Peripheral light focusing as a potential mechanism for phakic dysphotopsia and lens phototoxicity

Ultraviolet and Visible Transmittance of Soft Contact Lenses with and without Ultraviolet Blockers

SIGNIFICANCE

Ultraviolet (UV) and visible light transmittance of soft contact lenses (SCLs) was measured. A significant difference in UV transmittance has been found between SCLs with a positive and negative back vertex power (BVP). It can be shown that thicker SCLs absorb more UV radiation.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine UV and visible light transmittance of different SCLs with and without UV protection filters.

METHODS

Twenty-one lens brands were investigated in the BVP range of -12.00 to +6.00 D. Three SCLs were measured per BVP 25 times. Three hundred thirty-nine SCLs with UV filter (stenfilcon A, somofilcon A, narafilcon A, senofilcon A, senofilcon C, etafilcon A, nesofilcon A) and 489 SCLs without UV filter (delefilcon A, lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, comfilcon A, balafilcon A, samfilcon A, asmofilcon A, nelfilcon A, omafilcon A, hilafilcon B, ocufilcon D, hioxifilcon A, omafilcon B) have been examined. The measurement setup was created according to ISO 18369-3.

RESULTS

All UV-absorbing labeled test SCLs meet UV protection class 2. senofilcon A, senofilcon C, and narafilcon A meet the higher UV protection class 1 level. A statistically significant difference in UV transmittance (280 to 380 nm) has been found between SCLs with a positive BVP (+1.00 to +6.00 D) and SCLs with a negative BVP (-1.00 to -12.00 D), both without (P = .04) and with UV filters (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

With the ISO-conforming, diopter-independent measurement setup, the UV-absorbing test contact lenses that meet the current international standards, regardless of their BVP, were identified. Lenses with increased center thickness absorb more UV radiation. Further studies may use a modified measurement setup with a larger aperture than 10 mm. It would also be worthwhile to examine the UV absorption of the contact lens over the complete corneal area and limbal area because UV radiation may damage inner ocular tissues like the crystalline lens as well as limbal stem cells.

Computational Model of Sclerotic Scatter

PURPOSE

A clinical examination technique to detect pathology within the anterior eye is known as "sclerotic scatter" (SS). Its propagation pathway has not been thoroughly investigated. Although conventionally theorized to occur by "total internal reflection" (TIR) within the cornea, existing data suggest that this may be an incomplete explanation.

METHODS

An anterior eye model representative of a human eye has been constructed using nonsequential ray tracing (OpticStudio 18.1). Three generations of the model were constructed to support the analyses of the pathway of light in SS. A design of experiment methodology involving the key parameters was used to determine the slit-lamp setup for optimum clinical visualization.

RESULTS

Most of the light directed into the temporal limbus in SS is lost (52%) into the sclera or reemitted back to the clinician. Only 0.006% of light that transits the central cornea undergoes TIR off the anterior cornea and more significantly 0.000125% off the posterior cornea. The optimal slit-lamp setup parameters to maximize the clinician's visualization are also summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

The propagation of light within SS primarily does not occur by TIR off the posterior cornea but rather the direct transcameral propagation of light. SS also represents an inefficient usage of light, with approximately half of the light creating a potential glare source for clinicians. We have formulated a recommended set of parameters for the slit-lamp setup to maximize clinical visualization. We also describe the transcameral pathways involved in SS that create a corneal "backlighting" effect. Almost a century after Graves original description, the optics of this phenomenon are described here.

Damage of the ocular surface from indoor suntanning-Insights from in vivo confocal microscopy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ocular surface at the microstructural level of adults who habitually undertake indoor-suntanning utilising in vivo confocal microscopy.

METHODS

Participants were prospectively recruited and enrolled into either а study group (n = 75) with a history UV indoor tanning, or a control group (n = 75) with no prior history of artificial tanning. The study group participated in voluntary tanning sessions performed with standard equipment and maintained their usual routine for eye protection. Slit lamp biomicroscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy were performed at baseline before undertaking a series of suntanning sessions (10 sessions of 10 min duration over a 15 day period), within three days after the last session, and four weeks after the last session. Control group participants were examined at baseline and 8 weeks later and did not participate in tanning sessions.

RESULTS

All participants were female with a mean age of 25 ± 4 years and 24 ± 4 years in the study and control groups, respectively. No clinically significant changes were observed in either group over time using slit lamp biomicroscopy (all p ≥ 0.05), however, statistically significant differences were observed between the study and the control group for all corneal layers imaged using confocal microscopy (all p ≤ 0.03). Characteristic cystic conjunctival lesions with dark centres and bright borders were observed in 95% of the study group before and in 100% after the suntanning sessions.

CONCLUSION

Indoor suntanning resulted in statistically significant microstructural changes in the cornea and the bulbar conjunctiva that are undetectable with slit lamp biomicroscopy.

