The Effect of Guided Imagery on Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgical Operations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Guided imagery distracts patients from disturbing feelings and thoughts, positively affects emotional well-being, and reduces pain by producing pleasing mental images. This study aimed to determine the effects of guided imagery on postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. This randomized controlled study was conducted between April 2018 and May 2019. This study included 60 patients who underwent lower extremity surgery. After using guided imagery, the posttest mean Visual Analog Scale score of patients in the intervention group was found to be 2.56 (1.00 ± 6.00), whereas the posttest mean score of patients in the control group was 4.10 (3.00 ± 6.00), and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p <.001). Guided imagery reduces short-term postoperative pain after lower extremity surgery.

Documentation for Assessing Pain in Postoperative Pain Management Pre- and Post-intervention

PURPOSE

Although Norwegian law requires the documentation of patients' care processes, including pain assessment, research has shown that the quality of postoperative documentation for assessing pain does not meet an acceptable standard and requires improvement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an educational intervention can increase nurses' documentation of postoperative pain assessments, alter patients' opioid consumption, and ensure that patients have at least one documented Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≤3 at rest before being discharged. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the nurses' education and experience influenced their pain assessments.

DESIGN

An observational study with a pre-post intervention.

METHODS

The study following a pre-post design involved documenting pain assessments of 304 patients undergoing cancer surgeries in a postoperative unit at the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital. In an educational intervention, two 45-minutes teaching sessions within two weeks, addressed validated pain assessment tools and the documentation of pain assessment. Descriptive frequency analysis and partial correlation with Pearson's r - value were used, with P < .05 indicating significance.

FINDINGS

Postintervention, pain assessments in general increased significantly from a mean of two times per patient to three times. Overall, the use of assessment tool Critical -Care Pain Observation Tool increased from 6.1% to 25.8%, opioid consumption increased in mean from 3.34 to 4.79 in milligram and the documentation at discharge increased from 81.4% to 91.4%. The documentation of nurses with more than 10 years' experience in the unit especially improved from 17.5% to 31.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational intervention and reminders about basic systematic pain assessment and the evaluation of pain measures improved nurses' documentation of postoperative pain management and documentation at discharge. The findings underscore the importance of regularly ensuring the quality of patients' treatment by systematically documenting nurses' clinical tasks and the outcome of patients' care.

Healthcare practitioners' experiences of postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care-A qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To explore and describe healthcare practitioners' experiences of postoperative pain management to patients undergoing planned lumbar spine surgery by identifying the healthcare practitioners' behaviours, attitudes and strategies.

BACKGROUND

Poorly managed postoperative pain continues to cause suffering and prolong hospital care and may affect individual and team practitioners' strategies and attitudes. The impact of these strategies and attitudes needs greater understanding.

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative study.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted at a university hospital in Sweden during January-March 2016 with 9 healthcare practitioners (ages: 29-61 years; gender: male 3 and female 6; professions: medical doctor 3, registered nurse 3 and physiotherapist 3; professional experience: 1.5 months to 25 years). The interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research COREQ.

RESULTS

The interviews revealed healthcare practitioners' attitudes and strategies. Three themes were identified: (a) Connecting with the person was recognised as the key component in postoperative pain management; (b) Professionalism: a balancing act, accentuated health care practitioners' duality in being both vulnerable and strong in delicate care situations; and (c) Collaboration: being constantly responsive, the necessity for healthcare practitioners to be constantly responsive to their environment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings pinpoint the need for healthcare organisations to build structures enabling practitioners to deliver adequate pain management in acknowledging the practitioners' delicate situation when facing patients in pain.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Given the global need for postoperative pain management, our findings have international relevance. Preconceived expectations on specific pain need to be depicted and postoperative pain taken seriously to protect the patient as well as the healthcare practitioners.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Ethiopian Nursing Staff Regarding Post-Operative Pain Management: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Pain management is one part of management in the postoperative period. The prevalence of moderate to severe postoperative pain and its functional interference is high in Ethiopian patients. In this study we aimed (1) to assess nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding post-operative pain management; (2) to identify the factors of nurses' knowledge and attitudes.

METHOD

A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted. All nurses working in Amhara region referral hospitals were involved in the study. The Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (NKASRP) was used to measure the nurses' pain management knowledge and attitudes. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with knowledge and attitude.

RESULTS

A total of 433 nurses were included. Of the total respondents, 90.6% of them had a bachelor's degree with work experience of between 1 to 5 years (58.5%). Only 76 (19.2%) participants got access to read journals and 66 (16.7%) had taken training regarding postoperative pain management. The results showed that 56.5% [95% CI= (51.6-61.3)] respondents had adequate knowledge and 8.9% [95% CI= (6.1-11.6)] of them had positive attitudes towards POP management. Higher level of education [AOR=8.2; CI= (2.51-26.83)], getting access to read journals [AOR =1.83; CI= (1.01-3.30)], and taking POP management training [AOR=8.63; CI= (3.67-20.28)] were statistically associated with adequate knowledge. Similarly, positive attitude towards postoperative pain management was associated with taking POP management training, available of pain management course in the curriculum, and getting access to read.

CONCLUSION

Although more than half of nurses in the study area had adequate knowledge towards POP management, only a small number had a positive attitude. Taking POP management training and getting access to read journals were significantly associated with good knowledge and attitude towards POP management; therefore, regular in-service training and getting accessing reading materials (such as journals or articles) are recommended to enhance quality service to patients.

