Two trials of antenatal thyrotrophin-releasing hormone for fetal maturation: stopping before the due date. Antenatal TRH Trial and the Thyroneth Trial Groups

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone added to corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Thyrotropin-releasing hormones (TRH) added to prenatal corticosteroids has been suggested as a way to further reduce breathing problems and neonatal lung disease in infants born preterm.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of giving prenatal TRH in addition to corticosteroids to women at risk of preterm birth for the prevention of neonatal respiratory disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2013) and reference lists of retrieved studies. We also contacted trial authors.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in women at sufficient risk of preterm birth to warrant the use of prenatal corticosteroids to promote lung maturity. TRH and corticosteroids were compared with corticosteroids, with or without placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All assessments of trial eligibility, risk of bias and data extractions were independently carried out by at least two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 4600 women were recruited into the 15 trials included in the review, however two trials did not contribute any outcome data to the review. The trials had a moderate risk of bias. Overall, prenatal TRH, in addition to corticosteroids, did not reduce the risk of death prior to hospital discharge (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.27, six trials, 3694 infants), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (average RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.22, nine trials, 3833 infants), or chronic lung disease (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.19, five trials, 2511 infants), and did not improve any of the secondary fetal, neonatal or childhood outcomes assessed by intention-to-treat analyses.Indeed, the data showed prenatal TRH to have adverse effects for women and their infants. All side effects reported (nausea, vomiting, light headedness, urgency of micturition, facial flushing) were significantly more likely to occur in women receiving TRH. In the infants, prenatal TRH increased the risk of needing respiratory support (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.29, three trials, 1969 infants), and of having a low Apgar score at five minutes (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.92, three trials, 1969 infants). Only three trials provided data on childhood follow-up, and while one trial suggested poorer outcomes for infants who were exposed to prenatal TRH, the other two trials, that assessed infants using an established developmental instrument, showed no clear differences between groups in follow-up outcomes.Sensitivity analyses by trial quality, or subgroups with differing times from entry to birth, or different dose regimens of TRH, did not change these findings.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal TRH in addition to corticosteroids, given to women at risk of preterm birth, does not improve infant outcomes and can cause maternal side effects.

How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of four methods of analysis on the results of randomised controlled trials that recruit women with multiple pregnancies and measure outcomes on their babies.

DESIGN

Analysis of one real and two simulated data sets.

SETTING

Secondary analysis of perinatal randomised controlled trials.

POPULATION

Randomised controlled trials including women with multiple pregnancies.

METHODS

The analytical methods compared were (a) assuming independence among babies, (b) analysing outcomes per women, counting a woman as having an outcome if any of her babies had it (equivalent to selecting the worst outcome among any of a woman's babies), (c) randomly selecting one baby from each set of multiples for inclusion in the analysis, (d) adjustment of the analysis to take account of non-independence of babies from multiple pregnancies, using methods developed for analysis of cluster randomised trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios for trials' main outcomes.

RESULTS

Results from application of cluster trial methods were similar to those from assuming independence among babies, but with slightly wider confidence intervals, reflecting the reduced effective sample size caused by non-independence between babies from the same pregnancy. Results were more variable using the other two methods, and in some cases, departed markedly from the results of the cluster trial methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster trial methods provide a simple way of adjusting the analysis to take account of non-independence between babies from the same pregnancy. Random selection and analysis by pregnancy (methods (b) and (c)) have disadvantages and do not report outcomes for all of the babies in the trial. This may cause problems with incorporating trials analysed using these methods into systematic reviews.