Handing it to pterygium: Explaining pterygium laterality

PURPOSE

To evaluate any correlation between pterygium laterality and patient handedness.

METHODS

Our study represents a retrospective observational study of a series of consecutive pterygium patients recruited from two centres. Each patient was assessed for their handedness which was compared to the laterality of their presenting pterygium. Patients that possessed bilateral disease comparisons between pterygium size and handedness were made. Correlation statistics were performed to compare patient handedness and pterygium location (right or left). For patients possessing bilateral disease only, the pre-surgical differences between lengths and areas of pterygium were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients were recruited into our study. 172 patients possessed unilateral disease and in 47 patients, the disease was bilateral. A significant association was identified between handedness and pterygium laterality (p < 0.001). Patients with right-sided pterygia were more likely to be right-handed (OR 2.327) and left-sided presentations who were more likely to be left-handed (OR 5.717). For bilateral presentations, patients were found to have longer (mean increase 3.50 ± 0.47 mm) and larger (mean increase 4.38 ± 0.48 mm²) pterygia in the eye ipsilateral to their dominant hand.

CONCLUSIONS

A new insight of handedness as a contributing factor to pterygium laterality is consistent with evidence relating to the asymmetrical development of cortical cataract as well as to theories underlying the geometry of ocular UV exposure. A more complete understanding of factors contributing to ocular insolation may further inform as to improved protective measures and provides further evidence for the role of peripheral light focusing in pterygium pathogenesis.

Optical Analysis and Reappraisal of the Peripheral Light Focusing Theory of Nasal Pterygia Formation

Purpose

Pterygia are much more common nasally than temporally. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major risk factor. Coroneo proposed that the nasal preference is caused by the “peripheral light focusing effect,” (PLF), in which UV at an oblique angle passes through temporal cornea and is concentrated on and damages nasal limbal stem cells. This study evaluates whether the PLF is sufficient to explain the nasal preference.

Methods

Whereas Coroneo and colleagues derived the maximum PLF intensity gain (UV concentration factor) as a function of incident angle (i.e., different nasal limbal positions were used for different incident angles) the current analysis derived intensity gain at a fixed position such at the nasal corneo-limbal junction (CLJ). This provided a measure of the total PLF irradiation at this position, which was compared to total direct irradiation of nasal and temporal limbus at the corresponding positions (e.g., CLJs). In Part 1, analysis was performed like that of Coroneo, using horizontally incident UV; in Part 2, the analysis was extended to include incident rays above and below the horizontal.

Results

In both part 1 and part 2 of the study, the limbal UV irradiation of the nasal limbus from the PLF was not sufficient to explain the strong nasal location preference of pterygia.

Conclusions

The analysis calls into question the PLF explanation of nasal location preference. Other explanations of the nasal preference, and of pterygium pathogenesis, should be considered, such as temporal to nasal tear flow carrying substances such as cytokines to the nasal limbus.

UV light-blocking contact lenses protect against short-term UVB-induced limbal stem cell niche damage and inflammation

UVB irradiation has been linked to pathogenesis of pterygium, a conjunctival tumor growing onto transparent cornea, the windscreen of the eye. Due to corneal anatomy, ambient UVB irradiation is amplified at the stem cell-containing nasal limbus. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of a UV-blocking contact lens (UVBCL, senofilcon A, Class 1 UV blocker) on limbal epithelial cells and fibroblasts under UVB irradiation compared to a non-UVB-blocking contact lens. UVBCL prevented UVB-induced DNA damage (as assessed by cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer immunostaining) as well as a decrease in proliferation and scratch wound closure rate of both limbal epithelial and fibroblast cells. Similarly, UVBCL protected limbal epithelial cells from UVB-induced loss of their phenotype in terms of colony forming efficiency and stem cell marker expression (ABCB5, P63α, integrin β1) compared to controls. Moreover, with UVBCL pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and MCP1 remained unchanged. These data demonstrate the significance of UV-protection in preserving the limbal niche in response to at least short-term UVB. Our data support the use of UVBCL in protecting limbal niche cells, especially after limbal stem cell transplantation and in patients after pterygium surgery, to help prevent recurrences.

Ultraviolet damage to the eye revisited: eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®), a new ultraviolet protection label for eyewear

