Myocardial SPECT perfusion defect size compared to infarct size by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute or chronic infarction

Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Rosuvastatin versus Atorvastatin Loading Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a single high-dose rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin preloading in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI.) Methods: A total of 99 patients presented with STEMI and were randomly divided into three groups—a control group (n = 33) with no statin treatment, an atorvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 80 mg atorvastatin dose and the rosuvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 40 mg rosuvastatin dose in the emergency room (ER) prior to PCI. Post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) were recorded, and ST-segment resolution was measured. Results: CTFC was significantly lower for the atorvastatin group (p-value < 0.01) than in the control group. A final TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved in 32 (97.0%) patients in the rosuvastatin group and 28 (84.8%) patients in the atorvastatin group compared with only 25 (75.8%) patients in the control group (p = 0.014). Peak CK-MB in the rosuvastatin group (263.2 [207.2−315.6]) and the atorvastatin group (208 [151.0−314.1]) was lower compared to that in the control group (398.4 [303.9−459.3]); p < 0.001. Conclusions: A single extensive dose of lipophilic atorvastatin prior to primary PCI in STEMI patients showed better improvement in microvascular myocardial perfusion compared to hydrophilic rosuvastatin.

Long-term outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the long-term occurrence of the composite endpoint of heart failure (HF) hospitalization or all-cause death (primary endpoint) in patients randomized to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using individualized multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement compared with a routine fluoroscopic approach. Furthermore, this study aims to evaluate whether inter-lead electrical delay (IED) is associated with improved response rate of this endpoint.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed follow-up data until November 2020 for all 182 patients included in the ImagingCRT trial for the occurrence of HF hospitalization and all-cause death. During median (inter-quartile range) time to primary endpoint/censuring of 6.7 (3.3-7.9) years, the rate of the primary endpoint was 60% (n = 53) in the imaging group compared with 52% (n = 48) in the control group [hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.81, P = 0.31]. Neither the risk of HF hospitalization (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.62-1.99, P = 0.72) nor of all-cause death differed between treatment groups (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.82-1.85, P = 0.32). The risk of the primary endpoint was significantly reduced among those with IED ≥100 ms when compared with those with IED <100 ms (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, an individualized multimodality imaging-guided strategy targeting LV lead placement towards the latest mechanically activated non-scarred myocardial segment during CRT implantation did not reduce HF hospitalization or all-cause death when compared with routine LV lead placement during long-term follow-up. Targeting the latest electrical activation should be studied as an alternative individualized strategy for optimizing LV lead placement in CRT recipients.

Global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking for infarct size estimation

AIMS

To assess the utility of speckle tracking global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) compared with traditional echocardiographic indices including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), wall motion score index (WMSI), and end-systolic volume index (ESVI), in estimating the infarct size (IS) following a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study includes 227 patients with STEMI and day 1 and day 30 echocardiograms, and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) only at day 30 to assess IS. IS was modelled by linear regression with echocardiographic parameters using MPI as reference. Resulting echocardiographic IS estimates were compared by ratios of standard deviations of model residuals (RSD). To estimate the resultant day 30 IS 1 day after a STEMI, GLS was more precise than LVEF (RSD: 0.91, P = 0.014) and ESVI (RSD: 0.88, P = 0.002), and comparable with WMSI (RSD 0.99, P = 0.86). To estimate IS from a day 30 echocardiogram, GLS was comparable with LVEF (RSD: 0.98, P = 0.68) and ESVI (RSD: 1.04, P = 0.40), but WMSI was more precise (RSD: 0.89, P = 0.006). Multiple linear regression revealed that on day 1 after STEMI, GLS significantly complemented the standard parameters separately (P-values all models <0.001) or combined [multivariable model: GLS (P = 0.001), WMSI (P = 0.03), LVEF (P = 0.40)]. On day 30, GLS significantly complemented LVEF and ESVI, but when WMSI was in the model, GLS's association with IS was not significant.

