RNA interference is a powerful tool for chronobiological study in the cricket

Functional analysis of Pdp1 and vrille in the circadian system of a cricket

Circadian rhythms are generated by a circadian clock for which oscillations are based on the rhythmic expression of the so-called clock genes. The present study investigated the role of Gryllus bimaculatus vrille (Gb'vri) and Par domain protein 1 (Gb'Pdp1) in the circadian clock of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Structural analysis of Gb'vri and Gb'Pdp1 cDNAs revealed that they are a member of the bZIP transcription factors. Under light/dark cycles (LD) both genes were rhythmically expressed in the clock tissue, the optic lobes, whereas the rhythm diminished under constant darkness (DD). Gb'vri and Gb'Pdp1 mRNA levels were significantly reduced by RNA interference (RNAi) of Gb'Clk and Gb'cyc, suggesting they are controlled by Gb'CLK/Gb'CYC. RNAi of Gb'vri and Gb'Pdp1 had little effect on locomotor rhythms, although their effects became visible when treated together with Gb'cyc^RNAi. The average free-running period of Gb'vri^RNAi/Gb'cyc^RNAi crickets was significantly shorter than that of Gb'cyc^RNAi crickets. A similar period shortening was observed also when treated with Gb'Pdp1^RNAi/Gb'cyc^RNAi. Some Gb'Pdp1^RNAi/Gb'cyc^RNAi crickets showed rhythm splitting into two free-running components with different periods. Gb'vri^RNAi and Gb'Pdp1^RNAi treatments significantly altered the expression of Gb'Clk, Gb'cyc, and Gb'tim in LD. These results suggest that Gb'vri and Gb'Pdp1 play important roles in cricket circadian clocks.

Neither per, nor tim1, nor cry2 alone are essential components of the molecular circadian clockwork in the Madeira cockroach

Circadian clocks control rhythms in physiology and behavior entrained to 24 h light-dark cycles. Despite of conserved general schemes, molecular circadian clockworks differ between insect species. With RNA interference (RNAi) we examined an ancient circadian clockwork in a basic insect, the hemimetabolous Madeira cockroach Rhyparobia maderae. With injections of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) of cockroach period (Rm´per), timeless 1 (Rm´tim1), or cryptochrome 2 (Rm´cry2) we searched for essential components of the clock´s core negative feedback loop. Single injections of dsRNA of each clock gene into adult cockroaches successfully and permanently knocked down respective mRNA levels within ~two weeks deleting daytime-dependent mRNA rhythms for Rm´per and Rm´cry2. Rm´perRNAi or Rm´cry2RNAi affected total mRNA levels of both genes, while Rm´tim1 transcription was independent of both, also keeping rhythmic expression. Unexpectedly, circadian locomotor activity of most cockroaches remained rhythmic for each clock gene knockdown employed. It expressed weakened rhythms and unchanged periods for Rm´perRNAi and shorter periods for Rm´tim1RNAi and Rm´cry2RNAi.As a hypothesis of the cockroach´s molecular clockwork, a basic network of switched differential equations was developed to model the oscillatory behavior of clock cells expressing respective clock genes. Data were consistent with two synchronized main groups of coupled oscillator cells, a leading (morning) oscillator, or a lagging (evening) oscillator that couple via mutual inhibition. The morning oscillators express shorter, the evening oscillators longer endogenous periods based on core feedback loops with either PER, TIM1, or CRY2/PER complexes as dominant negative feedback of the clockwork. We hypothesize that dominant morning oscillator cells with shorter periods express PER, but not CRY2, or TIM1 as suppressor of clock gene expression, while two groups of evening oscillator cells with longer periods either comprise TIM1 or CRY2/PER suppressing complexes. Modelling suggests that there is an additional negative feedback next to Rm´PER in cockroach morning oscillator cells.

cryptochrome genes form an oscillatory loop independent of the per/tim loop in the circadian clockwork of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

BACKGROUND

Animals exhibit circadian rhythms with a period of approximately 24 h in various physiological functions, including locomotor activity. This rhythm is controlled by an endogenous oscillatory mechanism, or circadian clock, which consists of cyclically expressed clock genes and their product proteins. cryptochrome (cry) genes are thought to be involved in the clock mechanism, and their functions have been examined extensively in holometabolous insects, but in hemimetabolous insects their role is less well understood.

RESULTS

In the present study, the role of cry genes was investigated using RNAi technology in a hemimetabolous insect, the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Using a molecular cloning approach, we obtained cDNAs for two cry genes: Drosophila-type cry1 (Gb'cry1) and mammalian-type cry2 (Gb'cry2). Gb'cry2 has six splicing variants, most of which showed rhythmic mRNA expression. Gb'cry1RNAi treatment had only a limited effect at the behavioral and molecular levels, while Gb'cry2RNAi had a significant effect on behavioral rhythms and molecular oscillatory machinery, alone or in combination with Gb'cry1RNAi. In Gb'cry1/Gb'cry2 double-RNAi crickets, most clock genes showed arrhythmic expression, except for timeless, which retained clear rhythmic expression. Molecular analysis revealed that some combination of Gb'cry1 and Gb'cry2 variants suppressed CLK/CYC transcriptional activity in cultured cells.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we propose a new model of the cricket's circadian clock, including a molecular oscillatory loop for Gb'cry2, which can operate independent of the Gb'per/Gb'tim loop.

