Quantitative analysis of the loss of muscarinic receptors in various peripheral tissues in M1-M5 receptor single knockout mice

Importance of receptor expression in the classification of novel ligands at the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Affinity-based, selective orthosteric ligands for the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are difficult to develop due to high sequence homology across the five subtypes. Selectivity can also be achieved via the selective activation of a particular subtype or signalling pathway. Promisingly, a prior study identified compounds 6A and 7A as functionally selective and Gi biased compounds at the M2 mAChR. Here, we have investigated the activation of individual G protein subfamilies and the downstream signalling profiles of 6A and 7A at the M2 mAChR.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

G protein activation was measured with the TRUPATH assay in M2 mAChR FlpIn CHO cells. Activity in downstream signalling pathways was determined using the cAMP CAMYEL BRET sensor and assay of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation.

KEY RESULTS

M2 mAChRs coupled to Gɑi1, GɑoA and Gɑs, but not Gɑq, in response to canonical orthosteric agonists. Compounds 6A and 7A did not elicit any G protein activation, cAMP inhibition or stimulation, or ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Instead, a Schild analysis indicates a competitive, antagonistic interaction of compounds 6A and 7A with ACh in the Gɑi1 activation assay. Overexpression of the M2 mAChR may suggest an expression-dependent activation profile of compounds 6A and 7A.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These data confirm that the M2 mAChR preferentially couples to Gɑi/o and to a lesser extent to Gɑs in response to canonical orthosteric ligands. However, this study was not able to detect Gɑi bias of compounds 6A and 7A, highlighting the importance of cellular background when classifying new ligands.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: hot topics from the Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists 2021 Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.14/issuetoc.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for psychotic disorders: bench-side to clinic

Modern interest in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activators for schizophrenia began in the 1990s when xanomeline, an M₁/M₄-preferring mAChR agonist developed for cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD), had unexpected antipsychotic activity. However, strategies to address tolerability concerns associated with activation of peripheral mAChRs were not available at that time. The discovery of specific targeted ligands and combination treatments to reduce peripheral mAChR engagement have advanced the potential of mAChR activators as effective treatments for psychotic disorders. This review provides perspectives on the background of the identification of mAChRs as potential antipsychotics, advances in the preclinical understanding of mAChRs as targets, and the current state of mAChR activators under active clinical development for schizophrenia.

Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists

Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M₁ to M₅. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers’ claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype’s function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply “specific” agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.

Phosphoproteome reveals molecular mechanisms of aberrant rhythm in neurotransmitter-mediated islet hormone secretion in diabetic mice

BACKGROUND

Acetylcholine (ACh) and norepinephrine (NE) are representative neurotransmitters of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves, respectively, that antagonize each other to coregulate internal body functions. This also includes the control of different kinds of hormone secretion from pancreatic islets. However, the molecular mechanisms have not been fully elucidated, and whether innervation in islets is abnormal in diabetes mellitus also remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunofluorescence colocalization and islet perfusion were performed and the results demonstrated that ACh/NE and their receptors were highly expressed in islet and rapidly regulated different hormones secretion. Phosphorylation is considered an important posttranslational modification in islet innervation and it was identified by quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses in this study. The phosphorylated islet proteins were found involved in many biological and pathological processes, such as synaptic signalling transduction, calcium channel opening and insulin signalling pathway. Then, the kinases were predicted by motif analysis and further screened and verified by kinase-specific siRNAs in different islet cell lines (αTC1-6, Min6 and TGP52). After functional verification, Ksr2 and Pkacb were considered the key kinases of ACh and NE in insulin secretion, and Cadps, Mlxipl and Pdcd4 were the substrates of these kinases measured by immunofluorescence co-staining. Then, the decreased expression of receptors, kinases and substrates of ACh and NE were found in diabetic mice and the aberrant rhythm in insulin secretion could be improved by combined interventions on key receptors (M3 (pilocarpine) or α2a (guanfacine)) and kinases (Ksr2 or Pkacb).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal innervation was closely associated with the degree of islet dysfunction in diabetic mice and the aberrant rhythm in insulin secretion could be ameliorated significantly after intervention with key receptors and kinases in the early stage of diabetes mellitus, which may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for diabetes mellitus in the future.

Social Isolation: How Can the Effects on the Cholinergic System Be Isolated?

Social species form organizations that support individuals because the consequent social behaviors help these organisms survive. The isolation of these individuals may be a stressor. We reviewed the potential mechanisms of the effects of social isolation on cholinergic signaling and vice versa how changes in cholinergic signaling affect changes due to social isolation.There are two important problems regarding this topic. First, isolation schemes differ in their duration (1–165 days) and initiation (immediately after birth to adulthood). Second, there is an important problem that is generally not considered when studying the role of the cholinergic system in neurobehavioral correlates: muscarinic and nicotinic receptor subtypes do not differ sufficiently in their affinity for orthosteric site agonists and antagonists. Some potential cholinesterase inhibitors also affect other targets, such as receptors or other neurotransmitter systems. Therefore, the role of the cholinergic system in social isolation should be carefully considered, and multiple receptor systems may be involved in the central nervous system response, although some subtypes are involved in specific functions. To determine the role of a specific receptor subtype, the presence of a specific subtype in the central nervous system should be determined using search in knockout studies with the careful application of specific agonists/antagonists.

