Re-appearance of hepatitis B virus following therapy with rituximab for lymphoma is not rare in Japanese patients with past hepatitis B virus infection

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following rituximab treatment in HBsAg-negative, HBcAb-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients: A long-term, real-world observation

AIM

Longitudinal data of the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (rHBV) and serial serological markers or HBV-DNA has been limited. This study aimed to investigate the temporal course of rHBV development in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing long-term rituximab therapy.

METHODS

The occurrence of rHBV was examined in 157 RA patients during rituximab therapy. Serum levels of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV core antibody (HBcAb), and HBsAb were determined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassays, and viral loads by real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

RESULTS

Among 157 patients undergoing rituximab therapy, 103 (65.6%) were HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive. Before rituximab therapy, 20 (19.4%) of these 103 patients were HBsAb-negative, while 83 (80.1%) were HBsAb-positive. Five (20%) HBsAb-negative patients developed rHBV after rituximab therapy. Among 83 HBsAb-positive patients, 4 (4.8%) developed rHBV. Among 9 patients with rHBV, 7 (77.7%) exhibited HBsAg seroreversion. Significant decline of HBsAb titers (mean ± SD, 296.0 ± 417.3 mIU/mL at baseline vs 187.0 ± 332.5 mIU/mL after rituximab therapy, P < 0.001) was observed in HBsAg-/HBsAb + patients. All HBsAg-negative patients who developed rHBV during rituximab therapy were characterized by baseline HBsAb titers < 100 mIU/mL and negative HBsAb at the time of rHBV. HBsAb positivity was an independent protective factor for rHBV (hazards ratio: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.62, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Baseline HBsAb positivity was a significant protective factor for rHBV in HBsAg-negative, HBcAb-positive RA patients receiving rituximab therapy.

Pharmacotherapy-Induced Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients With Prior Functional Cure: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To describe and quantify the incidence and morbidity of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) secondary to pharmaceutical agents (eg, rituximab, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, direct-acting antivirals [DAAs] for hepatitis C) among patients with previously resolved hepatitis B infection.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database was searched from inception through July 2018 using the terms hepatitis B + ( reactivation OR [drug or drug class linked to HBVr]).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant English-language cohort studies or randomized trials quantifying the incidence of HBVr secondary to pharmacotherapy among patients negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and DNA and positive for hepatitis B core antibody were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among 2045 articles, 102 met inclusion criteria. Receipt of rituximab was associated with the highest risk of HBVr (for oncological indication: 6.2% rate [225/3601 patients]) and subsequent hepatitis (up to 52.4% of all HBVr cases). Biologic agents for autoimmune disease were uncommonly associated with HBVr (2.4%, 56/2338), with only 4 cases of hepatitis, all attributable to rituximab. Reactivation caused by DAAs was rare (0.3%, 28/8398), with no cases of hepatitis. Relevance to Patient Care/Clinical Practice: This review compares and contrasts the incidence and clinical relevance of HBVr for various pharmacotherapies among patients with functionally cured hepatitis B, with discussion of appropriate risk mitigation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with prior functional cure of hepatitis B, prophylactic antiviral therapy is recommended with rituximab administration irrespective of indication because of a high risk for HBVr-associated morbidity. Enhanced monitoring alone is reasonable for patients receiving nonrituximab biologics or DAAs.

Antiviral therapies for managing viral hepatitis in lymphoma patients

INTRODUCTION

In patients with lymphoma the detection of positive hepatitis B or C viruses (HBV and HCV) serology involves crucial therapeutic consequences. In HBV-infected patients the serological profile of active (HBsAg-positive) or resolved (HBsAg-negative/anti-HBcAb-positive) infection is associated to differential risk of viral reactivation during rituximab-based therapy and require appropriate strategies of monitoring and of antiviral prophylaxis. In HCV-associated NHL patients consolidated data demonstrated that interferon (IFN)-based antiviral therapy (AT) is able to induce lymphoma regression strictly related to viral eradication, while preliminary data of the new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are very promising. Areas covered: This review summarizes current evidences about HBV reactivation risk in patients undergoing rituximab-based treatments and appropriate options of antiviral prophylaxis with lamivudine, entecavir or tenofovir, as well as pre-emptive strategy in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients. Moreover previous experiences with IFN-based AT as well as recent studies with DAAs in HCV-associated indolent lymphomas or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are reviewed. Expert opinion: Entecavir or tenofovir prophylaxis is recommended for HBsAg-positive patients, while universal prophilaxis with lamivudine may be preferred in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients. In asymptomatic patients with HCV-associated indolent lymphoma DAA-based AT should be used as first-line option, while in DLBCL its deliver after immunochemotherapy-induced complete remission is suggested.

Hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma: a meta-analysis

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBsAg-positive) are at risk of viral reactivation if rituximab is administered without antiviral treatment, a potentially fatal complication of treatment. Patients with so-called 'resolved hepatitis B virus infection' (HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive) may also be at risk. We performed a systematic review of the English and Chinese language literature to estimate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma. A pooled risk estimate was calculated for HBV reactivation. The impact of HBsAb status and study design on reactivation rates was explored. Data from 578 patients in 15 studies were included. 'Clinical HBV reactivation', (ALT >3 × normal and either an increase in HBV DNA from baseline or HBsAg seroreversion), was estimated at 6.3% (I(2) = 63%, P = 0.006). Significant heterogeneity was detected. Reactivation rates were higher in prospective vs retrospective studies (14.2% vs 3.8%; OR = 4.39, 95% CI 0.83-23.28). Exploratory analyses found no effect of HBsAb status on reactivation risk (OR = 0.083; P = 0.151). Our meta-analysis confirms a measurable and potentially substantial risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients exposed to rituximab. However, heterogeneity in the existing literature limits the generalizability of our findings. Large, prospective studies, with uniform definitions of HBV reactivation, are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/cAb-positive patients.

