Short- and long-term results of extended left hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

Morbidity analysis of left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary disease and live donor

BACKGROUND

Despite remarkable advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management, left hepatic trisectionectomy (LHT) remains a challenging procedure with a somewhat high postoperative morbidity rate compared with less-extensive resections. This study aimed to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of LHT and identify factors associated with the postoperative morbidity of this technically demanding surgical procedure.

METHODS

The medical records of 53 patients who underwent LHT between June 2005 and October 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The independent prognostic factor of postoperative morbidity was analyzed using the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common indication for surgery (n = 21), followed by hilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 14), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 10), and other pathologies (including colorectal liver metastasis, hepatolithiasis, gallbladder cancer, living donor, hemangioma, and multilocular biliary cyst; n = 8). The rates of postoperative morbidities of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher and 90-day mortality were 39.6% and 1.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 81.1%, 61.4%, and 44.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative jaundice [hazard ratio (HR) = 6.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-24.17, P = 0.009] and operative time > 420 min (HR = 4.66, 95% CI: 1.27-17.17, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-hospital mortality of LHT surgery can be minimalized by a reliable preoperative evaluation of liver function and selection of the dominant anatomic features of right posterior sector, active and appropriate preoperative management for obstructive cholangitis and compensatory hypertrophy of the future remnant posterior sector, and the experience of the surgeon.

Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancies: Its' role and outcomes. A retrospective cohort study

Background

Left hepatic trisectionectomy (LHT) is a complex hepatic resection; its’ role and outcomes in hepatobiliary malignancies remains unclear.

Materials and methods

All patients undergoing LHT at the tertiary HPB referral unit at RSCH, Guildford, UK from September 1996 to October 2015 were included. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database.

Results

Twenty-eight patients underwent LHT. The M:F ratio was 1.8:1. Median age was 60 years (range 43–76 years). Diagnoses included colorectal liver metastases (CRLM; n = 20); cholangiocarcinoma (CCA; n = 4); and other (neuroendocrine tumour metastases (NET; n = 3) and breast metastases (n = 1)). Median duration of surgery was 270 min (range 210–585 min). Median blood loss was 750 ml (300–2400 ml) with a perioperative transfusion rate of 21% (n = 6/28). The rate of all post-operative complications was 21% for all patients, and given the extensive resection performed four patients (14%) developed varying degrees of hepatic insufficiency. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma developed severe hepatic insufficiency, which was fatal within 90 days of surgery. 1 and 3-year survivals were 92% and 68% respectively.

Conclusion

This study supports LHT in patients with significant tumour burden. Despite extensive resection, our favourable morbidity and mortality rates show this is a safe and beneficial procedure for patients with all hepatobiliary malignancies. Given the nature of resection the incidence of post-operative hepatic insufficiency is higher than less extensive hepatic resections.

•

LHT is an extended resection reported to have higher incidences of morbidity and mortality compared with less extensive hepatic resections.

•

This procedure is useful for the surgical management of patients with hepatic lesions that were previously considered unresectable.

•

We report favourable outcomes following LHT at our institution compared with less extensive hepatic resections.

•

An initial post-operative lactate of >1.5 mmol/L was associated with an increased risk of developing post-operative complications (p = 0.035).

Current role of trisectionectomy for hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies

BACKGROUND

Trisectionectomy is a treatment option in extensive liver malignancy, including colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, the reported experience of this procedure is limited. Therefore, we present our experience with right hepatic trisectionectomy (RHT) for CRLM as an example and discuss the changing role of trisectionectomy in the context of modern treatment alternatives based on a literature review.

