Antiarrhythmic action of rilmenidine on adrenaline-induced arrhythmia via central imidazoline receptors in halothane-anaesthetized dogs

Imidazoline Receptor System: The Past, the Present, and the Future

Imidazoline receptors historically referred to a family of nonadrenergic binding sites that recognize compounds with an imidazoline moiety, although this has proven to be an oversimplification. For example, none of the proposed endogenous ligands for imidazoline receptors contain an imidazoline moiety but they are diverse in their chemical structure. Three receptor subtypes (I₁, I₂, and I₃) have been proposed and the understanding of each has seen differing progress over the decades. I₁ receptors partially mediate the central hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs. Moxonidine and rilmenidine have better therapeutic profiles (fewer side effects) than clonidine as antihypertensive drugs, thought to be due to their higher I₁/α ₂-adrenoceptor selectivity. Newer I₁ receptor agonists such as LNP599 [3-chloro-2-methyl-phenyl)-(4-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrol-2-yl)-amine hydrochloride] have little to no activity on α ₂-adrenoceptors and demonstrate promising therapeutic potential for hypertension and metabolic syndrome. I₂ receptors associate with several distinct proteins, but the identities of these proteins remain elusive. I₂ receptor agonists have demonstrated various centrally mediated effects including antinociception and neuroprotection. A new I₂ receptor agonist, CR4056 [2-phenyl-6-(1H-imidazol-1yl) quinazoline], demonstrated clear analgesic activity in a recently completed phase II clinical trial and holds great promise as a novel I₂ receptor-based first-in-class nonopioid analgesic. The understanding of I₃ receptors is relatively limited. Existing data suggest that I₃ receptors may represent a binding site at the Kir6.2-subtype ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells and may be involved in insulin secretion. Despite the elusive nature of their molecular identities, recent progress on drug discovery targeting imidazoline receptors (I₁ and I₂) demonstrates the exciting potential of these compounds to elicit neuroprotection and to treat various disorders such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic pain.

Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with decreased incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after congenital cardiac operations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative tachyarrhythmias remain a common complication after congenital cardiac operations. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, can have a therapeutic role in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias for cardioversion to sinus rhythm or heart rate control. Whether routine perioperative use of DEX decreases the incidence of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias was studied.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 32 pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations received DEX and were compared with 20 control patients who did not receive DEX.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine was started after anesthesia induction and continued intraoperatively and postoperatively for 38±4 hours (mean dose, 0.76±0.04 μg/kg/h). Ten control patients and 2 DEX patients sustained 16 episodes of tachyarrhythmias (p=0.001), including a 25% vs 0% (p=0.01) incidence of ventricular tachycardia and 25% vs 6% (p=0.05) of supraventricular arrhythmias in the control and DEX group, respectively. Transient complete heart block occurred in 2 control patients and in 1 DEX patient. Control patients had a higher heart rate (141±5 vs 127±3 beats/min, p=0.03), more sinus tachycardia episodes (40% vs 6%; p=0.008), required more antihypertensive drugs with nitroprusside (20±7 vs 4±1 μg/kg; p=0.004) and nicardipine (13±5 vs 2±1 μg/kg; p=0.02), and required more fentanyl (39±8 vs 19±3 μg/kg; p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with a significantly decreased incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, without significant adverse effects.

The antiarrhythmic effect of centrally administered rilmenidine involves muscarinic receptors, protein kinase C and mitochondrial signalling pathways

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We have previously demonstrated that stimulation of imidazoline receptors in the CNS prevented halothane-adrenaline arrhythmias during halothane anaesthesia and that stimulation of the vagus nerve may be critical to this effect. However, details of the mechanism(s) involved are not yet available. The present study was designed to examine the role of muscarinic receptors, protein kinase C (PKC), ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K(ATP)) and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) in the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine, an imidazoline receptor agonist.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Rats were anaesthetized with halothane and monitored continuously for arterial blood pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose of adrenaline was defined as the lowest dose producing three or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period. We confirmed that centrally administered rilmenidine prevented halothane-adrenaline arrhythmias and then examined the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine in the presence of atropine methylnitrate, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, calphostin C, a PKC inhibitor, HMR-1098, a sarcolemmal K(ATP) inhibitor, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid, a mitochondrial K(ATP) inhibitor or atractyloside, an MPTP opener.