The ethics of postoperative pain management: Mapping nurses' views

AIM

We explored the positions of nurses working in hospitals regarding the acceptability of refusing to give a repeat dose of painkiller to a postoperative patient who requested it. These positions were compared with that of lay people, physicians, and other health professionals.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Factorial design was used to assess the impact of 6 situational factors: the patient's age, the current level of pain as assessed by the nurse, the number of requests, the level of risk associated with the administration of a repeat dose, the outcome of surgery, and the giving of alternative mild analgesics. We implemented a combination of scenario technique and of cluster analysis. Data were collected from April 2013 to December 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

138 registered nurses, 32 nurse's aides, 33 physicians, 23 psychologists, and 169 lay people participated in the study.

RESULTS

We found 4 qualitatively different meaningful positions. A plurality of participants (57% of nurses) considered that refusing was not acceptable, irrespective of circumstances. A substantial minority of participants (but 52% of physicians) considered that refusing was acceptable only if the level of pain was low and the risk was high. Other participants (mostly lay people) considered that refusing was always acceptable each time a risk of side effects, either serious or simply mild, was present.

Complexity of Pain, Nurses' Knowledge, and Treatment Options

The complexity of pain requires nurses to conduct in-depth assessments, be knowledgeable about influential factors (ie, age, culture, health status), and treat pain with the least harmful and most beneficial interventions. The monotherapy use of analgesics, the fifth vital sign, and a 1-dimensional scale have fallen short of satisfactory results. Pain is the most frequent reason individuals seek health care and cost billions of dollars. Nurses are pivotal in the management of pain. Nurses who are knowledgeable about pain and pain management improve patient outcomes and patient satisfaction scores. Research results indicate the need to advance nurses' knowledge in pain management through various educational offerings.

Pain Assessment Strategies in Home Care and Nursing Homes in Mid-Norway: A Cross-sectional Survey

The prevalence of pain ranges from 27.8% to 86.5% in nursing homes and 42% to 50% in home care. Pain assessment is the first step toward effective pain management. The aim of this study was to explore the use of pain assessment strategies (verbal, numeric, and observation rating scales and standardized questions) in home care and nursing homes. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Health care providers who were responsible for the patients' medications replied to a questionnaire. In-home care and nursing homes in 11 randomly selected municipalities in Mid-Norway were included. Three hundred ninety-two individuals were included in this study (70% response rate): 271 (69%) from nursing homes and 121 (31%) from home care. The respondents working in home care had a higher educational level than those in working in nursing homes. Pain assessment instruments were not used frequently in nursing homes and home care. Verbal and numeric rating scales were used significantly more frequently in home care than in nursing homes. Registered nurses (RNs) in nursing homes used standardized questions significantly more often than did RNs in home care. RNs and social educators in home care self-reported less competence in treating the patients' total pain experience than did those in nursing homes. Workplace (working in home care) and regular training in the use of pain assessment tools explained more than 20% of the variation in the use of pain assessment tools. Regular training in the use of pain assessment tools is needed for health care workers in home care and nursing homes.

Predictors of nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward postoperative pain in Greece

Undertreatment of postoperative pain can aggravate patient outcomes and is associated with attending nurses' knowledge deficits or negative attitudes toward pain. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes toward postoperative pain of surgical department nurses and to identify predictors of their knowledge and attitudes. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey that took place in the departments of general surgery, orthopedics, neurosurgery, ear-nose-throat surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology at five Greek hospitals. Participants were a convenience sample of registered and assistant nurses. Nurses were asked to complete a three-section questionnaire, which included demographics, a Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) tool modified for postoperative pain, and seven questions capturing personal characteristics, working conditions, and feelings about work. One hundred eighty-two questionnaires were completed. Average scores were 45.35% for modified KASRP tool; 28.57% for pain assessment; 55.44% for general pain management; and 47.13% for use of analgesics. Four of the five most commonly missed items referred to use of analgesics. More previous personal experience of postoperative pain (p = .002) and being a registered nurse (p = .015) predicted higher modified KASRP tool score. Participation in continuing education programs and department of employment were also associated with differences in the modified tool score. The knowledge deficits and negative attitudes of the nurses toward postoperative pain highlight the role of pregraduate and continuing education, appropriately specialized for each surgical department, in the development of empathy toward patients in pain and of clinical competency regarding pain assessment and administration of analgesics.

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the use of pain scales in postoperative pain assessments

AIM

To describe how healthcare professionals perceive the use of pain scales in postoperative care.

BACKGROUND

Pain scales are important but not an obvious choice to use in postoperative care. No study has explored how healthcare professionals experience the use of pain scales.

METHODS

An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was used. The sample consisted of 25 healthcare professionals. Semistructured interviews were performed.

RESULTS

Four descriptive categories emerged - the use of pain scales facilitated the understanding of postoperative pain, facilitated treatment, demanded a multidimensional approach and was affected by work situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals described that pain scales contribute to the understanding of patient's postoperative pain. It is important to ensure patient understanding and be aware about variations in pain ratings. Dialogue and observations are necessary to be certain what the ratings mean to the patient. The use of pain scales depends on patient's needs and organization.