Spanish society of liver transplantation (SETH) consensus recommendations on hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

Impact of Donor Age on Recipient Survival in Adult-to-Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of donor age on recipient outcome after living-donor partial liver transplantation (LDLT).

BACKGROUND

Donor age is a well-known prognostic factor in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, its role in LDLT remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 315 consecutive cases of primary adult-to-adult LDLT in our center between April 2006 and March 2014. Recipients were divided into 5 groups according to the donor age: D-20s (n = 60); D-30s (n = 72); D-40s (n = 57); D-50s (n = 94); and D-60s (n = 32). The recipient survival and the association with various clinical factors were investigated.

RESULTS

Recipient survival proportions were significantly higher in D-20s compared with all the other groups (P = 0.008, < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.006, vs D-30s, -40s, -50s, and -60s, respectively), whereas there was no association between recipient survival and their own age. There are 3 typical relationships between donors and recipients in adult-to-adult LDLT: from child-to-parent, between spouses/siblings, and from parent-to-child. The overall survival in child-to-parent was significantly higher than in spouses/siblings (P = 0.002) and in parent-to-child (P = 0.005), despite significantly higher recipient age in child-to-parent [59 (42-69) years, P < 0.001]. Contrastingly, parent-to-child exhibited the lowest survival, despite the youngest recipient age [26 (20-43) years, P < 0.001]. In addition, younger donor age exhibited significantly better recipient survival both in hepatitis C virus-related and in non-hepatitis C virus diseases. Univariate and multivariate analyses both demonstrated that donor age and graft-type (right-sided livers) are independent prognostic factors for recipient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age is an independent, strong prognostic factor in adult-to-adult LDLT.

The potential regulatory role of miR16 to the interplay between interferon and transforming growth factor beta pathways through IRF3 and SMAD7 in hepatitis C virus infected patients

BACKGROUND

The defensive strategy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection depends on two antiviral pathways; interferon (IFN) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ). We aimed at verifying the relation between TGFβ and IFN antiviral pathways in HCV infection through SMAD7 and IRF3, and whether a possible regulatory role for microRNA-16 (miR16) on the interplay between IFN and TGFβ signaling pathways exists or not.

METHODS

We evaluated miR16, IRF3 and SMAD7 expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction in HCV infected patients and age and gender matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

miR16 expression was significantly higher while IRF3 and SMAD7 expression was significantly lower in HCV patients compared with healthy controls. Meanwhile, miR16 was negatively correlated to SMAD7 in HCV patients while IRF3 and SMAD7 were positively correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

The interplay between IFN and TGFβ pathways through IRF3 and SMAD7 in the context of immunity against HCV infection could be under the control of miR16.

The donor risk index: A decade of experience

In 2006, derivation of the donor risk index (DRI) highlighted the importance of donor factors for successful liver transplantation. Over the last decade, the DRI has served as a useful metric of donor quality and has enhanced our understanding of donor factors and their impact upon recipients with hepatitis C virus, those with low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and individuals undergoing retransplantation. DRI has provided the transplant community with a common language for describing donor organ characteristics and has served as the foundation for several tools for organ risk assessment. It is a useful tool in assessing the interactions of donor factors with recipient factors and their impact on posttransplant outcomes. However, limitations of statistical modeling, choice of donor factors, exclusion of unaccounted donor and geographic factors, and the changing face of the liver transplant recipient have tempered its widespread use. In addition, the DRI was derived from data before the MELD era but is currently being applied to expand the donor pool while concurrently meeting the demands of a dynamic allocation system. A decade after its introduction, DRI remains relevant but may benefit from being updated to provide guidance in the use of extended criteria donors by accounting for the impact of geography and unmeasured donor characteristics. DRI could be better adapted for recipients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by examining and including recipient factors unique to this population. Liver Transplantation 23 1216-1225 2017 AASLD.

Early Measurement of Indocyanine Green Clearance Accurately Predicts Short-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are no accurate tools to predict short-term mortality or the need for early retransplantation after liver transplantation (LT). A noninvasive measurement of indocyanine green clearance, the plasma disappearance rate (PDR), has been associated with initial graft function.