KEY RESULTS

The antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine was significantly inhibited by atropine methylnitrate, calphostin C, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid and atractyloside, but the effects of HMR-1098 in our model were not clear.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The present results suggest that muscarinic receptors, PKC, mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and MPTP may be crucial components of the mechanism involved in the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine given into the CNS.

Reduced Hemodynamic Responses to Physical and Mental Stress Under Low-Dose Rilmenidine in Healthy Subjects

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system plays a major role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. Rilmenidine is an I(1)-imidazoline receptor agonist that reduces blood pressure by modulation of central sympathetic activity, but the effects of low-dose rilmenidine on the hemodynamic responses to physiological maneuvers that increase adrenergic drive is not known. To assess the effects of low-dose rilmenidine on the hemodynamic responses to stress, 32 healthy subjects (20-56 years old) underwent acute physical exercise (n = 15, individualized ramp protocol on treadmill) and mental stress (n = 17, word color Stroop and mental arithmetics tests) two hours after the oral administration of 0.5 mg of rilmenidine (RIL) or placebo (PLA) following a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study. No subject complained of any side effect. Rilmenidine reduced peak exercise heart rate (PLA: 187 +/- 7; RIL: 181 +/- 9 bpm; P = 0.003), but did not modify peak aerobic power (VO(2max) - PLA: 41.7 +/- 6.2; RIL: 42.3 +/- 6.7 ml/kg/min; P = 0.26). During mental stress, rilmenidine inhibited the peak systolic (PLA: 123 +/- 10; RIL: 114 +/- 8 mmHg; P = 0.02) and diastolic (PLA: 86 +/- 7; RIL: 81 +/- 7 mmHg; P <0.05) blood pressure responses. In conclusion, rilmenidine reduced the hemodynamic response to physical and mental stress stimuli without limiting exercise capacity. These results support the concept that rilmenidine, at a dose lower than the ones recommended to treat hypertension, reduced the myocardial oxygen demand to stress and may carry potential clinical impact.

Identification of the Central Imidazoline Receptor Subtype Involved in Modulation of Halothane-Epinephrine Arrhythmias in Rats

We previously reported that imidazoline receptors in the central nervous system are involved in modulation of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmias. These receptors have been subclassified as I1 and I2 subtypes, but it is not known which receptor subtype is involved in halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. We designed the present study to clarify the involvement of central imidazoline receptor subtype in the modulation of halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. Rats were anesthetized with halothane and monitored continuously for systemic arterial blood pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine was defined as the smallest dose that produces three or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period. Intracisternal moxonidine dose-dependently inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias during halothane anesthesia. Intracisternal efaroxan, a selective I1 antagonist with little affinity for I2 subtype, but not rauwolscine, an alpha2 antagonist without affinity for imidazoline receptors, blocked the antiarrhythmic effect of moxonidine. Intracisternal BU 224 and 2-BFI, selective I2 ligands, also inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias dose-dependently; however, these effects were abolished by efaroxan. We conclude that central I1, but not I2, receptors play an important role in inhibition of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmia.

