The effects of idazoxan and other alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists on urine output in the rat

Effects of imidazoline agents in a rat conditioned place preference model of addiction

Agmatine (AG), idazoxan (IDZ), and efaroxan (EFR) are imidazoline receptor ligands with beneficial effects in central nervous system disorders. The present study aimed to evaluate the interaction between AG, IDZ, and EFR with an opiate, tramadol (TR), in a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. In the experiment, we used five groups with 8 adult male Wistar rats each. During the condition session, on days 2, 4, 6, and 8, the rats received the drugs (saline, or TR, or IDZ and TR, or EFR and TR, or AG and TR) and were placed in their least preferred compartment. On days 1, 3, 5, and 7, the rats received saline in the preferred compartment. In the preconditioning, the preferred compartment was determined. In the postconditioning, the preference for one of the compartments was reevaluated. TR increased the time spent in the non-preferred compartment. AG decreased time spent in the TR-paired compartment. EFR, more than IDZ, reduced the time spent in the TR-paired compartment, but without statistical significance. AG reversed the TR-induced CPP, while EFR and IDZ only decreased the time spent in the TR-paired compartment, without statistical significance.

Possible structural and functional relationships between imidazoline receptors and alpha 2-adrenoceptors

Although it is now well established that imidazoline receptors and alpha 2-adrenoceptors are discrete entities with distinct endogenous ligands, the two receptor classes apparently have several common features. While the catecholamines stimulate alpha 2-adrenoceptors but not imidazoline receptors, agmatine, a guanidine analog that may be an endogenous imidazoline receptor ligand, can interact with both I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors as well as alpha 2-adrenoceptors, although, interestingly, other guanidines such as guanabenz are highly selective for alpha 2-adrenoceptors versus I1 receptors. Most I1 receptor agonists such as moxonidine, rilmenidine, and clonidine can also stimulate alpha 2-adrenoceptors, and the same physiological response is produced by activation of central I1 receptors and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, but their anatomical locations differ. The imidazoline idazoxan is an antagonist at I1, I2, and alpha 2-receptors, but minor structural alterations of idazoxan can result in molecules with selectivity for either alpha 2-adrenoceptors or imidazoline receptors. The precise mode of interaction of imidazoline agonists and antagonists with the alpha 2-adrenoceptor is not yet understood, and structures of the imidazoline receptors are still unknown. Nevertheless, the fact that many agents can stimulate or block both receptor classes, combined with the fact that alpha 2-adrenoceptors and I1 receptors can mediate identical physiological responses, suggests that many common structural features may be present.

Alpha 2-adrenoceptors: more subtypes but fewer functional differences

The proliferation of receptor subtypes based on differences in amino acid sequence does not necessarily coincide with functional differences. The number of alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes, as defined by ligand-binding and molecular studies, has been increasing in the past few years, which suggests the possibility of distinct physiological and pathological pathways that could be targeted by new selective drugs. However, the evidence from functional studies has been less convincing. This could be due to the lack of sufficiently selective ligands or to the similarity between the activated state of receptor subtypes. Species differences and the local receptor environment are also important determinants of the pharmacological profile of a particular subtype. The pharmacology of the putative subtypes of alpha 2-adrenoceptors and their function are discussed in this review by Alison MacKinnon, Mike Spedding and Christine Brown.