METHODS

Between January 1993 and December 2014 all patients undergoing RHT at a single center in the UK for CRLM were included. Patient and tumor characteristics were reviewed and a multivariate analysis was done. Based on a literature review the role of trisectionectomy in the treatment of HPB malignancies was discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients undergoing RHT were included. Overall perioperative morbidity was 40.3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 7.6% but reduced to 2.8% over time. Multivariate analysis identified additional organ resection (P = .040) and blood transfusion (P = .028) as independent risk factors for morbidity. Multiple tumors, total hepatic vascular exclusion, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for significantly decreased disease-free and disease-specific survival. Further surgery for recurrence after RHT significantly prolonged survival compared with palliative chemotherapy only.

CONCLUSION

With the further development of surgical and multimodal treatment strategies in CRLM the indications for trisectionectomy are decreasing. Having being formerly associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality, this single-center experience clearly shows that these concomitant risks decrease with experience, liberal use of portal vein embolization and improved patient selection. Trisectionectomy remains relevant in selected patients.

Is Enhanced One-Stage Hepatectomy a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Two-Stage Hepatectomy in the Setting of Multiple Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Comparative Analysis between Two Pioneering Centers

BACKGROUND

Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is the present standard for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases (CLM). As alternative, ultrasound-guided one-stage hepatectomy (E-OSH) has been proposed even for deep-located nodules to compare TSH and E-OSH.

METHODS

All consecutive TSH at the Paul Brousse Hospital and E-OSH at the Humanitas Research Hospital were considered. The inclusion criteria were ≥6 CLM, ≥3 CLM in the left liver, and ≥1 lesion with vascular contact. A total of 74 TSH and 35 E-OSH were compared.

RESULTS

The 2 groups had similar characteristics. Drop-out rate of TSH was 40.5%. In comparison with the cumulated hepatectomies of TSH, E-OSH had lower blood loss (500 vs. 1,100 mL, p = 0.009), overall morbidity (37.1 vs. 70.5%, p = 0.003), severe morbidity (14.3 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04), and liver-specific morbidity (22.9 vs. 40.9%, p = 0.02). R0 resection rate was similar between groups. E-OSH and completed TSH had similar overall survival (5-year 38.2 vs. 31.8%), recurrence-free survival (3-year 17.6 vs. 17.7%), and recurrence sites.

CONCLUSIONS

E-OSH is a safe alternative to TSH for multiple bilobar deep-located CLM. Whenever feasible, E-OSH should even be considered the preferred option because it has excellent safety and oncological outcomes equivalent to completed TSH, without the drop-out risk.

The Post-SIR-Spheres Surgery Study (P4S): Retrospective Analysis of Safety Following Hepatic Resection or Transplantation in Patients Previously Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres

BACKGROUND

Reports show that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) may downsize inoperable liver tumors to resection or transplantation, or enable a bridge-to-transplant. A small-cohort study found that long-term survival in patients undergoing resection following SIRT appears possible but no robust studies on postsurgical safety outcomes exist. The Post-SIR-Spheres Surgery Study was an international, multicenter, retrospective study to assess safety outcomes of liver resection or transplantation following SIRT with yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres^®; Sirtex).

METHODS

Data were captured retrospectively at participating SIRT centers, with Y-90 resin microspheres, surgery (resection or transplantation), and follow-up for all eligible patients. Primary endpoints were perioperative and 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Standard statistical methods were used.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients [hepatocellular carcinoma: 49; metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): 30; cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, other: 7 each]; 36% of patients had one or more lines of chemotherapy pre-SIRT. Sixty-three percent of patients had comorbidities, including hypertension (44%), diabetes (26%), and cardiopathy (16%). Post-SIRT, 71 patients were resected and 29 received a liver transplant. Grade 3+ peri/postoperative complications and any grade of liver failure were experienced by 24 and 7% of patients, respectively. Four patients died <90 days postsurgery; all were trisectionectomies (mCRC: 3; cholangiocarcinoma: 1) and typically had one or more previous chemotherapy lines and presurgical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In 100 patients undergoing liver surgery after receiving SIRT, mortality and complication rates appeared acceptable given the risk profile of the recruited patients.