Giving rituximab in patients with occult or resolved hepatitis B virus infection: are the current guidelines good enough?

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after 'resolved' infection can occur in the setting of immunosuppression, including iatrogenically induced by anti-CD20 antibodies. The presence of antibodies against the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) is a marker of risk for this phenomenon. The risk of this occurring in patients with circulating HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) is well characterized, but is less well characterized in patients who are HBsAg negative.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature regarding HBV reactivation in the context of rituximab therapy. We have limited our review to HBsAg-negative patients, and clinical outcomes following HBV reactivation.

EXPERT OPINION

We have recommended prophylactic anti-viral therapy for all HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients undergoing rituximab therapy in combination with other immunosuppressive therapy.

A study of hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with rituximab therapy in real-world clinical practice: a single-center experience

Background/Aims

The widespread use of cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunosuppressants has resulted in reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recently becoming an issue. Although rituximab (an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) has revolutionized the treatment of lymphoma, recent reports have suggested that rituximab therapy increases the risk of viral-mediated complications, and particularly HBV reactivation. This study analyzed real clinical practice data for rituximab-related HBV reactivation.

Methods

Between January 2005 and December 2011, 169 patients received treatment with rituximab. Screening status of the HBV infection and frequency of preemptive therapy were determined in these patients, and the clinical features of HBV reactivation were analyzed.

Results

Seventy-nine of the 169 patients with chronic or past HBV infection were selected for evaluation of HBV reactivation. Of the 90 patients who were excluded, 22 (13.0%) were not assessed for HBsAg and anti-HBc, and 14 (8.3%) were not assessed for anti-HBc due to seronegativity for HBsAg. The selected patients were divided into those with chronic HBV infection (n=12) and those with past HBV infection (n=67); six patients (7.6%) experienced HBV reactivation. Eight patients received preemptive therapy, but three patients (37.5%) underwent HBV reactivation. Although HBsAg seropositivity was an independent risk factor for HBV reactivation (P=0.038), of the six patients with HBV reactivation, two (33.3%) had past HBV infection and three (50%) died of liver failure.

Conclusions

The findings of this study demonstrate that adherence to guidelines for screening and preemptive therapy for HBV reactivation was negligent among the included cohort. Attention should be paid to HBV reactivation in patients with past as well as chronic HBV infection during and after rituximab therapy.

Occult hepatitis B: clinical viewpoint and management

Occult HBV infection (OBI) is defined as HBV DNA detection in serum or in the liver by sensitive diagnostic tests in HBsAg-negative patients with or without serologic markers of previous viral exposure. OBI seems to be higher among subjects at high risk for HBV infection and with liver disease. OBI can be both a source of virus contamination in blood and organ donations and the reservoir for full blown hepatitis after reactivation. HBV reactivation depends on viral and host factors but these associations have not been analyzed thoroughly. In OBI, it would be best to prevent HBV reactivation which inhibits the development of hepatitis and subsequent mortality. In diverse cases with insufficient data to recommend routine prophylaxis, early identification of virologic reactivation is essential to start antiviral therapy. For retrieving articles regarding OBI, various databases, including OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, were used.

Reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus infection after immunosuppression: is it time to adopt pre-emptive therapy?

New therapeutic options like monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD20/rituximab) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased both the effectiveness of therapies and the risk for reactivation of Hepatitis B virus (HBV). We describe two cases with serological evidence of resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) positive), who developed reverse seroconversion (clearance of HBsAb/appearance of HBsAg) with active HBV infection after treatment with combination of conventional chemotherapy, rituximab and autologous HSCT for hematological malignancies. Review of the literature highlights the increasing incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved infection and raises concerns as to whether current guidelines for pre-chemotherapy screening with sensitive HBV-DNA assays and serial monitoring for anti-HBs titres should be implemented also for patients with resolved infection. Future studies should aim at clarifying the cost-benefit from administration of nucleoside analogues in these patients.

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antibody titers in B cell lymphoma patients after rituximab therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known complication after rituximab therapy in patients with B cell lymphoma. Traditionally, hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) is a protective antibody, but the effect of rituximab on these antibodies has not been well studied. In 29 B cell lymphoma patients who were positive for anti-HBs before rituximab therapy, anti-HBs serologies before and after rituximab therapy were compared. Anti-HBs titers after rituximab treatment were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those before treatment. None of the ten cases with pre-treatment anti-HBs titers above 100 mIU/mL became negative for anti-HBs after rituximab therapy. In contrast, 8 of the 19 patients with pre-treatment anti-HBs titers below 100 mIU/mL lost their anti-HBs (P = 0.027). Of these, one patient developed HBsAg seroreversion and HBV reactivation after rituximab therapy. Regarding patients with loss of anti-HBs or not, there was no significant difference in pre- and post-treatment immunoglobulin G levels between both groups. The rate of anti-HBs loss increased with advanced lymphoma stage and international prognostic index (P = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pre-treatment anti-HBs titer is the only independent factor influencing the loss of anti-HBs (per one log mIU/mL, odds ratio, 0.003; 95% confidence interval, 0.000-0.302; P = 0.014). In conclusion, we found that anti-HBs titers decreased significantly (P < 0.001) after rituximab treatment. B cell lymphoma patients with low pre-treatment anti-HBs titers (<100 mIU/mL) were more likely to lose anti-HBs antibodies and were at risk of HBV reactivation after rituximab immunochemotherapy.