Transient cardiac ischaemia and abnormal variations in systemic blood pressure in unselected primary open angle glaucoma patients

Girl Power in Glaucoma: The Role of Estrogen in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Estrogen is essential in maintaining various physiological features in women, and a decline in estrogen levels are known to give rise to numerous unfortunate symptoms associated with menopause. To alleviate these symptoms hormone replacement therapy with estrogen is often used, and has been shown to be fruitful in improving quality of life in women suffering from postmenopausal discomforts. An often forgotten condition associated with menopause is the optic nerve disorder, glaucoma. Thus, estrogen may also have an impact in maintaining the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which make up the optic nerve, thereby preventing glaucomatous neurodegeneration. This review aims to provide an overview of possible associations of estrogen and the glaucoma subtype, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), by evaluating the current literature through a PubMed-based literature search. Multiple in vitro and in vivo studies of RGC protection, as well as clinical and epidemiological data concerning the well-defined retinal neurodegenerative disorder POAG have been reviewed. Over all, deficiencies in retinal estrogen may potentially instigate RGC loss, visual disability, and eventual blindness. Estrogen replacement therapy may therefore be a beneficial future treatment. However, more studies are needed to confirm the relevance of estrogen in glaucoma prevention.

Heart rate variability: the comparison between high tension and normal tension glaucoma

RELEVANCE

Vascular factors may be involved in the development of both high tension glaucoma (HTG) and normal tension (NTG) glaucoma; however, they may be not exactly the same. Autonomic dysfunction characterized by heart rate variability (HRV) is one of the possible reasons of decrease in mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP).

PURPOSE

To compare the shift of the HRV parameters in NTG and HTG patients after a cold provocation test (CPT).

METHODS

MOPP, 24-hour blood pressure and HRV were studied in 30 NTG, 30 HTG patients, and 28 healthy subjects. The cardiovascular fitness assessment was made before and after the CPT. The direction and magnitude of the average group shifts of the HRV parameters after CPT were assessed using the method of comparing regression lines in order to reveal the difference between the groups.

RESULTS

MOPP and minimum daily diastolic blood pressure were decreased in HTG and NTG patients compared to healthy subjects. There was no difference in MOPP between HTG and NTG before the CPT. However, all HRV parameters reflected the predominance of sympathetic innervation in glaucoma patients compared to healthy subjects (P < 0.05).Before the CPT, the standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) of HRV was lower in HTG compared to NTG, 27.2 ± 4.1 ms and 35.33 ± 2.43 ms (P = 0.02), respectively. After the CPT, SDNN decreased in NTG by 1.7 ms and increased in HTG and healthy subjects by 5.0 ms and 7.09 ms, respectively (P < 0.05). The analysis of relative shift of other HRV parameters after the CPT also revealed a significant difference between NTG and HTG in regard to the predominance of sympathetic innervation in NTG compared to HTG.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NTG have more pronounced disturbance of autonomic nervous system than HTG patients, which is manifested with the activation of sympathetic nervous system in response to CPT. This finding refers to the NTG pathogenesis and suggests the use of HRV assessment in glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.

Recommendations for analysis of repeated-measures designs: testing and correcting for sphericity and use of manova and mixed model analysis

PURPOSE

A common experimental design in ophthalmic research is the repeated-measures design in which at least one variable is a within-subject factor. This design is vulnerable to lack of 'sphericity' which assumes that the variances of the differences among all possible pairs of within-subject means are equal. Traditionally, this design has been analysed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-anova) but increasingly more complex methods such as multivariate anova (manova) and mixed model analysis (MMA) are being used. This article surveys current practice in the analysis of designs incorporating different factors in research articles published in three optometric journals, namely Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (OPO), Optometry and Vision Science (OVS), and Clinical and Experimental Optometry (CXO), and provides advice to authors regarding the analysis of repeated-measures designs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Of the total sample of articles, 66% used a repeated-measures design. Of those articles using a repeated-measures design, 59% and 8% analysed the data using RM-anova or manova respectively and 33% used MMA. The use of MMA relative to RM-anova has increased significantly since 2009/10. A further search using terms to select those papers testing and correcting for sphericity ('Mauchly's test', 'Greenhouse-Geisser', 'Huynh and Feld') identified 66 articles, 62% of which were published from 2012 to the present.

SUMMARY

If the design is balanced without missing data then manova should be used rather than RM-anova as it gives better protection against lack of sphericity. If the design is unbalanced or with missing data then MMA is the method of choice. However, MMA is a more complex analysis and can be difficult to set up and run, and care should be taken first, to define appropriate models to be tested and second, to ensure that sample sizes are adequate.