Clearing of toxic substances: are there differences between the available liver support devices?

Itching for Answers: A Comprehensive Review of Cholestatic Pruritus Treatments

Cholestasis is a clinical and laboratory syndrome indicating impaired bile production or excretion. One of the hallmark symptoms of cholestasis is pruritus. Itch can be severe and debilitating for patients, impacting their quality of life similarly to pain, and, in some cases, it can be refractory. Current therapies like anion exchange resins and rifampicin, offer partial relief but with side effects. Effective, well-tolerated treatments are urgently needed. This literature review examines existing options (bile acid sequestrants, antihistamines, opioid antagonists, sertraline, and rifampicin) and explores novel therapies (monoclonal antibodies, PPAR agonists, and bile-acid-based therapies). We analyze mechanisms, limitations, and adverse effects to aid clinicians and researchers. Novel approaches include monoclonal antibodies to inhibit bile recirculation and PPAR agonists targeting pruritus signaling. Despite the limited current options, ongoing research promises better treatments for cholestatic pruritus, addressing its distressing impact. In summary, cholestasis-associated pruritus poses a significant challenge with limited treatments. Advancements in understanding its pathophysiology offer hope for more effective therapies in the future.

Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison

ExtraCorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) systems were developed with the aim of supporting the liver in its detoxification function by clearing the blood from hepatic toxic molecules. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis on patients presenting with liver failure who were treated with different extracorporeal techniques in our intensive care unit to evaluate and compare their detoxification abilities. To verify the effectiveness of the techniques, mass balance (MB) and adsorption per hour were calculated for total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), and bile acids (BA) from the concentrations measured. MB represents the total amount (mg or mcMol) of a molecule removed from a solution and is the only representative parameter to verify the purification effectiveness of one system as it is not affected by the continuous production of the molecules, released in the circulation from the tissues, as it is the case for the reduction rate (RR). The total adsorption per hour is calculated by the ratio between MB and the time duration and shows the adsorption ability in an hour. Our comparative study shows the superior adsorption capability of CytoSorb system regarding TB, DB, and BA, evaluated through the MB and adsorption per hour, in comparison with CPFA, MARS, Prometheus, and PAP. In conclusion, as extracorporeal purification in liver failure could be considered useful for therapeutic purposes, Cytosorb, being more performing than other systems considered, could represent the device of first choice.

Kidney Outcomes Following Utilization of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System

Introduction

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is an extracorporeal system combining conventional veno-venous hemodiafiltration and adsorption to provide rescue support in fulminant hepatic failure. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with hepatic failure warranting continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Our primary aim was to characterize a cohort of patients who received MARS therapy and examine kidney events given the current paucity of available data.

Methods

Patients initiating MARS in a tertiary care setting from January 2014 through December 2020 were assessed for treatment indications, transplantation, CKRT, kidney recovery, and death. Data was collected using the REDCAP software.

Results

A total of 49 patients (67% female; 75% White) received MARS therapy with 29 patients (59%) requiring concomitant CKRT. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was the most common indication for MARS initiation (55%). In-hospital mortality was 41% (12/29) among patients who received CKRT versus 10% (2/20) among those not requiring CKRT (relative risk [RR] 4.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 16.52, P = 0.044); this persisted following adjustment for prespecified patient characteristics (all RR ≥ 3.76, all P ≤ 0.060). One-year mortality post-MARS initiation was high overall but highest among the CKRT group (59% [17/29] vs. 25% [5/20] unadjusted RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.08 to 7.94, P = 0.035). Liver transplant after MARS occurred in 41% of patients (20/49). After CKRT, 39% of patients (9/29) recovered kidney function prior to hospital discharge.

