Growth hormone excess and galactorrhoea without acromegalic features. Case reports

Silent somatotroph pituitary adenomas: an update

Silent growth hormone adenomas (SGHA) are a rare entity of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnosis is invariably made post-operatively of a tumor immunopositive for GH (and Pit-1 in selected cases) but without clinical acromegaly. Mainly young females are affected, and tumors are often uncovered by investigation for headaches or oligoamenorrhea. Integration of clinical, pathological and biochemical data is required for proper diagnosis. Beside normal IGF-1 levels, a third of SGHAs displays elevated GH levels and some will eventually progress to acromegaly. Almost two-thirds will be mixed GH-prolactin tumors and sparsely-granulated monohormonal GH tumors seems the more aggressive subtype. Recurrence and need for radiation is higher than other non-functioning tumors so close follow-up is warranted.

Clinically silent somatotroph adenomas are common

OBJECTIVE

Somatotroph adenomas are typically recognized when they secrete GH excessively and cause acromegaly. Both 'silent' somatotroph adenomas (immunohistochemical evidence of GH excess without biochemical or clinical evidence) and 'clinically silent' somatotroph adenomas (immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence but no clinical evidence) have occasionally been reported. The relative frequency of each presentation is unknown. The goal of this study was, therefore, to determine the frequency of clinically silent somatotroph adenomas, a group that is potentially recognizable in vivo.

DESIGN

We retrospectively identified 100 consecutive patients who had surgically excised and histologically confirmed pituitary adenomas.

METHODS

Each pituitary adenoma was classified immunohistochemically by pituitary cell type. Somatotroph adenomas were further classified as 'classic' (obvious clinical features of acromegaly and elevated serum IGF1), 'subtle' (subtle clinical features of acromegaly and elevated IGF1), 'clinically silent' (no clinical features of acromegaly but elevated IGF1), and 'silent' (no clinical features of acromegaly and normal IGF1).

RESULTS

Of the 100 consecutive pituitary adenomas, 29% were gonadotroph/glycoprotein, 24% somatotroph, 18% null cell, 15% corticotroph, 6% lactotroph, 2% thyrotroph, and 6% not classifiable. Of the 24 patients with somatotroph adenomas, classic accounted for 45.8%, subtle 16.7%, clinically silent 33.3%, and silent 4.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically silent somatotroph adenomas are more common than previously appreciated, representing one-third of all somatotroph adenomas. IGF1 should be measured in all patients with a sellar mass, because identification of a mass as a somatotroph adenoma expands the therapeutic options and provides a tumor marker to monitor treatment.

Silent pituitary macroadenoma co-secreting growth hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone

Silent pituitary adenomas are a group of tumors showing heterogenous morphological features with no hormonal function observed clinically. To date no explanation has been provided as to why these tumors remain "silent". We report a case of a silent macroadenoma with both growth hormone (GH) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) staining and secretion but with no clinical manifestations, in particular, the absence of features of acromegaly or hyperthyroidism. The relevant literature is reviewed.

Histopathological analyses of silent pituitary somatotroph adenomas using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopic observation

To characterize the morphological and functional aspects of silent somatotroph adenomas with paradoxical responses of GH in TRH or GnRH provocation tests, which are considered to be a useful strategy for endocrinological identification of silent somatotroph adenomas, we examined three silent somatotroph adenomas histopathologically. The adenomas were investigated by immunohistochemistry, including the highly sensitive catalyzed signal amplification system, the non-radioisotopic in situ hybridization method, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. GH production and GH-immunopositive secretory granules in the adenoma cells were demonstrated histopathologically, and the adenomas were interpreted as being densely granulated somatotroph adenomas. Endocrinological identification of silent somatotroph adenomas in combination with paradoxical responses of GH in TRH or GnRH provocation tests may elucidate the increasing number of silent somatotroph adenomas that have been regarded as mammotroph or clinically inactive adenomas. One should be aware of the differences between the previously reported silent somatotroph adenomas, most of which are sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas, a somatotroph adenomas with paradoxical and the silent somatotroph adenomas, most of which are sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas, and the silent somatotroph adenomas with paradoxical responses of GH in TRH or GnRH provocation tests, which are densely granulated somatotroph adenomas.

Morphologically unclassified GH-producing adenoma showing galactorrhea without acromegaly

A 24-year-old woman with a large pituitary adenoma had amenorrhea and galactorrhea, but no physical stigmata of acromegaly despite slightly elevated serum growth hormone (GH) and normal serum prolactin (PRL) levels. Subtotal removal of the tumor cured galactorrhea and resulted in normalization of serum GH concentration. The question is raised whether amenorrhea and galactorrhea were related to excessive GH production in this patient. Absence of acromegaly might have been due to the short duration of the disease. The tumor was a chromophobic, periodic acid-Schiff-negative adenoma. Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization revealed focal GH immunoreactivity and diffuse, weak signal for GH messenger RNA. By electron microscopy, the tumor showed no features of GH or PRL-producing adenomas. Two different cell types could be distinguished: the majority were similar to null cells, whereas a small number of cells resembled somatotrophs and lactotrophs, possessing many secretory granules and exhibiting exocytosis. On the basis of its ultrastructure, this tumor can be classified as an atypical acidophil cell line adenoma in which adenomatous null cells transformed to the differentiated cells capable of producing GH.