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes After Major Liver Surgery and Extended Hemihepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

To determine the surgical and oncologic outcomes after major liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at a Dutch University Hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with CRLM who had undergone major liver resection, defined as ≥ 4 liver segments, between January 2000 and December 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

Major liver surgery was performed in 117 patients. Of these, 26 patients had undergone formal extended left or right hemihepatectomy. Ninety-day postoperative mortality was 8%. Major postoperative complications occurred in 27% of patients; these adverse events were more common in the extended hemihepatectomy group. Median disease-free survival was 11 months and median overall survival 44 months.

CONCLUSION

Major liver surgery, including formal extended hemihepatectomy, is associated with significant operative morbidity and mortality but can confer prolonged overall survival for patients with CRLM.

Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care

OBJECTIVE(S)

Higher-volume centers demonstrate better perioperative outcomes for complex surgical interventions, though resource utilization implications of this hospital-level variation are unclear. We hypothesized that for hepatic lobectomy, higher operative volume correlates with better outcomes and lower costs.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, 4163 patients undergoing hepatic lobectomy were identified from the University HealthSystems Consortium database. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and decision analytic models were constructed to identify differences in hospital utilization and cost. Cost included both index and readmission hospitalizations, when applicable.

RESULTS

The annual number of hepatic lobectomies performed by the institutions within the study ranged from 1 to 86. The median age of the 4163 patients was 58 years with a roughly equal gender split (M/F 49 %:51 %) and a racial breakdown which reflected that of the general US population. For all patients, the overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.3 % and the 30-day readmission rate was 13.4 %. Hospitals performing >30 hepatic lobectomies per year had significantly lower mortality and readmission rates than those hospitals performing ≤15 lobectomies annually (both p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, higher severity of illness (odd ratio (OR) 2.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [1.48-3.07], p < 0.001), discharge to rehab (OR 1.84, [1.28-2.64], p < 0.001), home with home health care (OR 1.38, [1.08-1.76], p = 0.01), and surgery at a low-volume hospital (OR 1.49, [1.18-1.88], p < 0.001) were significant predictors of readmission. Conversely, surgical intervention at high-volume centers was associated with decreased risk of readmission (OR 0.67, [0.53-0.85], p < 0.001). When both index and readmission costs were considered, per-patient cost at low-volume centers was 21.9 % higher than at high-volume centers ($19,669 vs. $16,137). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for perioperative mortality and readmission at all centers did not significantly change the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, for the first time, demonstrate that hospital volume in hepatic lobectomy is an important, modifiable risk factor for readmission and cost. To optimize resource utilization, patients undergoing complex hepatic surgery should be directed to higher-volume surgical institutions.

Clinical outcomes of left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy

Background

Left hepatic trisectionectomy (LHT) is a challenging major anatomical hepatectomy with a high complication rate and a worldwide experience that remains limited. The aim of this study was to describe changes in surgical practice over time, to analyse the outcomes of patients undergoing LHT for hepatobiliary malignancy, and to identify factors associated with morbidity and mortality.

Methods

A cohort study was undertaken of patients who underwent LHT at a single tertiary hepatobiliary referral centre between January 1993 and March 2013. Univariable and multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes following LHT.

Result

Some 113 patients underwent LHT for colorectal liver metastasis (57), hilar cholangiocarcinoma (22), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (12) and hepatocellular carcinoma (11); 11 patients had various other indications. Overall morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 46·0 and 9·7 per cent respectively. Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 71·3 and 44·4 per cent respectively. Total hepatic vascular exclusion and intraoperative blood transfusion were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity, whereas blood transfusion was the only factor predictive of in-hospital mortality. Time period analysis revealed a decreasing trend in blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity and mortality in the last 5 years.

Conclusion

Morbidity, mortality and long-term survival after LHT support its use in selected patients with a significant tumour burden.

