Older donor allografts are associated with poor patient survival after living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related liver diseases

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation using elderly donors

Purpose

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using elderly donors is increasing in frequency in response to organ shortage. However, elderly donor graft has been reported to negatively affect graft patency and patient survival.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 604 patients who underwent LDLT at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea between May 1999 and September 2012. Elderly donors were defined as those ≥55 years of age. Here, we evaluate the survival differences and causes of death of recipients of elderly donor grafts.

Results

The overall mortality rate of the recipients was significantly higher in the elderly donor group (group A) than in the younger donor group (group B: 46.2% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.004). The survival length of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (31.2 ± 31.3 and 51.4 ± 40.8 months, P = 0.014). The significantly common causes of death in group A were biliary (41.7%) and arterial complication (16.7%), and it was higher than those in group B (P = 0.000 and P = 0.043, respectively).

Conclusion

LDLT using elderly donors could induce more serious complications and higher mortality rates than those at using younger donors. As such, careful donor selection is needed, especially with regard to assessing the condition of potential elderly donor livers. Furthermore, a large-volume and multicenter study of complications and outcomes of LDLT using elderly donor liver is required.

Flowmetry-based portal inflow manipulation for a small-for-size liver graft in a recipient with spontaneous splenorenal shunt

We report a case of living donor liver transplantation using a small-for-size graft (SFSG) with graft to estimated standard liver volume of only 28% in a recipient with spontaneous splenorenal shunt and demonstrate the value of intraoperative ultrasonic flowmetry. Despite an SFSG, the graft was underperfused. This was recognized by flowmetry and was rectified by ligation of the splenorenal shunt.

The impact of donor age on the outcome of adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The negative effects of increased donor age on liver transplantation became evident in deceased donor liver transplantation. In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the details remain unclear.

METHODS

Initially, 137 adult LDLT recipients from August 1996 to May 2005 were divided into two groups (donors <50 years of age: n=99, donors >or= 50 years of age: n=38) for the retrospective study. Then, 24 recipients who received LDLT from June 2005 to July 2006 were divided into two groups: group 1 (donors <50 years of age, n=14) and group 2 (donors >or= 50 years of age, n=10) and enrolled in the prospective study to analyze their clinical course and prognostic factors in the aged graft.

RESULTS

In the retrospective study, the younger donor group had significantly better survival than that of the aged donor group (P=0.015, Log rank test). In the prospective study, the postoperative graft functions showed that the serum total bilirubin levels were significantly lower in group 1 (P<0.02, by ANOVA analysis). The phosphorylated-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription3 expression at 4 hr after reperfusion (RT2) in group 2 was significantly lower than that in group 1. At RT2, the expressions were up-regulated in group 1, but were down-regulated in group 2. The serum 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine value became significantly higher in group 1 two weeks after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

In the near term, Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription3 gene induction during cold preservation may be of great use in improving the outcome of aged grafts in LDLT.