dosing in the treatment of cervical dystonia and blepharospasm with Xeomin®: a new botulinum neurotoxin A

Xeomin(®) (incobotulinumtoxinA; Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) was first introduced in Germany for movement disorders in 2005. In 2010, it was approved for use in the United States by the FDA for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm. It is a unique botulinum type A formulation free of any complexing proteins and contains only the pure 150 kD neurotoxin. Thus, the formation of neutralizing antibodies is not induced even after long-term treatment. The purpose of this report is to review the safety profile and dosing schedule for Xeomin for the treatment of CD and blepharospasm. The recommended dose for patients with CD is 120 U/treatment, with administration intervals normally between 3 and 6 months. However, clinical studies have found Xeomin to be safe and effective at doses up to 400 U in both previously treated and treatment-naïve patients. The recommended starting dose in patients with blepharospasm is 2.5-5.0 U/injection site. Patients can be switched using a 1:1 conversion ratio from Botox(®) (onabotulinumtoxinA, Allergen Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) to Xeomin without any loss of efficacy or safety concerns. Xeomin does not differ from Botox in terms of its potency, onset, diffusion profile, or duration and waning of effect. It is the only botulinum treatment that is stable for up to 3 years at room temperature. Xeomin offers a new and important treatment option for movement disorders.

A new treatment for focal dystonias: incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®), a botulinum neurotoxin type A free from complexing proteins

Dystonia is a movement disorder of uncertain pathogenesis that is characterized by involuntary and inappropriate muscle contractions which cause sustained abnormal postures and movements of multiple or single (focal) body regions. The most common focal dystonias are cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm (BSP). The first-line recommended treatment for CD and BSP is injection with botulinum toxin (BoNT), of which two serotypes are available: BoNT type A (BoNT/A) and BoNT type B (BoNT/B). Conventional BoNT formulations include inactive complexing proteins, which may increase the risk for antigenicity, possibly leading to treatment failure. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®); Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) is a BoNT/A agent that has been recently Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of adults with CD and adults with BSP previously treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox(®); Allergen, Inc, Irvine, CA) - a conventional BoNT/A. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the only BoNT product that is free of complexing proteins. The necessity of complexing proteins for the effectiveness of botulinum toxin treatment has been challenged by preclinical and clinical studies with incobotulinumtoxinA. These studies have also suggested that incobotulinumtoxinA is associated with a lower risk for stimulating antibody formation than onabotulinumtoxinA. In phase 3 noninferiority trials, incobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated significant improvements in CD and BSP symptoms in both primary and secondary measures, compared with baseline, and met criteria for noninferiority versus onabotulinumtoxinA. In placebo-controlled trials, incobotulinumtoxinA also significantly improved the symptoms of CD and BSP, with robust outcomes in both primary and secondary measures. The use of incobotulinumtoxinA has been well tolerated in all trials, with an adverse event profile similar to that of onabotulinumtoxinA. Based on these data, incobotulinumtoxinA is a safe and effective BoNT/A for the treatment of CD and BSP, and may pose a lower risk for immunogenicity leading to treatment failure compared with other available BoNT agents. This paper reviews the treatment of focal dystonias with BoNTs, in particular, incobotulinumtoxinA. Controlled trials from the existing incobotulinumtoxinA literature are summarized.