Conclusions

Patients requiring MARS frequently have AKI warranting the use of concomitant CKRT, which is associated with a high rate of in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

Liver replacement therapy with extracorporeal blood purification techniques current knowledge and future directions

Clinically, it is highly challenging to promote recovery in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Despite recent advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of ALF and ACLF, standard medical therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach. Liver transplantation (LT) is considered the last option, and in several cases, it is the only intervention that can be lifesaving. Unfortunately, this intervention is limited by organ donation shortage or exclusion criteria such that not all patients in need can receive a transplant. Another option is to restore impaired liver function with artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems. The first such systems were developed at the end of the 20^th century, providing solutions as bridging therapy, either for liver recovery or LT. They enhance the elimination of metabolites and substances that accumulate due to compromised liver function. In addition, they aid in clearance of molecules released during acute liver decompensation, which can initiate an excessive inflammatory response in these patients causing hepatic encephalopathy, multiple-organ failure, and other complications of liver failure. As compared to renal replacement therapies, we have been unsuccessful in using artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems to completely replace liver function despite the outstanding technological evolution of these systems. Extracting middle to high-molecular-weight and hydrophobic/protein-bound molecules remains extremely challenging. The majority of the currently available systems include a combination of methods that cleanse different ranges and types of molecules and toxins. Furthermore, conventional methods such as plasma exchange are being re-evaluated, and novel adsorption filters are increasingly being used for liver indications. These strategies are very promising for the treatment of liver failure. Nevertheless, the best method, system, or device has not been developed yet, and its probability of getting developed in the near future is also low. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of liver support systems on the overall and transplant-free survival of these patients, and further investigation using randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses is needed. This review presents the most popular extracorporeal blood purification techniques for liver replacement therapy. It focuses on general principles of their function, and on evidence regarding their effectiveness in detoxification and in supporting patients with ALF and ACLF. In addition, we have outlined the basic advantages and disadvantages of each system.

Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Liver Failure and End-Stage Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation

Providing dialysis to patients with liver failure is challenging because of their tenuous hemodynamics and refractory ascites. With better machinery and increased availability, continuous kidney replacement therapy has been successfully delivered to acutely ill patients in liver failure over the past few decades. Intermittent hemodialysis continues to remain the modality of choice outside the intensive care unit and on occasion needs to be complemented with paracentesis. Peritoneal dialysis has not been widely used, but recent literature shows promising outcomes barring for publication bias. Albumin dialysis could be a lifesaving procedure for a carefully selected subgroup of patients with liver failure.

Artificial liver support systems

Artificial liver systems are used to bridge between transplantation or to allow a patient's liver to recover. They are used in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There are five artificial systems currently in use: molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, selective plasma filtration therapy, and hemodiafiltration. The aim is to compare existing data on the efficiency of these devices. A literature search was conducted using online libraries. Inclusion criteria included randomized control trials or comparative human studies published after the year 2000. A systematic review was conducted for the five individual devices with a more detailed comparison of the biochemistry for the SPAD and MARS systems. Eighty-nine patients were involved in the review comparing SPAD and MARS. Results showed that there was an average reduction in bilirubin (-53 μmol/L in MARS and -50 μmol/L in SPAD), creatinine (-19.5 μmol/L in MARS and -7.5 μmol/L in SPAD), urea (-0.9 mmol/L in MARS and -0.75 mmol/L in SPAD), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (-0.215 μmol/L·s in MARS and -0.295 μmol/L·s in SPAD) in both SPAD and MARS. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in the two systems. This review demonstrated that both MARS and SPAD aid recovery of ALF. There is no difference between the efficiency of MARS and SPAD. Because of the limited data, there is a need for more randomized control trials. Evaluating cost and patient preference would aid in differentiating the systems.

MARS: Should I Use It?

Severe liver failure, including acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, is associated with high mortality, and many patients die despite aggressive medical therapy. While liver transplantation is a viable treatment option for liver failure patients, a large proportion of these patients die given the shortage in the liver donation and the severity of illness, leading to death while waiting for a liver transplant. Extracorporeal liver support devices, including molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), have been developed as bridge to transplantation (bridge for patients who are decompensating while waiting for liver transplantation) and bridge to recovery (for whom recovery is deemed reasonable). In addition to its uses in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, the MARS system has also been applied in various clinical settings, such as drug overdosing and poisoning and intractable cholestatic pruritus refractory to pharmacological treatment. This review aims to discuss the controversies, potential benefits, practicalities, and disadvantages of using MARS in clinical practice.