Muscarinic receptor binding activity in rat tissues by vibegron and prediction of its receptor occupancy levels in the human bladder

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of vibegron, a selective β₃ -adrenoceptor agonist, used to treat overactive bladder, on muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder, and to predict the occupancy levels of muscarinic receptors by vibegron in the bladders of humans orally administered a clinical dose.

METHODS

Muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder and other tissues were examined by a radioligand binding assay using [N-methyl-³ H]scopolamine chloride. The occupancy levels of muscarinic receptors by vibegron in bladders of humans after its oral administration were predicted from the estimation of unbound concentrations in human plasma and urine in the literature.

RESULTS

Vibegron (0.1-100 μmol/L) inhibited specific [N-methyl-³ H]scopolamine chloride binding in the bladder and other tissues of rats in a concentration-dependent manner. The 50% inhibitory concentration value of vibegron in the bladder was approximately twofold higher than that in the heart, and approximately 315- and 3.5-fold lower than those in the submaxillary gland and brain, respectively. Therefore, the binding affinity of vibegron for muscarinic receptors was higher in the heart and bladder than in the submaxillary gland and brain. By using the rat bladder receptor binding affinity, occupancy levels of muscarinic receptors in the human bladder were predicted to be 51-91% until 24 h after its oral administration at 50 mg of vibegron.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to suggest that vibegron binds to muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder and other tissues, with a potentially higher affinity for the M₂ subtype than the M₁ and M₃ subtypes. These results might be clinically relevant for pharmacotherapy with vibegron for overactive bladder.

Possible Involvement of Muscarinic Receptor Blockade in Mirabegron Therapy for Patients with Overactive Bladder

The selective β ₃-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron, an established alternative to antimuscarinic therapy for patients with overactive bladder, induces additional effects against receptors, transporters, and hepatic enzymes. The present study aimed to elucidate the effects of mirabegron on muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder using radioligand binding and functional assays. Mirabegron (0.1-100 μM) inhibited specific [N-methyl-³H]scopolamine methyl chloride binding in the bladder and other tissues of rats in a concentration-dependent manner. Binding affinity in the bladder was similar to that in the heart and significantly higher than those in the submaxillary gland and brain. Mirabegron induced the concentration-dependent relaxation of carbachol-induced contractions in the rat isolated bladder. Further analyses using a two-site model revealed that the relative quantities of high- and low-affinity components for mirabegron were 44.5% and 55.5%, respectively. Respective pEC₅₀ values were 7.06 and 4.97. Based on the receptor binding affinity and pharmacokinetics of mirabegron, muscarinic receptor occupancy in the human bladder for 24 hours after the administration of a single oral dose of 50 mg mirabegron was 37%-76%. The present results demonstrate for the first time that mirabegron may relax the detrusor smooth muscle not only by β ₃-adrenoceptor activation but also muscarinic receptor blockade. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Mirabegron, the first selective β ₃-adrenoceptor agonist, represents an alternative to antimuscarinic agents for management of overactive bladder (OAB). The present study aimed to clarify whether mirabegron directly binds to muscarinic receptors and affects cholinergic agonist-induced contractions in rat urinary bladder and to predict muscarinic receptor occupancy in human bladder after oral administration of mirabegron. The results demonstrated that mirabegron therapy for patients with OAB may be due not only to β ₃-adrenoceptor activation but also muscarinic receptor blockade.

Direct in vitro and in vivo demonstration of muscarinic receptor binding by the novel radioligand, [3H]5-hydroxymethyltolterodine, in the bladder and other tissues of rats

In vitro and in vivo binding sites of [³H]-labeled 5-hydroxymethyltolterodine (5-HMT), a new radioligand for labeling muscarinic receptors in rat tissues were characterized. Specific [³H]5-HMT binding in rat tissues was saturable and of high affinity in each tissue. The dissociation constant (K_d) was significantly lower in bladder and heart than in submaxillary gland. Significant levels of in vivo specific [³H]5-HMT binding by intravenous injection of the radioligand were detected in tissues, except for cerebral cortex. Thus, [³H]5-HMT was shown to specifically label muscarinic receptors in rat tissues, suggesting a useful radioligand for labeling muscarinic receptors with high affinity.

The beneficial effects of a muscarinic agonist on pancreatic β-cells

The brain and nervous system play an important role in pancreatic β-cell function. This study investigated the role of muscarinic agonists or acetylcholine, which is the major neurotransmitter in the vagal nerve, in regulating pancreatic β-cell mass and glucose homeostasis. Administration of the muscarinic agonist bethanechol increased insulin secretion and improved glucose tolerance in insulin-receptor substrate 2 (IRS2)-knockout (IRS-2^−/−) mice and diet-induced obesity mice. Oral administration of bethanechol increased β-cell mass and proliferation in wild-type mice, but not IRS-2^−/− mice. The muscarinic agonist also increased the incorporation of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) into islets isolated from wild-type mice and pancreatic β-cell line MIN6. The phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) induced by oral administration of bethanechol was observed in wild-type mice, but not IRS-2^−/− mice. The secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was also stimulated by bethanechol in wild-type mice, and a GLP-1 antagonist partially inhibited the bethanechol-induced increase in β-cell mass. These results suggest that the muscarinic agonist exerted direct and indirect effects on β-cell proliferation that were dependent on the IRS-2/Akt pathway. The bethanechol-stimulated release of GLP-1 may be indirectly associated with β-cell proliferation.

