Diagnosing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgery: when and which patients to treat

Post-surgical exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

Being an underdiagnosed and under or insufficiently treated condition, surgical pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PSP) is the condition in which pancreatic enzymes are insufficient for digestion because of gastrointestinal (GI) surgery involving the upper GI tract, biliary ducts, or the pancreas, and and leading to potential malnutrition and deterioration in quality of life. Age, obesity, history of tobacco use, family history of diabetes, surgery due to a malignant tumor, presence of steatorrhea, jaundice, weight loss, and intraoperative findings of hard pancreatic texture have been associated with a higher risk of PSP. Pancreatoduodectomy (PD) has demonstrated an increased risk of developing PSP, with a prevalence between 19-100%. Distal pancreatectomy (DP) and central pancreatectomy (CenP) are associated with less risk of PSP, with a prevalence of 0-82% and 3.66-8.7%, respectively. In patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), PSP was associated with 80% in Partington-Rochelle procedure, 86% in Frey procedure, 80% in duodenum preserving pancreatic head procedure, >60% in PD and 27.5-63% in DP. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) is a generally accepted tool for diagnosis. Treatment is recommended to start as soon as a diagnosis is achieved, or clinical suspicion is high. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy improves symptoms of malabsorption, facilitates weight gain, and ultimately improves patients' quality of life. Starting dosage is between 10,000-50,000 units in snacks and 50,000-75,000 units in main meals, administered throughout food intake, though further data specifically on PSP are needed. Follow-up in PSP is recommended on an on-demand basis, where malnutrition should be assessed.

Incidence, Diagnosis and Management of Malabsorption Following Oesophagectomy: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Survival following oesophagectomy for cancer is improving, resulting in increased focus on quality of life and survivorship. Malabsorption syndrome is multifactorial and includes exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and bile acid malabsorption (BAM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reported incidence and management of malabsorption syndromes post-oesophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library evaluating incidence, diagnosis and management of malabsorption was performed for studies published until December 2021.

RESULTS

Of 464 identified studies, eight studies (n = 7 non-randomised longitudinal studies) were included where patients were identified with malnutrition following oesophagectomy. Studies included a combined sample of 328 (range 7-63) patients. Malabsorption syndromes including EPI, SIBO and BAM occurred in 15.9-100%, 37.8-100% and 3.33-100% over 21 days-60 months, 1-24 months and 1-24 months respectively. There was no consensus definition for EPI, SIBO or BAM, and there was variation in diagnostic methods. Diagnostic criteria varied from clinical (gastrointestinal symptoms or weight loss), or biochemical (faecal elastase, hydrogen breath test and Selenium-75-labelled synthetic bile acid measurements). Treatment modalities using pancreatic enzyme replacement, rifaximin or colesevelam showed improvement in symptoms and weight in all studies, where investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Malabsorption syndromes following oesophagectomy are under-recognised, and thus under-reported. The resultant gastrointestinal symptoms may have a negative effect on post-operative quality of life. Current literature suggests benefit with outlined therapies; however, greater understanding of these conditions, their diagnosis and management is required to further understand which patients will benefit from treatment.

Urine Proteomics Reveals Sex-Specific Response to Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is a surgical option for refractory chronic pancreatitis-related pain. Despite the known clinical implications of TPIAT, the molecular effects remain poorly investigated. We performed the first hypothesis-generating study of the urinary proteome before and after TPIAT.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients eligible for TPIAT were prospectively enrolled. Urine samples were collected the week before and 12 to 18 months after TPIAT. The urine samples were prepared for bottom-up label-free quantitative proteomics using the "MStern" protocol.

RESULTS

Using 17 paired samples, we identified 2477 urinary proteins, of which 301 were significantly changed post-TPIAT versus pre-TPIAT. Our quantitative analysis revealed that the molecular response to TPIAT was highly sex-specific, with pronounced sex differences pre-TPIAT but minimal differences afterward. Comparing post-TPIAT versus pre-TPIAT, we found changes in cell-cell adhesion, intracellular vacuoles, and immune response proteins. After surgery, immunoglobulins, complement proteins, and cathepsins were increased, findings that may reflect glomerular damage. Finally, we identified both known and novel markers for immunoglobulin A nephropathy after 1 patient developed the disease 2 years after TPIAT.

