The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial

Optimizing Perioperative Pain Control After Ambulatory Urogynecologic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a multimodal protocol on opiate use and postoperative pain after ambulatory urogynecologic surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing ambulatory urogynecologic surgery patients treated under a standard perioperative pain protocol with those treated under a multimodal perioperative pain protocol. The multimodal protocol consisted of preoperative gabapentin and acetaminophen and postoperative scheduled doses of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pain scores were obtained from nursing records and assessed on the Numeric Rating Scale 11 per hospital protocol. All opioid dosages were converted into morphine milligram equivalents using standardized conversion tables.

RESULTS

We treated 109 patients under the standard protocol and 112 under the multimodal protocol. Patients had similar baseline characteristics. Overall, a minority of patients (39%) used postoperative opioids; this was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.45). The 2 groups also were similar with regard to the total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (P=0.35). Postoperatively, patients treated under the standard protocol had higher mean pain scores (2.2 vs 1.4, P=0.002). Patients treated under the standard protocol were also significantly more likely to report postoperative pain (69%) than those treated under the multimodal protocol (52%; P=0.01), and the multimodal protocol was associated with a 25% lower risk of postoperative pain (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.94) than the standard protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients infrequently use opiates after ambulatory urogynecologic surgery. The use of a multimodal pain protocol was associated with lower pain scores, and patients in a multimodal pain protocol were more likely to report no pain.

Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Fast-track surgery (FTS), also known as enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multidisciplinary approach to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimise hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and reduce health care costs, all without compromising patient safety. The advantages of FTS in abdominal surgery most likely extend to gynaecological surgery, but this is an assumption, as FTS in elective gynaecological surgery has not been well studied. No consensus guidelines have been developed for gynaecological oncological surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. To our knowledge, there are no published randomised controlled trials; however, some studies have shown that FTS in gynaecological oncological surgery leads to early hospital discharge with high levels of patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is whether FTS reduces the length of stay in hospital compared to traditional management. The secondary aim is whether FTS is associated with any increase in post-surgical complications compared to traditional management (for both open and laparoscopic surgery).

METHODS/DESIGN

This trial will prospectively compare FTS and traditional management protocols. The primary endpoint is the length of post-operative hospitalisation (days, mean ± standard deviation), defined as the number of days between the date of discharge and the date of surgery. The secondary endpoints are complications in both groups (FTS versus traditional protocol) occurring during the first 3 months post-operatively including infection (wound infection, lung infection, intraperitoneal infection), post-operative nausea and vomiting, ileus, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative thrombosis, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry II score.

DISCUSSION

The advantages of FTS most likely extend to gynaecology, although, to our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative length of hospitalisation after major gynaecological or gynaecological oncological surgery and to analyse patients' post-operative complications. This trial may reveal whether FTS leads to early hospital discharge with few complications after gynaecological surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02687412 . Approval Number: SCCHEC20160001. Date of registration: registered on 23 February 2016.

Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit

Clinical audit is the process by which clinicians are able to demonstrate to themselves, their patients, hospital administrators, and healthcare financial providers the outcome and safety of their clinical practice. It is a process by which the public can be assured of safety and outcomes. A fast-track surgery program was initiated in January 2008, and this paper represents a rolling clinical audit of the outcomes of that program until the end of June 2012. Three hundred and eighty-nine patients underwent fast track surgical management after having a laparotomy for suspected or confirmed gynaecological cancer. There were no exclusions and the data presented represents the practice and outcomes of all patients referred to a single gynaecological oncologist. The majority of patients were deemed to have complex surgical procedures performed usually through a vertical midline incision. One third of patients had a nonzero performance status, median weight was 68 kilograms, and median BMI was 26.5 with 31% being classified as obese. Median operating time was 2.25 hours, and the median estimated blood loss was 175 mL. Overall the median length of stay (LOS) was 3 days with 95% of patients tolerating early oral feeding. Four percent of patients required readmission, and 0.5% were required to return to the operating room. Whilst the wound infection rate was 2.6%, there were no ureteric, bowel or neurovascular injuries. Overall there were 2 bladder injuries (0.5%), and the incidence of venous thromboembolism was 1%. Subset analysis was also undertaken. Whilst a number of variables were associated with reduced LOS, on multivariate analysis, benign pathology, shorter operating time, and the ability to tolerate early oral feeding were found to be significant. The data and experience presented is the largest and most extensive reported in the literature relating to fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology. The public can be reassured of the safety and improved outcomes that can be achieved after the introduction of such a program.

The surgical rectus sheath block for post-operative analgesia: a modern approach to an established technique

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical rectus sheath block for post-operative pain relief following major gynaecological surgery.

TECHNIQUE

Local anaesthetic (20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine bilaterally) is administered under direct vision to the rectus sheath space at the time of closure of the anterior abdominal wall.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective case note review of 98 consecutive patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery for benign or malignant disease who received either standard subcutaneous infiltration of the wound with local anaesthetic (LA, n=51) or the surgical rectus sheath block (n=47) for post-operative pain relief.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Pain scores on waking, (2) duration of morphine-based patient controlled analgesia (PCA), (3) quantity of morphine used during the first 48 post-operative hours and (4) length of post-operative stay.

RESULTS

The groups were similar in age, the range of procedures performed and the type of pathology observed. Patients who received the surgical rectus sheath block had lower pain scores on waking [0 (0-1) vs. 2 (1-3), p<0.001], required less morphine post-operatively [12 mg (9-26) vs. 36 mg (30-48), p<0.001], had their PCAs discontinued earlier [24h (18-34) vs. 37 h (28-48), p<0.001] and went home earlier [4 days (3-4) vs. 5 days post-op (4-8), p<0.001] [median (interquartile range)] than patients receiving standard subcutaneous local anaesthetic into the wound.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical rectus sheath block appears to provide effective post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery. A randomised controlled clinical trial is required to assess its efficacy further.