1
|
Singhal S, Gurjar M, Sahoo JN, Saran S, Dua R, Sahoo AK, Sharma A, Agarwal S, Sharma A, Ghosh PS, Rao PB, Kothari N, Joshi K, Deokar K, Mukherjee S, Sharma P, Sreedevi BPS, Sivaramakrishnan P, Singh U, Sundaram D, Agrawal A, Katoch CDS. Aerosol drug therapy in critically ill patients (Aero-in-ICU study): A multicentre prospective observational cohort study. Lung India 2024; 41:200-208. [PMID: 38687231 PMCID: PMC11093142 DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_580_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, a significant understanding of delivering optimal aerosol therapy and the availability of various drugs and devices have led to an increase in its use in clinical practice. There are only a few studies available regarding their use in critically ill patients from a few parts of the world. We aimed to study the practice pattern of aerosol therapy in critically ill patients from Indian intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS After ethical approval, this multi-centric prospective observational study was performed over a study period of four weeks. Newly admitted adult patients considered who had an artificial airway and/or ventilation (including non-invasive). Patients were followed up for the next 14 days or until ICU discharge/death (whichever came first) for details of each aerosol therapy, including ongoing respiratory support, drug type, and aerosol-generating device. RESULTS From the nine participating centers across India, 218 patients were enrolled. Of 218 enrolled patients, 72.48% received 4884 aerosols with 30.91 ± 27.15 (95%CI: 26.6-35.1) aerosols per patient over 1108 patient days. Approximately 62.7% during IMV, 30.2% during NIV, 2.3% in spontaneously breathing patients with an artificial airway during weaning, and 4.7% were given without an artificial airway after weaning or decannulation. In 59%, a single drug was used, and bronchodilators were the most frequent. The jet nebulizer was the most common, followed by the ultrasonic and vibrating mesh aerosol generator. The ventilator setting was changed in only 6.6% of the aerosol sessions with IMV and none with NIV. CONCLUSION Aerosol therapy is frequently used with a wide variation in practices; bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs, and jet nebulizers are the most widely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Singhal
- Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
| | - Mohan Gurjar
- Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Jyoti Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Sai Saran
- Critical Care Medicine, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ruchi Dua
- Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Alok Kumar Sahoo
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Ankur Sharma
- Trauma and Emergency (Anaesthesia and Critical Care), AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Sonika Agarwal
- Critical Care Medicine, HIMS, SRHU, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | | | | | | | - Nikhil Kothari
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care, AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Krupal Joshi
- Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
| | - Kunal Deokar
- Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
| | | | - Prakhar Sharma
- Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Billa PS Sreedevi
- Critical Care Medicine, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Umadri Singh
- Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Dhivya Sundaram
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care, AIIMS Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Avinash Agrawal
- Critical Care Medicine, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nemcova N, Kosutova P, Kolomaznik M, Mateffy S, Turianikova Z, Calkovska A, Mikolka P. The effect of budesonide delivered by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on acute inflammatory response in severe lung injury in adult rabbits. Physiol Res 2023; 72:S509-S521. [PMID: 38165755 PMCID: PMC10861260 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.935232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The inflammation present in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and thereby associated injury to the alveolar-capillary membrane and pulmonary surfactant can potentiate respiratory failure. Even considering the high mortality rate of severe ARDS, glucocorticoids appear to be a reasonable treatment option along with an appropriate route of delivery to the distal lung. This study aimed to investigate the effect of budesonide therapy delivered intratracheally by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) on lung function and inflammation in severe ARDS. Adult New Zealand rabbits with respiratory failure (P/F<13.3 kPa) induced by intratracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid (HCl, 3 ml/kg, pH 1.5) followed by high tidal ventilation (VT 20 ml/kg) to mimic ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) were treated with intratracheal bolus of budesonide (0.25 mg/kg, Pulmicort) delivered by HFOV (frequency 8 Hz, MAP 1 kPa, deltaP 0.9 kPa). Saline instead of HCl without VILI with HFOV delivered air bolus instead of therapy served as healthy control. All animals were subjected to lung-protective ventilation for 4 h, and respiratory parameters were monitored regularly. Postmortem, lung injury, wet-to-dry weight ratio, leukocyte shifts, and levels of cytokines in plasma and lung were evaluated. Budesonide therapy improved the lung function (P/F ratio, oxygenation index, and compliance), decreased the cytokine levels, reduced lung edema and neutrophils influx into the lung, and improved lung architecture in interstitial congestion, hyaline membrane, and atelectasis formation compared to untreated animals. This study indicates that HFOV delivered budesonide effectively ameliorated respiratory function, and attenuated acid-induced lung injury in a rabbit model of severe ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Nemcova
- Department of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montigaud Y, Georges Q, Leclerc L, Clotagatide A, Louf-Durier A, Pourchez J, Prévôt N, Périnel-Ragey S. Impact of gas humidification and nebulizer position under invasive ventilation: preclinical comparative study of regional aerosol deposition. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11056. [PMID: 37422519 PMCID: PMC10329710 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38281-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Successful aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated patients depends on multiple factors. Among these, position of nebulizer in ventilator circuit and humidification of inhaled gases can strongly influence the amount of drug deposited in airways. Indeed, the main objective was to preclinically evaluate impact of gas humidification and nebulizer position during invasive mechanical ventilation on whole lung and regional aerosol deposition and losses. Ex vivo porcine respiratory tracts were ventilated in controlled volumetric mode. Two conditions of relative humidity and temperature of inhaled gases were investigated. For each condition, four different positions of vibrating mesh nebulizer were studied: (i) next to the ventilator, (ii) right before humidifier, (iii) 15 cm to the Y-piece adapter and (iv) right after the Y-piece. Aerosol size distribution were calculated using cascade impactor. Nebulized dose, lung regional deposition and losses were assessed by scintigraphy using 99mtechnetium-labeled diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid. Mean nebulized dose was 95% ± 6%. For dry conditions, the mean respiratory tract deposited fractions reached 18% (± 4%) next to ventilator and 53% (± 4%) for proximal position. For humidified conditions, it reached 25% (± 3%) prior humidifier, 57% (± 8%) before Y-piece and 43% (± 11%) after this latter. Optimal nebulizer position is proximal before the Y-piece adapter showing a more than two-fold higher lung dose than positions next to the ventilator. Dry conditions are more likely to cause peripheral deposition of aerosols in the lungs. But gas humidification appears hard to interrupt efficiently and safely in clinical use. Considering the impact of optimized positioning, this study argues to maintain humidification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoann Montigaud
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U1059 Sainbiose; Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Quentin Georges
- Intensive Care Unit G, CHU Saint-Etienne, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Lara Leclerc
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U1059 Sainbiose; Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | | | - Jérémie Pourchez
- Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U1059 Sainbiose; Centre CIS, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Nathalie Prévôt
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, CHU Saint-Etienne, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France
- Université Jean Monnet, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 Sainbiose, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Sophie Périnel-Ragey
- Intensive Care Unit G, CHU Saint-Etienne, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
- Université Jean Monnet, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U1059 Sainbiose, 42023, Saint-Etienne, France.
