Management of squamous atypia (borderline nuclear abnormalities): repeat cytology or colposcopy?

The significance of mild squamous atypia on cytology

Between January, 1991 and February, 1993 inclusive, 396 Papanicolaou smears were reported to show Mild Squamous Atypia with or without Human Papilloma Virus (MSA +/- HPV). All women with MSA +/- HPV smears were routinely recalled for colposcopy. To determine the significance of MSA +/- HPV on routine smear screening, the records of all patients were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-seven women (85.1%) attended the colposcopy clinic and are the subjects analyzed for this report. The remaining 59 (14.9%) failed to attend. Intraepithelial neoplasia was found in 61 patients (18.1%), of whom 27 (8.0%) had a high grade lesion (CIN 2 or 3 or GIN 2). No patient had invasive cancer of the cervix. Only 1 of the 45 pregnant women had a significant lesion. It is concluded that all asymptomatic women with MSA +/- HPV on cervical smear may be managed in accordance with the current NH and MRC recommendations (1) and have a repeat smear in 6 months and colposcopy if the abnormality persists at 12 months.

Cytological screening and management of abnormalities in prevention of cervical cancer: an overview with stochastic modelling

AIMS

To develop a mathematical model of the histological changes of precancer and the development of invasive cancer and how these are related to cytological findings. To use this to investigate the effects on incidence of cervical cancer, number of smear tests and colposcopies, of different schedules for cervical screening, and the clinical management policies for dyskaryosis.

METHODS

A stochastic model was developed relating the available data on tissue progression to the cytological findings. Two strategies, A and B, were compared: under A, women with any abnormal smear receive immediate colposcopy and treatment; under B, women with mild or borderline dyskaryosis have repeated smears at six monthly intervals with colposcopy only for persistent abnormalities.

RESULTS

The model predicted an incidence of invasive cervical cancer in an unscreened population of women aged over 18 years of 5.9 per 10,000 per year. With 70% coverage and three yearly screening under strategy A, the incidence fell to 2.00 and under B to 2.10. The number of smears required was similar but A required two to three times as many colposcopies as B. Raising the coverage to 90% reduced the incidence to around 1 per 10,000 per year but changing the screening interval, the specificity or sensitivity of cytology had much less effect.

CONCLUSION

The model has been tested under a wide range of possible variations in natural history, specificity and sensitivity of cytology. For low grade smear abnormalities, open colposcopic referral is predicted to reduce invasive cancer only slightly more than repeat cytology, at the expense of much additional colposcopy. Improving cytological coverage is suggested as more effective in reducing invasive cancer than increased use of colposcopy or more frequent screening.

Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance

How best to manage women who are found on cervical screening to have mild dyskaryosis remains controversial. Cytological surveillance misses some lesions picked up by colposcopy, but colposcopy is emotionally traumatic for women, the majority of whom will have a normal result. To determine what proportion of lesions are missed by cytological surveillance, and whether any abnormalities persist after colposcopy, we studied, by means of colposcopy and biopsy, the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and subclinical human papillomavirus infection (HPVI) in two groups of patients who had had a first smear showing mild dyskaryosis at least 24 months earlier. One group was recruited from a centre practising cytological surveillance, with colposcopy for patients showing persistent or progressive cytological abnormality. The other group all had early colposcopy and treatment. Of 214 patients recruited into the cytological surveillance group, 70 (33%) had been referred for colposcopy within 24 months. Colposcopy of the remaining 144 (after a mean interval of 27 months from presentation) revealed that 54 (38%) were disease free, 64 (44%) had HPVI/CIN1, 8 (6%) had CIN2, and 18 (12%) had CIN3. A smear at that time identified 12 of the 18 (67%) with CIN3 as needing close cytological follow-up (1 patient) or prompt referral for colposcopy (11 patients). 137 women in the early colposcopy group attended for the study colposcopy (after a mean interval of 32 months from presentation). 37% were found to have some abnormality persisting after an earlier colposcopy, but none had CIN3. Cytological surveillance of mild dyskaryosis resulted in a 12% risk of patients having a small CIN3 lesion after 2 years, but this risk was reduced to 4% by the addition of a third repeat smear 12 months after the second. With such a policy only about a third of women would require colposcopy, and the risk of missing serious underlying precancerous changes would be low.

Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Quantitative histological study of 84 laser cone biopsies showed a highly significant correlation between the grade of a cervical smear and the size of the lesion for all grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (CIN I P = 0.004; CIN II P = 0.0001; CIN III P = 0.003; total CIN P less than 0.0001); 10 of 34 (29%) of women with CIN III and mild dyskaryosis or less had significantly smaller lesions than 23 of 36 (63%) of women with CIN III and moderate or severe dyskaryosis. Repeat cytology identified as severe dyskaryosis all those with large CIN III lesions. Lesion size has been neglected in studies of the natural history of CIN and in the assessment of cytological screening, but offers an explanation for the apparent discrepancies between cytological, colposcopic and histological assessment of progression of CIN.