CONCLUSIONS

We found distinct changes in the urinary proteomic profile after TPIAT and the response to TPIAT is highly sex-specific.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency After Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Systematic Review and Optimal Management Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) occurs when pancreatic enzyme activity in the intestinal lumen is insufficient for normal digestion to occur. The true incidence and diagnosis of EPI after pancreatectomy has not been fully understood and optimized. The aim of this study was to present incidence and diagnostic criteria for EPI after pancreatectomy for cancer and provide a guide for management and optimal therapy in pancreatectomy patients with cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature with publication dates from 2014 to 2019 was performed. A comprehensive diagnostic and treatment algorithm was then created based on literature review and current treatment options.

RESULTS

In total, 30 studies were included, 19 combined both pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), 9 for central pancreatectomy, and 2 others. EPI was defined subjectively without definitive testing using any of the established diagnostic studies in the majority of studies 23 (76%). Preoperative EPI was calculated to be 11.52%. Most studies assessed exocrine function at least 6 months postoperatively with four studies extending the follow-up period beyond 12 months. EPI diagnosed postoperatively at 1 month (40.27%), 3 months (30.94%), 6 months (36.06%), and 12 months (34.69%). After PD, the median prevalence of postoperative EPI was 43.14%, CP, the median prevalence was 4.85%, DP, median prevalence of postoperative EPI of 11.94%.

CONCLUSION

EPI is a frequent outcome that is often misdiagnosed or under-reported by the patient post-pancreatectomy. Given the increasing overall survival in pancreatectomy patients for cancer, surgeon awareness and assessment is critical to improving patients' overall quality of life.

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in long-term follow-up after curative gastric resection with D2 lymphadenectomy: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) can be a problem following gastrectomies. This study aimed to reveal the EPI prevalence and its possible causes in gastric cancer patients that underwent subtotal or total gastrectomy, with completed oncological treatments, and with long-term disease-free survival success. Additionally, we also sought to determine whether there were any relations between EPI and blood biomarkers, weight change, malnutrition parameters, and quality of life after gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 69 gastric cancer patients whose oncological treatments had already been completed, with a minimum follow-up period of 16 months, were included in the study. Fecal samples were taken from all patients for the Fecal Elastase-1 Test, and patients were stratified into three groups based on the results: low (<100 μg/g), moderate (100-200 μg/g), and normal (>200 μg/g). These results were compared with patients' clinical characteristics, blood nutrition biomarkers, Maastricht indexes (MI), Bristol stool scale, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores.

RESULTS

FE-1 levels were low in 33 (47.8%) of the patients, moderate in 11 (15.9%), and normal in 25 (36.2%). The rate of patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the low FE-1 group was higher than the normal FE-1 and moderate FE-1 groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). The serum total protein and lipase levels were lower in the low FE-1 group than in the normal FE-1 group (P = 0.023 and P < 0.001, respectively). When compared to the normal FE-1 group, the MI score of the low FE-1 group was higher (P = 0.018). The low FE-1 group had lower GIQLI gastrointestinal symptom scores than the normal FE-1 group (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

During long-term follow-up, EPI can be seen in more than half of patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Radiotherapy as an adjunct to adjuvant treatment in the postoperative period is considered a serious risk factor for EPI development. EPI contributes to malnutrition development after gastrectomy and negatively affects the patients' quality of life, especially in terms of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Bariatric Surgery and Its Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Recent data have suggested that bariatric procedures, especially laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), are safe and effective weight loss measures in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). But most of the studies have looked at short-term outcomes, and there is a general lack of awareness of underlying disease processes and baseline comorbidities in IBD patients undergoing bariatric procedures. Postbariatric issues in IBD patients including diarrhea from dumping syndrome, choleretic diarrhea, a high prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, stomal ulcerations, stenosis, and renal and gallstones can complicate the natural history of IBD. This could lead to unnecessary hospitalizations, change of medical therapy, and poor surgical and quality of life outcomes. In this review, we will discuss major complications after common bariatric procedures (SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and gastric banding) and suggest possible management strategies.

Nature-Inspired Design and Application of Lipidic Lyotropic Liquid Crystals

Amphiphilic lipids aggregate in aqueous solution into a variety of structural arrangements. Among the plethora of ordered structures that have been reported, many have also been observed in nature. In addition, due to their unique morphologies, the hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains, very high internal interfacial surface area, and the multitude of possible order-order transitions depending on environmental changes, very promising applications have been developed for these systems in recent years. These include crystallization in inverse bicontinuous cubic phases for membrane protein structure determination, generation of advanced materials, sustained release of bioactive molecules, and control of chemical reactions. The outstanding diverse functionalities of lyotropic liquid crystalline phases found in nature and industry are closely related to the topology, including how their nanoscopic domains are organized. This leads to notable examples of correlation between structure and macroscopic properties, which is itself central to the performance of materials in general. The physical origin of the formation of the known classes of lipidic lyotropic liquid crystalline phases, their structure, and their occurrence in nature are described, and their application in materials science and engineering, biology, medical, and pharmaceutical products, and food science and technology are exemplified.