- Intensive Care Unit G, Saint Etienne University Hospital, North Hospital, UMR INSERM U1059, Avenue Albert Raymond, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katiyar SK, Gaur SN, Solanki RN, Sarangdhar N, Suri JC, Kumar R, Khilnani GC, Chaudhary D, Singla R, Koul PA, Mahashur AA, Ghoshal AG, Behera D, Christopher DJ, Talwar D, Ganguly D, Paramesh H, Gupta KB, Kumar T M, Motiani PD, Shankar PS, Chawla R, Guleria R, Jindal SK, Luhadia SK, Arora VK, Vijayan VK, Faye A, Jindal A, Murar AK, Jaiswal A, M A, Janmeja AK, Prajapat B, Ravindran C, Bhattacharyya D, D'Souza G, Sehgal IS, Samaria JK, Sarma J, Singh L, Sen MK, Bainara MK, Gupta M, Awad NT, Mishra N, Shah NN, Jain N, Mohapatra PR, Mrigpuri P, Tiwari P, Narasimhan R, Kumar RV, Prasad R, Swarnakar R, Chawla RK, Kumar R, Chakrabarti S, Katiyar S, Mittal S, Spalgais S, Saha S, Kant S, Singh VK, Hadda V, Kumar V, Singh V, Chopra V, B V. Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy. Indian J Tuberc 2022; 69 Suppl 1:S1-S191. [PMID: 36372542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Katiyar
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, G.S.V.M. Medical College & C.S.J.M. University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| | - S N Gaur
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - R N Solanki
- Department of Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Nikhil Sarangdhar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, D. Y. Patil School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - J C Suri
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Raj Kumar
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, National Centre of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - G C Khilnani
- PSRI Institute of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, PSRI Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Dhruva Chaudhary
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Rupak Singla
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, National Institute of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases (formerly L.R.S. Institute), Delhi, India
| | - Parvaiz A Koul
- Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
| | - Ashok A Mahashur
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, P. D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A G Ghoshal
- National Allergy Asthma Bronchitis Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - D Behera
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - D J Christopher
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Deepak Talwar
- Metro Centre for Respiratory Diseases, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - H Paramesh
- Paediatric Pulmonologist & Environmentalist, Lakeside Hospital & Education Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K B Gupta
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Medicine, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Mohan Kumar T
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, One Care Medical Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - P D Motiani
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - P S Shankar
- SCEO, KBN Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajesh Chawla
- Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Randeep Guleria
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - S K Jindal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - S K Luhadia
- Department of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Medicine, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - V K Arora
- Indian Journal of Tuberculosis, Santosh University, NCR Delhi, National Institute of TB & Respiratory Diseases Delhi, India; JIPMER, Puducherry, India
| | - V K Vijayan
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Abhishek Faye
- Centre for Lung and Sleep Disorders, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Amit K Murar
- Respiratory Medicine, Cronus Multi-Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Anand Jaiswal
- Respiratory & Sleep Medicine, Medanta Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Arunachalam M
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A K Janmeja
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Government Medical College, Chandigarh, India
| | - Brijesh Prajapat
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Yashoda Hospital and Research Centre, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - C Ravindran
- Department of TB & Chest, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | - Debajyoti Bhattacharyya
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Inderpaul Singh Sehgal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - J K Samaria
- Centre for Research and Treatment of Allergy, Asthma & Bronchitis, Department of Chest Diseases, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Jogesh Sarma
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Lalit Singh
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRMS Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - M K Sen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, ESIC Medical College, NIT Faridabad, Haryana, India; Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Mahendra K Bainara
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Mansi Gupta
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi PostGraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Nilkanth T Awad
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narayan Mishra
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, M.K.C.G. Medical College, Berhampur, Orissa, India
| | - Naveed N Shah
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Chest Diseases Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
| | - Neetu Jain
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, PSRI, New Delhi, India
| | - Prasanta R Mohapatra
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India
| | - Parul Mrigpuri
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Pawan Tiwari
- School of Excellence in Pulmonary Medicine, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - R Narasimhan
- Department of EBUS and Bronchial Thermoplasty Services at Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R Vijai Kumar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, MediCiti Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Rajendra Prasad
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi and U.P. Rural Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Safai, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rajesh Swarnakar
- Department of Respiratory, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and Interventional Pulmonology, Getwell Hospital & Research Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rakesh K Chawla
- Department of, Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care, Sleep & Interventional Pulmonology, Saroj Super Speciality Hospital, Jaipur Golden Hospital, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Rohit Kumar
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - S Chakrabarti
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Saurabh Mittal
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sonam Spalgais
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | | - Surya Kant
- Department of Respiratory (Pulmonary) Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - V K Singh
- Centre for Visceral Mechanisms, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Hadda
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vikas Kumar
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Virendra Singh