Anti-angiogenic agents in metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health concern being the third leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. The availability of better therapeutic options has led to a decline in cancer mortality in these patients. Surgical resection should be considered in all stages of the disease. The use of conversion therapy has made surgery a potentially curative option even in patients with initially unresectable metastatic disease. In this review we discuss the role of various anti-angiogenic agents in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We describe the mechanism of action of these agents, and the rationale for their use in combination with chemotherapy. We also review important clinical studies that have evaluated the safety and efficacy of these agents in mCRC patients. Despite the discovery of several promising anti-angiogenic agents, mCRC remains an incurable disease with a median overall survival of just over 2 years in patients exposed to all available treatment regimens. Further insights into tumor biology and tumor microenvironment may help improve outcomes in these patients.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant after Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been demonstrated as a feasible procedure in extended liver resections as a means of successfully increasing the volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) is toxic to the organ and may impair hepatic regeneration. This study was performed to assess the procedure's effect on hypertrophy of the FLR, including the short-term survival.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed 19 consecutive ALPPS patients, of whom 58% (n = 11) received neoadjuvant CTx because of colorectal liver metastasis (CRM). Patients presented with multifocal CRM (n = 11, 58%); cholangiocarcinoma (n = 7, 37%), of which 5 were in the Klatskin position; and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 1, 5%). Hepatectomy was performed within 6 to 13 days after hepatic partition. Volumetry was performed before both liver partitioning and hepatectomy. A survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Liver partition and portal vein ligation induced sufficient hypertrophy of the FLR, with an increased volume of 74% ± 35%. Patients underwent hepatectomy after a median of 8 days; in all cases R0 resection was achieved. Neoadjuvant CTx was shown to significantly impair hypertrophy. The volume of the FLR in non-CTx patients increased by 98% ± 35%; an increase of 59% ± 22% was observed in patients who underwent CTx (p = 0.027). Chemotherapy did not have an impact on either morbidity or in-hospital mortality, which were 68% and 16%, respectively. One-year overall survival was 53%, with a 1-year survival of 67% in CRM patients and 38% in non-CRM patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Data presented here demonstrate for the first time that neoadjuvant CTx significantly impairs hypertrophy of the FLR after ALPPS.

Safety and long-term outcomes of anatomic left hepatic trisectionectomy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anatomic left hepatic trisectionectomy (ALHT) is a complex hepatic resection, and its outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remain unclear. This paper focuses on the assessment of the safety and long-term effects of ALHT on intermediate and advanced HCC patients with tumors that occupy the left liver lobe.

METHODS

This study performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive HCC patients who underwent ALHT in a single-center cohort between December 2004 and December 2011.

RESULTS

ALHT was performed on 34 intermediate and advanced HCC patients (0.05%) of 17064 HCC patients who had undergone hepatic resection. Among them, 12 (33.3%) developed postoperative complications. Based on the multivariate analysis, we found that a serum prealbumin level of 170 mg/L is associated with an increased risk of morbidity (P=0.008). The one-year, two-year, three-year, and five-year overall survival rates were 61%, 27%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. The median overall survival was 13 months (range, 2-89 months). Based on the multivariate analysis, we also found that patients with an A/G ratio <1.5 are more likely to have poor prognosis than those with an A/G ratio ≥ 1.5 (P=0.014). Multiple tumors are associated with worse outcomes (P=0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

ALHT is safe for intermediate and advanced HCC patients with tumors that occupy the left lobe and with preoperative Child-Pugh class A liver function. Low preoperative serum prealbumin level may increase the risk of postoperative complications. Although early intrahepatic recurrence rate is high, some patients, especially those with a single tumor and normal A/G ratio, exhibit long-term survival.