Common features in diverse insect clocks

This review describes common features among diverse biological clocks in insects, including circadian, circatidal, circalunar/circasemilunar, and circannual clocks. These clocks control various behaviors, physiological functions, and developmental events, enabling adaptation to periodic environmental changes. Circadian clocks also function in time-compensation for celestial navigation and in the measurement of day or night length for photoperiodism. Phase response curves for such clocks reported thus far exhibit close similarities; specifically, the circannual clock in Anthrenus verbasci shows striking similarity to circadian clocks in its phase response. It is suggested that diverse biological clocks share physiological properties in their phase responses irrespective of period length. Molecular and physiological mechanisms are best understood for the optic-lobe and mid-brain circadian clocks, although there is no direct evidence that these clocks are involved in rhythmic phenomena other than circadian rhythms in daily events. Circadian clocks have also been localized in peripheral tissues, and research on their role in various rhythmic phenomena has been started. Although clock genes have been identified as controllers of circadian rhythms in daily events, some of these genes have also been shown to be involved in photoperiodism and possibly in time-compensated celestial navigation. In contrast, there is no experimental evidence indicating that any known clock gene is involved in biological clocks other than circadian clocks.

Circadian molecular clockworks in non-model insects

The recent development of molecular genetic technology is promoting studies on the clock mechanism of various non-model insect species, revealing diversity and commonality of their molecular clock machinery. Like in Drosophila, their clocks generally consist of clock genes including period, timeless, Clock, and cycle, except for hymenopteran species which lack timeless in their genome. Unlike in Drosophila, however, some insects show vertebrate-like traits: The clock machinery involves mammalian type cryptochrome, cycle is rhythmically expressed, and Clock is constitutively expressed. Although the oscillatory mechanisms of the clock are still to be investigated in most insects, RNAi and genome editing technology should accelerate the study, leading toward understanding the origin of variable overt behavioral rhythms such as nocturnal, diurnal, and crepuscular activity rhythms.

gb'clock is expressed in the optic lobe and is required for the circadian clock in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

Reverse genetic studies have revealed that common clock genes, such as period (per), timeless (tim), cycle (cyc), and Clock (Clk), are involved in the circadian clock mechanism among a wide variety of insects. However, to what degree the molecular oscillatory mechanism is conserved is still to be elucidated. In this study, cDNA of the clock gene Clk was cloned in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, and its function was analyzed using RNA interference (RNAi). In adult optic lobes, the Clk mRNA level showed no significant rhythmic changes both under light-dark cycle (LD) and constant darkness (DD). A single injection of Clk double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) resulted in a knockdown of the mRNA level to about 25% of the peak level of control animals. The injected crickets lost their locomotor rhythms in DD. The arrhythmicity in locomotor activity persisted for up to 50 days after the Clk dsRNA injection. Control animals injected with DsRed2 dsRNA showed a clear locomotor rhythm like intact animals. Injection of Clk dsRNA not only suppressed the mRNA levels of both per and tim but also abolished their rhythmic expression. per RNAi down-regulates the Clk mRNA levels, suggesting that per is required for sufficient expression of Clk. These results suggest that Clk is an essential component and plays an important role in the cricket's circadian clock machinery like in Drosophila, but regulation of its expression is probably different from regulation in Drosophila.

Long-term effect of systemic RNA interference on circadian clock genes in hemimetabolous insects

RNA interference (RNAi) strategy, which enables gene-specific knock-down of transcripts, has been spread across a wide area of insect studies for investigating gene function without regard to model and non-model insects. This technique is of particular benefit to promote molecular studies on non-model insects. However, the optimal conditions for RNAi are still not well understood because of its variable efficiency depending on the species, target genes, and experimental conditions. To apply RNAi technique to long-running experiments such as chronobiological studies, the effects of RNAi have to persist throughout the experiment. In this study, we attempted to determine the optimal concentration of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) for systemic RNAi and its effective period in two different insect species, the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and the firebrat Thermobia domestica. In both species, higher concentrations of dsRNA principally yielded a more efficient knock-down of mRNA levels of tested clock genes, although the effect depended on the gene and the species. Surprisingly, the effect of the RNAi reached its maximum effect 1-2 weeks and 1 month after the injection of dsRNA in the crickets and the firebrats, respectively, suggesting a slow but long-term effect of RNAi. Our study provides fundamental information for utilizing RNAi technique in any long-running experiment.

RNA interference of timeless gene does not disrupt circadian locomotor rhythms in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

Molecular studies revealed that autoregulatory negative feedback loops consisting of so-called "clock genes" constitute the circadian clock in Drosophila. However, this hypothesis is not fully supported in other insects and is thus to be examined. In the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, we have previously shown that period (per) plays an essential role in the rhythm generation. In the present study, we cloned cDNA of the clock gene timeless (tim) and investigated its role in the cricket circadian oscillatory mechanism using RNA interference. Molecular structure of the cricket tim has rather high similarity to those of other insect species. Real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed that tim mRNA showed rhythmic expression in both LD and DD similar to that of per, peaking during the (subjective) night. When injected with tim double-stranded RNA (dstim), tim mRNA levels were significantly reduced and its circadian expression rhythm was eliminated. After the dstim treatment, however, adult crickets showed a clear locomotor rhythm in DD, with a free-running period significantly shorter than that of control crickets injected with Discosoma sp. Red2 (DsRed2) dsRNA. These results suggest that in the cricket, tim plays some role in fine-tuning of the free-running period but may not be essential for oscillation of the circadian clock.