Truncated domains of human serum albumin improves the binding efficiency of uremic toxins: A surface plasmon resonance and computational approach

Albumin binding is the major cause for the toxicity of protein bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) in uremic patients. Albumin binding property is exploited to address this issue, as some of the extracorporeal dialysis systems use albumin as dialysate. In this line, a detailed study about binding of PBUTs to human serum albumin (HSA) and its domains gives valuable information. The focus of this work emphasizes the mechanism of binding of HSA and its domains with a few selected PBUTs such as hippuric acid (HA), indole acetic acid (IAA) and melatonin. The HSA domains (D2, D3 and D2-3) were expressed in Pichia pastoris and purified by using Albupure matrix. The binding of the expressed domains and HSA, with PBUTs, was measured using surface plasmon resonance and analyzed. All the three domains have significant affinity towards PBUTs, while D3 had greater affinity for all the three selected PBUTs. Docking studies showed that the basic amino acid, lysine, was forming hydrogen bond with PUBTs inorder to stabile these complex. This study would be having therapeutic importance for preparing the extracorporeal dialysis systems, in combination of different domains of HSA to remove the PBUTs.

Extracorporeal Removal of Poisons and Toxins

Extracorporeal therapies have been used to remove toxins from the body for over 50 years and have a greater role than ever before in the treatment of poisonings. Improvements in technology have resulted in increased efficacy of removing drugs and other toxins with hemodialysis, and newer extracorporeal therapy modalities have expanded the role of extracorporeal supportive care of poisoned patients. However, despite these changes, for at least the past three decades the most frequently dialyzed poisons remain salicylates, toxic alcohols, and lithium; in addition, the extracorporeal treatment of choice for therapeutic removal of nearly all poisonings remains intermittent hemodialysis. For the clinician, consideration of extracorporeal therapy in the treatment of a poisoning depends upon the characteristics of toxins amenable to extracorporeal removal (e.g., molecular mass, volume of distribution, protein binding), choice of extracorporeal treatment modality for a given poisoning, and when the benefit of the procedure justifies additive risk. Given the relative rarity of poisonings treated with extracorporeal therapies, the level of evidence for extracorporeal treatment of poisoning is not robust; however, extracorporeal treatment of a number of individual toxins have been systematically reviewed within the current decade by the Extracorporeal Treatment in Poisoning workgroup, which has published treatment recommendations with an improved evidence base. Some of these recommendations are discussed, as well as management of a small number of relevant poisonings where extracorporeal therapy use may be considered.

Experimental bio-artificial liver: Importance of the architectural design on ammonia detoxification performance

AIM

To determine the influence of the construction design over the biological component’s performance in an experimental bio-artificial liver (BAL) device.

METHODS

Two BAL models for liver microorgans (LMOs) were constructed. First, we constructed a cylindrical BAL and tested it without the biological component to establish its correct functioning. Samples of blood and biological compartment (BC) fluid were taken after 0, 60, and 120 min of perfusion. Osmolality, hematocrit, ammonia and glucose concentrations, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (as a LMO viability parameter), and oxygen consumption and ammonia metabolizing capacity (as LMO functionality parameters) were determined. CPSI and OTC gene expression and function were measured. The second BAL, a “flat bottom” model, was constructed using a 25 cm² culture flask while maintaining all other components between the models. The BC of both BALs had the same capacity (approximately 50 cm³) and both were manipulated with the same perfusion system. The performances of the two BALs were compared to show the influence of architecture.

