Diagnosis, prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Cumulative live birth rate after oocyte in vitro maturation with a pre-maturation step in women with polycystic ovary syndrome or high antral follicle count

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the 24-month cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or high antral follicle count (AFC) who underwent oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM) with pre-maturation step (CAPA-IVM).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was performed at IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, and IVFMD Phu Nhuan, My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. All women with PCOS or high AFC treated with a CAPA-IVM cycle were included. Cumulative live birth was defined as at least one live birth resulting from the initiated CAPA-IVM cycle. Where a woman did not return for embryo transfer, outcomes were followed up until 24 months from the day of oocyte aspiration. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors predicting the CLBR.

RESULTS

Data from 374 women were analyzed, 368 of whom had embryos for transfer (98.4%), and six had no embryos for transfer (1.6%). The oocyte maturation rate was 63.2%. The median number of frozen embryos was 4 [quartile 1, 2; quartile 3, 6]. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were 60.4% and 43.6%, respectively. At 24 months after starting CAPA-IVM treatment, the CLBR was 38.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that patient age and number of frozen embryos were significant predictors of cumulative live birth after CAPA-IVM.

CONCLUSIONS

CAPA-IVM could be considered as an alternative to in vitro fertilization for the management of infertility in women with PCOS or a high AFC who require assisted reproductive technology.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome induced by clomiphene: a case report

This article reported a rare case of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following oral clomiphene. The patient was instructed to take clomiphene on the 5th day of menstruation, 50 mg daily for 5 days, without any medical examination or laboratory tests before administration of clomiphene. The treatment outcome was ideal by conservative treatment. This reminded that full assessment and risk prediction should be performed before the prescription of clomiphene. And clomiphene should be used only when indicated. What's more, high risk factors of the particular patient should be taken into full consideration.

Fertility preservation for pediatric patients with hemoglobinopathies: Multidisciplinary counseling needed to optimize outcomes

Hemoglobinopathies are autosomal recessive disorders that occur when genetic mutations negatively impact the function of hemoglobin. Common hemoglobinopathies that are clinically significant include sickle cell disease, alpha thalassemia, and beta thalassemia. Advancements in disease-modifying and curative treatments for the common hemoglobinopathies over the past thirty years have led to improvements in patient quality of life and longevity for those who are affected. However, the diseases, their treatments and cures pose infertility risks, making fertility preservation counseling and treatment an important part of the contemporary comprehensive patient care. Sickle cell disease negatively impacts both male and female infertility, primarily by testicular failure and decreased ovarian reserve, respectively. Fertility in both males and females with beta thalassemia major are negatively impacted by iron deposition due to chronic blood transfusions. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment for SCD and transfusion dependent beta thalassemia. Many of the conditioning regimens for HSCT contain chemotherapeutic agents with known gonadotoxicity and whole-body radiation. Although most clinical studies on toxicity and impact of HSCT on long-term health do not evaluate fertility, gonadal failure is common. Male fertility preservation modalities that exist prior to gonadotoxic treatment include sperm banking for pubertal males and testicular cryopreservation for pre-pubertal boys. For female patients, fertility preservation options include oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Oocyte cryopreservation requires controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with ten to fourteen days of intensive monitoring and medication administration. This is feasible once the patient has undergone menarche. Follicular growth is monitored via transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound, and hormone levels are monitored through frequent blood work. Oocytes are then harvested via a minimally invasive approach under anesthesia. Complications of COH are more common in patients with hemoglobinopathies. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome creates a greater risk to patients with underlying vascular, pulmonary, and renal injury, as they may be less able to tolerate fluids shifts. Thus, it is critical to monitor patients undergoing COH closely with close collaboration between the hematology team and the reproductive endocrinology team. Counseling patients and families about future fertility must take into consideration the patient's disease, treatment history, and planned treatment, acknowledging current knowledge gaps.

Decrease in serum anti-Müllerian hormone level per puncture with laparoscopic ovarian drilling using ultrasonically activated device

PURPOSE

To determine the contributing factor in infertility treatment with laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) to the decrease in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome using an ultrasonically activated device.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 60 patients (aged 23-36 years) who received 25-120 punctures in each ovary with LOD treatment from January 2014 to December 2018.

RESULTS

The mean decrease in serum AMH level per puncture with LOD was 0.07 ± 0.04 ng/ml in all 60 patients and 0.08 ± 0.04 ng/ml in patients with ≥10 ng/ml preoperative serum AMH level, which was significantly higher than in those with <10 ng/ml (0.05 ± 0.02 ng/ml). The mean decrease in serum AMH level per puncture in patients with body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 (0.10 ± 0.03 ng/ml) was significantly higher than in those with BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2 (0.07 ± 0.04 ng/ml) and >25 kg/m2 (0.06 ± 0.02 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean decrease in serum AMH levels per puncture with LOD using an ultrasonically activated device depends on the preoperative serum AMH level and BMI of patients.

Employer-Sponsored Egg Freezing: Carrot or Stick?

BACKGROUND

Since 2014, many companies have followed the lead of Apple and Facebook and now offer financial support to female employees to access egg freezing. Australian companies may soon make similar offers. Employer-sponsored egg freezing (ESEF) has raised concerns and there is academic debate about whether ESEF promotes reproductive autonomy or reinforces the 'career vs. family' dichotomy. Despite the growing availability of ESEF and significant academic debate, little is known about how ESEF is perceived by the public. The aim of this study was to explore women's attitudes toward ESEF.