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation potentially damages the skin, the immune system, and structures of the eye. A useful UV sun protection for the skin has been established. Since a remarkable body of evidence shows an association between UV radiation and damage to structures of the eye, eye protection is important, but a reliable and practical tool to assess and compare the UV-protective properties of lenses has been lacking. Among the general lay public, misconceptions on eye-sun protection have been identified. For example, sun protection is mainly ascribed to sunglasses, but less so to clear lenses. Skin malignancies in the periorbital region are frequent, but usual topical skin protection does not include the lids. Recent research utilized exact dosimetry and demonstrated relevant differences in UV burden to the eye and skin at a given ambient irradiation. Chronic UV effects on the cornea and lens are cumulative, so effective UV protection of the eyes is important for all age groups and should be used systematically. Protection of children's eyes is especially important, because UV transmittance is higher at a very young age, allowing higher levels of UV radiation to reach the crystalline lens and even the retina. Sunglasses as well as clear lenses (plano and prescription) effectively reduce transmittance of UV radiation. However, an important share of the UV burden to the eye is explained by back reflection of radiation from lenses to the eye. UV radiation incident from an angle of 135°-150° behind a lens wearer is reflected from the back side of lenses. The usual antireflective coatings considerably increase reflection of UV radiation. To provide reliable labeling of the protective potential of lenses, an eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®) has been developed. It integrates UV transmission as well as UV reflectance of lenses. The E-SPF® compares well with established skin-sun protection factors and provides clear messages to eye health care providers and to lay consumers.

Ultraviolet radiation and the anterior eye

The eye is on the one hand dependent on visible light energy and on the other hand can be damaged by these and the contiguous ultraviolet (UV) and infrared wavelengths. Diseases of the eye in which sunlight has been implicated have been termed the ophthalmohelioses, and these conditions pose a significant problem to the eye health of many communities. The ophthalmohelioses have a tremendous impact on patients' quality of life and have significant implications on the cost of health care. Although cataract is not entirely caused by insolation, it now seems certain that sunlight plays a contributory role-cataract extraction is one of the, if not the most, commonly performed surgical procedures in many societies. Pterygium, typically afflicting a younger population, adds a tremendous burden, both human and financial, in many countries. We review evidence that peripheral light focusing by the anterior eye to the sites of usual locations of pterygium and cataract plays a role in the pathogenesis of these conditions. Recognition of the light pathways involved with foci at stem cell niches has directed our investigations into inflammatory and matrix metalloproteinase-related pathophysiologic mechanisms. An understanding of the intracellular mechanisms involved has provided some insight into how medical treatments have been developed for the effective management of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. The concept of peripheral light focusing has also provided direction in the prevention of these diseases. This has resulted in improved sunglass design and the further development of UV-blocking contact lenses. With the development of ocular UV fluorescence photographic techniques, we have been able to demonstrate preclinical ocular surface evidence of solar damage. Evidence that diet may play a role in the development of certain conditions is reviewed. The conundrum of the public health message about solar exposure is also reviewed, and in this context, the potential role of vitamin D deficiency is summarized. The eye may play a role in the development of individualized assessment techniques of solar damage, perhaps allowing us to provide better advice to both individuals and populations.

Inhibition of lens photodamage by UV-absorbing contact lenses

PURPOSE

To determine whether class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses protect against UVB radiation-induced damage in a human lens epithelial cell line (HLE B-3) and postmortem human lenses using a proteomics approach.

METHODS

HLE B-3 cells were exposed to 6.4 mW/cm(2) UVB radiation at 302 nm for 2 minutes (768 mJ/cm(2)) with or without covering by senofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses or lotrafilcon A non-UV-blocking (lotrafilcon A has some UV-blocking ability, albeit minimal) contact lenses. Control cells were not exposed to UVB radiation. Four hours after treatment, cells were analyzed by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry, and changes in protein abundance were quantified. F-actin and microtubule cytoskeletons were examined by fluorescence staining. In addition, human donor lenses were exposed to UVB radiation at 302 nm for 4 minutes (1536 mJ/cm(2)). Cortical and epithelial cell proteins were scraped from lens surfaces and subjected to the same protein analyses.

RESULTS

Senofilcon A lenses were beneficial for protecting HLE B-3 cells against UVB radiation-induced changes in caldesmon 1 isoform, lamin A/C transcript variant 1, DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide, β-actin, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), annexin A2, triose phosphate isomerase, and ubiquitin B precursor. These contact lenses also prevented actin and microtubule cytoskeleton changes typically induced by UVB radiation. Conversely, non-UV-blocking contact lenses were not protective. UVB-irradiated human lenses showed marked reductions in αA-crystallin, αB-crystallin, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, βS-crystallin, βB2-crystallin, and G3PDH, and UV-absorbing contact lenses significantly prevented these alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Senofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses largely prevented UVB-induced changes in protein abundance in lens epithelial cells and in human lenses.

The entrance pupil of the human eye: a three-dimensional model as a function of viewing angle

Precise peripheral ocular measurements have become important in vision research. These measurements are influenced by the shape and position of the peripherally observed entrance pupil. A long-held assumption is that its apparent shape is elliptical and is optically centered in its position. Our three-dimensional model shows that as viewing angle increases, the entrance pupil moves forward, tilts and curves towards the observer's direction. Moreover, the tangential pupil size narrows and exhibits asymmetric distortions. Consequently, its shape is non-elliptical and its geometric mid-point departs from the optical center. These findings may have implications on the accuracy of peripheral ocular measurements.