- Mahavir Jaipuria Rajasthan Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Vishal Chopra
- Department of Chest & Tuberculosis, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
| | - Visweswaran B
- Interventional Pulmonology, Yashoda Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ari A, Fink JB. Quantifying Delivered Dose with Jet and Mesh Nebulizers during Spontaneous Breathing, Noninvasive Ventilation, and Mechanical Ventilation in a Simulated Pediatric Lung Model with Exhaled Humidity. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13081179. [PMID: 34452139 PMCID: PMC8400423 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Acutely ill children may transition between spontaneous breathing (SB), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and mechanical ventilation (MV), and commonly receive the same drug dosage with each type of ventilatory support and interface. This study aims to determine the aerosol deposition with jet (JN) and mesh nebulizers (MN) during SB, NIV, and MV using a pediatric lung model. Drug delivery with JN (Mistymax10) and MN (Aerogen Solo) was compared during SB, NIV, and MV using three different lung models set to simulate the same breathing parameters (Vt 250 mL, RR 20 bpm, I:E ratio 1:3). A heated humidifier was placed between the filter and test lung to simulate exhaled humidity (35 ± 2 °C, 100% RH) with all lung models. Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg/3 mL) was delivered, and the drug deposited on an absolute filter was eluted and analyzed with spectrophotometry. Aerosol delivery with JN was not significantly different during MV, NIV, and SB (p = 0.075), while inhaled dose obtained with MN during MV was greater than NIV and SB (p = 0.001). The delivery efficiency of MN was up to 3-fold more than JN during MV (p = 0.008), NIV (p = 0.005), and SB (p = 0.009). Delivered dose with JN was similar during MV, NIV, and SB, although the delivery efficiency of MN differs with different modes of ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Ari
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-512-716-2691
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harb HS, Saeed H, Madney YM, Abdelrahman MA, Osama H, Esquinas AM, Abdelrahim ME. Update efficacy of aerosol therapy with noninvasive ventilator approach (non-invasive ventilation and nasal high flow). J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
7
|
Cunningham SM, Tanner DA. A Review: The Prospect of Inhaled Insulin Therapy via Vibrating Mesh Technology to Treat Diabetes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E5795. [PMID: 32785196 PMCID: PMC7460322 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background: Inhaled insulin has proven to be viable and, in some aspects, a more effective alternative to subcutaneous insulin. Past and present insulin inhaler devices have not found clinical or commercial success. Insulin inhalers create a dry powder or soft mist insulin aerosol, which does not provide the required uniform particle size or aerosol volume for deep lung deposition. Methods: The primary focus of this review is to investigate the potential treatment of diabetes with a wet insulin aerosol. Vibrating mesh nebulisers allow the passive inhalation of a fine wet mist aerosol for the administration of drugs to the pulmonary system in higher volumes than other small-volume nebulisers. Results: At present, there is a significant focus on vibrating mesh nebulisers from the pharmaceutical and biomedical industries for the systemic administration of pharmaceuticals for non-traditional applications such as vaccines or the treatment of diabetes. Systemic drug administration using vibrating mesh nebulisers leads to faster-acting pharmaceuticals with a reduction in drug latency. Conclusions: Systemic conditions such as diabetes, require the innovative development of custom vibrating mesh devices to provide the desired flow rates and droplet size for effective inhaled insulin administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David A. Tanner
- School of Engineering, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ari A, Fink JB. Recent advances in aerosol devices for the delivery of inhaled medications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 17:133-144. [PMID: 31959028 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1712356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Aerosolized medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of patients with pulmonary diseases, and there has been an increased interest in the development of aerosol delivery devices over the years. Technical innovations have advanced device design, novel features such as breath actuation, dose tracking, portability, and feedback mechanism during treatment that improved the performance of aerosol devices, and effectiveness of inhalation therapy.Areas covered: The purpose of this paper is to review recent advances in aerosol devices for delivery of inhaled medications.Expert opinion: Drug formulations and device designs are rapidly evolving to make more consistent dosing across a broad range of inspiratory efforts, to maximize dose and target specific areas of the diseased lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Ari
- Department of Respiratory Care, Texas State University, College of Health Professions, Round Rock, TX, USA
| | - James B Fink
- Department of Respiratory Care, Texas State University, College of Health Professions, Round Rock, TX, USA.,Aerogen Pharma Corp, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kadota K, Inoue N, Matsunaga Y, Takemiya T, Kubo K, Imano H, Uchiyama H, Tozuka Y. Numerical simulations of particle behaviour in a realistic human airway model with varying inhalation patterns. J Pharm Pharmacol 2019; 72:17-28. [DOI: 10.1111/jphp.13195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kadota
- Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | - Nana Inoue
- Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | | | - Tetsushi Takemiya
- Siemens PLM Software Computational Dynamics K.K. Yokohama Kanagawa Japan
| | - Kenji Kubo
- Siemens PLM Software Computational Dynamics K.K. Yokohama Kanagawa Japan
| | - Hideki Imano
- Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | | | - Yuichi Tozuka
- Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ehrmann S. Vibrating Mesh Nebulisers – Can Greater Drug Delivery to the Airways and Lungs Improve Respiratory Outcomes? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.17925/erpd.2018.4.1.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Aerosols are an increasingly important mode of delivery of drugs, particularly bronchodilators, for the treatment of respiratory diseases, notably asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most common type of nebuliser is the jet nebuliser (JN); they have been in use for more than a century but these devices can be cumbersome to use and may sometimes deliver insufficient amounts of drug. A more recent development in aerosol therapy is the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) which is very user friendly and is more efficient than the JNs due to an extremely low residual volume. Scintigraphy images from studies of volunteer subjects using radio-labelled aerosol treatment show that VMN-generated aerosols deliver more drug to patients in a shorter period of time than JN-generated aerosols. Various bench, animal model and small clinical studies have shown that VMNs are more efficient than JNs in drug delivery, potentially improving clinical outcomes. These studies have included various breathing circuits used in mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula systems and devices for spontaneously breathing patients. The efficiency of drug delivery was affected by factors including the position of the nebuliser in the circuit and humidity. Some studies have shown potential substantial savings by hospitals in the cost of MV treatments after switching from metered dose inhalers to VMNs. VMNs have also been shown to be effective for the administration of inhaled antibiotics, corticosteroids and other drugs. Larger studies of the effects of VMNs on patient outcomes are needed but they are likely to be an increasingly important means of administering therapies to a burgeoning population with respiratory disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin HL, Fang TP, Cho HS, Wan GH, Hsieh MJ, Fink JB. Aerosol delivery during spontaneous breathing with different types of nebulizers- in vitro/ex vivo models evaluation. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2017; 48:225-231. [PMID: 29277689 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nebulizers for spontaneous breathing have been evaluated through different study designs. There are limitations in simulated bench models related to patient and nebulizer factors. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation of inhaled drug mass between in vitro and ex vivo studies by testing aerosol deposition of various types of nebulizers. METHODS Ten healthy subjects were recruited to receive aerosol therapy with five nebulizers in random order: 1) a jet nebulizer (JN); 2) a breath-enhanced nebulizer (BEN); 3) a manually triggered nebulizer (MTN), 4) a breath-actuated nebulizer (BAN), and 5) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with valved-adapter. A unit dose of salbutamol containing 5 mg in 2.5 mL was placed into the nebulizer and administered for 10 min. For the ex vivo study, minute ventilation of healthy subjects was recorded for 1 min. For the in vitro study a breathing simulator was utilized with adult breathing patterns. Aerosolized drug from the nebulizers and the accessory tubes was captured using inspiratory and expiratory collecting filters. Captured drug was eluted, measured and expressed as inhaled and exhaled mass using spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 276 nm. RESULTS 10 healthy subjects were recruited, aged 20.8 ± 0.7 years old, with a mean height of 166.2 ± 9.2 cm and weight of 64.7 ± 12.4 kg. There was no significant difference in the inhaled drug dose between the JN and BEN (15.0 ± 1.94% and 17.74 ± 2.65%, respectively, p = .763), yet the inhaled doses were lower than the other three nebulizers (p < .001). The VMN delivered greater inhaled dose than the other four nebulizers (p < .01). The respiratory rate of the cohorts was significantly correlated with the inhaled drug dose. For the in vitro model, the JN delivered a lower inhaled dose (11.6 ± 1.6, p < .001) than the other nebulizers, whereas the MTN and BAN deposited significantly lower exhaled doses (1.7 ± 0.4 and 2.7 ± 0.2, respectively, p < .001). The VMN demonstrated a greater drug dose with the in vitro study than the ex vivo model (44.0 ± 0.9% and 35.5 ± 6.3% respectively, p = .003), whereas the JN in the ex vivo model resulted in a greater inhaled drug dose (15.0 ± 1.9% for ex vivo vs 11.6 ± 1.6% for in vitro, p = .008). CONCLUSIONS These in vitro/ex vivo model comparisons of nebulizers performance indicated that breath-related nebulizers can be estimated using an in vitro model; however, the JN and VMN delivered inhaled drug mass differed between models. There was a significant correlation between respiratory rate and inhaled mass, and the inhaled drug dose generated by VMN correlated with minute ventilation. This study demonstrated that the VMN produced greater inhaled drug dose and lowest residual dose, whereas the BEN, BAN, and MTN produced lower exhaled drug dose in both in vitro and ex vivo models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Ling Lin
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.
| | - Tien-Pei Fang
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Sun Cho
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Gwo-Hwa Wan
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linko, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Jer Hsieh
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, ChiYi, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
In vitro evaluation of aerosol delivery of aztreonam lysine (AZLI): an adult mechanical ventilation model. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2017; 14:1447-1453. [PMID: 29041861 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1393411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The delivery profile of Aztreonam lysine (AZLI) during mechanical ventilation (MV) is unknown. We evaluated the amount of AZLI drug delivered using an in vitro model of adult MV. METHODS An adult lung model designed to mimic current clinical practice was used. Both nebulizers were placed before a Y-piece and 4 settings were tested: A) Aeroneb solo® [AS] with a t-piece; B) AS with the spacer; C) M-Neb® [MN] with a t-piece and D) MN with the spacer. Performance was evaluated in terms of: 1) Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD); 2) Geometric standard deviation (GSD), 3) Fine particle dose (FPD), 4) Fine particle fraction (FPF), 5) Inhalable mass (IM), and 6) Recovery rate (RR). RESULTS Both devices showed an adequate delivery of AZLI during MV, with MMAD between 2.4-2.5 µm and 87% of FPF. The FPD (38.8 and 31.7), IM (44.8 and 36.1) and RR (30 and 24) were similar for AS and MN respectively. Nebulizer aerosol delivery increased (50 and 70% respectively) for both nebulizers when using the spacer. CONCLUSION Both AS and MN showed a good aerosol delivery profile for AZLI during in vitro mechanical ventilation. Better aerosol delivery performance was obtained using the spacer.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dugernier J, Ehrmann S, Sottiaux T, Roeseler J, Wittebole X, Dugernier T, Jamar F, Laterre PF, Reychler G. Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review. Crit Care 2017; 21:264. [PMID: 29058607 PMCID: PMC5651640 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. METHODS In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. RESULTS Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406-12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. CONCLUSIONS Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Dugernier
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. .,Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. .,Médecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Stephan Ehrmann
- Université François Rabelais, UMR 1100, F-37032, Tours, France.,INSERM, Centre d'étude des Pathologies Respiratoires, UMR 1100, F-37032, Tours, France.,CHRU de Tours, Réanimation polyvalente, F-37044, Tours, France
| | - Thierry Sottiaux
- Soins Intensifs, Clinique Notre-Dame de Grace, Chaussée de Nivelles 212, 6041, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Jean Roeseler
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Wittebole
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Dugernier
- Soins Intensifs, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Avenue Reine Fabiola 9, 1340, Ottignies, Belgium
| | - François Jamar
- Médecine Nucléaire, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre-François Laterre
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gregory Reychler
