Antagonism of the antithrombotic and anti-atherosclerotic actions of aspirin by rofecoxib in the cholesterol-fed rabbit

Monitoring Antiplatelet Aggregation In Vivo and In Vitro by Microtiter Plate Method

BACKGROUND

The current light transmission aggregation method is a recognized conventional method for platelet function evaluation, but it is time-consuming and poor in parallelism and cannot simultaneously monitor multiple inducers at multiple levels. The microtiter plate method has been established because of the high-throughput characteristic, but it needs more practical applications.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the microtiter plate method by using aspirin and clopidogrel in vivo and in vitro.

METHODS

In vitro, the platelet aggregations inhibited by aspirin (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 90 μM) and clopidogrel (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300 μM) were evaluated with the presence of arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) agonists. Using the combination index (CI), the effect of the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel on platelet aggregation was evaluated. In vivo, New Zealand rabbits (n = 18) were randomly divided into 3 groups, aspirin group (5 mg/kg, intragastrical gavage [i.g.]), clopidogrel group (14 mg/kg at the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg, i.g.), and the combination of these two drugs, administered (i.g.) continuously for 7 days. Then, the blood was collected to measure platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

Different concentrations of AA (12.5, 25, 50, 100 μM) and ADP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 μM) could promote platelet aggregation in concentration-dependent manner, and the most stable induction concentrations of AA and ADP were 50 and 5 μM. In vitro, with the above optimized detection system, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination had concentration-dependent antiplatelet aggregation. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel also showed synergistic inhibition effect within the concentration range studied. In vivo, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination inhibited platelet aggregation induced by multiple concentrations of AA and ADP agonists, and the combined inhibition was more significant during the administration than aspirin or clopidogrel alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved microtiter plate method combining the use of multiple levels of multiple agonists avoids the variation of the effective inducer concentrations due to individual different response of platelets to agonists. It may be a potential approach in the detection of platelet aggregation.

The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Intraluminal Thrombus: Current Concepts of Development and Treatment

The pathogenesis of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) shows several hallmarks of atherosclerotic and atherothrombotic disease, but comprises an additional, predominant feature of proteolysis resulting in the degradation and destabilization of the aortic wall. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on AAA development, involving the accumulation of neutrophils in the intraluminal thrombus and their central role in creating an oxidative and proteolytic environment. Particular focus is placed on the controversial role of heme oxygenase 1/carbon monoxide and nitric oxide synthase/peroxynitrite, which may exert both protective and damaging effects in the development of the aneurysm. Treatment indications as well as surgical and pharmacological options for AAA therapy are discussed in light of recent reports.

High on treatment platelet reactivity against aspirin by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs--pharmacological mechanisms and clinical relevance

Inhibition of platelet function by aspirin results from irreversible inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase (COX)-1. While sufficient inhibition is obtained at antiplatelet doses (75-325 mg/day) in most (≥95%) treated patients, the antiplatelet effect of aspirin and subsequent cardiovascular risk reduction is much less in clinical settings and disease-dependent. Several reasons for this "high on treatment platelet reactivity" are known. This paper reviews the evidence for an interaction between aspirin and other COX inhibitors, namely non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Numerous experimental studies demonstrated a pharmacodynamic interaction between aspirin and NSAIDs. This likely occurs within the hydrophobic substrate channel of platelet COX-1 and might be explained by molecular competition between inhibitor drugs and substrate (arachidonic acid) at overlapping binding sites. This interaction is found with some compounds, notably ibuprofen and dipyrone (metamizole), but not with others, such as diclofenac and acetaminophen (paracetamol). Hence, this interaction is not a class effect of NSAIDs and/or non-steroidal analgesics but rather due to specific structural requirements which still remain to be defined. In vivo studies on healthy subjects and patients tend to confirm this type of interaction as well as large differences between NSAIDs and non-steroidal analgesics, respectively. These interactions may be clinically relevant and may increase the cardiovascular risk in long-term treatment for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with chronic inflammation, such as rheumatoid arthritis. These patients have an elevated risk for myocardial infarctions and may require chronic antiplatelet treatment by aspirin in addition to treatment of inflammatory pain.