Liver transplantation in treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Surgical resection is the only curative modality for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and 5-year overall survival after resection is about 40%. Nonresectable CLM is not curable and 5-year overall survival is currently about 10%. Before 1995, several liver transplantations for CLMs were performed, but outcome was poor (5-year survival rate: 18%). Liver transplantation for CLMs was abandoned and CLMs were even considered a contraindication to the procedure. Since then, the survival rate after liver transplantation in general has improved by almost 30%. In a prospective pilot study of liver transplantation for nonresectable CLM, a 5-year overall survival rate of 60% was demonstrated, however 19 of 21 patients experienced recurrence of disease. Here, current knowledge and ongoing research in this field is reviewed, and the potential role for liver transplantation as one of several treatment modalities for CLM discussed.

Long-term results after in-situ split (ISS) liver resection

PURPOSE

In-situ split (ISS) liver resection is a novel method to induce rapid hypertrophy of the contralateral liver lobe in patients at risk for postoperative liver failure due to insufficient liver remnant. So far, no data about oncological long-term survival after ISS liver resection is available.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our patients treated with ISS liver resection at the Department of Surgery of the University of Regensburg, the first center worldwide to perform ISS.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2014, ISS liver resection was performed in 16 patients. Two patients (12.5 %) were lost in early postoperative phase (90 days) and one was lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients with a follow-up period of more than 3 months were included into oncologically focused analyses. Median follow-up was 26.4 months (range 3.2-54.6). Seven patients had suffered from colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and six from various other liver malignancies (non-CRLM). The ISS procedure had led to a median increase of 86.3 % of the left lateral liver lobe after a median of 9 days (range 4-28 days). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 14.6 months and median overall survival (OS) was 41.7 months (26.4 months when including 90-days mortality). Three-year survival was calculated with 56.4 and 48.9 % when including perioperative mortality, respectively (CRLM 64.3 % vs. non-CRLM 50 %).

CONCLUSION

ISS liver resection can provide long-term survival of selected patients with advanced liver malignancies that otherwise are not eligible for liver resection due to insufficient liver remnant.

Repeat liver resection after a hepatic or extended hepatic trisectionectomy for colorectal liver metastasis

OBJECTIVE

A right and left hepatic trisectionectomy and an extended trisectionectomy are the largest liver resections performed for malignancy. This report analyses a series of 23 patients who had at least one repeat resection after a hepatic trisectionectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a single-centre prospective liver resection database from May 1996 to April 2009 was used for patient identification. Full notes, radiology and patient reviews were analysed for a variety of factors with respect to survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent up to 3 repeat hepatic resections after 20 right and 3 left hepatic trisectionectomies. In 18 patients the initial surgery was an extended trisectionectomy. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after a repeat resection were 100%, 46% and 32%, respectively. No factors predictive for survival were identified.

CONCLUSION

A repeat resection after a hepatic trisectionectomy for CRLM can offer extended survival and should be considered where appropriate.

Kinetics of liver function tests after a hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases predict post-operative liver failure as defined by the International Study Group for Liver Surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) has been defined by the International Study Group for Liver Surgery (ISGLS). The purpose of the present study was to examine the kinetics of conventional liver function tests (LFT) after a major liver resection and is the first to examine their utility in predicting PHLF in groups defined by the ISGLS.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing a major liver resection for colorectal liver metastases were stratified into ISGLS groups and their LFT up to 1 year after surgery compared. Receiving-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of LFT identified optimal thresholds in predicting category C liver failure.

RESULTS

In total, 32, 22 and 19 patients belonged to ISGLS groups A, B and C, respectively. The median international normalized ratio (INR) and bilirubin values on post-operative days 1, 3, 5 and 7 were significantly different among the groups (all P-values <0.05). ROC analysis of day 1 INR (AUC 0.813) and day 5 bilirubin (AUC 0.798) revealed thresholds of 1.35 and 52 μmol/l to have sensitivities of 85% and 81% and specificities of 63% and 73%, respectively, to predict group C liver failure.

DISCUSSION

Post-operative LFT after a major liver resection differs significantly among the three ISGLS groups. Thresholds of bilirubin and INR can be used to identify patients who are at a maximum risk of complications.