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Médecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Pneumologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Michotte JB, Staderini E, Aubriot AS, Jossen E, Dugernier J, Liistro G, Reychler G. Pulmonary Drug Delivery Following Continuous Vibrating Mesh Nebulization and Inspiratory Synchronized Vibrating Mesh Nebulization During Noninvasive Ventilation in Healthy Volunteers. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2017; 31:33-41. [PMID: 28683216 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2016.1339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A breath-synchronized nebulization option that could potentially improve drug delivery during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is currently not available on single-limb circuit bilevel ventilators. The aim of this study was to compare urinary excretion of amikacin following aerosol delivery with a vibrating mesh nebulizer coupled to a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, using conventional continuous (Conti-Neb) and experimental inspiratory synchronized (Inspi-Neb) nebulization modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A crossover clinical trial involving 6 noninvasive ventilated healthy volunteers (mean age of 32.3 ± 9.5 y) randomly assigned to both vibrating mesh nebulization modes was conducted: Inspi-Neb delivered aerosol during only the whole inspiratory phase, whereas Conti-Neb delivered aerosol continuously. All subjects inhaled amikacin solution (500 mg/4 mL) during NIPPV using a single-limb bilevel ventilator (inspiratory positive airway pressure: 12 cm H2O, and expiratory positive airway pressure: 5 cm H2O). Pulmonary drug delivery of amikacin following both nebulization modes was compared by urinary excretion of drug for 24 hours post-inhalation. RESULTS The total daily amount of amikacin excreted in the urine was significantly higher with Inspi-Neb (median: 44.72 mg; interquartile range [IQR]: 40.50-65.13) than with Conti-Neb (median: 40.07 mg; IQR: 31.00-43.73), (p = 0.02). The elimination rate constant of amikacin (indirect measure of the depth of drug penetration into the lungs) was significantly higher with Inspi-Neb (median: 0.137; IQR: 0.113-0.146) than with Conti-Neb (median: 0.116; IQR: 0.105-0.130), (p = 0.02). However, the mean pulmonary drug delivery rate, expressed as the ratio between total daily urinary amount of amikacin and nebulization time, was significantly higher with Conti-Neb (2.03 mg/min) than with Inspi-Neb (1.09 mg/min) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS During NIPPV with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, the use of inspiratory synchronized vibrating mesh nebulization may improve pulmonary drug delivery compared with conventional continuous vibrating mesh nebulization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Bernard Michotte
- 1 Western Switzerland University of Applied Sciences-Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud (HESAV), Filière Physiothérapie, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enrico Staderini
- 2 Western Switzerland University of Applied Sciences-Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud (HEIG-VD), 1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Sophie Aubriot
- 3 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Centre de Référence pour la Mucoviscidose, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emilie Jossen
- 4 Ligue pulmonaire neuchâteloise, 2034 Peseux, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Dugernier
- 5 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service des soins intensifs, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Liistro
- 6 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service de Pneumologie; Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gregory Reychler
- 6 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service de Pneumologie; Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saeed H, Mohsen M, Fink JB, Dailey P, Salah Eldin A, Abdelrahman MM, Elberry AA, Rabea H, Hussein RR, Abdelrahim ME. Fill volume, humidification and heat effects on aerosol delivery and fugitive emissions during noninvasive ventilation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Feng B, Tang P, Leung SSY, Dhanani J, Chan HK. A Novel In-Line Delivery System to Administer Dry Powder Mannitol to Mechanically Ventilated Patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2016; 30:100-107. [PMID: 27754730 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2016.1320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanically ventilated patients commonly suffer from ventilator-associated pneumonia, hypoxemia, and other lower respiratory tract infection as a result of pathogen colonization and poor sputum clearance. Consequently, there is a high rate of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Dry powder mannitol increases sputum clearance, and therefore, we developed a system to administer it to mechanically ventilated patients without disconnection from the ventilator. METHODS The inspiratory line from a ventilator was split by using a three-way valve into two parallel lines where one contains a humidifier for normal breathing cycle and the other line contains a dry powder inhaler (Osmohaler™). The inspiratory air went through the dry powder line and aerosolized the mannitol powder only when its administration to a patient is required. We determined the delivered dose and particle size distributions of emitted aerosols in vitro from 9.5 mm endotracheal and 7.5 mm tracheostomy tubes, with inspiratory airflow of 60, 70, and 80 L/min. RESULTS This novel setup was able to deliver 24.6% ± 3.33% of the 160 mg loaded dose mannitol powder (4 × 40 mg capsules) and 26.7% ± 2.19% of the 320 mg dose (4 × 80 mg capsules) when the endotracheal tube was used. With the shorter tracheostomy tube, the delivery dose increased to 35.6% ± 3.01% and 39.5% ± 2.04% of the 160 and 320 mg doses, respectively. The volume median diameters of the aerosols were in the respirable range with the largest value being 5.17 ± 0.87 μm. CONCLUSIONS This delivery system has been shown to consistently deliver a high respirable dose of mannitol powder. Since this setup does not require disconnection of patients from the ventilator, it is safer for hypoxemic patients and easier to be adapted in a real clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benny Feng
- 1 Advanced Drug Delivery Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Patricia Tang
- 1 Advanced Drug Delivery Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Sharon Shui Yee Leung
- 1 Advanced Drug Delivery Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayesh Dhanani
- 2 Department of Intensive Care, Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital , Herston, Australia .,3 Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, University of Queensland , Queensland, Australia
| | - Hak-Kim Chan
- 1 Advanced Drug Delivery Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dugernier J, Reychler G, Wittebole X, Roeseler J, Depoortere V, Sottiaux T, Michotte JB, Vanbever R, Dugernier T, Goffette P, Docquier MA, Raftopoulos C, Hantson P, Jamar F, Laterre PF. Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study. Ann Intensive Care 2016; 6:73. [PMID: 27447788 PMCID: PMC4958090 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Dugernier
- Soins Intensifs, Médecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. .,Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Gregory Reychler
