Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast

Testing the visual field of children and adults with Rarebit: The role of task repetition on sensitivity

Rarebit is a simple and user-friendly perimetry that tests the visual field by using tiny supra-threshold dot stimuli. It appears to be especially useful for examining the visual field of children who are under 12 years of age. However, previous data showed that the number of errors was higher in children than adults. We ask whether the different number of errors in these two groups depended on task learning and whether it may be accounted for by sensitivity differences or a response bias. Thirty-one children between 9 and 12 years of age and thirty-nine adults were tested three times with Rarebit perimetry. A bias-free sensitivity index, d', rather than the simple hit rate, revealed a group difference that remained after extensive task repetition. Indeed, d' increased with task learning in a similar way in the two groups so that group difference remained after practice. The response bias differed in the two groups, being conservative in the older group (criterion C >0) and liberal in the younger (criterion C < 0). Both biases disappeared with task learning in the third session, suggesting that response bias cannot account for the group difference in sensitivity after practice. When bias-free measures of sensitivity are used and task learning effects are minimized, Rarebit perimetry may be a more valuable method than simple mean hit rate (MHR) to enlighten sensitivity differences in the visual field assessment within the pediatric population.

Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability

BACKGROUND

We aim to establish normative values and evaluate test-retest variability for the central and foveal field tests of version 4 of rarebit perimetry.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study undertaken in collaboration between Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, and Singapore Polytechnic.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four normal subjects were recruited and included in the study.

METHODS

Subjects underwent rarebit perimetry testing, studying the central and foveal fields. All subjects repeated the test within 1 month of the initial visit. The 'mean hit rates' of one eye of every subject were analysed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean hit rates of subjects were analysed to establish normative values for the central and foveal fields. Test-retest variability was also analysed.

RESULTS

Overall normative mean hit rates were 86.3 ± 13.95% for the central field and 91.6 ± 6.35% for the foveal field. For every increasing year of age, we found a 0.47% decrease in the central mean hit rates (P < 0.001). Normative mean hit rate for central and foveal fields were 90.6 ± 12.3% and 98.2 ± 3.7% respectively, in 'young' subjects, and 81.9 ± 15.6% and 85.0 ± 9.0% respectively, in 'mature' subjects. We found no significant test-retest variability in the foveal field (P = 0.554). There was significant test-retest variability in the central field (P < 0.001), but the difference was a 3.5 unit mean hit rate increase, which may be clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Rarebit perimetry is repeatable and reliable. We have established normative values for two age groups.

Macular structure and function and the development of retinopathy in diabetes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between structural and functional changes identified with the Rarebit fovea test (RFT) in diabetic patients over two years. In addition, we evaluated whether the RFT changes at baseline can predict vascular changes detectable by conventional screening methods four to six years later.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with diabetes and 42 age-matched healthy subjects underwent an initial examination. Two years later, 25 of the diabetic patients and 20 of the controls were re-examined in the same way. Four to six years later, 40 of the diabetic patients underwent a standard screening examination including fundus photography. After two years, all subjects were examined with the RFT and visual acuity (VA) was assessed. In addition, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography were performed on the diabetic patients. At a screening examination of the diabetic patients after four to six years, fundus photographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

After two years, a marked difference in RFT results was observed between the 20 normal subjects and the 25 patients with diabetes. Results from other tests (VA and central retinal thickness, as measured with OCT) were unchanged compared with the initial examinations. Fundus photography four to six years later of 40 of the 42 diabetic patients showed an increased incidence of retinopathy unrelated to the RFT findings at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in the current study indicate that the RFT might detect macular dysfunction in diabetic eyes without microvascular changes. This dysfunction increased during a two-year period and presumably reflects neural impairment in diabetes mellitus but did not predict development of retinopathy during the four to six year period.

Association of visual function and ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and no or minimal diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) classically presents with micro-aneurysms, small haemorrhages and/or lipoprotein exudates. Several studies have indicated that neural loss occurs in DR even before vascular damage can be observed. This study evaluated the possible relationship between structure (spectral domain-optical coherence tomography) and function (Rarebit visual field test) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and no or minimal diabetic retinopathy (DR). Results demonstrated loss of macular visual function and corresponding thinning of the ganglion cell layer (GCL) in the pericentral area of the macula of diabetic patients (Rs = 0.65, p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, GCL thickness remained an independent predictor of decreased visual function (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Early DR seems to include a neurodegenerative component.

Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of cataract on rarebit perimetry and the fovea test.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients scheduled for cataract surgery (mean age 63.0 +/- 7.9 years) were examined prior to and after cataract surgery with a complete ophthalmological examination. In addition, the rarebit perimetry (RBP) and the rarebit fovea test (RFT) were performed.