METHODS

Women aged 18-60 years who resided in Victoria, Australia were invited to complete an online, cross-sectional survey investigating views toward egg freezing. Associations between participant demographics and their views about ESEF were assessed using multinominal logistic regression, adjusted for age and free text comments were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 656 women, median age 28 years (range: 18-60 years). Opinions on the appropriateness of employers offering ESEF were divided (Appropriate: 278, 42%; Inappropriate: 177, 27%; Unsure: 201, 31%). There was significantly less support for ESEF among older participants and those employed part-time (p < 0.05). While some participants saw the potential for ESEF to increase women's reproductive and career options, others were concerned that ESEF could pressure women to delay childbearing and exacerbate existing inequities in access to ARTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed that while some women identified risks with ESEF, for many women ESEF is not viewed as theoretically wrong, but rather it may be acceptable under certain conditions; such as with protections around reproductive freedoms and assurances that ESEF is offered alongside other benefits that promote career building and family. We suggest that there may be a role for the State in ensuring that these conditions are met.

Ischemic Stroke Associated With Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of assisted reproductive technology. Severe OHSS may be accompanied by thromboembolic events, such as pulmonary thromboembolism or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ischemic stroke may occur in rare cases.

CASE REPORT

We report a 32-year-old woman with a recent medical history of OHSS who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset of impaired consciousness. Her initial Glasgow Coma Scale score was 10 (E3V3M4). History taking and a thorough physical examination were impossible because of the patient's mental status. Additional medical history was obtained with the assistance of the patient's husband. Ischemic stroke was confirmed on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging performed after a basic examination and confirmation of normal findings on a noncontrast brain computed tomography scan. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although the incidence of cerebral infarction is low in younger patients, emergency physicians treating young women in the ED who have recently undergone fertility treatment or have been diagnosed with OHSS should be aware of the possibility of complications caused by OHSS. Specifically, if these patients complain of traditional or nontraditional neurologic symptoms during an ED visit, stroke should be strongly suspected.. This awareness will reduce the incidence of sequelae through prompt examination and treatment.

In-vitro maturation of oocytes versus conventional IVF in women with infertility and a high antral follicle count: a randomized non-inferiority controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Is one cycle of IVM non-inferior to one cycle of conventional in IVF with respect to live birth rates in women with high antral follicle counts (AFCs)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We could not demonstrate non-inferiority of IVM compared with IVF.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

IVF with ovarian hyperstimulation has limitations in some subgroups of women at high risk of ovarian stimulation, such as those with polycystic ovary syndrome. IVM is an alternative ART for these women. IVM may be a feasible alternative to IVF in women with a high AFC, but there is a lack of data from randomized clinical trials comparing IVM with IVF in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This single-center, randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted at an academic infertility center in Vietnam from January 2018 to April 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In total, 546 women with an indication for ART and a high AFC (≥24 follicles in both ovaries) were randomized to the IVM (n = 273) group or the IVF (n = 273) group; each underwent one cycle of IVM with a prematuration step versus one cycle of IVF using a standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering. The primary endpoint was live birth rate after the first embryo transfer. The non-inferiority margin for IVM versus IVF was -10%.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Live birth after the first embryo transfer occurred in 96 women (35.2%) in the IVM group and 118 women (43.2%) in the IVF group (absolute risk difference -8.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.6%, 0.5%). Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates at 12 months after randomization were 44.0% in the IVM group and 62.6% in the IVF group (absolute risk difference -18.7%; 95% CI -27.3%, -10.1%). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome did not occur in the IVM group, versus two cases in the IVF group. There were no statistically significant differences between the IVM and IVF groups with respect to the occurrence of pregnancy complications, obstetric and perinatal complications, preterm delivery, birth weight and neonatal complications.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation of the study was its open-label design. In addition, the findings are only applicable to IVM conducted using the prematuration step protocol used in this study. Finally, the single ethnicity population limits the external generalizability of the findings.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our randomized clinical trial compares live birth rates after IVM and IVF. Although IVM is a viable and safe alternative to IVF that may be suitable for some women seeking a mild ART approach, the current study findings approach inferiority for IVM compared with IVF when cumulative outcomes are considered. Future research should incorporate multiple cycles of IVM in the study design to estimate cumulative fertility outcomes and better inform clinical decision-making.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was partly supported by Ferring grant number 000323 and funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) and by the Fund for Research Flanders (FWO). LNV has received speaker and conference fees from Merck, grant, speaker and conference fees from Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and speaker, conference and scientific board fees from Ferring; TMH has received speaker fees from Merck, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Ferring; RJN has received conference and scientific board fees from Ferring, is a minor shareholder in an IVF company, and receives grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia; BWM has acted as a paid consultant to Merck, ObsEva and Guerbet, and is the recipient of grant money from an NHMRC Investigator Grant; RBG reports grants and fellowships from the NHMRC of Australia; JS reports lecture fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Biomérieux, Besins Female Healthcare and Merck, grants from Fund for Research Flanders (FWO), and is co-inventor on granted patents on CAPA-IVM methodology in the US (US10392601B2) and Europe (EP3234112B1); TDP, VQD, VNAH, NHG, AHL, THP and RW have no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03405701 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

16 January 2018.

DATE OF FIRST PATENT’S ENROLMENT

25 January 2018.

Fresh embryo transfer versus freeze-only after in vitro maturation with a pre-maturation step in women with high antral follicle count: a randomized controlled pilot study

PURPOSE

In vitro maturation (IVM) is an alternative to in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). This study determined the effectiveness and safety of a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer (ET) after IVM with a pre-maturation step (CAPA-IVM) in women with a high antral follicle count (AFC).

METHODS

This randomized, controlled pilot study (NCT04297553) was conducted between March and November 2020. Forty women aged 18-37 years with a high AFC (≥24 follicles in both ovaries) undergoing one cycle of CAPA-IVM were randomized to a freeze-only strategy with subsequent frozen ET (n = 20) or to fresh ET (n = 20). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first ET of the started treatment cycle.