RESULTS

The cylindrical BAL showed a good exchange of fluids and metabolites between blood and the BC, reflected by the matching of osmolalities, and glucose and ammonia concentration ratios after 120 min of perfusion. No hemoconcentration was detected, the hematocrit levels remained stable during the whole study, and the minimal percentage of hemolysis (0.65% ± 0.10%) observed was due to the action of the peristaltic pump. When LMOs were used as biological component of this BAL they showed similar values to the ones obtained in a Normothermic Reoxygenation System (NRS) for almost all the parameters assayed. After 120 min, the results obtained were: LDH release (%): 14.7 ± 3.1 in the BAL and 15.5 ± 3.2 in the NRS (n = 6); oxygen consumption (μmol/min·g wet tissue): 1.16 ± 0.21 in the BAL and 0.84 ± 0.15 in the NRS (n = 6); relative expression of Cps1 and Otc: 0.63 ± 0.12 and 0.67 ± 0.20, respectively, in the BAL, and 0.86 ± 0.10 and 0.82 ± 0.07, respectively, in the NRS (n = 3); enzymatic activity of CPSI and OTC (U/g wet tissue): 3.03 ± 0.86 and 222.0 ± 23.5, respectively, in the BAL, and 3.12 ± 0.73 and 228.8 ± 32.8, respectively, in the NRS (n = 3). In spite of these similarities, LMOs as a biological component of the cylindrical BAL were not able to detoxify ammonia at a significant level (not detected vs 35.1% ± 7.0% of the initial 1 mM NH₄⁺ dose in NRS, n = 6). Therefore, we built a second BAL with an entirely different design that offers a flat base BC. When LMOs were placed in this “flat bottom” device they were able to detoxify 49.3% ± 8.8% of the initial ammonia overload after 120 min of perfusion (n = 6), with a detoxification capacity of 13.2 ± 2.2 μmol/g wet tissue.

CONCLUSION

In this work, we demonstrate the importance of adapting the BAL architecture to the biological component characteristics to obtain an adequate BAL performance.

Applying the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in the Treatment of Acute Liver Failure (ALF) Case Report

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare but life-threatening illness with multiple organ failure. The short-term mortality rate exceeded 80 % despite modern approaches in treatment. Drugs, infections by hepatic viruses and toxins are the most common causes of ALF. Progressive jaundice, coagulation disorder and hepatic encephalopathy are dominated as a clinical signs of the illness. We present a case of a 36-year-old Caucasian woman hospitalized in ICU due to yellow discoloration of the skin and sclera, severe disseminated coagulopathy and hemodynamic instability. ALF is developed due to Hepatitis B Virus infection, resulting in hepatic toxicity as well as coma. General condition rapidly improved after applying of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS), an extracorporeal liver support system based on albumin dialysis. It is relatively expensive treatment that is used for the patient with hepatic encephalopathy grade 3 or 4 in our institution. In conclusion, an early administration of MARS significantly reveals subjective and objective clinical improvement in the case we presented.

Severe Cholestasis and Bile Cast Nephropathy Induced by Anabolic Steroids Successfully Treated with Plasma Exchange

We report a case of a bodybuilder who took a regimen of anabolic steroids containing stanozolol and testosterone propionate for 8 weeks which led to the development of jaundice and severe pruritus with serum total bilirubin reaching 41.22 mg/dL. Despite supportive care with fluid and albumin therapy, serum creatinine was progressively increasing. He underwent 6 successful sessions of plasma exchange (PE) with marked improvement at the end of the sessions. Three months after discharge, the patient's creatinine and total bilirubin levels were 1.08 mg/dL and 1.2 mg/dL, respectively.