RESULTS

Best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA, expressed in minimum angle of resolution (MAR)], RBP and RFT mean hit rate (MHR) improved significantly after cataract surgery. The relative pre-postsurgery difference was larger in the RFT [2.1 standard deviations (SDs)] compared to in BCVA (0.78 SDs). Seven patients had good BCVA (< or = 1.25) and RBP (83-99%) but low RFT (0-66%) before surgery. One patient with low preoperative BCVA (2.5) had a normal RFT (94%).

CONCLUSION

Cataract influenced both the RFT and RBP test, albeit the former more than the latter. The influence of cataract on RFT results, even when visual acuity is decreased only moderately, has to be taken into account when evaluating foveal function in patients with cataract. The larger relative change in RFT compared to BCVA values is thought to indicate that RFT is more sensitive for the effect of cataract. Therefore, RFT appears to be a sensitive test for visual disturbance and can presumably provide additional information at the preoperative evaluation of the patient.

Foveal function in children treated for amblyopia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate foveal function, using three different methods, in children treated for monocular amblyopia.

METHODS

A sample of 24 otherwise healthy children with treated amblyopia and an age-matched control group of 25 healthy children were examined for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using a standard decimal (KM) chart and the computerized TriVA method at 50% and 10% contrasts. Foveal function was also measured with the rarebit fovea test (RFT), which is included in the rarebit perimetry program package. This test uses very small and bright dots against a dark background. The result is expressed as mean hit rate (MHR).

RESULTS

Amblyopic eyes showed significantly lower BCVA when evaluated with the KM chart and with the TriVA test at different contrast levels, compared with both fellow eyes and control eyes. No statistically significant difference between amblyopic and fellow eyes was found when foveal function was evaluated with the RFT (median MHRs 91.5% and 94.5%, respectively), although results for both amblyopic and fellow eyes were statistically lower than those of the control group (median MHR 97%) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). This might indicate that the RFT provides different information about foveal function than conventional VA tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in the current study accord with those of other studies reporting abnormalities in the fellow eyes of previously treated amblyopic patients. These findings may reflect a general disturbance in the visual system rather than a monocular adaptation to refractive error or ocular motor disturbance.

The relationship between Rarebit perimetry and OCT-derived retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in glaucoma

PURPOSE

To examine the association between measures of neuroretinal matrix integrity as determined with Rarebit perimetry and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived retinal nerve fibre layer thickness.

METHODS

One randomly selected eye of 30 White primary open-angle glaucoma patients (age: 60.9 +/- 11.7 years; MD: -3.2 +/- 5.1 dB) and 16 healthy White individuals (age: 33.2 +/- 6.4 years; MD: -0.8 +/- 0.8 dB) were included in the study. Participants underwent Rarebit perimetry testing (central field, software version 4) and an OCT fast retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) scan. Correlation was investigated between hemifield Rarebit scores and the corresponding RNFL values, as well as between global Rarebit scores and the respective RNFL measures.

RESULTS

Statistically significant correlations of average hit rate (HR) < 90 and mean hit rate (MHR) were detected with Max-Min and average thickness (Pearson's r ranging from 0.393 to 0.474). Number HR < 90 showed a moderate correlation only with Max-Min (r = -0.396, P = 0.030). Regarding the association between hemifield hit rates and the corresponding OCT thickness parameters, only inferior maximum correlated moderately with HR superior (r = 0.385, P = 0.035). A tendency was detected for the relationship of superior maximum with HR inferior (r = 0.345, P = 0.062). For the control group, no significant correlation was found for any of the global or hemifield indices and the corresponding thickness values.

CONCLUSION

Although Rarebit perimetry is based on a physiological principle distinctly different from conventional perimetry, it provides global indicators of neuroretinal matrix integrity that correlate with some OCT-derived RNFL thickness measures.

Fixation stability during Rarebit Fovea Test

BACKGROUND

Unstable fixation has been reported to be a common cause of unreliable results in perimetry. The Rarebit Fovea Test (RFT) is a computerised foveal function test that evaluates the 4 x 3 degrees central visual field, using very small test stimuli. To minimise the test time, no fixation control is used. Instead, stable fixation is facilitated by the use of a dynamic fixation target. The aim of the current study was to evaluate fixation stability during a RFT examination by continuous recording of the eye movements.

METHOD

Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled in the study together with two amblyopic subjects. A three-dimensional eye tracker was used to measure eye movements during two test sessions. All subjects went through one session of fixation measurement with stimulus presentation and one session without stimulus presentation. Both sessions lasted approximately 90 seconds.