RESULTS

The ongoing pregnancy rate in the freeze-only group (65%) was significantly higher than that in the fresh ET group (25%; p = 0.03), as was the live birth rate (60% versus 20%; p = 0.02). Clinical pregnancy rate was numerically, but not significantly, higher after frozen versus fresh ET (70% versus 35%; p = 0.06), while the number of day 3 or good quality embryos, endometrial thickness on the day of oocyte pick-up, implantation rate, and positive pregnancy test rate did not differ significantly between groups. No cases of OHSS were observed, and miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the effectiveness of CAPA-IVM could be improved considerably by using a freeze-only strategy followed by frozen ET in subsequent cycles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04297553 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

The Frequency of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome and Thromboembolism with Originator Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa (GONAL-f) for Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review

Background

Recombinant human follitropin alfa (r-hFSH) is used for ovarian stimulation as part of medically assisted reproduction. There is a risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with r-hFSH treatment, and an increased risk for thromboembolic events in the presence of pregnancy with OHSS.

Objectives

To report the frequency of OHSS and thromboembolism with originator follitropin alfa (GONAL-f) based on the Global Safety Database of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and a systematic review of published data.

Data Sources

Reports of OHSS and thromboembolism were obtained from the Global Safety Database of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany from 20 October 1995 to 19 October 2018. The systematic review was based on MEDLINE and Embase searches from inception to 19 October 2018.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Patients receiving GONAL-f for ovulation induction or ART, with a starting dose within the range included in the prescribing information and providing information on the occurrence of OHSS and/or thromboembolism.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Matches

In the Global Safety Database of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany there were an estimated 16,525,975 treatment cycles since 20 October 1995; 1110 reported cases of OHSS and 80 reported cases of thromboembolic events (reporting rates 6.7 and 0.48 per 100,000 treatment cycles, respectively). The systematic review identified 45 studies (5186 patients exposed to GONAL-f; 5240 treatment cycles). There were 272 reports of OHSS (5190 [5.19%] per 100,000 treatment cycles), including 10 cases of severe OHSS (191 [0.19%] per 100,000 treatment cycles).

Limitations

There may be the potential for under-reporting of safety outcomes in the literature, and under-reporting is a well-known phenomenon in spontaneous reporting databases.

Conclusion and Implications of Key Findings

Our analyses demonstrate low rates of OHSS and thromboembolism with GONAL-f.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01512-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A comparison of IVF outcomes transferring a single ideal blastocyst in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal ovulatory controls

PURPOSE

To assess the effects PCOS on live birth rates when transferring a single fresh ideal blastocyst.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study performed at the university-affiliated reproductive center. Women with PCOS and a control group of normal ovulatory women who underwent their first fresh embryo transfer with single ideal grade blastocyst were included in the study. Demographic, stimulation information and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analysed. The primary outcome was live birth rates, and secondary outcomes included pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

71 Women with PCOS and 272 normal ovulatory controls underwent their first embryo transfer and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. PCOS patient were younger (31.0 ± 3.7 vs. 33.1 ± 3.2, p = 0.0001), with higher AFC (40.0 ± 9.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.6, p = 0.0001), required lower dose of gonadotropins to stimulate (1198 ± 786 vs. 1891 ± 1224, p = 0.0001), and had higher serum testosterone levels (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of previous pregnancies, the number of previous full-term pregnancies, the level of basal serum FSH, estradiol level at triggering and the BMI. When compared by Chi squared testing pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates did not differ. However, when controlling (with multivariate stepwise logistic regression) for confounders, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS (p = 0.035, CI: 0.18-0.92).

CONCLUSION

After controlling for confounders, when transferring a fresh single ideal blastocyst, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS than normal ovulatory controls.

Coenzyme Q10 improves the in vitro maturation of oocytes exposed to the intrafollicular environment of patients on fertility treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of patient follicular environment with oxidative stress on oocyte quality.

METHODS

Patients on fertility treatment with either advanced maternal age or endometriosis were asked to donate follicular fluid collected during ovum pick-up. Follicular fluid (FF) was added (20%, 10% and 5%; %V/V) to in vitro maturation (IVM) medium with mouse oocytes. Following maturation culture, the oocytes were assessed for meiosis reinitiation. In a second setup, coenzyme Q10 was added to culture medium with FF. In addition to assessing meiotic maturation, a subset of oocytes was assessed for spindle structure and chromosome alignment.

RESULTS

Supplementation of IVM medium with FF of patients of advanced maternal age (with or without antioxidants) did not have an effect on the maturation capacity of mouse oocytes. However, the addition of FF of individuals with endometriosis (without antioxidants) in the two highest concentrations affected oocyte maturation (61.5% & 57.0% maturation) compared with the lowest concentration (89.2% maturation) (p<0.05). Supplementation of medium with coenzyme Q10 did not improve the maturation rate of oocytes exposed to the FF of individuals with endometriosis (28.5±13.7%) (p<0.05). Nevertheless, preliminary analysis of spindle abnormality and chromosome alignment revealed that oocytes resuming meiosis in the presence of FF of patients with endometriosis displayed aberrant spindle morphology and chromosomal misalignment.

CONCLUSION

The follicular environment of patients with endometriosis severely affected oocyte (nuclear) maturation. In vitro maturation in the presence of coenzyme Q10 appears to be a tool for rescuing oocytes exposed to such follicular environment.

Respiratory Diseases of Pregnancy

Pregnant patients can suffer from the same respiratory diseases as the general population in addition to unique syndromes of pregnancy (such as pre-eclampsia and tocolytic induced pulmonary edema, and pregnancy induced cardiomyopathy). Pregnancy by itself may add certain challenges such as difficult intubation. The critically ill pregnant patient requires a multidisciplinary approach and early inclusion of obstetrical expertise is paramount in managing these patients especially in the third trimester.

