The effects of hyoscine and anticholinesterases on cholinergic transmission to the smooth muscle cells of the avian gizzard

Pharmacological properties of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic inhibitory transmission in chicken gizzard

1. Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory transmission in chicken gizzard was studied by use of intracellular microelectrode techniques. Changes in membrane potential in response to NANC nerve stimulation were recorded in the gizzard smooth muscle pretreated with atropine (1 microM) and guanethidine (1 microM). 2. Field stimulation of the intramural nerves (FS) evoked inhibitory junction potentials (i.j.ps) which were abolished by tetrodotoxin (1 microM), but not inhibited at all by K+ channel blockers including apamin (0.5 microM), tetraethylammonium (TEA, 10 mM), charybdotoxin (0.2 microM) and glibenclamide (10 microM). 3. NG-nitro-L-arginine (3 mM), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, inhibited i.j.ps. The effect was reversed by L-arginine (3 mM), but not by D-arginine (3 mM). 4. 8-Bromo cyclic GMP (100 microM), a membrane permeable analogue of cyclic GMP, produced a membrane hyperpolarization which was blocked by TEA (10 mM) or glibenclamide (10 microM). 5. NO at concentrations of up to 400 microM affected neither i.j.ps nor resting membrane potential. On the other hand, NO (80 microM) caused the membrane to hyperpolarize in the smooth muscle of guinea-pig ileum. 6. These results suggest that in the chicken gizzard, NANC i.j.ps may not arise from opening of conventional types of K+ channel and that NO seems unlikely to be involved in the generation of i.j.ps. A possible mechanism by which the inhibitory effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine on i.j.ps was brought about will be discussed.

Development of vagal innervation to the muscle of the avian gizzard

The development of the vagal innervation to the gizzard has been investigated in chick embryos and young chicks. The membrane potential, first measurable on the 15th day of incubation, was -54 +/- 0.5 mV and increased with development to -67 +/- 0.4 mV. The latter value was attained 5 days after hatching and persisted thereafter. Stimulation of intramural nerves elicited a cholinergic, excitatory junction potential (EJP) for the first time, only in a small fraction of cells, on the 20th day of incubation. Within 3 days after hatching, cholinergic transmission showed the same features as in older chicks. Stimulation of the vagus nerve elicited no membrane potential responses before hatching but as early as 4 days after hatching, non-adrenergic, inhibitory junction potentials (IJPs) were evoked. In the next 10 days or so, the IJP was replaced with a cholinergic EJP as seen in mature tissues. After atropine (0.1-1 microM) treatment, both vagal and intramural nerve stimulation evoked a non-adrenergic IJP in a small fraction of cells immediately after hatching. The fraction of cells exhibiting the IJP increased with growth and reached 100% 5 days after hatching. Hexamethonium (50 or 100 microM) abolished the vagally-evoked EJPs. The vagally-evoked IJPs remained unchanged after application of hexamethonium in the early days after hatching, but later they were abolished in about half of the cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Some characteristics of transmission from non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic excitatory nerves to the smooth muscle of the chicken

Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic excitatory junction potentials (e.j.p.s) were recorded from the longitudinal muscle cells of the chicken rectum following stimulation of the nerve of Remak and field stimulation of intramural nerves. The amplitude of e.j.p.s was a direct function of the stimulus intensity. When peak depolarization of an e.j.p. reached threshold, a muscle action potential was evoked. When the extrinsic nerve was stimulated with a given stimulus intensity, the e.j.p.s recorded from different cells showed little change in amplitude and time-course, reached their peaks in 74 ms and declined to half their amplitudes in 230 ms. These corresponding values for the e.j.p.s in response to field stimulation were 51 ms and 159 ms respectively, but became larger as the microelectrode was moved away from the stimulating site. The amplitude became smaller also and the distance at which the e.j.p. declined to half its control amplitude was 4.3 mm. The time constant for the exponential decay phase of the e.j.p. was the same as the time constant for the muscle membrane. Facilitation of e.j.p. amplitude occurred during repetitive nerve stimulation; however, the facilitation was accompanied frequently by an initial depression phase during extrinsic nerve stimulation.

Comparative studies of purinergic nerves

Purinergic nerves supply the gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates, including fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds, as well as mammals. Their cell bodies are located in Auerbach's plexus and their axons extend in an anal direction before innervating mainly the circular muscle coat. In the stomach they are controlled by preganglionic cholinergic fibres of parasympathetic origin. They are involved in "receptive relaxation" of the stomach, "descending inhibition" in peristalsis and reflex relaxation of oesophageal and internal anal sphincters. The terminal varicosities of purinergic nerves are characterised by a predominance of "large opaque vesicles," which can be distinguished from the "large granular vesicles" found in small numbers in both adrenergic and cholinergic nerves. Stimulation of purinergic nerves with single pulses produces hyperpolarisations of up to 25 mV (inhibitory junction potentials) in smooth muscle cells. These potentials are unaffected by atropine, adrenergic neuron blocking agents or sympathetic denervation, but are abolished by tetrodotoxin. The "rebound contraction" which characteristically follows cessation of purinergic nerve stimulation is probably due to prostaglandin. Evidence that ATP is the transmitter released from purinergic nerves includes: (1) synthesis and storage of ATP in nerves; (2) release of ATP from the nerves when they are stimulated; (3) exogenously applied ATP mimicking the action of nerve-released transmitter, both producing a specific increase in K+ conductance; (4) the presence of Mg-activated ATPase, 5'-nucleotidase and adenosine deaminase, enzymes which inactivate ATP; (5) drugs (including quinidine, some 2-substituted imidazolines, 2-2'pyridylisatogen and dipyridamole) which produce similar blocking or potentiating effects on the response to exogenously applied ATP and nerve stimulation. Speculations are made about the evolution and development of the nervous system, including the possibility that purinergic nerves are a primitive nerve type.