Structure-Activity Relationships of Pan-Gαq/11 Coupled Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulators

Recent years have seen a large increase in the discovery of allosteric ligands targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). One of the challenges in screening such compounds is to understand their mechanisms of action and define appropriate parameter estimates for affinity, cooperativity and efficacy. Herein we describe the mechanisms of action and structure-activity relationships for a series of "pan-G_q-coupled" muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (mAChR) positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). Using a combination of radioligand binding, functional inositol phosphate accumulation assays, receptor alkylation and operational data analysis, we show that most compounds in the series derive their variable potency and selectivity from differential cooperativity at the M₁, M₃ and M₅ mAChRs. None of the PAMs showed greater than 10-fold subtype selectivity for the agonist-free receptor, but VU6007705, VU6007678, and VU6008555 displayed markedly increased cooperativity compared to the parent molecule and M₅ mAChR-preferring PAM, ML380 (αβ > 100), in the presence of ACh. Most of the activity of these PAMs derives from their ability to potentiate ACh binding affinity at mAChRs, though VU6007678 was notable for also potentiating ACh signaling efficacy and robust allosteric agonist activity. These data provide key insights for the future design of more potent and subtype-selective mAChR PAMs.

Basic and clinical aspects of antimuscarinic agents used to treat overactive bladder

Antimuscarinic agents are now widely used as the pharmacological therapy for overactive bladder (OAB) because neuronal (parasympathetic nerve) and non-neuronal acetylcholine play a significant role for the bladder function. In this review, we will highlight basic and clinical aspects of eight antimuscarinic agents (oxybutynin, propiverine, tolterodine, solifenacin, darifenacin, trospium, imidafenacin, and fesoterodine) clinically used to treat urinary dysfunction in patients with OAB. The basic pharmacological characteristics of these eight antimuscarinic agents include muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity, functional bladder selectivity, and muscarinic receptor binding in the bladder and other tissues. The measurement of drug-receptor binding after oral administration of these agents allows for clearer understanding of bladder selectivity by the integration of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics under in vivo conditions. Their central nervous system (CNS) penetration potentials are also discussed in terms of the feasibility of impairments in memory and cognitive function in elderly patients with OAB. The clinical aspects of efficacy focus on improvements in the daytime urinary frequency, nocturia, bladder capacity, the frequency of urgency, severity of urgency, number of incontinence episodes, OAB symptom score, and quality of life (QOL) score by antimuscarinic agents in patients with OAB. The safety of and adverse events caused by treatments with antimuscarinic agents such as dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, erythema, fatigue, increased sweating, urinary retention, and CNS adverse events are discussed. A dose-dependent relationship was observed with adverse events, because the risk ratio generally increased with elevations in the drug dose of antimuscarinic agents. Side effect profiles may be additive to or contraindicated by other medications.

Muscarinic receptors 2 and 5 regulate bitter response of urethral brush cells via negative feedback

We have recently identified a cholinergic chemosensory cell in the urethral epithelium, urethral brush cell (UBC), that, upon stimulation with bitter or bacterial substances, initiates a reflex detrusor activation. Here, we elucidated cholinergic mechanisms that modulate UBC responsiveness. We analyzed muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M1-5 mAChR) expression by using RT-PCR in UBCs, recorded [Ca²⁺]_i responses to a bitter stimulus in isolated UBCs of wild-type and mAChR-deficient mice, and performed cystometry in all involved strains. The bitter response of UBCs was enhanced by global cholinergic and selective M2 inhibition, diminished by positive allosteric modulation of M5, and unaffected by M1, M3, and M4 mAChR inhibitors. This effect was not observed in M2 and M5 mAChR-deficient mice. In cystometry, M5 mAChR-deficient mice demonstrated signs of detrusor overactivity. In conclusion, M2 and M5 mAChRs attenuate the bitter response of UBC via a cholinergic negative autocrine feedback mechanism. Cystometry suggests that dysfunction, particularly of the M5 receptor, may lead to such symptoms as bladder overactivity.-Deckmann, K., Rafiq, A., Erdmann, C., Illig, C., Durschnabel, M., Wess, J., Weidner, W., Bschleipfer, T., Kummer, W. Muscarinic receptors 2 and 5 regulate bitter response of urethral brush cells via negative feedback.