- Médecine Physique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Wittebole
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Roeseler
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Virginie Depoortere
- Médecine Nucléaire, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Sottiaux
- Soins Intensifs, Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce, Chaussée de Nivelles 212, Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Jean-Bernard Michotte
- Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud, Filière physiothérapie, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Beaumont 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rita Vanbever
- Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Dugernier
- Soins Intensifs, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Avenue Reine Fabiola 9, 1340, Ottignies, Belgium
| | - Pierre Goffette
- Radiologie Interventionnelle, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Agnes Docquier
- Anesthésiologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Raftopoulos
- Neurochirurgie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Hantson
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - François Jamar
- Médecine Nucléaire, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre-François Laterre
- Soins Intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Michotte JB, Staderini E, Le Pennec D, Dugernier J, Rusu R, Roeseler J, Vecellio L, Liistro G, Reychler G. In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Operating in Inspiratory Synchronized and Continuous Nebulization Modes During Noninvasive Ventilation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2016; 29:328-36. [PMID: 27310926 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Backround: Coupling nebulization with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in patients with respiratory diseases. However, a breath-synchronized nebulization option that could potentially improve drug delivery by limiting drug loss during exhalation is currently not available on bilevel ventilators. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare aerosol delivery of amikacin with a vibrating mesh nebulizer coupled to a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, using conventional continuous (Conti-Neb) and experimental inspiratory synchronized (Inspi-Neb) nebulization modes. METHODS Using an adult lung bench model of NIV, we tested a vibrating mesh device coupled with a bilevel ventilator in both nebulization modes. Inspi-Neb delivered aerosol only during the whole inspiratory phase, whereas Conti-Neb delivered aerosol continuously. The nebulizer was charged with amikacin solution (250 mg/3 mL) and placed at two different positions: between the lung and exhalation port and between the ventilator and exhalation port. Inhaled, expiratory wasted and circuit lost doses were assessed by residual gravimetric method. Particle size distribution of aerosol delivered at the outlet of the ventilator circuit during both nebulization modes was measured by laser diffraction method. RESULTS Regardless of the nebulizer position, Inspi-Neb produced higher inhaled dose (p < 0.01; +6.3% to +16.8% of the nominal dose), lower expiratory wasted dose (p < 0.05; -2.7% to -42.6% of the nominal dose), and greater respirable dose (p < 0.01; +8.4% to +15.2% of the nominal dose) than Conti-Neb. The highest respirable dose was found with the nebulizer placed between the lung and exhalation port (48.7% ± 0.3% of the nominal dose). CONCLUSIONS During simulated NIV with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, the use of inspiratory synchronized vibrating mesh nebulization improves respirable dose and reduces drug loss of amikacin compared with continuous vibrating mesh nebulization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Bernard Michotte
- 1 Western Switzerland University of Applied Sciences-Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud , Filière Physiothérapie, Switzerland .,6 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service de Pneumologie; Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC) , Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Belgium
| | - Enrico Staderini
- 2 Western Switzerland University of Applied Sciences-Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud , Switzerland
| | - Deborah Le Pennec
- 3 Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, INSERM, UMR 1100, Equipe "aérosolthérapie et biomédicaments à visée respiratoire," Université de Tours , Faculté de Médecine, France
| | - Jonathan Dugernier
- 4 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Service des soins intensifs, Belgium
| | - Rares Rusu
- 2 Western Switzerland University of Applied Sciences-Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud , Switzerland
| | - Jean Roeseler
- 4 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Service des soins intensifs, Belgium
| | - Laurent Vecellio
- 3 Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, INSERM, UMR 1100, Equipe "aérosolthérapie et biomédicaments à visée respiratoire," Université de Tours , Faculté de Médecine, France .,5 Aerodrug, DTF, Faculty of Medicine, Tours University , France
| | - Giuseppe Liistro
- 6 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service de Pneumologie; Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC) , Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Belgium
| | - Grégory Reychler
- 6 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Service de Pneumologie; Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC) , Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pitance L, Reychler G, Vecellio L, Leal T, Reychler H, Liistro G. Influence of Tracheostomy on Lung Deposition in Spontaneously Breathing Patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2016; 29:454-460. [PMID: 26907544 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nebulized drugs are frequently administrated through tracheostomy in clinical routine. So far, the amount of drug deposited into the lung in these patients remains unknown. The aim of our pharmacokinetic study was to compare lung delivery of amikacin in the same subjects in two settings: spontaneously breathing through a tracheostomy and through the mouth. METHODS Lung delivery was measured by amikacin urinary drug concentration in nine patients who were transitory tracheostomized for the need of a head and neck oncologic surgery. Patients performed two nebulization sessions: with a mouthpiece (MB) and through tracheostomy (TB) using a adapted jet nebulizer (Sidestream®). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Lung delivery was similar with the two conditions of nebulization (6.5 ± 2.5% vs. 6.3 ± 2.0% of the nominal mass of amikacin, respectively, for MB and TB; p = 0.95). Duration of nebulization was also comparable (19.7 ± 1.6 vs. 20.1 ± 1.8 min, respectively, for mouth and tracheostomy breathing; p = 0.307). The half-life and elimination rate constant were not different between the two settings. We conclude that nebulized therapy can be administered in spontaneously breathing tracheostomized adults patients, with a similar amount of drug delivered to the lung compared with spontaneously mouth breathing patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Pitance
- 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Brussels, Belgium
- 2 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale and Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Grégory Reychler