A Second Dose of GnRHa in Combination with Luteal GnRH Antagonist May Eliminate Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Women with ≥30 Follicles Measuring ≥11 mm in Diameter on Trigger Day and/or Pre-trigger Peak Estradiol Exceeding 10 000 pg/mL

This observational study included 21 patients at remarkably high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), characterized by more than 30 follicles measuring ≥11 mm in diameter on trigger day and/or pre-trigger peak estradiol exceeding 10 000 pg/mL, which was also the feature of women with established severe early OHSS followed by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger and freeze-all policy that previously have been reported. All patients received a second dose of GnRHa 12 h after the first GnRHa trigger combined with administration of GnRH antagonist at 0.25 mg/day for a period of 3 days from the day of oocyte retrieval onwards. The in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes may be preferable compared with a bolus of GnRHa trigger and none of the included patients developed moderate-to-severe OHSS. Moreover, patients' symptoms, reproductive hormone levels and ultrasound findings were improved significantly. This new strategy seems to be efficacious and could be a further supplement of GnRHa trigger with or without applying freeze-all strategy to completely prevent early-onset moderate to severe OHSS, especially for the patients characterized by ≤30 follicles measuring ≥11 mm in diameter on trigger day and/or pre-trigger peak estradiol exceeding 10 000 pg/mL. Further studies should be performed to compare this regimen with conventional methods of OHSS prevention.

Humanae vitae, ideología de género y futuro biotecnológico

Este artículo tiene como finalidad hacer un comentario breve alusivo a la influencia de la Humanae vitae, cincuenta años después de haber sido publicada. En este contexto se comentan algunos aspectos alusivos a la influencia positiva que confiere esta encíclica al entorno afectivo de la sexualidad, tanto en la edad adulta como en edades temprana de la juventud, ante la influencia de la ideología LGTBI. La visión antropológica de la sexualidad confiere un entorno de respeto por la dignidad de la persona, ante las desviaciones que pueden llegar a presentarse debidas a la influencia de la ideología de género. Finalmente, se citan algunos artículos científicos de índole internacional, que ilustran positivamente la posibilidad de compatibilizar la ciencia con el carácter unitivo y procreativo de la Humanae vitae, en un entorno globalizado.

Effectiveness and safety of in vitro maturation of oocytes versus in vitro fertilisation in women with high antral follicle count: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In vitro maturation (IVM) is a potential alternative to conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). This is particularly relevant in women with a high antral follicle count (AFC) and/or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), who are at increased risk for OHSS. However, no randomised controlled trials of IVM versus IVF in women with high AFC have reported both pregnancy and OHSS rates. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of one IVM cycle and one IVF with segmentation cycle within women with PCOS or high AFC-related subfertility.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled trial will be conducted at a specialist IVF centre in Vietnam. Eligible subfertile women with PCOS and/or high AFC will be randomised to undergo either IVM or IVF. The primary outcome is live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle. Cycles in which no embryo is available for transfer will be considered as failures. The study has a non-inferiority design, with a maximal acceptable between-group difference of 5%. Rates of OHSS will also be reported.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the participating centre, and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03405701; Pre-results.

Live birth rate after human chorionic gonadotropin priming in vitro maturation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

In vitro maturation (IVM) has some advantages over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), particularly in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) where the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation is high. We studied the live birth rate in a large series of PCOS women undergoing human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-priming IVM.

METHODS

This retrospective study included women with PCOS aged 18-42 years undergoing IVM with hCG priming. We reported live birth rate after the first embryo transfer and cumulative live birth rate from embryos obtained in the IVM cycle. We also performed logistic regression to assess which factors predicted number of oocytes and live birth.

RESULTS

We included 921 women (age 28.9±3.5 years, body mass index 21.8±3.1 kg/m2, infertility duration 3.7±2.6 years, 81% primary infertility, 88% first IVF attempt, 94% ovulation induction failure). Live birth rate after the first embryo transfer was 31.7%, with a cumulative live birth rate from the cycle of 33.7%. High anti-Müllerian hormone levels predicted a high number of oocytes and a high oocyte maturation rate while the opposite was the case when luteinizing hormone levels were high.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with PCOS, hCG priming IVM was feasible and resulted in acceptable live birth rates.

Occurrence of ovarian follicular dominance during stimulation for IVM impacts usable blastocyst yield

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of ovarian follicular dominance on the outcome of oocyte in-vitro maturation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 21 patients with polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovary syndrome (Rotterdam criteria, 2004) subjected to 24 invitro maturation (IVM) cycles between October 2015 and January 2017. Patients undergoing IVM received minimal gonadotropin stimulation starting on day 2 or 3 of the cycle; ovum pick-up typically occurred on days 6 to 8. No hCG-trigger shot was given. Following 30h of IVM, mature oocytes were inseminated by ICSI and the resulting embryos cultured up to the blastocyst stage.

RESULTS

Ovarian follicular dominance was observed in nine of the 24 IVM cycles. Oocyte IVM yielded an overall maturation rate of 69.3±23.8%, and no difference was observed when the groups with or without a dominant follicle were assessed independently. The rates of fertilization and usable blastocysts per fertilized oocyte, mature oocyte (Metaphase II) or cumulus-oocyte-complex were nearly three times higher (28.7±22.5%) in the group without ovarian follicular dominance. No differences were found in the clinical pregnancy rates attained by the individuals with or without a dominant follicle after 21 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of ovarian follicular dominance during hormonal stimulation for in-vitro maturation negatively impacted embryological outcomes. Strategies devised to limit the appearance of ovarian follicular dominance must be further explored.

Predictive factors for live birth after in vitro maturation of oocytes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

In vitro maturation (IVM) of human oocytes can be an alternative treatment option to conventional in vitro fertilization. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are considered the classical candidates for IVM because of the associated ovarian morphology and because IVM diminishes the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The objective of this study was to identify predictive factors for live birth in a cohort of women with PCOS who underwent IVM.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 159 patients with PCOS who had IVM cycles in which single or double embryo transfer was performed. The IVM protocol included three days of gonadotropin ovarian stimulation and hCG priming when the leading follicle size was 10-12 mm. Collected cumulus-oocyte complexes were cultured for 24 h for maturation. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was used for fertilization. Embryo transfer was performed two days after fertilization. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed with logistic regression to identify predictors for live birth.