Protective effects of centrally acting sympathomodulatory drugs on myocardial ischemia induced by sympathetic overactivity in rabbits

It is recognized that an imbalance of the autonomic nervous system is involved in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death during myocardial ischemia. In the present study we investigated the effects of clonidine and rilmenidine, two centrally acting sympathomodulatory drugs, on an experimental model of centrally induced sympathetic hyperactivity in pentobarbital-anesthetized New Zealand albino rabbits of either sex (2-3 kg, N = 89). We also compared the effects of clonidine and rilmenidine with those of propranolol, a beta-blocker, known to induce protective cardiovascular effects in patients with ischemic heart disease. Central sympathetic stimulation was achieved by intracerebroventricular injection of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate (10 micro mol), associated with inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis with L-NAME (40 mg/kg, iv). Glutamate triggered ventricular arrhythmia and persistent ST-segment shifts in the ECG, indicating myocardial ischemia. The intracisternal administration of clonidine (1 microg/kg) and rilmenidine (30 microg/kg) or of a nonhypotensive dose of rilmenidine (3 microg/kg) decreased the incidence of myocardial ischemia (25, 14 and 25%, respectively, versus 60% in controls) and reduced the mortality rate from 40% to 0.0, 0.0 and 12%, respectively. The total number of ventricular premature beats per minute fell from 30 +/- 9 in the control group to 7 +/- 3, 6 +/- 3 and 2 +/- 2, respectively. Intravenous administration of clonidine (10 micro g/kg), rilmenidine (300 microg/kg) or propranolol (500 microg/kg) elicited similar protective effects. We conclude that clonidine and rilmenidine present cardioprotective effects of central origin, which can be reproduced by propranolol, a lipophilic beta-blocking agent.

Does it make sense to develop new centrally acting cardiovascular drugs?

1. The autonomic nervous system plays a pivotal role in modulating all the components of the cardiovascular regulation. Therefore, one can assume that drugs targeting this system may be useful in the management of several cardiovascular diseases. 2. Drugs acting on central nervous system centres seem to be modulators rather than blockers; as such, they are expected to preserve the contraregulatory processes and to generate only a few side effects. 3. Because the sympathetic nervous system is largely involved in the regulation of vasomotor tone, centrally acting antihypertensive drugs were developed first. 4. Recently, new leader compounds selective for non- adrenergic imidazoline recepetors have been synthetized. Although such drugs have no capacity to activate alpha2-adrenoceptors, they have been proven to be hypotensive. These drugs are expected to be even better tolerated than the currently available centrally active drugs. They may also have additional beneficial effects. 5. Here, the experimental evidence suggesting that such drugs may be useful in the management of some cardiac arrhythmias and/or left ventricular dysfunction will be reviewed.

Imidazoline receptors in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases

The site of the hypotensive action of imidazoline compounds, such as clonidine, was first identified within the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem. Afterwards, it was shown that imidazolines reduced blood pressure when applied in this area, whereas no catecholamine was capable of such an effect. These data led us to suggest the existence of receptors specific for imidazolines different from the alpha-adrenergic receptors. Soon after, the existence of imidazoline binding sites (IBS) was reported in the brain and in a variety of peripheral tissues including pancreatic gland and kidney. As expected, these specific binding sites do not bind the catecholamines. The IBS are classified in two groups: the I1 type, sensitive to clonidine and idazoxan; and the I2 type, sensitive to idazoxan and largely insensitive to clonidine. Imidazoline receptors were shown to be involved in several physiological regulations and pathological processes such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and some mood disorders. Evidence for their implication in the nervous regulation of blood pressure and in the insulin secretion control will be presented. The hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs involve imidazoline receptors (I1Rs), while their most frequent side-effects only involve alpha2-adrenergic receptors. A new class of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs selective for I1Rs is now available. At hypotensive doses, these drugs are devoid of significant side effects. It was shown that the good acceptability of these drugs is likely due to their selectivity for I1Rs.

