Effects of terlipressin and somatostatin on liver and thorax blood volumes in patients with cirrhosis

Multisystem hemodynamic effects of terlipressin in cirrhosis: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) is a serious complication of advanced liver disease. Pharmacologic options are limited in effectiveness, therefore liver transplantation is the definitive therapy. Early investigation into terlipressin as a first-line therapy for HRS-AKI has been promising but expected hemodynamic changes across organ systems in patients with cirrhosis have not been thoroughly examined.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature including adult patients with cirrhosis who received terlipressin and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Non-human studies, case reports, conference abstracts, and review articles were excluded. Searches were performed up to December 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL.

RESULTS

Of 2022 studies retrieved, 56 studies met inclusion criteria. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac output were the most reported parameters. Pulmonary arterial pressure and wedge pressure were the next most common. Systemic vascular resistance, hepatic and renal measures such as resistive indices and portal pressure gradients had fewer studies. Studies reported decreased heart rate, increased mean arterial pressure, decreased cardiac output/index, and increased systemic vascular resistance. Other hemodynamic outcomes were more varied across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin exerts a variety of hemodynamic effects across organ systems and vascular beds. More studies are required to understand if any hemodynamic parameters might predict terlipressin response or adverse events.

Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians' preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center

Background

Vasoactive drugs are frequently used in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The aim of study was to assess physicians’ preference of vasoactive agents in acute EVB, their reasons of preference and efficacy and safety of these short course regimens.

Methods

Cirrhotic patients with suspected EVB were screened (n = 352). Eligible patients were assigned based on the physician’s preference to either somatostatin (group S) or terlipressin (group T) followed by EVL. In group S, intravenous bolus (250 µg) of somatostatin followed by 250 µg/hour was continued for three days. In group T, 2 mg bolus injection of terlipressin was followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 h for three days.

Results

A total of 150 patients were enrolled; 41 in group S and 109 in group T. Reasons for physician preference was convenience in administration (77.1%) for group T and good safety profile (73.2%) for group S. Very early rebleeding within 49–120 h occurred in one patient in groups S and T (p = 0.469). Four patients in group S and 14 patients in group T have variceal rebleeding episodes within 6–42 d (p = 0.781). Overall treatment-related adverse effects were compatible in groups S and T (p = 0.878), but the total cost of terlipressin and somatostatin differed i.e., USD 621.32 and USD 496.43 respectively.

Conclusions

Terlipressin is the preferred vasoactive agent by physicians in our institution for acute EVB. Convenience in administration and safety profile are main considerations of physicians. Safety and hemostatic effects did not differ significantly between short-course somatostatin or terlipressin, although terlipressin is more expensive.

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent infusions of terlipressin for the control of acute variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension: An open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Continuous infusion of terlipressin causes more stable reduction in portal venous pressure than intermittent infusion. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of continuous infusion vs. intermittent boluses of terlipressin to control acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive patients with portal hypertension and AVB were randomized to receive either continuous intravenous infusion (Group A, n = 43) or intravenous boluses of terlipressin (Group B, n = 43). Group A received 1 mg intravenous bolus of terlipressin followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg in 24 h. Group B received 2 mg intravenous bolus of terlipressin followed by 1 mg intravenous injection every 6 h. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy was done within 12 h of admission. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was done using a multi-band ligator. In both groups, treatment was continued up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was rebleeding or death within 5 days of admission.

RESULTS

Patients in group A had lower rate of treatment failure (4.7%) as compared to patients in group B (20.7%) (p = 0.02). Within 6 weeks, four and eight patients died in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.21). Model for end-stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) score and continuous infusion of terlipressin showed significant relationship with treatment failure on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of terlipressin may be more effective than intermittent infusion to prevent treatment failure in patients with variceal bleeding. There is significant relationship between MELD-Na score [Odd ratio = 1.37 (95% CI-1.16 - 1.62), p-value < 0.001] and continuous infusion of terlipressin [Odd ratio = 0.18 (95% CI-0.037 - 0.91), p-value - 0.04] with treatment failure.

Systemic hemodynamic response to terlipressin predicts development of hepatorenal syndrome and survival in advanced cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to predict the occurrence of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and death in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 2-year data of 78 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (Child-Pugh B/C: 45/43). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO) were measured in all patients just before administration of 2 mg of terlipressin and 30 min later. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated as MAP/CO. ΔMAP, and ΔCO, and ΔSVR were defined as the percentage change of MAP, CO, and SVR, respectively, after terlipressin injection. Plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone were evaluated at baseline. Two multivariate models were used: one excluding (model 1) and one including (model 2) the Model of End-stage Liver Disease score.

RESULTS

Higher ΔSVR, Model of End-stage Liver Disease score, and PRA were related independently to the severity of cirrhosis. Independent predictors of HRS at 12 and 24 months were ΔSVR (models 1/2: P=0.008/0.01 and 0.01/0.02, respectively), ΔCO (models 1/2: P=0.01/0.03 and 0.03/0.04, respectively), and PRA (models 1/2: P=0.04 and model 1: P=0.04, respectively). ΔSVR at 12 and 24 months (models 1/2: P=0.005/0.01 and 0.01/0.03, respectively) and ΔCO at 24 months (models 1/2: P=0.02/0.01, respectively) were related independently to survival. Patient groups with significantly higher probability of HRS and mortality were identified by certain cutoffs of ΔSVR (20.6 and 22.8%, respectively) and ΔCO (-10.6 and -11.8%, respectively). ΔSVR and ΔCO independently predicted survival in patients with the most advanced cirrhosis and infection-related survival.

CONCLUSION

An increase in SVR by at least 20% and a decrease in CO at least 10% in response to terlipressin could predict HRS and mortality in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Addition of Somatostatin After Successful Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Does not Prevent Early Rebleeding in Comparison to Placebo: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of endoscopic sclerotherapy in controlling acute variceal bleeding is significantly improved when vasoactive drug is added. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is superior to sclerotherapy. Whether efficacy of EVL will also improve with addition of somatostatin is not known. We compared EVL plus somatostatin versus EVL plus placebo in control of acute variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding were enrolled. After emergency EVL, patients were randomized to receive either somatostatin (250 mcg/hr) or placebo infusion. Primary endpoint was treatment failure within 5 days. Treatment failure was defined as fresh hematemesis ≥2 h after start of therapy, or a 3 gm drop in Hb, or death.

RESULTS

61 patients were enrolled (EVL plus somatostatin group, n = 31 and EVL plus placebo group, n = 30). The baseline characteristics were similar. Within the initial 5-day period, the frequency of treatment failure was similar in both the groups (EVL plus somatostatin group 8/31 [26%] versus EVL plus placebo group 7/30 [23%]; P = 1.000). The mortality was also similar in the two groups (3/31 [10%] vs. 3/30 [10%]; P = 1.000). Baseline HVPG ≥19 mm Hg and active bleeding at index endoscopy were independent predictors of treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of somatostatin infusion to EVL therapy does not offer any advantage in control of acute variceal bleeding or reducing mortality. The reason for this may be its failure to maintain sustained reduction in portal pressure for five days. Active bleeding at index endoscopy and high baseline HVPG should help choose early alternative treatment options. Trial registered with ClincalTrials.gov vide NCT01267669.

Hemodynamic effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of terlipressin for portal hypertension: a randomized comparison

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The hemodynamics of patients with portal hypertension within 4 h after a single injection of terlipressin has been studied. However, the hemodynamics in a longer phase under different infusion styles is unknown. This study aims to compare the effects of bolus and continuous infusion of terlipressin on systemic and hepatic hemodynamics in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure were randomly assigned to be treated with either intravenous bolus infusion of terlipressin (1 mg) followed by a continuous infusion (4 mg/24 h, n = 10), or intravenous bolus injection of terlipressin (2 mg) followed by intermittent injections (1 mg/6 h, n = 10). The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and portal venous pressure (PVP) were monitored and recorded at baseline, 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, and then once an hour. Serum renin activity, serum angiotensin II, and aldosterone levels were measured prior to and 24 h after the administration of terlipressin.

RESULTS

PVP dropped rapidly in both groups, and reduced 16.46% and 28.22%, respectively, at the 1-h time point. Thereafter, PVP remained stable in continuous group while rebounded obviously in intermittent group. One hour after the start of drug administration, heart rate decreased significantly in both groups (84.1 ± 12.8 vs 73.8 ± 12.6 in intermittent group and 86.7 ± 11.5 vs 77.1 ± 13.6 in continuous group, P < 0.005), and mean arterial pressure increased in both groups, although no statistical differences were found.

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion of terlipressin reduces PVP stably and may become an alternative to traditional bolus injection.