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone added to corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Thyrotropin-releasing hormones (TRH) added to prenatal corticosteroids has been suggested as a way to further reduce breathing problems and neonatal lung disease in infants born preterm.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of giving prenatal TRH in addition to corticosteroids to women at risk of very preterm birth for the prevention of neonatal respiratory disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (July 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1965 to July 2003), EMBASE (1988 to July 2003), Current Contents (1997 to July 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in women at sufficient risk of preterm birth to warrant the use of prenatal corticosteroids to promote lung maturity. TRH and corticosteroids were compared with corticosteroids with or without placebo. The main outcomes considered were fetal and infant mortality, infant morbidity, childhood development and maternal morbidity.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All assessments of trial eligibility, quality and data extractions were done by at least two authors independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 4600 women were recruited into the 13 included trials. Five trials were rated of high quality. Overall, prenatal TRH, in addition to corticosteroids, did not reduce the risk of neonatal respiratory disease or chronic oxygen dependence, and did not improve any of the fetal, neonatal or childhood outcomes assessed by intention to treat analyses.Indeed, the data showed prenatal TRH to have adverse effects for women and their infants. All side-effects monitored were more likely to occur in women receiving TRH. In the infants, prenatal TRH increased the risk of needing ventilation (relative risk (RR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.29, 3 trials, 1969 infants), having a low Apgar score at five minutes (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.92, 3 trials, 1969 infants) and, for the two trials providing data, was associated with poorer outcomes at childhood follow up. Sensitivity analyses by trial quality, or subgroups with differing times from entry to birth, or different dose regimens of TRH, did not change these findings.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormones, in addition to corticosteroids, given to women at risk of very preterm birth do not improve infant outcomes and can cause maternal side-effects.

Neurodevelopmental outcome of children treated with antenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormone

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate neurodevelopmental outcome until 2 years of age in children who participated in a multicenter antenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) trial to improve respiratory outcome and to lower mortality.

METHODS

Neurodevelopmental outcome was studied in infants whose mothers were admitted to the Academic Medical Center and enrolled in the European Antenatal TRH trial. Mothers were treated for imminent preterm delivery (before 30 weeks) with corticosteroids plus either placebo (placebo-group) or TRH (TRH-group). TRH treatment consisted of 400 micro g every 8 hours up to 4 doses. Assessments included neurologic development at 12 months and psychomotor development at 12 and 24 months using the Bayley developmental scales.

RESULTS

Sixty-two infants were included, 10 of whom died. Of the surviving infants, 24 received TRH and 28 received placebo. Ten infants were lost to follow-up. Each group consisted of 21 infants. Both groups were comparable regarding gestational age, birth weight, and time interval between trial medication and birth. However, in the TRH group, more respiratory problems, ventilator days, and chronic lung disease were found. Neurologic and motor outcome did not differ between the groups, but lower mental developmental index scores were found in the TRH group at both ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal TRH treatment is associated with a delay in mental development. This study demonstrates the importance of long-term follow-up of perinatal intervention trials with possible consequences for neurodevelopmental outcome of the infant.

Is there a role for antenatal TRH therapy for the prevention of neonatal lung disease?

Unfortunately, surfactant therapy is not routinely available to infants in some parts of the world because of its cost. It is the hypothesis of this article that in situations where surfactant is not available, there may be a role for antenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) plus glucocorticoid therapy. Data from randomized clinical trials, which compared therapy with antenatal glucocorticoid plus TRH to that with glucocorticoid alone were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis. The trials that incorporated surfactant therapy were analyzed separately from those in which surfactant was not used. In addition, because surfactant therapy was only available to some patients in the Australian ACTOBAT trial, each group analysis was performed with and without the ACTOBAT data. A characteristic of the earlier presurfactant trials is that few were designed for "intention to treat" analysis. In most of these studies, it was decided a priori to include babies who delivered within a specified time period after hormone therapy. The addition of TRH did not decrease respiratory distress syndrome in those trials in which surfactant therapy was used. In the presurfactant trials, respiratory distress syndrome was significantly decreased when "intention to treat" data were examined, as well as in those infants who delivered between 1 and 10 days after maternal therapy. There was also a significant decrease in oxygen dependency at 28 days after birth, and in oxygen dependency or death at this time, in those infants who delivered 1 to 10 days after treatment. Antenatal TRH had no significant effect of on neonatal complications such as air leak, intraventricular hemmorhage, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, or necrotizing enterocolitis. However, TRH did produce transient suppression of the pituitary thyroid axis. There were also a variety of transient complications in the mothers, including nausea, vomiting or flushing, light-headed feeling, and increased blood pressure. The authors conclude that the implementation of appropriate antenatal glucocorticoid treatment is the first priority. Once this has been established, the data presented here suggest that addition of antenatal TRH should be considered in those situations where surfactant is not available.