Hemofiltration: treating and preventing infection

Melatonin ameliorates anxiety and depression-like behaviors and modulates proteomic changes in triple transgenic mice of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as anxiety and depression. The levels of melatonin decrease in brains of AD patients. The potential effect of melatonin on anxiety and depression behaviors in AD and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we treated 10-month-old triple transgenic mice of AD (3xTg-AD) with melatonin (10 mg/kg body weight/day) for 1 month and explored the effects of melatonin on anxiety and depression-like behaviors in 3xTg-AD mice and the protein expression of hippocampal tissues. The behavioral test showed that melatonin ameliorated anxiety and depression-like behaviors of 3xTg-AD mice as measured by open field test, elevated plus maze test, forced swimming test, and tail suspension test. By carrying out two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) coupled with mass spectrometry, we revealed a total of 46 differentially expressed proteins in hippocampus between the wild-type (WT) mice and non-treated 3xTg-AD mice. A total of 21 differentially expressed proteins were revealed in hippocampus between melatonin-treated and non-treated 3xTg-AD mice. Among these differentially expressed proteins, glutathione S-transferase P 1 (GSTP1) (an anxiety-associated protein) and complexin-1 (CPLX1) (a depression-associated protein) were significantly down-regulated in hippocampus of 3xTg-AD mice compared with the WT mice. The expression of these two proteins was modulated by melatonin treatment. Our study suggested that melatonin could be used as a potential candidate drug to improve the neuropsychiatric behaviors in AD via modulating the expression of the proteins (i.e. GSTP1 and CPLX1) involved in anxiety and depression behaviors. © 2017 BioFactors, 43(4):593-611, 2017.

Management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients

Candida species have become predominant pathogens in critically ill patients. In this population, invasive candidiasis is associated with a poor prognosis but adequate management can limit the attributable mortality. Adequate management, however, is hampered by a problematic diagnosis as the clinical picture of invasive disease is non-specific and blood cultures have a low sensitivity. Moreover, it is often hard to differentiate colonisation from infection and many critically ill patients are heavily colonised with Candida species, especially when receiving broad-spectrum antibacterials. The question of which antifungal agent to choose has become more complex as the development of new drugs raises promising expectations. Until the 1980s therapy for invasive candidiasis was limited to amphotericin B, but with the advent of new antifungal agents, such as azoles and echinocandins, less toxic therapeutic options are possible and doors have opened towards prevention and optimised therapy in the case of documented candidiasis. Through the arrival of these new antifungal agents, a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of invasive candidiasis has been developed: antifungal prophylaxis, pre-emptive therapy, and empirical and definitive antifungal therapy. Each of these strategies has a specific target population, as defined by specific underlying conditions and/or individual risk factors. Antifungal prophylaxis, in order to prevent candidal infection, is based on the type of underlying diseases with a high risk for invasive candidiasis. Individual risk factors are not taken into account. Potential indications are bone marrow transplantation, liver transplantation, recurrent gastrointestinal perforations or leakages, and surgery for acute necrotising pancreatitis. Pre-emptive therapy is also a preventive strategy. It can be recommended on the basis of an individual risk profile including overt candidal colonisation. Empirical therapy is started in patients with a risk profile for invasive candidiasis. It is recommended in the presence of clinical signs of infection, deteriorating clinical parameters, or a clinical picture of infection not responding to antibacterials but in the absence of a clear causative pathogen. Definitive antifungal therapy is defined as therapy in patients with documented invasive infection. The main goal is to maintain a balance between optimal prevention and timely initiation of therapy on one hand, and to minimise selection pressure in order to avoid a shift towards less susceptible Candida species on the other hand.

Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia

The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is problematic despite numerous attempts at defining acceptable diagnostic criteria and the optimal technique for routine respiratory sampling. Clinical criteria have imperfect diagnostic reliability in ventilated patients, but remain crucial for defining those patients who may require respiratory sampling. Quantitative clinical scoring systems may improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in some ventilated patients. Review of published studies suggest that fibreoptic bronchoscopic techniques have greater diagnostic reliability than qualitative endotracheal aspirates, despite inconsistent results when comparing the same techniques in different centres. However, the cost and invasive nature of bronchoscopic methods precludes their use as first-line techniques in VAP. Non-bronchoscopic, non-directed techniques are cheaper, safer and more widely available alternatives to fibreoptic bronchoscopy techniques and have comparable accuracy. Quantitation of respiratory tract cultures is useful in excluding VAP in patients with equivocal signs of pneumonia. The diagnostic threshold of bacterial load that defines the presence of VAP should vary according to the pre-test probability of pneumonia, length of ventilation, antibiotic administration and immunocompetence of the patient.

Fungal infection in the intensive care unit

Fungal infection in critically ill patients is an increasingly prevalent problem. Candida spp. cause the majority of these infections in ICU. They occur most commonly in patients with severe underlying illness, multiple courses of antibiotics and intravascular catheters. Clinical diagnosis is difficult due to nonspecific signs and the frequent occurrence of widespread superficial colonization with Candida spp. in ventilated patients. Most patients are diagnosed using inferential evidence of infection, such as persistent pyrexia despite antibiotics, raised serum C-reactive protein and the presence of individual risk factors. Amphotericin B and fluconazole are the most commonly used anti-fungals dependent on the identity of the fungus. Most of these infections are endogenous; however, a proportion may be caused via the hands of healthcare staff or contaminated medical equipment.