Muscarinic receptor subtype distribution in the central nervous system and relevance to aging and Alzheimer's disease

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate the metabotropic actions of acetylcholine (ACh). There are five subtypes of mAChR, M₁ - M₅, which are expressed throughout the central nervous system (CNS) on numerous cell types and represent promising treatment targets for a number of different diseases, disorders, and conditions of the CNS. Although the present review will focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a number of conditions such as Parkinson's disease (PD), schizophrenia, and others represent significant unmet medical needs for which selective muscarinic agents could offer therapeutic benefits. Numerous advances have been made regarding mAChR localization through the use of subtype-selective antibodies and radioligand binding studies and these efforts have helped propel a number of mAChR therapeutics into clinical trials. However, much of what we know about mAChR localization in the healthy and diseased brain has come from studies employing radioligand binding with relatively modest selectivity. The development of subtype-selective small molecule radioligands suitable for in vitro and in vivo use, as well as robust, commercially-available antibodies remains a critical need for the field. Additionally, novel genetic tools should be developed and leveraged to help move the field increasingly towards a systems-level understanding of mAChR subtype action. Finally, functional, proteomic, and genetic data from ongoing human studies hold great promise for optimizing the design and interpretation of studies examining receptor levels by enabling patient stratification. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Neuropharmacology on Muscarinic Receptors'.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors participate in small intestinal mucosal homeostasis

BACKGROUND

Intestinal mucosal homeostasis is controlled by multiple factors and an intact, functional mucosa is essential for survival. Maintenance of the epithelium begins with crypt base stem cells which eventually give rise to all epithelial cell types. Evidence suggests an important role of the enteric cholinergic nervous system in these processes. We hypothesized that mice with altered muscarinic signaling would exhibit differences in mucosal morphometric and proliferative parameters compared to wild-type mice.

METHODS

Mouse lines specifically deficient in one of the five muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1KO-M5KO) were used for experiments. Distal ileal segments were obtained and histologic sections created. Villus height and crypt depth were measured using H&E-stained sections, while crypt proliferation index (CPI) was calculated using Ki67-stained sections.

RESULTS

The ileal mucosa from mice deficient in mAChRs exhibited differences from wild-type ileal mucosa in nearly all measured parameters. Knockout of mAChR2, mAChR3 and mAChR5 resulted in changes in all measured parameters. Ileal mucosa from M2KO mice showed an unexpected combination decreased VH but paradoxically increased CD and CPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations in mAChR signaling causes change in ileal mucosal morphometry and crypt cell proliferation. While all mAChR subtypes may be involved, mAChR2, mAChR3, and mAChR5 appear to be critical for mucosal homeostasis. Further characterization of these pathways is warranted.

Characterization of muscarinic receptor binding by the novel radioligand, [(3)H]imidafenacin, in the bladder and other tissues of rats

The present study aimed to directly characterize specific binding sites of tritium ([(3)H])-labeled imidafenacin, a new radioligand for labeling muscarinic receptors, in the bladder and other peripheral or central nervous tissues of rats. Muscarinic receptors in rat tissues were measured by radioligand binding assay using [(3)H]imidafenacin. Specific [(3)H]imidafenacin binding in rat tissues was saturable, reversible, and of high affinity. Estimated dissociation constants (Kd values) were significantly lower in submaxillary gland and prostate and higher in heart than in bladder, indicating lower Kd values in M1 and M3 subtype- than M2 subtype-dominating tissues. Unlabeled imidafenacin and clinically used antimuscarinic agents competed with [(3)H]imidafenacin for binding sites in bladder and other tissues in a concentration-dependent manner, which indicated pharmacological specificity of [(3)H]imidafenacin binding sites. Pretreatment with N-(2-chloroethyl)-4-piperidinyl diphenylacetate (4-DAMP mustard), an irreversible inactivating agent of M3 subtype, significantly decreased the number of [(3)H]imidafenacin binding sites in bladder, submaxillary gland, and colon, but not in heart. [(3)H]imidafenacin labeled muscarinic receptors in M1 and M3 subtype-dominating tissues with higher affinity than [N-methyl-(3)H]scopolamine methyl chloride (NMS). [(3)H]imidafenacin is a useful radioligand to label muscarinic receptors in M1- and M3-dominating tissues with high affinity.

[Integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics based on the in vivo analysis of drug-receptor binding]

  As I was deeply interested in the effects of drugs on the human body, I chose pharmacology as the subject of special study when I became a 4th year student at Shizuoka College of Pharmacy. I studied abroad as a postdoctoral fellow for two years, from 1978, under the tutelage of Professor Henry I. Yamamura (pharmacology) in the College of Medicine at the University of Arizona, USA. He taught me a variety of valuable skills such as the radioreceptor binding assay, which represented the most advanced technology developed in the US at that time. After returning home, I engaged in clarifying receptor abnormalities in pathological conditions, as well as in drug action mechanisms, by making the best use of this radioreceptor binding assay. In 1989, following the founding of the University of Shizuoka, I was invited by Professor Ryohei Kimura to join the Department of Pharmacokinetics. This switch in discipline provided a good opportunity for me to broaden my perspectives in pharmaceutical sciences. I worked on evaluating drug-receptor binding in vivo as a combined index for pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effect manifestation, with the aim of bridging pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. In fact, by focusing on data from in vivo receptor binding, it became possible to clearly rationalize the important consideration of drug dose-concentration-action relationships, and to study quantitative and kinetic analyses of relationships among pharmacokinetics, receptor binding and pharmacological effects. Based on this concept, I was able to demonstrate the utility of dynamic analyses of drug-receptor binding in drug discovery, drug fostering, and the proper use of pharmacokinetics with regard to many drugs.