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy after gastric resection: An update

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is one of the possible mechanisms of fat maldigestion following gastric surgery, together with reduced food intake, loss of gastric reservoir, small bowel bacterial overgrowth and rapid small bowel transit. Oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is the mainstay of treatment for EPI. The efficacy and safety of pancreatic enzyme substitution in patients following gastric resection remains unclear. This review article summarizes relevant studies addressing PERT after gastric resection.

Evidence-based Guidelines for the Management of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency After Pancreatic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND

EPI is a common complication after pancreatic surgery but there is certain confusion about its frequency, optimal methods of diagnosis, and when and how to treat these patients.

METHODS

Eighteen multidisciplinary reviewers performed a systematic review on 10 predefined questions following the GRADE methodology. Six external expert referees reviewed the retrieved information. Members from Spanish Association of Pancreatology were invited to suggest modifications and voted for the quantification of agreement.

RESULTS

These guidelines analyze the definition of EPI after pancreatic surgery, (one question), its frequency after specific techniques and underlying disease (four questions), its clinical consequences (one question), diagnosis (one question), when and how to treat postsurgical EPI (two questions) and its impact on the quality of life (one question). Eleven statements answering those 10 questions were provided: one (9.1%) was rated as a strong recommendation according to GRADE, three (27.3%) as moderate and seven (63.6%) as weak. All statements had strong agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

EPI is a frequent but under-recognized complication of pancreatic surgery. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the definition, diagnosis, and management of EPI after pancreatic surgery.

COMPARING THE ENZYME REPLACEMENT THERAPY COST IN POST PANCREATECTOMY PATIENTS DUE TO PANCREATIC TUMOR AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS

ABSTRACT Background - Among late postoperative complications of pancreatectomy are the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiencies. The presence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency imposes, as standard treatment, pancreatic enzyme replacement. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, with intractable pain or any complications with surgical treatment, are likely to present exocrine pancreatic insufficiency or have this condition worsened requiring adequate dose of pancreatic enzymes. Objective - The aim of this study is to compare the required dose of pancreatic enzyme and the enzyme replacement cost in post pancreatectomy patients with and without chronic pancreatitis. Methods - Observational cross-sectional study. In the first half of 2015 patients treated at the clinic of the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, who underwent pancreatectomy for at least 6 months and in use of enzyme replacement therapy were included in this series. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic pancreatitis prior to pancreatic surgery. For this study, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results - The annual cost of the treatment was R$ 2150.5 ± 729.39; R$ 2118.18 ± 731.02 in patients without pancreatitis and R$ 2217.74 ± 736.30 in patients with pancreatitis. Conclusion - There was no statistically significant difference in the cost of treatment of enzyme replacement post pancreatectomy in patients with or without chronic pancreatitis prior to surgical indication.

Efficacy and Safety of Pancrelipase/Pancreatin in Patients With Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency and a Medical History of Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to perform exploratory analyses of the efficacy and safety of pancrelipase delayed-release capsules (Creon) in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) with (n = 36) and without (n = 18) concurrent diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, post hoc, subgroup (±DM) analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pancrelipase in patients with EPI due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy (total or partial). After a 5-day placebo run-in period (baseline), patients were randomized to pancrelipase (72,000 lipase units/meal, 36,000/snack) or placebo for 7 days. Outcomes included changes in coefficients of fat absorption (CFA) and nitrogen absorption (CNA) from baseline to the end of the double-blind period.

RESULTS

Mean changes in nutrient absorption were greater with pancrelipase versus placebo in patients with DM (CFA, 36.0% vs 7.5%, P < 0.0001; CNA, 33.4% vs 3.7%, P = 0.0002) and without DM (CFA, 25.2% vs 12.3%, P = 0.0326; CNA, 39.1% vs 17.6%, P = 0.1187). Diabetes mellitus was not significantly associated with outcomes for CFA (P = 0.0802) and CNA (P = 0.2934). Incidences of adverse events, including hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, were similar in the pancrelipase and placebo arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancrelipase improved fat and protein absorption in patients with EPI due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, with or without DM, and matched the safety profile previously reported.

Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency in Patients With Pancreatic or Periampullary Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer, both before and after resection.

METHODS

Systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA guidelines). We included studies reporting on pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Data on patient demographics, type of pancreatic resection, diagnostic test, and occurrence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency were extracted. Prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was calculated before and after pancreatic resections and in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Nine observational cohort studies with 693 patients were included. Median preoperative prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was 44% (range, 42%-47%) before pancreatoduodenectomy, 20% (range, 16%-67%) before distal pancreatectomy, 63% before total pancreatectomy, and 25% to 50% in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The median prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency at least 6 months after pancreatoduodenectomy was 74% (range, 36%-100%) and 67% to 80% after distal pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency is diagnosed in approximately half of all patients scheduled to undergo resection for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. The prevalence increases markedly after resection. These data highlight the need of pancreatic enzyme suppletion in these patients.

Summary and recommendations from the Australasian guidelines for the management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency

AIM

Because of increasing awareness of variations in the use of pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy, the Australasian Pancreatic Club decided it was timely to re-review the literature and create new Australasian guidelines for the management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI).

METHODS

A working party of expert clinicians was convened and initially determined that by dividing the types of presentation into three categories for the likelihood of PEI (definite, possible and unlikely) they were able to consider the difficulties of diagnosing PEI and relate these to the value of treatment for each diagnostic category.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Recent studies confirm that patients with chronic pancreatitis receive similar benefit from pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy (PERT) to that established in children with cystic fibrosis. Severe acute pancreatitis is frequently followed by PEI and PERT should be considered for these patients because of their nutritional requirements. Evidence is also becoming stronger for the benefits of PERT in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However there is as yet no clear guide to help identify those patients in the 'unlikely' PEI group who would benefit from PERT. For example, patients with coeliac disease, diabetes mellitus, irritable bowel syndrome and weight loss in the elderly may occasionally be given a trial of PERT, but determining its effectiveness will be difficult. The starting dose of PERT should be from 25,000-40,000 IU lipase taken with food. This may need to be titrated up and there may be a need for proton pump inhibitors in some patients to improve efficacy.

Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing treatment for esophagogastric or esophageal cancer are exposed to a considerably high risk of malnutrition due to early obstruction of the gastrointestinal passage. Presently most of the patients undergo modern multimodal therapies which require chemoradiation or chemotherapy ahead of surgery. Therefore reconstruction of the obstructed gastrointestinal passage is considerably delayed. Surgery as the only curative option after neoadjuvant treatment is the mainstay of therapy in this setting. However, many patients are at risk for the development of postoperative complications associated with the complexity of the surgical procedure. Therefore enteral feeding as a prerequisite to avoid malnutrition represents a special therapeutic challenge.

SUMMARY

This review describes the recent literature on the incidence and influence of perioperative malnutrition on oncologic outcome, measures to determine patients at risk, possible strategies to reduce or avoid malnutrition by supportive enteral/parenteral nutrition, implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery programs and feeding routes, but also surgical and adjuvant procedures in the curative and palliative setting for patients undergoing treatment for gastroesophageal cancers.

KEY MESSAGES

Appropriate identification of patients at risk is crucial to avoid malnutrition. Early nutritional interventions during multimodal/neoadjuvant treatment may be beneficial for weight loss reduction although the evidence is not conclusive. Pouch reconstructions during surgery should be applied in order to increase quality of life and eating capacity. Reduction of postoperative complications could provide potential benefits. In palliative patients, insertion of self-expanding metal stents can reduce dysphagia and improve quality of life, but does not prolong overall survival. Further evidence is required to determine the value of the procedures and measures described in this review.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Nutritional risk scoring should be performed for every gastroesophageal cancer patient. Sophisticated reconstruction methods and early recovery programs should be enforced to reduce perioperative starvation periods. Self-expanding metal stents should be used for palliative patients.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Gastric resection, short bowel syndrome, and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for development of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Reasons are multifactorial and not completely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of EPI after distal (dRYGB) and proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pRYGB) and to assess the influence of respective limb lengths.

SETTING

University hospital, Switzerland.