CONCLUSION

On day 1 after revascularization for STEMI, GLS contains additional information about final IS compared with standard echocardiographic systolic function indices. Studies are needed to clarify whether this has prognostic implications.

Peak CKMB and cTnT accurately estimates myocardial infarct size after reperfusion

OBJECTIVES

To find the time-to-peak for creatine kinase MB(mass) (CKMB) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) after acute reperfusion, to compare peak and cumulative values to estimate infarct size (IS), and to evaluate clinical routine sampling for assessment of IS.

DESIGN

Acute primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 38 patients with first-time myocardial infarction. In 21 patients, CKMB and cTnT were acquired before PCI and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours thereafter. In 17 patients, clinical routine samples were acquired at arrival, and at 10 and 20 h. IS was assessed by delayed contrast-enhanced MRI (DE-MRI).

RESULTS

Time-to-peak was 7.6+/-3.6 h for CKMB and 8.1+/-3.4 h for cTnT. Peak values correlated strongly to cumulative values (r(s)=0.97-0.98) as well as to DE-MRI (r(s)=0.8-0.82). Clinical routine sampling showed lower rs values (0.47-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Peak values are likely captured if CKMB and cTnT are acquired at 3, 6, and 12 h after acute PCI. These peak values can be used to estimate myocardial infarct size after acute PCI.

Late gadolinium uptake demonstrated with magnetic resonance in patients where automated PERFIT analysis of myocardial SPECT suggests irreversible perfusion defect

BACKGROUND

Myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) is frequently used as the reference method for the determination of myocardial infarct size. PERFIT(R) is a software utilizing a three-dimensional gender specific, averaged heart model for the automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion. The purpose of this study was to compare the perfusion defect size on MPS, assessed with PERFIT, with the hyperenhanced volume assessed by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE) and to relate their effect on the wall motion score index (WMSI) assessed with cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) and echocardiography (echo).

METHODS

LGE was performed in 40 patients where clinical MPS showed an irreversible uptake reduction suggesting a myocardial scar. Infarct volume, extent and major coronary supply were compared between MPS and LGE as well as the relationship between infarct size from both methods and WMSI.

RESULTS

MPS showed a slightly larger infarct volume than LGE (MPS 29.6 +/- 23.2 ml, LGE 22.1 +/- 16.9 ml, p = 0.01), while no significant difference was found in infarct extent (MPS 11.7 +/- 9.4%, LGE 13.0 +/- 9.6%). The correlation coefficients between methods in respect to infarct size and infarct extent were 0.71 and 0.63 respectively. WMSI determined with cine-MRI correlated moderately with infarct volume and infarct extent (cine-MRI vs MPS volume r = 0.71, extent r = 0.71, cine-MRI vs LGE volume r = 0.62, extent r = 0.60). Similar results were achieved when wall motion was determined with echo. Both MPS and LGE showed the same major coronary supply to the infarct area in a majority of patients, Kappa = 0.84.

CONCLUSION

MPS and LGE agree moderately in the determination of infarct size in both absolute and relative terms, although infarct volume is slightly larger with MPS. The correlation between WMSI and infarct size is moderate.

The relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size assessed by MRI

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to determine a dysfunction index based on the maximum possible LVEF in relation to infarct size.

DESIGN

In 149 patients with chronic IHD, LVEF and infarct size were quantified by MRI. Dysfunction index was defined as the maximum possible LVEF minus measured LVEF.

RESULTS

The maximum possible LVEF was found to be LVEF=72.2-[1.18*infarct size]. Dysfunction index for the study population was mean 20 (range -6 to 57), 74% of the study population had a dysfunction index >10 and 44% had a dysfunction index >20.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that infarct size by MRI can be used to estimate a maximum possible LVEF and a dysfunction index. The distribution of dysfunction index in the population suggests a considerable prevalence of dysfunctional but viable myocardium. Future studies are needed to assess if the dysfunction index can be useful to assess the potential for improvement in LVEF following revascularization.