RESULTS

The women's mean age was 27.4 years, the mean number of retrieved oocytes was 14, and the live birth rate was 34.6%. The logistic regression revealed the following significant factors for live birth: infertility duration (OR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98), number of collected oocytes (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.01-3.2), embryo cell number (OR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5), and embryo grade (OR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.13-4.2).

CONCLUSION

Infertility duration, oocyte number, embryo cell number, and embryo grade were the most significant predictors for live birth after IVM in PCOS patients. These prognostic factors can be used when planning treatment or counselling patients.

Chapter 3 Current Challenges in Immature Oocyte Cryopreservation

Current freezing technology, especially the vitrification method, has markedly improved oocyte survival rate after warming, and the pregnancy rate is comparable to that achieved with fresh oocytes. However, most groups report using oocytes matured in vivo for vitrification. Although immature oocytes can be vitrified successfully, clinical outcomes do not reach that of vitrification of matured oocytes. The current literature suggests that oocytes should be vitrified at mature metaphase II (M-II) stage following IVM rather than at the immature germinal vesicle (GV) stage, because the potential for oocyte maturation is reduced when vitrification is performed on immature oocytes at the GV stage.

Renal and Hepatic Functions after A Week of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation during In Vitro Fertilization Cycles

BACKGROUND

One the main aspects of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle is to avoid any possible systemic damage on women undergoing a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The aim of this work is to evaluate renal and hepatic function blood tests in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF cycles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort analysis. All patients re- ceived a long stimulation protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues by daily administration, since the twenty-first day of the previous ovarian cycle followed by COH with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The daily dose of exogenous gonadotropins for every single patient was modified according to her follicular growth. The oocytes were retrieved during the oocyte pick up and fertilized by standard procedures of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The blood samples to evaluate renal and hepatic functions were taken at the 7^th day of ovarian stimulation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 426 women aged between 19 and 44 years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.68 Kg/m². The mean value of blood urea nitrogen was 14 ± 3.16 mg/ dl, creatinine: 1 ± 0.45 mg/dl, uric acid: 4 ± 1.95 mg/dl, total proteins: 7 ± 3.93 mg/dl, aspartate aminotransferase: 18 ± 6.29 mU/ml, alanine aminotransferase: 19 ± 10.41 mU/ ml, alkaline phosphatase: 81 ± 45.25 mU/ml, total bilirubin 1 ± 0.35 mg/dL. All of the results were considered as a normal range following the Medical Council of Canada.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that, unlike ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), COH patients did not show any alteration to renal and hepatic functions.

A short course of metformin does not reduce OHSS in a GnRH antagonist cycle for women with PCOS undergoing IVF: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Does 'metformin' reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist assisted conception treatment cycle?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A short course of metformin does not reduce the incidence of OHSS for women with PCOS undergoing a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Metformin does reduce the incidence of OHSS in a GnRH-agonist treatment cycle.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) using metformin or placebo. Randomisation was blinded to both patient and investigator, using a random permuted blocks method with a 50:50 allocation ratio. The study was completed over 5 years (2009-2014) with 153 randomised patients. A sample size calculation based on the incidence of OHSS was completed prospectively suggesting a minimum of 146 recruits was required for the trial with a power of 80% and a type 1 error of 0.05.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All patients met the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and were treated with a standard GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI treatment cycle in a tertiary infertility clinic. The study medication was started prior to stimulation and continued to oocyte retrieval. Of the 153 patients, 77 received metformin and 76 placebo.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There was no reduction in the incidence of moderate-severe OHSS (Placebo (PLA) 12.2%, metformin (MET) = 16%, 95% CI -0.08-0.16, P = 0.66). There was no difference in total gonadotrophin dose (PLA = 1200, MET = 1200, 95% CI -118.67-118.67, P = 0.75), oocytes retrieved (PLA = 15, MET = 14, 95% CI -2.37-4.37, P = 0.66) or fertilisation rate (PLA = 60.7%, MET = 53.3%, 95% CI -0.96-14.94, P = 0.07). However, using metformin resulted in a reduced clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per cycle started (PLA = 48.7%, MET = 28.6%, 95% CI 0.04-0.35, P = 0.02) and live birth rate (PLA = 51.6%, MET = 27.6%, 95% CI 0.05-0.40, P = 0.02). Furthermore, when ethnicity was taken into account there was a significant reduction in pregnancy outcome for the South Asian population irrespective of metformin or placebo use (CPR per cycle started, White Caucasian = 44.4%, South Asian = 19.4%; 95% CI 0.06-0.39, P = 0.01).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was only undertaken on an infertility population with PCOS with a limited duration of study medication use.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first adequately powered RCT to assess the impact of metformin on OHSS in a high-risk group (women with PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle. It does not support the empirical prescribing of metformin as an adjunct to a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT number 2009-010952-81.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

21 September 2009.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

30 October 2009.

Is Coasting Valuable in All Patients with Any Cause of Infertility?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the influence of coasting duration on the number and quality of oocytes and fertilization rate in male factor infertile women and those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

In this prospective observational follow-up study, 114 patients undergoing coasting (53 women with male factor infertility and 61 women with PCOS) were evaluated at the Royan Institute Research Center, Iran, between 2010 and 2012.

RESULTS

The results were analyzed according to the coasting periods of 1-4 days. In normal females, the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly reduced after the second day (p = 0.004). In addition, a statistically significant drop was observed in the number of metaphase II oocytes and fertilization rate after the third day (p = 0.006 and p = 0.006, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the number and quality of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rate with regard to coasting days in PCOS patients.