METHODS

The study comprised 188 consecutive patients who underwent primary dRYGB (common channel<120 cm, biliopancreatic limb 80-100 cm) or pRYGB (alimentary limb = 155 cm, biliopancreatic limb 40-75 cm) and who were followed-up for at least 2 years. Patients with a history of gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary resection (except for cholecystectomy), postoperative pregnancy, and any revision of RYGB (gastric pouch, limb lengths) were excluded. EPI was defined by clinical symptoms in combination with fecal pancreatic elastase-1<200 μg/g stool or fecal pancreatic elastase-1>200 and<500 μg/g stool and positive dechallenge-rechallenge test with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 52.2 months (range 24-120). Seventy-nine patients (42%) underwent dRYGB, and 109 (58%) underwent pRYGB. Of those, 59 (31%) patients were diagnosed with EPI after a mean 12.5±16.3 months. There was a significant difference between dRYGB and pRYGB groups in initial body mass index (dRYGB 47.1±8.1 kg/m(2) versus pRYGB 42.7±6.1 kg/m(2); P<.01), patients in Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score group C (13% versus 3%; P = .02), and prevalence of EPI (48% versus 19%; P<.01). Neither overall small bowel length nor absolute or relative limb lengths were influencing factors on EPI after dRYGB.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of EPI after dRYGB (48%) and pRYGB (19%) is of clinical importance. There was no significant difference in absolute or relative limb lengths between EPI and non-EPI groups after dRYGB.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Untreated pancreatic exocrine dysfunction is associated with poor quality of life and reduced survival, but is difficult to diagnose following pancreatic resection. Many factors including the extent of the surgery, the health of the residual pancreas and the type of reconstruction must be considered. Patients remain undertreated, and consequently there is much debate to whether or not pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be routinely prescribed following pancreatic resection.

METHODS

A review of the literature was undertaken to establish the incidence of PEI and factors identifying treatment.

RESULTS

Forty two to forty five percent of patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) experience pancreatic exocrine insufficiency pre-operatively, whilst the post-operative incidence is 56-98% in PD, and 12-80% following distal and central pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of pancreatic enzyme replacement should be considered at a starting dose of 50 to 75,000 units lipase with meals and 25,000 to 50,000 units with snacks in this patient group. Patients who have had a central or distal pancreatectomy should be individually assessed for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in the post operative period, with those undergoing extensive resection most likely to experience insufficiency. Patients who fail to respond to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be referred to a specialist dietitian, be advised on dose adjustment, and undergo investigation to exclude other gastro-intestinal pathology, including small bowel bacterial overgrowth and bile acid malabsorption.

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency following esophagectomy

Weight loss following esophagectomy is a management challenge for all patients. It is multifactorial with contributing factors including loss of gastric reservoir, rapid small bowel transit, malabsorption, and adjuvant chemotherapy. The development of a postoperative malabsorption syndrome, as a result of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), is recognized in a subgroup of patients following gastrectomy. This has not previously been documented following esophageal resection. EPI can result in symptoms of flatulence, diarrhea, steatorrhea, vitamin deficiencies, and weight loss. It therefore has the potential to pose a significant level of morbidity in postoperative patients. There is some evidence that patients with proven EPI (fecal elastase-1 < 200 μg/g) may benefit from a trial of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). We observed symptoms compatible with EPI in a subgroup of patients following esophagectomy. We hypothesized that this was contributing to malabsorption and malnutrition in these patients. To investigate this, fecal elastase-1 was measured in postoperative patients, and in those with proven EPI, a trial of PERT was commenced in combination with specialist dietary education. At routine postoperative follow-up, which included assessment by a specialist dietitian, those patients with symptoms suggestive of malabsorption were given the opportunity to have their fecal elastase-1 measured. PERT was then offered to patients with fecal elastase-1 less than 200 μg/g (EPI) as well as those in the 200-500 μg/g range (mild EPI) with more severe symptoms. Fecal elastase-1 was measured in 63 patients between June 2009 and January 2011 at a median of 4 months (range 1-42) following surgery. Ten patients had fecal elastase-1 less than 200 μg/g, and all had failed to maintain preoperative weight. All accepted a trial of PERT. Nine (90%) had symptomatic improvement, and seven (70%) increased their weight. Thirty-nine patients had a fecal elastase-1 in the 200-500 μg/g range. Twelve were given a trial of PERT based on level of symptoms, five (42%) reported an improvement in symptoms, but only two (17%) gained weight. Our early results support the observation that EPI is a factor contributing to postoperative morbidity in patients recovering from esophagectomy and that these patients can benefit from a trial of PERT. Our study has limitations, and a formal trial is required to evaluate the impact of EPI and PERT following esophagectomy. Currently, our practice is to measure fecal elastase-1 in any patient with unexplained weight loss or symptoms of malabsorption. In patients with proven EPI or those who are symptomatic with mild EPI, a trial of PERT should be offered and symptoms reassessed.