METHODS

We evaluated the ability of PDR to predict early mortality or retransplantation after LT. In this observational prospective study, 332 LT were analyzed. Donor, recipient, and intraoperative data were investigated. The ensuing score was prospectively evaluated in a validation cohort of 77 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients reached the main endpoint. By multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of the endpoint were PDR (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.92) and international normalized ratio (OR, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.82). A risk score weighted by the OR was built using cutoff values of 2.2 or greater for international normalized ratio (1 point) and less than 10%/min for PDR (2 points). Four categories (0 to 3) were possible. The risk of early death or retransplantation was associated with the score (0, 4.4%; 1, 6.5%; 2, 12%; and 3, 50%; χ for trend, P < 0.001). The score was also associated with duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay. The score had a good diagnostic performance in the validation cohort (sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 95.5%; positive predictive value, 66.7%; negative predictive value, 94.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple score obtained within the first day after LT predicts short-term survival and need for retransplantation and may prove useful when selecting diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

How important is donor age in liver transplantation?

The age of liver donors has been increasing in the past several years because of a donor shortage. In the United States, 33% of donors are age 50 years or older, as are more than 50% in some European countries. The impact of donor age on liver transplantation (LT) has been analyzed in several studies with contradictory conclusions. Nevertheless, recent analyses of the largest databases demonstrate that having an older donor is a risk factor for graft failure. Donor age is included as a risk factor in the more relevant graft survival scores, such as the Donor Risk Index, donor age and Model for End-stage Liver Disease, Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation, and the Balance of Risk. The use of old donors is related to an increased rate of biliary complications and hepatitis C virus-related graft failure. Although liver function does not seem to be significantly affected by age, the incidence of several liver diseases increases with age, and the capacity of the liver to manage or overcome liver diseases or external injuries decreases. In this paper, the importance of age in LT outcomes, the role of donor age as a risk factor, and the influence of aging on liver regeneration are reviewed.

Management of HCV in the liver transplant setting

Hepatitis C-related cirrhosis is the main indication for liver transplantation. In the absence of viral eradication, viral recurrence leads to recurrent HCV disease and progression to advanced graft disease in many recipients, particularly those transplanted with subobtimal grafts. Viral eradication is associated with improved outcome whether used pre- or post-transplantation. In the new era of interferon-free regimes, this is now safe and feasible in most transplant candidates and transplant recipients. There are questions that remain unanswered, such as defining the point of no return where clinical improvement does not follow viral eradication or management of treatment failures.

Immunological dysfunction during or after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C reduces graft survival

INTRODUCTION

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEGIFN/RBV) therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with a lower sustained virological response (SVR) rate as well as more frequent side effects compared to non-transplant patients. We aimed to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of LT recipients with recurrent hepatitis C who developed immunological dysfunction (ID) during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy and to assess its impact on patient and graft survival.

METHODS

Seventy-four deceased donor LT recipients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C were treated with PEG-IFN/RBV from 1/00 to 12/08. ID was defined as biopsy-proven rejection or moderate plasma cell hepatitis. Patients were followed up until death, re-LT or 30 September 2011.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (16 %) had ID, 8 (10.7 %) had cholestasis without ID, while 54 had no ID/cholestasis during or after discontinuation of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection prior to (hazard ratio = 4.87, p = 0.009) and type of immunosuppression at the time of initiation of PEG-IFN/RBV were the only independent predictors of ID. Patients who were on tacrolimus at the time of initiation of PEG-IFN/RBV had a significantly lower risk of ID compared to those who were on cyclosporine (HR 0.254, p = 0.023). Patients with ID had a trend toward a lower SVR rate (25 vs. 54 %, p = 0.18) and a significantly higher rate of graft failure (33 vs. 4 %, p = 0.004) compared to patients with no ID/cholestasis.

CONCLUSIONS

ID is common during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy for recurrent hepatitis C and frequently associated with decreased graft survival, trending toward low rates of SVR. Careful monitoring of liver biochemistries during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with a low threshold to biopsy patients and particularly those receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression may improve outcomes in these patients.

Management of hepatitis C infection before and after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection before cirrhosis development or decompensation may reduce LT need and risk of HCV recurrence post-LT. Factors associated with increased HCV risk or severity of recurrence include older age, immunosuppression, HCV genotype 1 and high viral load at LT. HCV recurrence post-LT leads to accelerated liver disease and cirrhosis development with reduced graft and patient survival. Currently, interferon (IFN)-based regimens can be used in dual-agent regimens with ribavirin, in triple-agent antiviral strategies with direct-acting antivirals (e.g., protease inhibitors telaprevir or boceprevir), or before transplant in compensated patients to reduce HCV viral load to prevent or reduce the risk of post-LT recurrence and complications; they cannot be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. IFN-based regimens are used in less than half of HCV-infected patients waiting for LT due to extremely low efficacy and poor tolerability. However, antiviral therapy is indicated after LT in patients with histologically confirmed CHC despite tolerability issues. Improvements in side effect management have increased survival in patients achieving therapeutic targets. HCV treatment pre- and post-LT results in significant health care costs especially when lack of efficacy leads to disease worsening, although studies have shown sofosbuvir treatment before LT vs conventional post-LT dual antiviral is cost effective. The suboptimal efficacy and tolerability of IFN-based therapies, plus the significant economic burden, means the need for effective and well tolerated IFN-free anti-HCV therapy for pre- and post-LT remains high.