CONCLUSION

Coasting with duration of more than three days should be performed with caution in normal females who are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

GnRH agonist with low-dose hCG (dual trigger) is associated with higher risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to GnRH agonist alone

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) alone and GnRHa in combination with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, dual trigger) for final oocyte maturation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic center. Study population included 108 women who received GnRHa trigger and 66 women who received dual trigger (GnRHa + low-dose [1000 IU] hCG trigger). The main outcome measure was OHSS. Secondary outcomes included total oocyte yield and oocyte maturity.

RESULTS

The incidence of early OHSS was significantly higher after dual trigger than GnRHa trigger (8.6 vs 0 %). Moreover, four of the six patients that developed OHSS developed severe OHSS. Logistic modeling revealed that the combination of age, BMI, baseline AFC, and E2 >4000 pg/mL was predictive of OHSS with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 and was superior to each factor alone. Adjusted analyses revealed that dual trigger was associated with a higher number of total oocytes (adjusted OR 1.27; 95 % confidence interval, 1.18, 1.38) and percentage of mature oocytes (AOR 1.10; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03, 1.17) obtained compared to GnRHa trigger alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation using GnRHa and low-dose hCG is associated with a significantly increased risk of severe OHSS compared to GnRH alone. However, dual trigger may be associated with a modest increase in oocyte yield, both in terms of number and maturity.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists can be used to prevent a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) without the hypo-oestrogenic side-effects, flare-up, or long down-regulation period associated with agonists. The antagonists directly and rapidly inhibit gonadotrophin release within several hours through competitive binding to pituitary GnRH receptors. This property allows their use at any time during the follicular phase. Several different regimens have been described including multiple-dose fixed (0.25 mg daily from day six to seven of stimulation), multiple-dose flexible (0.25 mg daily when leading follicle is 14 to 15 mm), and single-dose (single administration of 3 mg on day 7 to 8 of stimulation) protocols, with or without the addition of an oral contraceptive pill. Further, women receiving antagonists have been shown to have a lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Assuming comparable clinical outcomes for the antagonist and agonist protocols, these benefits would justify a change from the standard long agonist protocol to antagonist regimens. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001, and previously updated in 2006 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists compared with the standard long protocol of GnRH agonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted conception cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (searched from inception to May 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, inception to 28 April 2015), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 28 April 2015), EMBASE (1980 to 28 April 2015), PsycINFO (1806 to 28 April 2015), CINAHL (to 28 April 2015) and trial registers to 28 April 2015, and handsearched bibliographies of relevant publications and reviews, and abstracts of major scientific meetings, for example the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). We contacted the authors of eligible studies for missing or unpublished data. The evidence is current to 28 April 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently screened the relevant citations for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocols in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted the data. The primary review outcomes were live birth and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Other adverse effects (miscarriage and cycle cancellation) were secondary outcomes. We combined data to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for each comparison using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 RCTs, with 12,212 participants, comparing GnRH antagonist to long-course GnRH agonist protocols. The quality of the evidence was moderate: limitations were poor reporting of study methods.Live birthThere was no conclusive evidence of a difference in live birth rate between GnRH antagonist and long course GnRH agonist (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.23; 12 RCTs, n = 2303, I(2)= 27%, moderate quality evidence). The evidence suggested that if the chance of live birth following GnRH agonist is assumed to be 29%, the chance following GnRH antagonist would be between 25% and 33%.OHSSGnRH antagonist was associated with lower incidence of any grade of OHSS than GnRH agonist (OR 0.61, 95% C 0.51 to 0.72; 36 RCTs, n = 7944, I(2) = 31%, moderate quality evidence). The evidence suggested that if the risk of OHSS following GnRH agonist is assumed to be 11%, the risk following GnRH antagonist would be between 6% and 9%.Other adverse effectsThere was no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rate per woman randomised between GnRH antagonist group and GnRH agonist group (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; 33 RCTs, n = 7022, I(2) = 0%, moderate quality evidence).With respect to cycle cancellation, GnRH antagonist was associated with a lower incidence of cycle cancellation due to high risk of OHSS (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.69; 19 RCTs, n = 4256, I(2) = 0%). However cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response was higher in women who received GnRH antagonist than those who were treated with GnRH agonist (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65; 25 RCTs, n = 5230, I(2) = 68%; moderate quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate quality evidence that the use of GnRH antagonist compared with long-course GnRH agonist protocols is associated with a substantial reduction in OHSS without reducing the likelihood of achieving live birth.

Early Short Stimulation Modified Natural Cycle IVF With GnRH Agonist Trigger and In Vitro Maturation in a Woman with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering of final oocyte maturation has been used successfully in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. It has not been used to date in cycles in which immature oocytes are matured in vitro.

CASE

We report here for the first time that GnRHa triggering in a variation on the modified natural IVF cycle can be used as a strategy in the treatment of infertility secondary to polycystic ovary syndrome. In this approach, follicles were stimulated with gonadotropins for three to five days when they were small, and triggering of ovulation occurred when the largest follicles were 10 to 12 mm in diameter. This was followed by retrieval of many immature oocytes that were matured in vitro and subsequently developed to form blastocysts that resulted in a live birth.

CONCLUSION

This is the first human evidence that GnRHa triggering of ovulation can be used successfully when the aim is in vitro maturation of oocytes.

Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective at Preventing OHSS for Potentially High Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI?

Objective

To determine if the GnRH antagonist protocol is effective in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in potentially high responders.

Methods

A total of 660 IVF-ET/ICSI cycles were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criterion was age ≤ 30 years. Cycles were divided into two groups: a GnRHa group and a GnRHant group. In the GnRHa group, the patients received one single injection of 1.0mg-1.3mg Triptorelin in previous mid-luteal phase. In the GnRHant group, a daily dose of 0.25 mg Cetrotide was initiated when a lead follicle obtained a mean diameter of 14 mm, continued up until the day of hCG administration. The duration of stimulation, total dose of Gn, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and OHSS rate were compared.

Results

The duration of stimulation, E₂ level on hCG day, numbers of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, and high-quality embryos in the GnRHa group were all significantly more than those in the GnRHant group. In the GnRHa group, 83.53% of cancelled fresh-transferred cycles were cancelled because of high risk of OHSS, which was significantly higher than that in the GnRHant group (43.55%, P<0.05). The incidence of OHSS in the GnRHa group was slightly higher than that in the GnRHant group. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in the GnRHa group were significantly higher than those in the GnRHant group (37.36% VS 19.25%, 62.78% VS 31.06%; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that for potentially high responders, the GnRHant protocol can, to some extent, lower the cancellation and incidence rates of OHSS. The GnRHa protocol was superior to the GnRHant protocol in terms of implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.

The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical aspects of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and provide recommendations on its prevention.

OPTIONS

Preventative measures, early recognition, and prompt systematic supportive care will help avoid poor outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Establish guidelines to assist in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, early recognition of the condition when it occurs, and provision of appropriate supportive measures in the correct setting.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 2011 to 2013 using appropriate controlled vocabulary ([OHSS] ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and: agonist IVF, antagonist IVF, metformin, HCG, gonadotropin, coasting, freeze all, agonist trigger, progesterone) and key words (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, ovarian stimulation, gonadotropin, human chorionic gonadotropin, prevention). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English. There were no date restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to February 2013. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Summary Statements 1. The particular follicle-stimulating hormone formulation used for ovarian stimulation does not affect the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I) 2. Coasting may reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III) 3. Coasting for longer than 3 days reduces in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. (II-2) 4. The use of either luteinizing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin for final oocyte maturation does not influence the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I) 5. There is no clear published evidence that lowering the human chorionic gonadotropin dose will result in a decrease in the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III) 6. Cabergoline starting from the day of human chorionic gonadotropin reduces the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients at higher risk and does not appear to lower in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. (II-2) 7. Avoiding pregnancy by freezing all embryos will prevent severe prolonged ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients at high risk. (II-2) 8. Pregnancy rates are not affected when using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in GnRH antagonist protocols for final egg maturation when embryos are frozen by vitrification for later transfer. (II-2) Recommendations 1. The addition of metformin should be considered in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome who are undergoing in vitro fertilization because it may reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I-A) 2. Gonadotropin dosing should be carefully individualized, taking into account the patient's age, body mass, antral follicle count, and previous response to gonadotropins. (II-3B) 3. Cycle cancellation before administration of human chorionic gonadatropin is an effective strategy for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, but the emotional and financial burden it imposes on patients should be considered before the cycle is cancelled. (III-C) 4. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist stimulation protocols are recommended in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The risk of severe OHSS in patients on GnRH antagonist protocols who have a very robust ovarian stimulation response can be reduced by using a GnRH agonist as a substitute for human chorionic gonadotropin to trigger final oocyte maturation. (I-B) 5. A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with a GnRH agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation is recommended for donor oocyte and fertility preservation cycles. (III-C) 6. Albumin or other plasma expanders at the time of egg retrieval are not recommended for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I-E) 7. Elective single embryo transfer is recommended in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III-C) 8. Progesterone, rather than human chorionic gonadotropin, should be used for luteal phase support. (I-A) 9. Outpatient culdocentesis should be considered for the prevention of disease progression in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (II-2B).

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome complicated by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia peritonitis: a case report and literature review

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic disorder resulting from ovulation induction. Although the occurrence of this disorder is rare, it can be potentially life-threatening in its most severe forms. We herein present the case of a young nulliparous woman who presented with features of abdominal compartment syndrome and was subsequently diagnosed with severe OHSS. All physicians, in particular critical care doctors, must be aware of this rare, but potentially life-threatening iatrogenic disorder.

Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos?

In many clinics, good-quality embryos are selected for embryo transfer and cryopreservation at the cleavage stage, and poor-quality embryos are discarded. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine how many repeated IVF cycles could be avoided by culturing the cleavage stage poor-quality embryos to blastocyst stage and transferring them after vitrification and warming (604 IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection [IVF-ICSI] cycles were included). Poor-quality cleavage stage embryos not eligible for transfer or cryopreservation were cultured until day 5 or 6, and those developing to the blastocyst stage were vitrified. The rate of vitrified blastocysts and clinical pregnancy and delivery rate of the warmed blastocysts was evaluated. The effect of the extended culture on the cumulative delivery rate, and the number of avoided new treatment cycles was calculated. The surplus blastocysts resulted in clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and delivery rates of 24.6%, 27.3% and 17.2% respectively. The use of surplus blastocysts raised cumulative delivery rate from 43% to 47% and 53 repeated new cycles were avoided. This study shows that the cumulative delivery rate can be increased, and repeated IVF-ICSI treatments avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos, which otherwise would have been discarded.

How Humanae vitae has advanced reproductive health

By encouraging doctors and scientists to improve the regulation of births through the observation of natural fertility rhythms, Humanae vitae promoted the development of natural family planning (NFP). The study of NFP has lead to NFP-based methodologies in reproductive healthcare that are promoting advances in treatment of infertility, miscarriage, and a number of reproductive health disorders. In contrast, the contraceptive mentality has stunted the development of reproductive healthcare. Humanae vitae has provided a great gift to science and reproductive healthcare that all Catholics should be proud of.

Fertility issues in cancer survivorship

Breakthroughs in cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to dramatic improvements in survival and the need to focus on survivorship issues. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be gonadotoxic, resulting in impaired fertility. Techniques to help cancer survivors reproduce have been improving over the past decade. Discussion of the changes to a patient's reproductive health after cancer treatment is essential to providing comprehensive quality care. The purpose of this review is to aid in pre- and posttreatment counseling, focusing on fertility preservation and other strategies that may mitigate risks to the patient's reproductive, sexual, and overall health.

Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) as part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). While the safety and efficacy of ART is well established, physicians should always be aware of the risk of OHSS in patients undergoing COS, as it can be fatal. This article will briefly present the pathophysiology of OHSS, including the key role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), to provide the foundation for an overview of current techniques for the prevention of OHSS. Risk factors and predictive factors for OHSS will be presented, as recognizing these risk factors and individualizing the COS protocol appropriately is the key to the primary prevention of OHSS, as the benefits and risks of each COS strategy vary among individuals. Individualized COS (iCOS) could effectively eradicate OHSS, and the identification of hormonal, functional and genetic markers of ovarian response will facilitate iCOS. However, if iCOS is not properly applied, various preventive measures can be instituted once COS has begun, including cancelling the cycle, coasting, individualizing the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger dose or using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (for those using a GnRH antagonist protocol), the use of intravenous fluids at the time of oocyte retrieval, and cryopreserving/vitrifying all embryos for subsequent transfer in an unstimulated cycle. Some of these techniques have been widely adopted, despite the scarcity of data from randomized clinical trials to support their use.

The diagnosis and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical aspects of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and provide recommendations on its diagnosis and clinical management.

OUTCOMES

These guidelines will assist in the early recognition and management of ovarian hyperstimulation. Early recognition and prompt systematic supportive care will help avert poor outcomes.

EVIDENCE

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for relevant articles, using the key words "ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome" and "gonadotropins," and guidelines created by other professional societies were reviewed.

VALUES

The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1).

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Once the diagnosis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is made, disease severity should be classified as mild, moderate, severe, or critical. (III-B) 2. The physician prescribing gonadotropins should inform each woman of her personal risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III-A) 3. In areas where patients do not have ready access to physicians familiar with the diagnosis and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the physician prescribing gonadotropins should ensure that women are made aware that they should contact a physician or a member of the team within the hospital unit who has relevant experience, should the need arise. (III-B) 4. Outpatient management is recommended for women with mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. If outpatient management for more severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is to be undertaken, the physician should ensure that the woman is capable of adhering to clinical instructions and that there is a system in place to assess her status every 1 to 2 days. (III-A) 5. Paracentesis should be performed in admitted patients with tense ascites to alleviate their discomfort. (II-2B) 6. Outpatient culdocentesis should be considered for the prevention of disease progression in moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (II-2B) 7. Women with severe and critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be admitted to hospital for intravenous hydration and observation. (III-A) 8. Intravenous hydration should be initiated with a crystalloid solution to prevent hemoconcentration and provide adequate end-organ perfusion. If end-organ perfusion is not maintained with a crystalloid solution, an alternate colloid solution should be administered. (II-2B) 9. Pain relief in admitted patients should be managed with acetaminophen and/or opioid analgesics. (III-B) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with antiplatelet properties should not be used. (III-B) 10. Women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be considered for treatment with prophylactic doses of anticoagulants. (II-2B) 11. Critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, according to the end organ affected. (III-C).

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and treatment]

The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a major complication of ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization, with severe morbidity and possible mortality. Whereas its pathophysiology remains ill-established, the VEGF may play a key role as well as coagulation disturbances. Risk factors for severe OHSS may be related to patients characteristics or to the management of the ovarian stimulation. Two types of OHSS are usually distinguished: the early OHSS, immediately following the ovulation triggering and a later and more severe one, occurring in case of pregnancy. As no etiologic treatment is available, the therapeutic management of OHSS should focus on its related-complications. Thrombotic complications that can occur in venous or arterial vessels represent the major risk of OHSS, possibly conducting to myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents. Once the OHSS is diagnosed, prevention of thrombotic accidents remains the major issue.

Ascites ultrafiltration and concentration-reinfusion in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Mild forms of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome are common in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization, affecting up to 33% of in-vitro fertilization cycles; 3-8% of cycles are complicated by moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2006). To treat severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, albumin and other colloid solutions are used intravenously to increase the perfusion pressure (Manaka et al, 1995; Balasch et al, 1996), heparin to restore coagulation (Balasch et al, 1996) and dopamine to increase renal blood flow (Brinsden et al, 1995), but these all have limited effects.

Cumulative baby take-home rate among women with PCOS treated by IVF

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate cumulative live birth rates after an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) programme in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

IVF outcomes of 66 women with PCOS diagnosed via Rotterdam criteria, who failed to conceive after ovulation induction, were compared with 106 women with tubal factor infertility. One hundred and twenty-five cycles were analysed in the PCOS group and 225 cycles in the control group (1-4 cycles per woman). Results of frozen-thawed cycles, occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and drop-outs were also included.

RESULTS

Despite a lower pregnancy rate among women with PCOS versus controls, the cumulative baby take-home rate did not differ between the groups (48.5% and 44.3%). The first cycle was the most successful cycle for living birth rate in PCOS group. One-third of PCOS women, who did not continue after unsuccessful treatment, had more miscarriage but not more OHSS compared to those who continued.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the baby take-home rate was similar among women with PCOS, and controls, the outcomes of consecutive cycles were not equal. Cumulative data give more realistic information than pooled cycles.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting GnRH agonists in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

The introduction of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists combined with gonadotrophins is considered to be one of the most significant events in the development of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) programmes. This article reviews the use of GnRH agonists in IVF-ET programmes and the efficacy and safety of long-acting GnRH agonists. The use of agonists results in higher clinical pregnancy rates, more supernumerary embryos for cryopreservation and allows convenient programming of oocyte recovery. There are different types of agonist and ovarian stimulation protocol available for clinical use. Recent meta-analysis of the Cochrane database has demonstrated the superiority of the long protocols over the short and ultra-short protocols for GnRH agonist use in IVF and GIFT. The depot injection offers increased clinical and patient compliance and improves efficacy of pituitary downregulation. However, compared with short-acting agonists, the depot preparations are associated with a longer period of stimulation and higher doses of gonadotrophins. To date, there is no evidence of an increased risk of pregnancy wastages or teratogenicity in human pregnancies exposed to long-acting agonists.