Imidazoline receptors: a challenge

The hypotensive effect of imidazoline-like drugs (IMs) directly injected into the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem (NRL/RVLM) was shown to involve non-adrenergic imidazoline specific receptors (IRs). Some IMs caused hypotension when injected there, irrespective of their affinity and selectivity for any alpha-adrenoceptor subtype. Compounds, such as LNP 509, S 23515, S 23757 or benazoline with very high selectivities for IRs over alpha 2-adrenoceptors (A2Rs), became available recently. Some of these compounds (LNP 509, S 23515) caused hypotension when injected alone into the NRL/RVLM region. Nevertheless, high selectivity for IRs will not predict by its own the capability of IMs to elicit hypotension as some of these substances behaved as antagonists towards the hypotensive effects of the latter. As far as hybrid drugs, i.e., with mixed binding profiles (I1/alpha 2), were concerned, a significant correlation has been reported between their central hypotensive effect and their affinity for IRs. Imidazoline antagonists, such as idazoxan, were repeatedly shown to competitively prevent and reverse the centrally induced hypotensive effect of IMs. The sole stimulation of A2Rs within the NRL/RVLM region was not sufficient to decrease blood pressure as much as IMs did, as shown by the lack of significant blood pressure lowering effect of alpha-methylnoradrenaline (alpha-MNA). No correlation was observed between affinity of IMs for A2Rs and their central hypotensive effects. It is also noticeable that yohimbine, an A2Rs antagonist, was repeatedly shown to abolish the hypotensive effect of hybrids but usually in a non-competitive manner. Mutation of A2Rs was shown to prevent the hypotensive effects of centrally acting drugs. It is concluded that (i) drugs highly selective for I1Rs over A2Rs can reduce blood pressure by their own; (ii) the central hypotensive effect of IMs needs implication of IRs and appears to be facilitated by additional activation of A2Rs; and (iii) this effect requires intact A2Rs along the sympathetic pathways.

Drugs acting on imidazoline receptors: a review of their pharmacology, their use in blood pressure control and their potential interest in cardioprotection

Drugs acting within the autonomic nervous system are of particular interest when autonomic abnormalities are implicated in the development and maintenance of various cardiovascular pathologies. For example, it has been documented that in the early stages of hypertensive disease, i.e. hyperkinetic borderline hypertension, a sympathetic hyperactivity associated with a decreased parasympathetic activity results in increased cardiac output and heart rate. Several classes of drugs acting within the central, as well as the peripheral, autonomic nervous system are very efficient in treating hypertensive disease. One class - the second generation of a group of centrally acting drugs selective for imidazoline receptors - has proved beneficial in this respect, because drugs in this class are well tolerated and have interesting additional effects such as their antiarrhythmic action. Rilmenidine and moxonidine are the lead compounds of this class of drugs. Rilmenidine and moxonidine both proved more selective for cerebral imidazoline receptors than the reference drug, clonidine. It was suggested that this selectivity, attributable to their lower affinity for alpha2-adrenoceptors, explains the low incidence of adverse effects (including sedation) associated with these drugs. In addition, potentially beneficial actions on cardiac dysrythmias and congestive heart failure enlarge the therapeutic potential of the second generation of imidazoline-related drugs. This review focuses on the main pharmacological and clinical properties of rilmenidine and moxonidine, paying particular attention not only to their efficacy in hypertension but also to other potential cardiovascular indications.

alpha-2 and imidazoline receptor agonists. Their pharmacology and therapeutic role

Clonidine has proved to be a clinically useful adjunct in clinical anaesthetic practice as well as in chronic pain therapy because it has both anaesthetic and analgesic-sparing activity. The more selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists, dexmedetomidine and mivazerol, may also have a role in providing haemodynamic stability in patients who are at risk of peri-operative ischaemia. The side-effects of hypotension and bradycardia have limited the routine use of alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists. Investigations into the molecular pharmacology of alpha-2 adrenoceptors have elucidated their role in the control of wakefulness, blood pressure and antinociception. We discuss the pharmacology of alpha-2 adrenoceptors and their therapeutic role in this review. The alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists are agonists at imidazoline receptors which are involved in central blood pressure control. Selective imidazoline agonists are now available for clinical use as antihypertensive agents and their pharmacology is discussed.

Does a second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs really exist?

