The effect of an inhibitory factor from the bovine retractor penis on the gastro-intestinal tract and gall bladder of the guinea-pig

Novel autonomic neurotransmitters and upper gastrointestinal function

The evidence for, and possible roles of, inhibitory and excitatory non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) nerves supplying smooth muscle, and the effects of putative transmitter candidates are considered for each of three main regions of the upper gastrointestinal tract: (A) the smooth muscle portion of the oesophagus and the oesophagogastric junction, (B) the stomach (fundus, body and antrum) and gastroduodenal junction and (C) the biliary tract and choledochoduodenal junction. The major points from human tissues are as follows: 1. Inhibitory (NANCI) nerves appear to be present in the muscularis externa of oesophagus, stomach and duodenum, with greater density in the circular than in the longitudinal muscle. 2. NANCI nerves are present in high density at the oesophagogastric and choledochoduodenal junctions. They may also be present at the gastroduodenal junction. The gall-bladder may have a very sparse NANCI innervation. 3. Excitatory (NANCE) nerves appear to be present throughout the upper gastrointestinal tract. 4. Many candidates need at present to be considered for the role of NANCE transmitter(s) in the human upper gastrointestinal tract but substance P still seems a likely contender for this role. 5. Fewer candidates are at present generally available for the role of NANCI transmitter(s), with VIP and ATP being leading contenders. However, in the human upper gastrointestinal tract the evidence for ATP is not good, and VIP still remains the favourite candidate except in the gall-bladder, where its role remains to be elucidated.

Mechanisms underlying electrical and mechanical responses of the bovine retractor penis to inhibitory nerve stimulation and to an inhibitory extract

The response of the bovine retractor penis (BRP) to stimulation of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory nerves and to an inhibitory extract prepared from this muscle have been studied using intracellular microelectrode, sucrose gap and conventional mechanical recording techniques. Both inhibitory nerve stimulation and inhibitory extract hyperpolarized the membrane potential and relaxed spontaneous or guanethidine (3 X 10(-5) M)-induced tone. These effects were accompanied by an increase in membrane resistance. Following membrane potential displacement from an average value of -53 +/- 7 mV (n = 184; Byrne & Muir, 1984) inhibitory potentials to nerve stimulation were abolished at approximately -30 mV; there was no evidence of reversal. Displacement by inward hyperpolarizing current over the range -45 to -60 mV increased the inhibitory response to nerve stimulation and to inhibitory extract; at more negative potential values (above approximately -60 mV) the inhibitory potential decreased and was abolished (approximately -103 mV). There was no evidence of reversal. Removal of [K+]o reversibly reduced hyperpolarization to nerve stimulation and inhibitory extract. No enhancement was observed. Increasing the [K+]o to 20 mM reduced the inhibitory potential to nerve stimulation but this was restored by passive membrane hyperpolarization. Inhibitory potentials were obtained at membrane potential values exceeding that of the estimated EK (-49 mV). [Cl-]o-free or [Cl-]o-deficient solutions reduced and abolished (after some 20-25 min) the hyperpolarization produced by inhibitory nerve stimulation or inhibitory extract. The inhibitory potential amplitude following nerve stimulation was not restored by passive displacement of the membrane potential from -26 to -104 mV approximately. Ouabain (1-5 X 10(-5) M) reduced then (45-60 min later) abolished the inhibitory potential to nerve stimulation. The effects of this drug on the extract were not investigated. It is concluded that the inhibitory response to nerve stimulation and extract in the BRP may involve several ionic species. However, unlike that in gastrointestinal muscles the NANC response in the BRP is accompanied by an increased membrane resistance and does not primarily involve K+. The underlying mechanisms for the inhibitory response to both NANC nerve stimulation and inhibitory extract appear to be similar, compatible with the view that the latter may contain the inhibitory transmitter released from these nerves in this tissue.