Effect of warfarin withdrawal on thrombolytic treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke

Persistence to rivaroxaban therapy for stroke prevention in clinical practice in Italy: Rationale and design of the RITMUS-AF prospective observational cohort study

Background

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a cardiac rhythm disturbance that increases the risk of stroke and is highly prevalent in Europe and Italy, increasingly with advancing age. Oral anticoagulation is a key component of stroke prevention in patients with NVAF, yet withdrawal or interruption of anticoagulation may transiently increase the risk of embolic events. Treatment persistence to anticoagulation is an important metric but one that is not well studied in patients with NVAF in Italy. The RITMUS-AF study aims to evaluate the persistence with rivaroxaban treatment for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF in Italy.

Methods

RITMUS-AF is a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with NVAF in hospital cardiology departments with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant surveillance program across all 20 regions of Italy. The study population comprises consecutively screened, consenting patients with NVAF naïve to and newly treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in routine clinical practice. The target enrollment is 800 patients; each patient will be followed for a maximum duration of 24 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who discontinue rivaroxaban treatment. Secondary endpoints are reasons for rivaroxaban discontinuation, dose changes and reasons for changes, switches to alternative therapies and the reasons for these decisions, and self-reported adherence. Data analyses will be exploratory and descriptive.

Conclusion

RITMUS-AF will help to address the limited data in Italian clinical practice on treatment persistence and reasons for drug interruptions in patients with NVAF on rivaroxaban.

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in patients with continuation of antithrombotics

Aims

We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair in patients with the continuation of their antithrombotic agents.

Settings and Design

This was prospective cohort study.

Materials and Methods

A total of 115 patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair between January 2015 and September 2016 were included in the analysis. Seventeen patients continued their antithrombotics (antithrombotic group); the other 98 had not been on antithrombotics (control group).

Statistical Analysis Used

The analysis was performed by using Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

Results

The antithrombotic group had a greater mean age (65.9 ± 8.0 vs. 57.7 ± 13.6,P= 0.002) and higher prevalence of hypertension (64.7% vs. 33.7%,P= 0.015), cardiovascular diseases (64.7% vs. 7.1%,P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (23.5% vs. 0,P < 0.001), ischaemic heart disease (35.3% vs. 0,P < 0.001) and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists ≥2 (94.1% vs. 81.6%,P= 0.005). The operation time for the antithrombotic group was longer than that of the control group (92.06 ± 32.81 min vs. 72.33 ± 20.99 min,P= 0.015). None experienced conversion to open surgery in either group. There was no difference in the post-operative complications (29.4% vs. 28.6%) and sero-haematoma formation (23.5% vs. 11.1%). The analgesic requirement, hospital stays (23.72 ± 7.74 vs. 22.35 ± 10.33 h) and the time for return to normal daily activity (3.56 ± 1.74 vs. 3.63 ± 1.90) were not statistically different between the two groups. None in either group experienced major cardiovascular events within 30 days.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair can be safely performed in patients with the continuation of their antithrombotic agents in experienced hands.

Withdrawal of Antithrombotic Agents and the Risk of Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antithrombotic medications are effective for ischemic stroke prevention, but stoppage of these medications is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. The frequency of antithrombotic withdrawal in the general population is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a random phone sample of 2036 households in the Greater Cincinnati metropolitan area, representative of the stroke population by age, sex, and race, to determine the frequency of antithrombotic medication use and stoppage by physicians for medically indicated procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-two percent of survey respondents reported that they were on an antithrombotic medication. Ten percent of participants reported that they had stopped taking their medication within the past 60 days for a medically indicated intervention. Of those who stopped taking the medication, it was more common for persons taking an anticoagulant to stop their medication (20%) than those taking an antiplatelet agent (9%). Colonoscopies and orthopedic surgeries were the most common reasons for withdrawal of antiplatelet agents, whereas orthopedic and vascular surgeries were the most common reason for withdrawal of anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommended discontinuation of antithrombotic medication for surgical or diagnostic procedures is common practice for persons in the community representative of a stroke population. Because stoppage of these medications is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic stroke, further clinical trials are needed to determine best management practices in this setting.

Rebound effect of modern drugs: serious adverse event unknown by health professionals

OBJECTIVE

Supported in the Hippocratic aphorism primum non nocere, the bioethical principle of non-maleficence pray that the medical act cause the least damage or injury to the health of the patient, leaving it to the doctor to assess the risks of a particular therapy through knowledge of possible adverse events of drugs. Among these, the rebound effect represents a common side effect to numerous classes of modern drugs, may cause serious and fatal disorders in patients. This review aims to clarify the health professionals on clinical and epidemiological aspects of rebound phenomenon.

METHODS

A qualitative, exploratory and bibliographic review was held in the PubMed database using the keywords 'rebound', 'withdrawal', 'paradoxical', 'acetylsalicylic acid', 'anti-inflammatory', 'bronchodilator', 'antidepressant', 'statin', 'proton pump inhibitor' and 'bisphosphonate'.

RESULTS

The rebound effect occurs after discontinuation of numerous classes of drugs that act contrary to the disease disorders, exacerbating them at levels above those prior to treatment. Regardless of the disease, the drug and duration of treatment, the phenomenon manifests itself in a small proportion of susceptible individuals. However, it may cause serious and fatal adverse events should be considered a public health problem in view of the enormous consumption of drugs by population.

CONCLUSION

Bringing together a growing and unquestionable body of evidence, the physician needs to have knowledge of the consequences of the rebound effect and how to minimize it, increasing safety in the management of modern drugs. On the other hand, this rebound can be used in a curative way, broadening the spectrum of the modern therapeutics.

Unanswered questions in thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke

This article reviews some of the current literature in support or against extension of the intravenous tissue plasminogen activator window, use of intra-arterial therapy or devices, as well alternative pharmacologic therapies that may extend the window for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke, with consideration of the relative risk of thrombolytic complications, factors for worse outcomes, and unclear stroke onset, as seen in patients with wake-up stroke. The issue of newer concomitant antithrombotic therapies as they affect the decision for acute ischemic stroke thrombolytic therapy is also explored.