The site of the hypotensive action of imidazoline compounds, such as clonidine, was first identified within the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem: the nucleus reticularis lateralis. After that, it was shown that imidazolines and related substances reduced blood pressure when applied in this area whereas catecholamines were not capable of producing such an effect. These data led us to suggest the existence of receptors specific for imidazoline-like compounds different from the alpha2-adrenoceptors. Soon after, the existence of imidazoline binding sites was reported in the brain and in a variety of peripheral tissues including the human kidney. As expected, these specific binding sites do not bind the catecholamines. The imidazoline binding sites are already subclassified in two groups: the I1-subtype sensitive to clonidine and idazoxan, and the I2-subtype, sensitive to idazoxan and nearly insensitive to clonidine. Functional studies confirmed that the hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs involved imidazoline receptors while their most frequent side effects only involved alpha2-adrenoceptors. However, recent functional evidence suggests that a cross talk between imidazoline receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors is necessary to trigger a hypotensive effect within the ventral brainstem. Rilmenidine and Moxonidine are the leader compounds of a new class of antihypertensive drugs selective for imidazoline receptors. At hypotensive doses, these drugs are devoid of significant sedative effect. Rilmenidine evoked hypotension when injected within the nucleus reticularis lateralis region; it competed for [3H]-clonidine bound to specific imidazoline binding sites in human medullary membrane preparations but proved more selective for cerebral imidazoline receptors than clonidine. It is suggested that this selectivity might explain the low incidence of their side effects. Additional potentially beneficial actions on cardiac arrhythmias or congestive heart failure enlarge the therapeutic interest of imidazoline-related drugs. Recent binding and functional data throw a new light on the optimal pharmacological profile of this second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs.

Autonomic nervous system as a target for cardiovascular drugs

1. Drugs acting within the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are of particular interest when autonomic abnormalities are implicated in the development and maintenance of various cardiovascular pathologies. For example, it has been documented that in the early stages of hypertensive disease (i.e. hyperkinetic borderline hypertension) a sympathetic hyperactivity associated with a decreased parasympathetic activity results in increased cardiac output and heart rate. 2. Several classes of drugs acting within the central, as well as the peripheral ANS, are very efficient in treating hypertensive disease. One of these classes of drugs, the second generation of centrally acting drugs, has proved beneficial in this respect because, in addition to their therapeutic efficacy, these drugs are well tolerated. 3. The central nervous system may also be the target for drugs with the potential to treat other cardiovascular diseases. Some recent experimental and clinical data supporting such new perspectives concerning idiopathic dysrhythmias, angina pectoris and congestive heart failure will be summarized.

The involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in the post receptor mechanism of central I1-imidazoline receptors

1. To elucidate the possible involvement of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G proteins in the post receptor mechanism of alpha 2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline receptors, we examined the effect of pretreatment of the central nervous system with PTX on the antidysrhythmic effect of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, and rilmenidine, a selective I1-imidazoline receptor agonist on halothane-adrenaline dysrhythmias in rats. 2. Dexmedetomidine (0, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 micrograms kg-1 min-1.i.v.) and rilmenidine (0, 1.0, 3.0, 10, 20 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) prevented the genesis of halothane-adrenaline dysrhythmias in a dose-dependent fashion. Both idazoxan (10, 20 micrograms kg-1, intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.)), an alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist with high affinity for imidazoline receptors, and rauwolscine, (40 micrograms kg-1, i.c.v.), an alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist with low affinity for imidazoline receptors inhibited the action of dexmedetomidine (5.0 micrograms kg-1, min-1, i.v.), but the inhibitory potency of idazoxan was much greater than that of rauwolscine. While the pretreatment with PTX (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 micrograms kg-1, i.c.v.) did not change the dysrhythmogenecity of adrenaline, this treatment completely blocked the antidysrhythmic property of rilmenidine (20 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) as well as dexmedetomidine (5.0 micrograms kg-1 min-1, i.v.). 3. It is suggested that central I1-imidazoline receptors as well as alpha 2-adrenoceptors may be functionally coupled to PTX-sensitive G proteins.