RESULTS

Mean hit rate (MHR) in the whole group was 89.7 per cent. Five out of 14 subjects had abnormal RFT results. There was no significant difference in fixation stability either between the test sessions with and without stimulus presentations (p = 0.79) or between the subjects with abnormal (n = 5) and normal (n = 11) MHR, (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Fixation seems stable during RFT testing, thus the test design and fixation target used in the RFT could be considered adequate, at least in subjects with normal or near normal visual function. Further studies are needed to evaluate how different visual abnormalities will affect fixation stability during RFT testing.

Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension

PURPOSE

To test the capability of rarebit perimetry (RP), a recent non-conventional perimetric technique, in detecting early functional damage in subjects with ocular hypertension (OHT) and to compare RP findings with those obtained by frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry.

METHODS

Thirty patients with OHT were matched with 30 healthy subjects. All were tested with RP and FDT. Frequency-doubling technology mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), as well as RP mean hit rate (MHR), of the two groups were analyzed. The agreement between the two techniques was tested by Kappa analysis.

RESULTS

In the OHT group the mean (SD) FDT MD was 0.5 (2.1), the mean (SD) FDT PSD was 4.2 (1.6), and the mean (SD) RP MHR was 81.4 (6.7). In the control group, corresponding values were mean (SD) FDT MD 1.1 (1.4), mean (SD) FDT PSD 3.0 (0.3), mean (SD) RP MHR 96.2 (2.0). The differences between the two groups were not significant for the studied indexes. Eleven (36.6%) out of the 30 OHT eyes had abnormal RP results; 12 (40.0%) eyes had abnormal FDT results. Five (16.6%) eyes had abnormal RP and FDT findings. Only 1 eye (3.3%) in the control group had abnormal RP results and 3 eyes (10.0%) had abnormal FDT results. RP and FDT showed a moderate agreement (Kappa=0.43; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

RP and FDT showed VF defects not shown in standard automated perimetry in the OHT group. This may be indicative of an increased risk in developing glaucoma, even if a gold standard for detecting subtle defects is not currently available. RP has the additional advantage of not requiring any expensive device to be used. The poor agreement between these techniques in identifying eyes with early damage warrants further investigations. Large longitudinal studies are needed before defining the role of RP in early glaucoma diagnosis.

Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients

AIMS

To compare the efficiency of Rarebit perimetry and the Humphrey field analyser (HFA) in detecting the homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients with occipital lobe infarcts.

METHODS

40 patients who suffered from visual complaints caused by acute occipital lobe infarcts underwent visual field analysis on the same day, in random order-first with either Humphrey perimetry 30-2, SITA standard program (Zeiss Humphrey Systems) or Rarebit perimetry. A visual field was classified into four quadrants for right and left eyes: superior temporal, superior nasal, inferior temporal, and inferior nasal. The entire mean hit rate numbers (MHR) and mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD) values were compared for each quadrant of each eye.

RESULTS

The results of Rarebit MHR and HFA mean deviation values for each quadrant of the right and left eyes were highly correlated in all patients with homonymous hemianopia (Pearson's r correlation coefficients for superior temporal, superior nasal, inferior temporal and inferior nasal quadrants of right and left eyes were 0.827, 0.833, 0.843, 0851 and 0.746, 0821, 0882, 0.824, respectively (p<0.001 for all quadrants)). There was a strong correlation between Rarebit MHR and HFA PSD for each quadrant of both eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Rarebit perimetry is rapid, reliable, and easily performed in patients with homonymous hemianopia. It can be done using a simple software program and simple hardware and it readily detects severe visual loss in patients with occipital lobe lesions.

Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea: normative data for the Rarebit Foveal Test

BACKGROUND

Conventional visual tests are not sensitive enough to detect low degree neural damage, as 6/6 (1.0) visual acuity can be upheld with less than two-thirds of the normal number of optic nerve axons. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the physiologic properties of a new computerised test, the Rarebit Fovea Test (RFT), using very small stimuli, by quantifying the effect of age and binocular summation in relation to stimulus luminance.

METHODS

The RFT relies on the perception of very small (less than 0.5 minutes of arc) bright stimuli. Two different experiments were performed. 1. Thirty-five subjects (age 19 to 63 years) were tested with five different stimulus luminances, 158, 64, 53, 41 and 33 cd/m(2). 2. Nineteen subjects (age 19 to 63 years) were tested using binocular stimulation to define the binocular summation.

RESULTS

Significantly reduced median hit rates were observed at luminances of 53 cd/m(2) or below. Age and mean hit rate correlated negatively at all luminance levels below 158 cd/m(2). The mean hit rate from binocular stimulation, compared to the highest value from monocular stimulation in the same subject, was increased by a factor of 1.54 +/- 0.45 (SD). No age effect was found regarding binocular summation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results in the current study indicate that RFT can identify some of the well-known features of the visual system, that is, the effects of age and binocular summation, provided that the stimulus luminance is adequately selected.