Challenges on the road to a multicellular bioartificial liver

Over recent years, the progress in the development of a bioartificial liver (BAL) as an extracorporeal device or as a tissue engineered transplantable organ has been immense. However, many important BAL characteristics that are necessary to meet clinical demands have not been sufficiently addressed. This review describes the existing challenges in the development of a BAL for clinical applications, highlighting multicellularity and sinusoidal microarchitecture as crucial BAL characteristics to fulfil various liver functions. Currently available sources of nonparenchymal liver cells, such as endothelial cells, cholangiocytes and macrophages, used in BAL development are defined. Also, we discuss the recent studies on the reconstruction of the complex liver sinusoid microarchitecture using various liver cell types. Moreover, we highlight some other aspects of a BAL, such as liver zonation and formation of a vascular as well as biliary network for an adequate delivery, biotransformation and removal of substrates and waste products. Finally, the benefits of a multicellular BAL for the pharmaceutical industry are briefly described. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Therapeutic plasma exchange versus double plasma molecular absorption system in hepatitis B virus-infected acute-on-chronic liver failure treated by entercavir: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and double plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) were two extracorporeal liver support systems. Few studies compared their efficacy profile.

OBJECTIVE

This study was to compare the efficacy of TPE and DPMAS on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV-ACLF).

METHODS

60 HBV-ACLF patients were enrolled and prospectively studied. All patients received entecavir therapy, and were assigned to TPE group (n = 33) and DPMAS group (n = 27). Primary end-points were the effects of TPE and DPMAS on liver function and serum inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Serum procalcitonin, interleukin (IL)-6, and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were significantly elevated in patients with HBV-ACLF. TPE achieved significantly higher removal rates of total bilirubin (TBIL, P = .002), direct bilirubin (DBIL, P = .006), and hsCRP (P = .010) than DPMAS, but DPMAS displayed lower loss rate of albumin (P = .000). TPE and DPMAS resulted in similarly increased serum IL-6 levels and comparable 12-week survivals (P > .05). Multivariate analysis showed that hospital stay (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.062, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.011-1.115, P = .016), prothrombin time (RR: 1.346, 95% CI: 1.077-1.726, P = .010), and international normalized ratio (RR: 0.013, 95% CI: 0.006-0.788, P = .041) were independent predictors for 12-week survival. Both TPE and DPMAS treatments were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Compared to DPMAS, TPE was more efficient in eliminating TBIL, DBIL, and hsCRP, but it was associated with higher loss rate of albumin. TPE and DPMAS were similar in improving 12-week survivals in HBV-ACLF.

Continuous molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in 69 patients listed for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is used to purify blood from albumin-bound toxins in patients with liver failure. However, the application of MARS has not demonstrated improved survival in randomized clinical trials and the clinical utility has not been finally established. In our department, the use of MARS is now restricted to the most critically ill patients with acute or acute on chronic liver failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2005, we have treated 69 patients (30 males/39 females with median age of 49 years ranging from 1 months to 70 years) listed for liver transplantation (LT) with MARS. Median model of end-stage liver disease score in patients older than 12 years of age (n = 56) was 33 (interquartile range 26-39). The flow rate was 35-40 mL/kg/h and treatment kits were changed every 8-12 h. The patients were treated for a median of 27 h (range 1-144 h).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (81%) were transplanted. Nine died before they could be transplanted, and four patients recovered without transplantation. Forty-six (82%) of the transplanted patients were alive 30 days after transplantation. Ammonium decreased modestly from a median of 148 to 124 µM (p = 0.03) during MARS treatment. We detected worsening of coagulopathy with significant decreases in platelet count and fibrinogen concentrations, and increase in International Normalized Ratio. Phosphate and magnesium decreased significantly during MARS treatment.

CONCLUSION

Continuous MARS therapy may bridge liver failure patients to LT under close observation and treatment of coagulopathy and electrolyte disturbances.

Adsorption of the inflammatory mediator high-mobility group box 1 by polymers with different charge and porosity

High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is a conserved protein with a variety of biological functions inside as well as outside the cell. When released by activated immune cells, it acts as a proinflammatory cytokine. Its delayed release has sparked the interest in HMGB1 as a potential therapeutic target. Here, we studied the adsorption of HMGB1 to anionic methacrylate-based polymers as well as to neutral polystyrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. Both groups of adsorbents exhibited efficient binding of recombinant HMGB1 and of HMGB1 derived from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The adsorption characteristics depended on particle size, porosity, accessibility of the pores, and charge of the polymers. In addition to these physicochemical parameters of the adsorbents, modifications of the molecule itself (e.g., acetylation, phosphorylation, and oxidation), interaction with other plasma proteins or anticoagulants (e.g., heparin), or association with extracellular microvesicles may influence the binding of HMGB1 to adsorbents and lead to preferential depletion of HMGB1 subsets with different biological activity.