Non-neuronal functions of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Acetylcholine is an important neurotransmitter whose effects are mediated by two classes of receptors. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are ion channels, whereas the muscarinic receptors belong to the large family of G protein coupled seven transmembrane helix receptors. Beyond its function in neuronal systems, it has become evident that acetylcholine also plays an important role in non-neuronal cells such as epithelial and immune cells. Furthermore, many cell types in the periphery are capable of synthesizing acetylcholine and express at least some of the receptors. In this review, we summarize the non-neuronal functions of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, especially those of the M₂ muscarinic receptor in epithelial cells. We will review the mechanisms of signaling by the M₂ receptor but also the cellular trafficking and ARF6 mediated endocytosis of this receptor, which play an important role in the regulation of signaling events. In addition, we provide an overview of the M₂ receptor in human pathological conditions such as autoimmune diseases and cancer.

Characterization of bladder selectivity of antimuscarinic agents on the basis of in vivo drug-receptor binding

The in vivo muscarinic receptor binding of antimuscarinic agents (oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, and imidafenacin) used to treat urinary dysfunction in patients with overactive bladder is reviewed. Transdermal administration of oxybutynin in rats leads to significant binding of muscarinic receptors in the bladder without long-term binding in the submaxillary gland and the abolishment of salivation evoked by oral oxybutynin. Oral solifenacin shows significant and long-lasting binding to muscarinic receptors in mouse tissues expressing the M₃ subtype. Oral tolterodine binds more selectively to muscarinic receptors in the bladder than in the submaxillary gland in mice. The muscarinic receptor binding of oral imidafenacin in rats is more selective and longer-lasting in the bladder than in other tissues such as the submaxillary gland, heart, colon, lung, and brain, suggesting preferential muscarinic receptor binding in the bladder. In vivo quantitative autoradiography with (+)N-[¹¹C]methyl-3-piperidyl benzilate in rats shows significant occupancy of brain muscarinic receptors with the intravenous injection of oxybutynin, solifenacin, and tolterodine. The estimated in vivo selectivity in brain is significantly greater for solifenacin and tolterodine than for oxybutynin. Imidafenacin occupies few brain muscarinic receptors. Similar findings for oral oxybutynin were observed with positron emission tomography in conscious rhesus monkeys with a significant disturbance of short-term memory. The newer generation of antimuscarinic agents may be advantageous in terms of bladder selectivity after systemic administration.

Decrease in heart adrenoceptor gene expression and receptor number as compensatory tool for preserved heart function and biological rhythm in M(2) KO animals

Muscarinic receptors (MR) are main cardioinhibitory receptors. We investigated the changes in gene expression, receptor number, echocardiography, muscarinic/adrenergic agonist/antagonist changes in heart rate (HR) and HR biorhythm in M(2) KO mice (mice lacking the main cardioinhibitory receptors) in the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV). We hypothesize that the disruption of M(2) MR, key players in parasympathetic bradycardia, would change the number of receptors with antagonistic effects on the heart (β(1)- and β(2)-adrenoceptors, BAR), while the function of the heart would be changed only marginally. We have found changes in LV, but not in RV: decrease in M(3) MR, β(1)- and β(2)-adrenoceptor gene expressions that were accompanied by a decrease in MR and BAR receptor binding. No changes were found both in LV systolic and diastolic function as assessed by echocardiography (e.g., similar LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter, fractional shortening, mitral flow characteristics, and maximal velocity in LV outflow tract). We have found only marginal changes in specific HR biorhythm parameters. The effects of isoprenaline and propranolol on HR were similar in WT and KO (but with lesser extent). Atropine was not able to increase HR in KO animals. Carbachol decreased the HR in WT but increased HR in KO, suggesting the presence of cardiostimulatory MR. Therefore, we can conclude that although the main cardioinhibitory receptors are not present in the heart, the function is not much affected. As possible mechanisms of almost normal cardiac function, the decreases of both β(1)- and β(2)-adrenoceptor gene expression and receptor binding should be considered.

Muscarinic agonists and antagonists: effects on gastrointestinal function

Muscarinic agonists and antagonists are used to treat a handful of gastrointestinal (GI) conditions associated with impaired salivary secretion or altered motility of GI smooth muscle. With regard to exocrine secretion, the major muscarinic receptor expressed in salivary, gastric, and pancreatic glands is the M₃ with a small contribution of the M₁ receptor. In GI smooth muscle, the major muscarinic receptors expressed are the M₂ and M₃ with the M₂ outnumbering the M₃ by a ratio of at least four to one. The antagonism of both smooth muscle contraction and exocrine secretion is usually consistent with an M₃ receptor mechanism despite the major presence of the M₂ receptor in smooth muscle. These results are consistent with the conditional role of the M₂ receptor in smooth muscle. That is, the contractile role of the M₂ receptor depends on that of the M₃ so that antagonism of the M₃ receptor eliminates the response of the M₂. The physiological roles of muscarinic receptors in the GI tract are consistent with their known signaling mechanisms. Some so-called tissue-selective M₃ antagonists may owe their selectivity to a highly potent interaction with a nonmuscarinic receptor target.