Excessive immunosuppression as a potential cause of poor survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation for hepatitis C

Appropriate recipient selection of simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains controversial. In particular, data on liver graft survival in hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) SLKT recipients are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of HCV+ SLKT recipients (N = 25) in comparison with HCV- SLKT (N = 26) and HCV+ liver transplantation alone (LTA, N = 296). Despite backgrounds of HCV+ and HCV- SLKT being similar, HCV+ SLKT demonstrated significantly impaired 5-year liver graft survival of 35% (HCV- SLKT, 79%, P = 0.004). Compared with HCV+ LTA, induction immunosuppression was more frequently used in HCV+ SLKT. Five-year liver graft survival rate for HCV+ SLKT was significantly lower than that for LTA (35% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio of liver graft loss in HCV+ SLKT was 4.9 (95% confidence interval 2.0-12.1, P = 0.001). HCV+ SLKT recipients were more likely to succumb to recurrent HCV and sepsis compared with LTA (32% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001 and 24% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.030, respectively). Ten HCV+ SLKT recipients underwent anti-HCV therapy for recurrent HCV; only 1 achieved sustained virological response. HCV+ SLKT is associated with significantly decreased long-term prognosis compared with HCV- SLKT and HCV+ LTA.

Improved renal function in liver transplant recipients treated for hepatitis C virus with a sustained virological response and mild chronic kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with renal complications. We aimed to determine whether a sustained virological response (SVR) was associated with improvements in renal function (RF) in liver transplant (LT) recipients treated for HCV. Changes in RF were compared 1, 3, and 5 years after therapy as a function of the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) before treatment (BT). Variables associated with renal dysfunction [RD; 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) value 60 mL/minute] at the last follow-up (LFU) were evaluated for all treated LT patients with a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year since the end of treatment (EOT; n = 175). There were 99 patients with stage 2 CKD BT (MDRD-4 value 60-89 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ), and an improvement in RF was observed more frequently among SVR patients versus nonresponders (NRs). The median changes in the MDRD-4 values BT to 1, 3, and 5 years after treatment were -0.5, 4.5, and 9.4 mL/minute for the SVR patients and -1, -0.3, and -1.5 mL/minute for the NRs (P = 0.61, P = 0.06, and P = 0.004, respectively). RD was present in 31% of the patients at the LFU at a median of 3.8 years after EOT (range 1-9 years). The follow-up did not differ between SVR patients and NRs. RD was present at the LFU in 19% of SVR patients versus 40% of NRs (P = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, RD at the LFU was associated with NRs [relative risk (RR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)  = 1.3-11.23, P = 0.01], EOT MDRD-4 values (RR = 1.022, 95% CI = 1.001-1.04, P = 0.04), and female sex (RR = 5.6, 95% CI = 1.84-17.5, P = 0.002). In conclusion, SVR leads to improved RF in HCV-infected LT recipients with stage 2 CKD BT.

Living-donor liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompression. In areas with low deceased-donor organ availability like Japan, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is similarly indicated for HCV cirrhosis as deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries and accepted as an established treatment for HCV-cirrhosis, and the results are equivalent to those of DDLT. To prevent graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C, antiviral treatment with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. In contrast to DDLT, many Japanese LDLT centers have reported modified treatment regimens as best efforts to secure first graft, such as aggressive preemptive antiviral treatment, escalation of dosages, and elongation of treatment duration.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompensation. The use of poor quality organs, particularly from older donors, has a highly negative impact on the severity of recurrence and patient/graft survival. Although immunosuppressive regimens have a considerable impact on the outcome, the optimal regimen after liver transplantation for HCV-infected patients remains unclear. Disease progression monitoring with protocol biopsy and new noninvasive methods is essential for predicting patient/graft outcome and starting antiviral treatment with the appropriate timing. Antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. Living-donor liver transplantation is now widely accepted as an established treatment for HCV cirrhosis and the results are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation.