Pharmacological characterization of cannabinoid receptor activity in the rat-isolated ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation

Effects of Cannabinoids on Intestinal Motility, Barrier Permeability, and Therapeutic Potential in Gastrointestinal Diseases

Cannabinoids and their receptors play a significant role in the regulation of gastrointestinal (GIT) peristalsis and intestinal barrier permeability. This review critically evaluates current knowledge about the mechanisms of action and biological effects of endocannabinoids and phytocannabinoids on GIT functions and the potential therapeutic applications of these compounds. The results of ex vivo and in vivo preclinical data indicate that cannabinoids can both inhibit and stimulate gut peristalsis, depending on various factors. Endocannabinoids affect peristalsis in a cannabinoid (CB) receptor-specific manner; however, there is also an important interaction between them and the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) system. Phytocannabinoids such as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) impact gut motility mainly through the CB1 receptor. They were also found to improve intestinal barrier integrity, mainly through CB1 receptor stimulation but also via protein kinase A (PKA), mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK), and adenylyl cyclase signaling pathways, as well as by influencing the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabinoids in GIT disorders are postulated to occur by the lowering of inflammatory factors such as myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and regulation of cytokine levels. In conclusion, there is a prospect of utilizing cannabinoids as components of therapy for GIT disorders.

Copeptin, a surrogate marker of arginine8 vasopressin, has no ability to modulate human and mouse gastric motility

Copeptin, a glycosylated peptide fragment derived from the C-terminal region of the precursor of arginine⁸ vasopressin (AVP), is co-secreted with AVP in equimolar amounts. Elevated plasma AVP modulates gastric motility so we investigated whether copeptin had a similar effect. Copeptin (10^-9-10^-7M), and AVP (10^-12-10^-5M), were evaluated for their ability to modulate spontaneous and electrically-evoked (EFS) contractions of human proximal and distal gastric circular muscle in vitro. Similar experiments were performed on the mouse stomach and we re-examined the published effect of copeptin on the mouse aorta. In the presence of tetrodotoxin (10^-6M), atropine (10^-6M) and L-NAME (3 × 10^-4M), human proximal and distal stomach muscle contracted spontaneously and rhythmically as did mouse distal stomach. Copeptin (10^-9-10^-7M), had no effect on baseline muscle tone or myogenic spontaneous contractions of either human or mouse stomach. However, AVP concentration-dependently increased tone, amplitude and frequency of contractions in both regions of human stomach with similar potency (pEC₅₀ 9.0-9.5; n = 4) and threshold concentration (10^-11-10^-10M). AVP was similarly active in the mouse stomach. EFS-evoked cholinergic contractions (human and mouse) were unaffected by both peptides EFS-evoked relaxations of mouse stomach were unaffected by copeptin. In sub-maximally contracted mouse aorta the elevated tone was unaffected by copeptin (10^-7M) (cf. previously published study) but was reduced by carbachol (10^-6M) and sodium nitroprusside (10^-3M). We conclude that in contrast to AVP, copeptin over a concentration range reported in the plasma has no direct ability to modulate the motility of the human and mouse stomach.

Rimonabant, gastrointestinal motility and obesity

Background:

Obesity and overweight affect more than half of the US population and are associated with a number of diseases. Rimonabant, a cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker in the endocannabinoid (EC) system, was indicated in Europe for the treatment of obesity and overweight patients with associated risk factors but withdrawn on Jan, 2009 because of side effects. Many studies have reported the effects of rimonabant on gastrointestinal (GI) motility and food intake.

The aims of this review are:

to review the relationship of EC system with GI motility and food intake;

to review the studies of rimonabant on GI motility, food intake and obesity;

and to report the tolerance and side effects of rimonabant.

Methods:

the literature (Pubmed database) was searched using keywords: rimonabant, obesity and GI motility.

Results:

GI motility is related with appetite, food intake and nutrients absorption. The EC system inhibits GI motility, reduces emesis and increases food intake; Rimonabant accelerates gastric emptying and intestinal transition but decreases energy metabolism and food intake. There is rapid onset of tolerance to the prokinetic effect of rimonabant. The main side effects of rimonabant are depression and GI symptoms.

Conclusions:

Rimonabant has significant effects on energy metabolism and food intake, probably mediated via its effects on GI motility.