- 2 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale and Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) , Brussels, Belgium
- 3 Department of Pneumologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent Vecellio
- 4 Faculté de Médecine, DTF-Aerodrug , Tours, France
- 5 Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires INSERM U1100/EA6305, Université François Rabelais de Tours , Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France
| | - Teresinha Leal
- 2 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale and Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) , Brussels, Belgium
- 6 Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP)
| | - Hervé Reychler
- 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Brussels, Belgium
- 2 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale and Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Liistro
- 2 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale and Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) , Brussels, Belgium
- 3 Department of Pneumologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc , Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Michotte JB, Jossen E, Roeseler J, Liistro G, Reychler G. In vitro comparison of five nebulizers during noninvasive ventilation: analysis of inhaled and lost doses. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2015; 27:430-40. [PMID: 24517084 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies on performance comparison of nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator are available. Most of these data compared the aerosol drug delivery for only two different systems. Using an adult lung bench model of noninvasive ventilation, we compared inhaled and lost doses of three nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, as well as the influence of the nebulizer position. METHOD Three vibrating mesh nebulizers (Aeroneb(®) Pro, Aeroneb(®) Solo, and NIVO(®)), one jet nebulizer (Sidestream(®)), and one ultrasonic nebulizer (Servo Ultra Nebulizer 145(®)) coupled with a bilevel ventilator were tested. They were charged with amikacin solution (500 mg/4 mL) and operated at two different positions: before and after the exhalation port (starting from the lung). The inhaled dose, the expiratory wasted dose, and the estimated lost dose were assessed by the residual gravimetric method. RESULTS The doses varied widely among the nebulizer types and position. When the nebulizer was positioned before the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the highest inhaled dose (p<0.001), the jet nebulizer the highest expiratory wasted dose (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). When the nebulizer was positioned after the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizers delivered the highest inhaled (p<0.001) and expiratory wasted doses (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). The most efficient nebulizers were NIVO and Aeroneb Solo when placed before the exhalation port. CONCLUSIONS In a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, vibrating mesh nebulizers positioned between the exhalation port and lung model are more efficient for drug delivery compared with jet or ultrasonic nebulizers. In this position, the improved efficiency of vibrating mesh nebulizers was due to an increase in the inhaled dose and a reduction in the exhaled wasted dose compared with placement between the ventilator and the expiratory port. Because of the high total lost dose, the ultrasonic device should not be recommended. Nebulizer placement before the exhalation port increased the inhaled dose and decreased the expiratory wasted dose, except for the jet nebulizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Bernard Michotte
- 1 University of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO) , 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Boukhettala N, Porée T, Diot P, Vecellio L. In vitro performance of spacers for aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2014; 28:130-6. [PMID: 25050644 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During mechanical ventilation, different aerosol generators are employed with various interfaces. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a range of spacers, including a new device called Combihaler® designed for connection with both nebulizers and pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers (pMDIs). METHODS To assess the spacers, we used a ventilator and the Dual Adult Training and Test Lung (model 5600i, Michigan Instruments). Ventilation parameters were measured with and without spacers in volume-controlled and pressure-controlled mode. A filter was placed at the end of the endotracheal tube to measure aerosol delivery. Amikacin (1 g/8 mL) and salbutamol (5 mg/5 mL) were nebulized with an Aeroneb Solo® connected to its T-adapter or the Combihaler® spacer. Salbutamol (100 μg/actuation with 10 actuations) and beclomethasone (250 μg/actuation with 10 actuations) were delivered with a pMDI connected to a Minispacer®, an ACE® spacer, or a Combihaler® spacer. Drug delivery measurements were performed in volume-controlled mode in dry and humidified conditions. Drug deposits on the filter were assayed. RESULTS The use of spacers and the T-adapter did not change the ventilation parameters (p>0.9). Aerosol delivery of salbutamol and Amikacin by nebulization increased up to three-fold with the Combihaler® compared with the T-adapter in humidified and nonhumidified conditions (p<0.05). Aerosol delivery of salbutamol and beclometasone by pMDI increased up to three-fold with the Combihaler® and the ACE® spacer compared with the Minispacer® in humidified and nonhumidified conditions (p<0.05). Aerosol delivery by pMDIs and vibrating mesh nebulizers using either a T-adapter or spacers was reduced by up to 62.5% in a humidified circuit compared with a nonhumidified circuit. CONCLUSION Aerosol delivery via pMDIs and vibrating mesh nebulizers is greater with large spacers (Combihaler® and ACE®) than with smaller spacers (Minispacer®) or a T-adapter, in both humidified and nonhumidified conditions. In humidified conditions, the aerosol delivery decreased with all spacers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabile Boukhettala
- 1 Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires INSERM, Université François Rabelais de Tours , F-37032 Tours, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pornputtapitak W, El-Gendy N, Mermis J, O'Brien-Ladner A, Berkland C. NanoCluster budesonide formulations enable efficient drug delivery driven by mechanical ventilation. Int J Pharm 2013; 462:19-28. [PMID: 24374223 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/16/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Agglomerates of budesonide nanoparticles (also known as 'NanoClusters') are fine dry powder aerosols that were hypothesized to enable drug delivery through ventilator circuits. These engineered powders were delivered via a Monodose inhaler or a novel device, entrained through commercial endotracheal tubes, and analyzed by cascade impaction. Inspiration flow rates and other parameters such as inspiration patterns and inspiration volumes were controlled by a ventilator. NanoCluster budesonide (NC-Bud) formulations had a higher efficiency of aerosol delivery compared to micronized budesonide with NC-Bud showing a much higher percent emitted fraction (%EF). Different inspiration patterns (sine, square, and ramp) did not affect the powder performance of NC-Bud when applied through a 5.0 mm endotracheal tube. The aerosolization of NC-Bud also did not change with the inspiration volume (1.5-2.5 L) nor with the inspiration flow rate (20-40 L/min) suggesting fast emptying times for budesonide capsules. The %EF of NC-Bud was higher at 51% relative humidity compared to 82% RH. The novel device and the Monodose showed the same efficiency of drug delivery but the novel device fit directly to a ventilator and endotracheal tubing connections. The new device combined with NanoCluster formulation technology allowed convenient and efficient drug delivery through endotracheal tubes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nashwa El-Gendy
