1
|
Haslam-Larmer L, Shum L, Chu CH, McGilton K, McArthur C, Flint AJ, Khan S, Iaboni A. Real-time location systems technology in the care of older adults with cognitive impairment living in residential care: A scoping review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:1038008. [PMID: 36440422 PMCID: PMC9685159 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1038008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been growing interest in using real-time location systems (RTLS) in residential care settings. This technology has clinical applications for locating residents within a care unit and as a nurse call system, and can also be used to gather information about movement, location, and activity over time. RTLS thus provides health data to track markers of health and wellbeing and augment healthcare decisions. To date, no reviews have examined the potential use of RTLS data in caring for older adults with cognitive impairment living in a residential care setting. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to explore the use of data from real-time locating systems (RTLS) technology to inform clinical measures and augment healthcare decision-making in the care of older adults with cognitive impairment who live in residential care settings. METHODS Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycINFO (Ovid) and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for published English-language articles that reported the results of studies that investigated RTLS technologies in persons aged 50 years or older with cognitive impairment who were living in a residential care setting. Included studies were summarized, compared and synthesized according to the study outcomes. RESULTS A total of 27 studies were included. RTLS data were used to assess activity levels, characterization of wandering, cognition, social interaction, and to monitor a resident's health and wellbeing. These RTLS-based measures were not consistently validated against clinical measurements or clinically important outcomes, and no studies have examined their effectiveness or impact on decision-making. CONCLUSION This scoping review describes how data from RTLS technology has been used to support clinical care of older adults with dementia. Research efforts have progressed from using the data to track activity levels to, most recently, using the data to inform clinical decision-making and as a predictor of delirium. Future studies are needed to validate RTLS-based health indices and examine how these indices can be used to inform decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Haslam-Larmer
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leia Shum
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charlene H Chu
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathy McGilton
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Caitlin McArthur
- School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Alastair J Flint
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shehroz Khan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Iaboni
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Safety of brotizolam in hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 74:939-943. [PMID: 29568975 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-018-2447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of brotizolam in hospitalized patients. METHODS A single-center, comparative retrospective cohort analysis of patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards. Patients treated with brotizolam were compared to patients not treated with any benzodiazepines during hospitalization. Primary outcome was any of the following safety events: mechanical ventilation, delirium, and falls. RESULTS Six hundred patients were included after exclusion in the final analysis; 300 treated with brotizolam (treatment) and 300 not treated with any benzodiazepines (comparator). The brotizolam-treated patients were older with more comorbidities and psychotropic medications. After adjustment using multivariate logistic regression analysis with propensity score, the primary outcomes occurred at significantly higher rates in treated patients than in untreated patients (17 vs. 2 events; OR = 7.33). Any psychotropic medication administered during hospitalization was found by logistic regression to be the main independent risk factor for the studied safety outcomes while age, comorbidities, and the cause of hospitalization were not. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with brotizolam during hospitalization in internal medicine wards is linked to a higher risk of respiratory deterioration, delirium, and falls. Use of psychotropic medications during hospitalization is the main independent risk factor of safety outcomes. Further research is needed to fully evaluate the risks and benefits of sleep induction medications in hospitals.
Collapse
|
3
|
Defrancesco M, Marksteiner J, Fleischhacker WW, Blasko I. Use of Benzodiazepines in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18:pyv055. [PMID: 25991652 PMCID: PMC4648159 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Unfortunately, studies evaluating their benefits and risks in these patients are limited. METHODS Clinical trials focusing on the effect of benzodiazepines on cognitive functions, disease progression, behavioral symptoms, sleep disturbances, and the general frequency of benzodiazepine use were included in this review. Published articles from January 1983 to January 2015 were identified using specific search terms in MEDLINE and PubMed Library according to the recommendations of The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology initiative. RESULTS Of the 657 articles found, 18 articles met predefined selection criteria and were included in this review (8 on frequency, 5 on cognitive functions, 5 on behavioral and sleep disturbances). The frequency of benzodiazepine use ranged from 8.5% to 20%. Five studies reported accelerated cognitive deterioration in association with benzodiazepine use. Two studies reported clinical efficacy for lorazepam and alprazolam to reduce agitation in Alzheimer's disease patients. No evidence was found for an improvement of sleep quality using benzodiazepines. CONCLUSION This systematic review shows a relatively high prevalence of benzodiazepine use but limited evidence for clinical efficacy in Alzheimer's disease patients. However, there is a paucity of methodologically high quality controlled clinical trials. Our results underscore a need for randomized controlled trials in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Defrancesco
- Memory Clinic (Dr Defrancesco), and Division of General and Social Psychiatry (Drs Fleischhacker and Blasko), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy A, Landeskrankenhaus Hall, Hall, Austria (Dr Marksteiner); Division of Biological Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Fleischhacker)
| | - Josef Marksteiner
- Memory Clinic (Dr Defrancesco), and Division of General and Social Psychiatry (Drs Fleischhacker and Blasko), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy A, Landeskrankenhaus Hall, Hall, Austria (Dr Marksteiner); Division of Biological Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Fleischhacker)
| | - W Wolfgang Fleischhacker
- Memory Clinic (Dr Defrancesco), and Division of General and Social Psychiatry (Drs Fleischhacker and Blasko), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy A, Landeskrankenhaus Hall, Hall, Austria (Dr Marksteiner); Division of Biological Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Fleischhacker)
| | - Imrich Blasko
- Memory Clinic (Dr Defrancesco), and Division of General and Social Psychiatry (Drs Fleischhacker and Blasko), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy A, Landeskrankenhaus Hall, Hall, Austria (Dr Marksteiner); Division of Biological Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Fleischhacker)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yayama S, Yamakawa M, Suto S, Greiner C, Shigenobu K, Makimoto K. Discrepancy between subjective and objective assessments of wandering behaviours in dementia as measured by the Algase Wandering Scale and the Integrated Circuit tag monitoring system. Psychogeriatrics 2013; 13:80-7. [PMID: 23909964 DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Revised: 08/19/2012] [Accepted: 08/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Although wandering is one of the major research focuses of the behavioural psychological symptoms of dementia, assessment of wandering has mostly relied on caregiver-administered questionnaires. The purpose of this study was to compare staff-administered Algase Wandering Scale outcomes with objective temporal and spatial movement indicators obtained from the Integrated Circuit (IC) tag monitoring system. METHODS Patients with dementia were recruited from a dementia care unit in Osaka, Japan in 2007. Primary nurses administered the Algase Wandering Scale, and the temporal and spatial movements of the subjects were monitored by the IC tag. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject's proxies. RESULTS Nurses' assessments of wandering were in agreement with the IC tag outcomes only during the day shift. Spatial movements assessed by the staff did not reflect those measured by the IC tag. CONCLUSION This objective measurement of wandering showed the limitations in the assessment of spatial and temporal movement by the staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Yayama
- Faculty of Nursing, Senri Kinran University, 5-25-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|