Comparative characterization of lung muscarinic receptor binding after intratracheal administration of tiotropium, ipratropium, and glycopyrrolate

The aim of the current study was to characterize comparatively the binding of muscarinic receptor in the lung of rats intratracheally administered anticholinergic agents (tiotropium, ipratropium, glycopyrrolate) used clinically to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Binding parameters of [N-methyl-(3)H]scopolamine methyl chloride ([(3)H]NMS) were determined in tissues (lung, bladder, submaxillary gland) of rats intratracheally administered tiotropium, ipratropium, and glycopyrrolate. The in vitro binding affinity of tiotropium for the receptors was 10-11-fold higher than those of ipratropium and glycopyrrolate. Intratracheal administration of tiotropium (0.6-6.4 nmol/kg) caused sustained (lasting at least 24 h) increase in the apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) for [(3)H]NMS binding in rat lung compared with the control value. Concomitantly, there was a long-lasting decrease in the maximal number of binding sites (B(max)) for [(3)H]NMS. Similary, ipratropium and glycopyrrolate at 7.3 and 7.5 nmol/kg, respectively, brought about a significant increase in K(d) for [(3)H]NMS binding. The effect by ipratropium was observed at 2 h but not 12 h, and that by glycopyrrolate lasted for 24 h. Both agents had little influence on the muscarinic receptors in the bladder and submaxillary gland. The present study provides the first evidence that tiotropium, ipratropium, and glycopyrrolate administered intratracheally in rats selectively bound muscarinic receptors of the lung, and tiotropium and glycopyrrolate had a much longer-lasting effect than ipratropium.

α1-Adrenoceptors and muscarinic receptors in voiding function - binding characteristics of therapeutic agents in relation to the pharmacokinetics

In vivo and ex vivo binding of α(1)-adrenoceptor and muscarinic receptors involved in voiding function is reviewed with therapeutic agents (α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists: prazosin, tamsulosin and silodosin; and muscarinic receptor antagonists: oxybutynin, tolterodine, solifenacin, propiverine, imiafenacin and darifenacin) in lower urinary tract symptoms. This approach allows estimation of the inhibition of a well-characterized selective (standard) radioligand by unlabelled potential drugs or direct measurement of the distribution and receptor binding of a standard radioligand or radiolabelled form of a novel drug. In fact, these studies could be conducted in various tissues from animals pretreated with radioligands and/or unlabelled novel drugs, by conventional radioligand binding assay, radioactivity measurement, autoradiography and positron emission tomography. In vivo and ex vivo receptor binding with α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists and muscarinic receptor antagonists have been proved to be useful in predicting the potency, organ selectivity and duration of action of drugs in relation to their pharmacokinetics. Such evaluations of drug-receptor binding reveal that adverse effects could be avoided by the use of new α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists and muscarinic receptor antagonists for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Thus, the comparative analysis of α(1)-adrenoceptor and muscarinic receptor binding characteristics in the lower urinary tract and other tissues after systemic administration of therapeutic agents allows the rationale for their pharmacological characteristics from the integrated viewpoint of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The current review emphasizes the usefulness of in vivo and ex vivo receptor binding in the discovery and development of novel drugs for the treatment of not only urinary dysfunction but also other disorders.

Demonstration of muscarinic and nicotinic receptor binding activities of distigmine to treat detrusor underactivity

The present study was undertaken to examine whether distigmine, a therapeutic agent used to treat detrusor underactivity, binds directly to muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. We used radioreceptor binding assays and compared the effects of distigmine with those of neostigmine and donepedil. The inhibitory effect of distigmine on the blood acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was significantly weaker than that of neostigmine. Distigmine, neostigmine, and donepezil competed for specific binding sites of [N-methyl-(3)H]scopolamine methyl chloride ([(3)H]NMS ) and [(3)H]oxotremorine-M in the bladder, submaxillary gland and cerebral cortex of rats in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating significant binding activity of muscarinic receptors. Distigmine displayed significantly higher affinity for binding sites of [(3)H]oxotremorine-M compared with those of [(3)H]NMS as revealed by large ratios of its K(i) value for [(3)H]NMS to that for [(3)H]oxotremorine-M, suggesting that it has preferential affinity for agonist sites of muscarinic receptors. Distigmine seemed to bind to the agonist sites of muscarinic receptors in a competitive manner. Repeated oral administration of distigmine caused a significant decrease in the maximal number of binding sites (B(max)) for [(3)H]NMS in the bladder and submaxillary gland but not cerebral cortex. Distigmine also bound to nicotinic receptors in the rat cerebral cortex. In conclusion, distigmine shows direct binding to muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder, and repeated oral administration of distigmine causes downregulation of muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder. The observed direct interaction of distigmine with the bladder muscarinic receptors may partly contribute to the therapeutic and/or side effects seen in the treatment of detrusor underactivity.