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-suef University, Egypt
| | - Joel Mermis
- Department of Medicine Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Amy O'Brien-Ladner
- Department of Medicine Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Cory Berkland
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Albuterol delivery in an in vitro pediatric ventilator lung model: comparison of jet, ultrasonic, and mesh nebulizers. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14:e98-102. [PMID: 23287904 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0b013e3182712783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the influence of nebulizer types and nebulization modes on bronchodilator delivery in a mechanically ventilated pediatric lung model. DESIGN In vitro, laboratory study. SETTING Research laboratory of a university hospital. INTERVENTIONS Using albuterol as a marker, three nebulizer types (jet nebulizer, ultrasonic nebulizer, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer) were tested in three nebulization modes in a nonhumidified bench model mimicking the ventilatory pattern of a 10-kg infant. The amounts of albuterol deposited on the inspiratory filters (inhaled drug) at the end of the endotracheal tube, on the expiratory filters, and remaining in the nebulizers or in the ventilator circuit were determined. Particle size distribution of the nebulizers was also measured. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The inhaled drug was 2.8% ± 0.5% for the jet nebulizer, 10.5% ± 2.3% for the ultrasonic nebulizer, and 5.4% ± 2.7% for the vibrating-mesh nebulizer in intermittent nebulization during the inspiratory phase (p < 0.01). The most efficient nebulizer was the vibrating-mesh nebulizer in continuous nebulization (13.3% ± 4.6%, p < 0.01). Depending on the nebulizers, a variable but important part of albuterol was observed as remaining in the nebulizers (jet and ultrasonic nebulizers), or being expired or lost in the ventilator circuit (all nebulizers). Only small particles (range 2.39-2.70 µm) reached the end of the endotracheal tube. CONCLUSIONS Important differences between nebulizer types and nebulization modes were seen for albuterol deposition at the end of the endotracheal tube in an in vitro pediatric ventilator-lung model. New aerosol devices, such as ultrasonic and vibrating-mesh nebulizers, were more efficient than the jet nebulizer.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ari A, Fink JB, Dhand R. Inhalation therapy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: an update. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2012; 25:319-32. [PMID: 22856594 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Incremental gains in understanding the influence of various factors on aerosol delivery in concert with technological advancements over the past 2 decades have fueled an ever burgeoning literature on aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation. In-line use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and nebulizers is influenced by a host of factors, some of which are unique to ventilator-supported patients. This article reviews the impact of various factors on aerosol delivery with pMDIs and nebulizers, and elucidates the correlation between in-vitro estimates and in-vivo measurement of aerosol deposition in the lung. Aerosolized bronchodilator therapy with pMDIs and nebulizers is commonly employed in intensive care units (ICUs), and bronchodilators are among the most frequently used therapies in mechanically ventilated patients. The use of inhaled bronchodilators is not restricted to mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, as they are routinely employed in other ventilator-dependent patients without confirmed airflow obstruction. The efficacy and safety of bronchodilator therapy has generated a great deal of interest in employing other inhaled therapies, such as surfactant, antibiotics, prostacyclins, diuretics, anticoagulants and mucoactive agents, among others, in attempts to improve outcomes in critically ill ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Ari
- Georgia State University, Division of Respiratory Therapy, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pitance L, Vecellio L, Delval G, Reychler G, Reychler H, Liistro G. Aerosol delivery through tracheostomy tubes: an in vitro study. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2012; 26:76-83. [PMID: 22691111 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study investigated the influence of the cannula's inner diameter (ID) and of its removal on the expected respiratory dose of amikacin, using three different jet nebulizer configurations (Sidestream(®)): vented (N1), unvented with a piece of corrugated tubing attached to the expiratory limb of the T attachment (N2), and unvented alone (N3). METHODS The jet nebulizer was filled with amikacin (500 mg/4 mL) and was attached to the tracheostomy tube. A lung model simulating spontaneous breathing was connected to the tracheostomy tube. A filter was connected between the nebulizer and the tracheostomy tube to measure the inhaled dose, and between the tracheostomy tube and the lung model to measure the respiratory dose. Different cannula IDs were tested (6.5, 8, 8.5, and 10 mm), and aerosol lost in the cannulas was determined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Respiratory dose varied between 96±1 mg and 44±3 mg, with higher values observed with N2. The aerosol lost in the cannula was significant and represented up to 63% of the inhaled dose. There was a negative correlation between the cannula's ID and the aerosol lost in the cannula. After removal of the internal cannula, an increase in the respiratory dose of up to 31.3% was observed. We recommend removing the inner tracheostomy cannula to nebulize a larger amount of drug through a tracheostomy tube. Among the three jet nebulizer configurations studied, we recommend the unvented one with a piece of corrugated tubing attached to the expiratory limb of the T attachment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pitance
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pornputtapitak W, El-gendy N, Berkland C. Nanocluster Budesonide Formulations Enhance Drug Delivery through Endotracheal Tubes. J Pharm Sci 2012; 101:1063-72. [DOI: 10.1002/jps.22818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2011] [Accepted: 10/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
29
|
Agu RU, Ugwoke MI. In vitroandin vivotesting methods for respiratory drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2010; 8:57-69. [DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2011.543896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
30
|
Scholes J, Albarran J. What's in this issue? Nurs Crit Care 2010; 15:161-5. [PMID: 20645461 DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00423.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|