Principles and operational parameters to optimize poison removal with extracorporeal treatments

A role for nephrologists in the management of a poisoned patient involves evaluating the indications for, and methods of, enhancing the elimination of a poison. Nephrologists are familiar with the various extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) used in the management of impaired kidney function, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. However, these same skills and knowledge may not always be considered, or applicable, when prescribing ECTR for the treatment of a poisoned patient. Maximizing solute elimination is a key aim of such treatments, perhaps more so than in the treatment of uremia, because ECTR has the potential to reverse clinical toxicity and shorten the duration of poisoning. This manuscript reviews the various principles that govern poison elimination by ECTR (diffusion, convection, adsorption, and centrifugation) and how components of the ECTR can be adjusted to maximize clearance. Data supporting these recommendations will be presented, whenever available.

Available extracorporeal treatments for poisoning: overview and limitations

Poisoning is a significant public health problem. In severe cases, extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) may be required to prevent or reverse major toxicity. Available ECTRs include intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis, intermittent hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration, continuous renal replacement therapy, hemoperfusion, therapeutic plasma exchange, exchange transfusion, peritoneal dialysis, albumin dialysis, cerebrospinal fluid exchange, and extracorporeal life support. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the technical aspects, as well as the potential indications and limitations of the different ECTRs used for poisoned patients.

Treatment with plasma exchange may serve benefical effect in patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia: a single center experience

Hyperbilirubinemia is a common clinical manifestation, and may be life threatening. Many diseases result in hyperbilirubinemias, some are refractory, and cannot be cured by medication or surgery. Plasma exchange (PE) for hyperbilirubinemia is not a pathogenesis oriented therapy but strives for the opportunity to cure. In the present study, we aimed to present the outcomes of treatment of hyperbilirubinemia with PE in patients with various disorders. Eleven patients who underwent PE due to hyperbilirubinemia between 2006 and 2012 in Apheresis Unit of Erciyes University, were retrospectively reviewed. After PE, we observed a marked decline in total and direct bilirubin levels. The decline in the biochemical values were statically significant (p<0.003). Both total and direct bilirubin levels remained above the normal limits in one of 11 patients. PE should be considered as an effective and safe option in cases with hyperbilirubinemia, and this procedure can improve survival in patients with sufficient residual capacity of liver regeneration.

Albumin-drug interaction and its clinical implication

BACKGROUND

Human serum albumin acts as a reservoir and transport protein for endogenous (e.g. fatty acids or bilirubin) and exogenous compounds (e.g. drugs or nutrients) in the blood. The binding of a drug to albumin is a major determinant of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The present review discusses recent findings regarding the nature of drug binding sites, drug-albumin binding in certain diseased states or in the presence of coadministered drugs, and the potential of utilizing albumin-drug interactions in clinical applications.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Drug-albumin interactions appear to predominantly occur at one or two specific binding sites. The nature of these drug binding sites has been fundamentally investigated as to location, size, charge, hydrophobicity or changes that can occur under conditions such as the content of the endogenous substances in question. Such findings can be useful tools for the analysis of drug-drug interactions or protein binding in diseased states. A change in protein binding is not always a problem in terms of drug therapy, but it can be used to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents or to enhance the accumulation of radiopharmaceuticals to targets for diagnostic purposes. Furthermore, several extracorporeal dialysis procedures using albumin-containing dialysates have proven to be an effective tool for removing endogenous toxins or overdosed drugs from patients.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Recent findings related to albumin-drug interactions as described in this review are useful for providing safer and efficient therapies and diagnoses in clinical settings. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Serum Albumin.