Evaluation of discomfort of Goldmann tonometry without anaesthetic

Multimodal Heartbeat and Compression Optical Coherence Elastography for Mapping Corneal Biomechanics

The biomechanical properties of the cornea have a profound influence on the health, structural integrity, and function of the eye. Understanding these properties may be critical for diagnosis and identifying disease pathogenesis. This work demonstrates how two different elastography techniques can be combined for a multimodal approach to measuring corneal biomechanical properties. Heartbeat optical coherence elastography (Hb-OCE) and compression OCE were performed simultaneously to measure the stiffness of the cornea in an in vivo rabbit model. Measurements were further performed after collagen crosslinking to demonstrate how the combined technique can be used to measure changes in corneal stiffness and map mechanical contrast. The results of this work further suggest that measurements from Hb-OCE and compression OCE are comparable, meaning that Hb-OCE and compression OCE may be used interchangeably despite distinct differences in both techniques.

Compressional Optical Coherence Elastography of the Cornea

Assessing the biomechanical properties of the cornea is crucial for detecting the onset and progression of eye diseases. In this work, we demonstrate the application of compression-based optical coherence elastography (OCE) to measure the biomechanical properties of the cornea under various conditions, including validation in an in situ rabbit model and a demonstration of feasibility for in vivo measurements. Our results show a stark increase in the stiffness of the corneas as IOP was increased. Moreover, UV-A/riboflavin corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) also dramatically increased the stiffness of the corneas. The results were consistent across 4 different scenarios (whole CXL in situ, partial CXL in situ, whole CXL in vivo, and partial CXL in vivo), emphasizing the reliability of compression OCE to measure corneal biomechanical properties and its potential for clinical applications.

Statistical guidelines for clinical studies of human vision

Statistical analysis of data can be complex and different statisticians may disagree as to the correct approach leading to conflict between authors, editors, and reviewers. The objective of this article is to provide some statistical advice for contributors to optometric and ophthalmic journals, to provide advice specifically relevant to clinical studies of human vision, and to recommend statistical analyses that could be used in a variety of circumstances. In submitting an article, in which quantitative data are reported, authors should describe clearly the statistical procedures that they have used and to justify each stage of the analysis. This is especially important if more complex or 'non-standard' analyses have been carried out. The article begins with some general comments relating to data analysis concerning sample size and 'power', hypothesis testing, parametric and non-parametric variables, 'bootstrap methods', one and two-tail testing, and the Bonferroni correction. More specific advice is then given with reference to particular statistical procedures that can be used on a variety of types of data. Where relevant, examples of correct statistical practice are given with reference to recently published articles in the optometric and ophthalmic literature.