Antagonism by some antihistamines of the amino acid-evoked responses recorded from the lobster muscle fibre and the frog spinal cord

Histamine H3 Receptors Expressed in Ventral Horns Modulate Spinal Motor Output

Motoneuron activity is modulated by histamine receptors. While H₁ and H₂ receptors have been widely explored, H₃ histamine receptors (H₃Rs) have not been sufficiently characterized. This paper targets the effects of the selective activation of H₃Rs and their expression on the membranes of large ventral horn cells. The application of selective pharmacological agents to spinal cords isolated from neonatal rats was used to identify the presence of functional H₃Rs on the membrane of physiologically identified lumbar motoneurons. Intra and extracellular recordings revealed that H₃R agonist, α-methylhistamine, depolarized both single motoneurons and ventral roots, even in the presence of tetrodotoxin, an effect prevented by H₃R antagonist, thioperamide. Finally, immunohistochemistry located the expression of H₃Rs on a subpopulation of large cells in lamina IX. This study identifies H₃Rs as a new exploitable pharmacological target against motor disturbances.

Histamine modulates spinal motoneurons and locomotor circuits

Spinal motoneurons and locomotor networks are regulated by monoamines, among which, the contribution of histamine has yet to be fully addressed. The present study investigates histaminergic regulation of spinal activity, combining intra- and extracellular electrophysiological recordings from neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro preparations. Histamine dose-dependently and reversibly generated motoneuron depolarization and action potential firing. Histamine (20 µM) halved the area of dorsal root reflexes and always depolarized motoneurons. The majority of cells showed a transitory repolarization, while 37% showed a sustained depolarization maintained with intense firing. Extracellularly, histamine depolarized ventral roots (VRs), regardless of blockage of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Initial, transient glutamate-mediated bursting was synchronous among VRs, with some bouts of locomotor activity in a subgroup of preparations. After washout, the amplitude of spontaneous tonic discharges increased. No desensitization or tachyphylaxis appeared after long perfusion or serial applications of histamine. On the other hand, histamine induced single motoneuron and VR depolarization, even in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX). During chemically induced fictive locomotion (FL), histamine depolarized VRs. Histamine dose-dependently increased rhythm periodicity and reduced cycle amplitude until near suppression. This study demonstrates that histamine induces direct motoneuron membrane depolarization and modulation of locomotor output, indicating new potential targets for locomotor neurorehabilitation.

Analysis of histamine as a hair-cell transmitter in the lateral line of Xenopus laevis

The actions of histamine and histamine antagonists on afferent nerve activity were investigated in the lateral line of Xenopus laevis. Histamine (0.002-2.0 mM) had no effect on spontaneous activity or excitatory responses to water motion. In contrast, pyrilamine, an H1 receptor antagonist, suppressed spontaneous activity beginning at 0.01-0.05 mM. Below 0.3 mM the suppression was often preceded by a small excitatory response and responses to high (24-30 dB re threshold), but not low (0-18 dB) levels of water motion were selectively suppressed. Higher concentrations (0.3-2.0 mM) abolished spontaneous activity and suppressed responses at all levels of water motion. Cimetidine, an H2 receptor antagonist, had similar actions but was one-tenth as potent as pyrilamine. Tetrodotoxin (0.001-0.1 microM), which blocks voltage-sensitive Na+ channels, mimicked the suppressive effects of the histamine antagonists. Histamine (2.0 mM) failed to block the actions of pyrilamine (0.1 mM) indicating its effects are mediated through a mechanism other than histamine receptors. In addition, pyrilamine (0.05-0.1 mM) non-selectively suppressed excitation to exogenously applied L-glutamate (1.0-2.0 mM), L-aspartate (1.0-2.0 mM), kainate (0.005-0.01 mM), and quisqualate (0.002-0.005 mM) and altered responses to N-methyl-D-aspartate (0.5-1.0 mM). The results are inconsistent with histamine being a transmitter in the Xenopus lateral line and reveal that the actions of histamine antagonists are nonspecific, possibly due, in part, to blockade of voltage-sensitive Na+ channels.

Trimethaphan as a glutamate inhibitor at the crayfish neuromuscular junction

At the crayfish neuromuscular junction trimethaphan reduced the amplitude of both the glutamate-induced synaptic current and the excitatory junctional current in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations greater than 5 microM. These effects were dependent on membrane potential. Trimethaphan did not affect the inhibitory junctional potential and the input resistance of the opener muscle. The dose-response curves for inhibition of glutamate responses by trimethaphan suggest that trimethaphan is not a competitive glutamate antagonist. A quantum analysis of extracellularly recorded excitatory junctional potentials showed that trimethaphan decreased both quantum content and average unit size. Trimethaphan also prolonged the glutamate currents evoked by both short and prolonged ionophoretic currents, but the decay of nerve-evoked synaptic currents was accelerated by the drug. Three explanations worthy of consideration to explain the action of trimethaphan are the responses of extra-junctional receptors, the sudden release and short actions of the neurotransmitter in contrast with the progressive application and long exposure of exogenous agonists to receptors, and discrimination of glutamate and excitatory transmitter in the crayfish neuromuscular junction. The second of these possibilities is mainly discussed at length.

Further observations on the interaction between glutamate and aspartate on lobster muscle

1 The ability of bath-applied L-glutamate to enhance subsequent depolarizations produced by bath-applied L-aspartate on lobster muscle was further investigated by means of intracellular recording techniques. 2. Increasing the conditioning glutamate concentration or exposure time produced a greater enhancement of aspartate responses. Enhancement was also dependent on the time interval between glutamate and aspartate doses and was not prevented by overnight storage of preparations in vitro. 3. The dose-depolarization curve for enhanced aspartate responses (measured at a fixed time following a given dose of glutamate) was displaced to the left along the abscissa scale relative to control, with no detectable change in limiting log-log slope. 4. Conditioning doses of kainate or domoate (but not quisqualate, aspartate, or KCl) also enhanced aspartate responses; however, their conditioning effect was little affected by increasing the concentration, exposure time, or time interval before applying aspartate. The rate of onset and decline of the enhanced aspartate response always resembled that of the previous conditioning agonist. 5. D and L-Aspartate were approximately equieffective depolarizing agents whereas D-glutamate was approximately 1/40 as potent as L-glutamate. After a conditioning dose of D or L-glutamate, responses to D or L-aspartate were enhanced. 6. In a Na+-free (Li+) medium, both the glutamate depolarization and the conditioning effect towards aspartate were largely abolished. With kainate however, Na+ was not apparently important either for evoking the kainate response or for producing the conditioning effect. 7. Bath-applied glutamate greatly enhanced and prolonged the time course of the iontophoretic aspartate potential with only a small effect on the glutamate potential; however, these effects were not maintained after washout of glutamate. In contrast, bath-application of aspartate depressed the aspartate potential while enhancing the glutamate potential. Some sites that were insensitive to iontophoretically-applied aspartate became clearly responsive to this agent during a bath-application of glutamate. 8. It is proposed that during conditioning with bath-applied glutamate, kainate or domoate, some agonist is trapped by extrajunctional sites and is subsequently displaced by bath-applied aspartate to produce the long-term enhancement effect.