The residual nonadrenergic contractile response to nerve stimulation of the mouse prostate is mediated by acetylcholine but not ATP in a comparison with the mouse vas deferens

Neuronal release of noradrenaline is primarily responsible for the contraction of prostatic smooth muscle in all species, and this forms the basis for the use of α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists as pharmacotherapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Previous studies in mice have demonstrated that a residual nonadrenergic component to nerve stimulation remains after α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism. In the guinea pig and rat prostate and the vas deferens of guinea pigs, rats, and mice, ATP is the mediator of this residual contraction. This study investigates the mediator of residual contraction in the mouse prostate. Whole prostates from wild-type, α(1A)-adrenoceptor, and P2X1-purinoceptor knockout mice were mounted in organ baths, and the isometric force that tissues developed in response to electrical field stimulation or exogenously applied agonists was recorded. Deletion of the P2X1 purinoceptor did not affect nerve-mediated contraction. Furthermore, the P2-purinoceptor antagonist suramin (30 μM) failed to attenuate nerve-mediated contractions in wild-type, α(1A)-adrenoceptor, or P2X1-purinoceptor knockout mice. Atropine (1 μM) attenuated contraction in prostates taken from wild-type mice. In the presence of prazosin (0.3 μM) or guanethidine (10 μM), or in prostates taken from α(1A)-adrenoceptor knockout mice, residual nerve-mediated contraction was abolished by atropine (1 μM), but not suramin (30 μM). Exogenously administered acetylcholine elicited reproducible concentration-dependent contractions of the mouse prostate that were atropine-sensitive (1 μM), but not prazosin-sensitive (0.3 μM). Acetylcholine, but not ATP, mediates the nonadrenergic component of contraction in the mouse prostate. This cholinergic component of prostatic contraction is mediated by activation of muscarinic receptors.

The M2-muscarinic receptor inhibits the development of streptozotocin-induced neuropathy in mouse urinary bladder

We investigate the role of M(2)-muscarinic receptors in maintaining neurogenic bladder contraction during hyperglycemia. Mice were injected with a single dose of streptozotocin (125 mg/kg), and neurogenic contraction of urinary bladder from wild type and M(2)-muscarinic receptor knockout (M(2) KO) mice was measured at 8 to 24 weeks after treatment. In wild-type bladder lacking urothelium, the summation of the cholinergic (64%) and purinergic (56%) components of the electrical-field-stimulated response exceeded 100%, indicating a reserve capacity. Although the cholinergic component was slightly less in the M(2) KO mouse, the total electrical-field-stimulated contraction was the same as wild type. The cholinergic and purinergic components of contraction in wild-type bladder were minimally affected by streptozotocin treatment. In M(2) KO bladder, streptozotocin treatment reduced both the cholinergic (after 8-9 and 20-24 weeks) and purinergic (after 20-24 weeks only) components. The loss of function was approximately 50 to 70%. Similar results were observed in bladder with intact urothelium. M(2) KO bladder was more sensitive to the relaxant effect of isoproterenol compared with wild type, and this difference significantly increased at the early and late time points after streptozotocin treatment. In the presence of urothelium, however, this difference in isoproterenol sensitivity was smaller with streptozotocin treatment, but this trend reversed over time. Our results show that M(2) receptors oppose urinary bladder distension in wild-type bladder and inhibit streptozotocin-induced neuropathy.

The M3-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor stimulates glucose uptake in L6 skeletal muscle cells by a CaMKK-AMPK-dependent mechanism

The role of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in regulating glucose uptake in L6 skeletal muscle cells was investigated. [(3)H]-2-Deoxyglucose uptake was increased in differentiated L6 cells by insulin, acetylcholine, oxotremorine-M and carbachol. mAChR-mediated glucose uptake was inhibited by the AMPK inhibitor Compound C. Whole cell radioligand binding using [(3)H]-N-methyl scopolamine chloride identified mAChRs in differentiated but not undifferentiated L6 cells and M(3) mAChR mRNA was detected only in differentiated cells. M(3) mAChRs are Gq-coupled, and cholinergic stimulation by the mAChR agonists acetylcholine, oxotremorine-M and carbachol increased Ca(2+) in differentiated but not undifferentiated L6 cells. This was due to muscarinic but not nicotinic activation as responses were antagonised by the muscarinic antagonist atropine but not the nicotinic antagonist tubocurarine. Western blotting showed that both carbachol and the AMPK activator AICAR increased phosphorylation of the AMPKalpha subunit at Thr172, with responses to carbachol blocked by Compound C and the CaMKK inhibitor STO609 but not by the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin. AICAR-stimulated AMPK phosphorylation was not sensitive to STO-609, confirming that this compound inhibits CaMKK but not the classical AMPK kinase LKB1. The TAK1 inhibitor (5Z)-7-oxozeaenol and the G(i) inhibitor pertussis toxin both failed to block AMPK phosphorylation in response to carbachol. Using CHO-K1 cells stably expressing each of the mAChR subtypes (M(1)-M(4)), it was determined that only the M(1) and M(3) mAChRs phosphorylate AMPK, confirming a G(q)-dependent mechanism. This study demonstrates that activation of M(3) mAChRs in L6 skeletal muscle cells stimulates glucose uptake via a CaMKK-AMPK-dependent mechanism, independent of the insulin-stimulated pathway.