Mechanisms of Post-Infarct Left Ventricular Remodeling

Heart failure secondary to myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality. Long-term outcome after MI can be largely be defined in terms of its impact on the size and shape of the left ventricle (i.e., LV remodeling). Three major mechanisms contribute to LV remodeling: 1) early infarct expansion, 2) subsequent infarct extension into adjacent noninfarcted myocardium, and 3) late hypertrophy in the remote LV. Future developments in preventing post-MI heart failure will depend not only on identifying drugs targeting each of these individual mechanisms, but also on diagnostic techniques capable of assessing efficacy against each mechanism.

Quantitation of infarct size in patients with chronic coronary artery disease using rest-redistribution Tl-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT: correlation with contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Rest and rest-redistribution thallium 201 myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (MPS) has been incompletely validated in patients for determination of the total amount of scarred myocardium. We sought to determine whether rest or redistribution Tl-201 MPS provides an accurate determination of infarct size as defined by delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied patients (n = 44) with chronic coronary artery disease referred for rest-redistribution Tl-201 MPS, who were also studied by contrast-enhanced CMR within 3 +/- 4 days. Patients were considered retrospectively based on a series of patients referred for clinically indicated MPS. Defect size, as a percent of left ventricular mass (% LV), was determined by quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) and compared with the volume of delayed hyperenhancement on contrast-enhanced CMR, normalized to LV mass. Infarct size varied from 0% to 43% LV. Rest QPS defect size correlated with the amount of nonviable myocardium assessed by contrast-enhanced CMR (r = 0.76; mean difference, 4.3% +/- 8.0% LV). When delayed thallium data were considered, redistribution QPS was superior to rest QPS for determination of infarct size (redistribution r = 0.90; mean difference, 2.4% +/- 5.2% LV; P = .03 vs rest).

CONCLUSION

Rest-redistribution Tl-201 MPS provides a more accurate measurement of total infarct size than rest-only Tl-201 MPS and correlates with contrast-enhanced CMR.

MR Imaging with Remote Control: Feasibility Study in Cardiovascular Disease

The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. The purpose was to retrospectively evaluate remote control magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in complex cardiovascular procedures, whereby operational expertise was made available locally from a remote location. Thirty patients underwent cardiac (12 patients) and/or vascular (30 patients) 1.5-T MR imaging with a remote operator by using a personal computer. All patient studies were compared with 30 control studies obtained with conventional local imaging. Cardiac cine, myocardial delayed enhancement, and MR angiograms were assessed for overall image quality and motion artifact. MR angiograms were evaluated for vascular definition. Image quality was excellent in 90% (38 of 42) of remote images versus 60% (25 of 42) of control group images (P < .01). Scores for motion artifact were not significantly different (P = .11). Interactive MR imaging was successfully implemented with remote control in complex cardiovascular cases; diagnostic quality of images was superior to that of images obtained locally.

Semi-automatic quantification of myocardial infarction from delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Accurate and reproducible assessment of myocardial infarction is important for treatment planning in patients with ischemic heart disease. This study describes a novel method to quantify myocardial infarction by semi-automatic delineation of hyperenhanced myocardium in delayed contrast enhanced (DE) magnetic resonance (MR) images.

DESIGN

The proposed method automatically detects the hyperenhanced tissue by first determining the signal intensity of non-enhanced myocardium. A fast level set algorithm was used to limit the heterogeneity of the hyperenhanced regions, and to exclude small regions that constitute noise rather than infarction. The method was evaluated in 40 patients; 20 with acute infarction and 20 with chronic healed infarction using scanners from two different manufacturers. Infarct size measured by the proposed semi-automatic method was compared with manual measurements from three experienced observers. The software used is freely available for research purposes at http://segment.heiberg.se.

RESULTS

The difference in infarct size between semi-automatic quantification and the mean of the three observers was 6.1+/-6.6 ml (mean+/-SD), and the interobserver variability (SD) was 4.2 ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The method presented is a highly automated method for analyzing myocardial viability from DE-MR images. The bias of the method is acceptable and the variability is in the same order of magnitude as the interobserver variability for manual delineations.