The forefront for novel therapeutic agents based on the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction: bladder selectivity based on in vivo drug-receptor binding characteristics of antimuscarinic agents for treatment of overactive bladder

We have reviewed the binding of antimuscarinic agents, used to treat urinary dysfunction in patients with overactive bladder, to muscarinic receptors in target and non-target tissues in vivo. Transdermal administration of oxybutynin in rats led to significant binding in the bladder without long-term binding in the submaxillary gland and the abolishment of salivation evoked by oral oxybutynin. Oral solifenacin showed significant and long-lasting binding to muscarinic receptors in mouse tissues expressing the M(3) subtype. Oral tolterodine bound more selectively to muscarinic receptors in the bladder than in the submaxillary gland in mice. The muscarinic receptor binding activity of oral darifenacin in mice was shown to be pronounced and long-lasting in the bladder, submaxillary gland, and lung. In vivo quantitative autoradiography using (+)N-[(11)C]methyl-3-piperidyl benzilate in rats showed significant occupancy of brain muscarinic receptors on intravenous injection of oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin, and tolterodine. The estimated in vivo bladder selectivity compared to brain was significantly greater for solifenacin and tolterodine than oxybutynin. Darifenacin occupied few brain muscarinic receptors. Similar findings were also observed with positron emission tomography in conscious rhesus monkeys. The newer generation of antimuscarinic agents may be advantageous in the bladder selectivity after systemic administration.

Muscarinic Receptor Binding and Plasma Drug Concentration after the Oral Administration of Propiverine in Mice

OBJECTIVES

The current study was undertaken to characterize the binding of propiverine to muscarinic receptors in mouse tissues by measuring plasma concentrations of the drug and its metabolite.

METHODS

At 0.5-24 h after the oral administration of propiverine at pharmacologically relevant doses, muscarinic receptors in tissue homogenates were measured by a radioligand binding assay using [N-methyl- (3) H]scopolamine (NMS), along with the drug's concentration in plasma by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method.

RESULTS

In the in vitro experiments, propiverine and its metabolite 1-methy-4-piperidyl benzilate N-oxide competed with [(3) H]NMS for binding sites in the bladder, submaxillary gland and heart of mice in a concentration-dependent manner. After the oral administration of propiverine, dose- and time-dependent increases in the dissociation constant for specific [(3) H]NMS binding were observed in the bladder and other tissues of mice, indicating that orally administered propiverine and/or its metabolite undergo significant binding to muscarinic receptors in mouse tissues. A longer-lasting binding of muscarinic receptor was seen in the bladder than in the submaxillary gland at relatively low doses of propiverine. Furthermore, the decrease in maximal number of binding sites values for [(3) H]NMS binding was more remarkable in the bladder than submaxillary gland of propiverine treated mice. There was a dose-dependent rise in the plasma concentrations of propiverine and 1-methy-4-piperidyl benzilate N-oxide in mice after the oral administration of propiverine.

CONCLUSION

The oral administration of propiverine exerts a more prominent and longer-lasting effect in the bladder than in the submaxillary gland of mice. The N-oxide metabolite may contribute significantly to the blockade of muscarinic receptors caused by oral propiverine.

Immunoglobulins from scleroderma patients inhibit the muscarinic receptor activation in internal anal sphincter smooth muscle cells

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) IgGs affecting the M(3)-muscarinic receptor (M(3)-R) have been proposed to be responsible for the gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility in this disease. However, the effect of SSc IgGs on smooth muscle cell (SMC) function has not been studied. We determined the effect of SSc IgGs on the muscarinic receptor activation by bethanechol (BeCh; methyl derivate of carbachol) in SMC and smooth muscle strips from rat internal anal sphincter. IgGs were purified from GI-symptomatic SSc patients and normal volunteers, with protein G-Sepharose columns. SMC lengths were determined via computerized digital micrometry. The presence of M(3)-R and IgG-M(3)-R complex was determined by Western blot. IgGs from SSc patients but not from normal volunteers caused significant and concentration-dependent inhibition of BeCh response (P < 0.05). The maximal shortening of 22.2 +/- 1.2% caused by 10(-4) M BeCh was significantly attenuated to 8.3 +/- 1.2% by 1 mg/ml of SSc IgGs (P < 0.05). Experiments performed in smooth muscle strips revealed a similar effect of SSc IgG that was fully reversible. In contrast to the effect on BeCh, the SSc IgGs caused no significant effect (P > 0.05) on K(+) depolarization and alpha(1)-adrenoceptor activation by phenylephrine. Western blot studies revealed the specific presence of SSc IgG-M(3)-R complex. SSc IgGs attenuated M(3)-R activation, which was reversible with antibody removal. These data suggest that SSc GI dysmotility may be caused by autoantibodies that inhibit the muscarinic neurotransmission. Future treatment of SSc patients may be directed at the removal or neutralization of these antibodies.