Usefulness of serology in preendoscopic screening. The Italian Helicobacter pylori Study Group

More economic 25 mg 13C-urea breath test can be effective in detecting primary Helicobacter pylori infection in children

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The high cost of the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) limits its wide application for both epidemiological and clinical studies for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. This study examined if a lower-dose UBT, applying 1 mg/kg of bodyweight (maximum 25 mg, UBT(25)), could introduce cost savings while preserving high diagnostic yields for primary H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Children aged less than 16 years were recruited after obtaining consent. Those children with administration of antibiotics or proton pump inhibitors within 1 month of the tests were excluded. Positive tests for both the UBT with 50 mg urea (UBT(50)) and the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) were qualifying criteria for H. pylori infection. Negative results for both indicated non-infection. The UBT(25) was conducted 1 week after the UBT(50). The cut-off points for the UBT(25) ranging from 2delta to 5delta were examined for their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates.

RESULTS

A total of 153 children were recruited (55% male; mean age 9.1 +/- 3.5 years). Both the UBT(50) and HpSA test were positive in 18 (13.1%) and negative in 119 children, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the UBT(25) were optimally achieved at 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.4-100) and 95.0% (95% CI: 91.1-99.9), judged with a cut-off point at 3.5delta. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for children older than 7 years than for those younger than 7 years (98%vs 85%, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Lower-dose UBT titration by bodyweight can cut costs while maintaining a highly reliable method to screen primary H. pylori infection in children older than 7 years, which is generally beyond school age.

Helicobacter pylori "test-and-scope" strategy for dyspeptic patients. Is it useful and safe?

AIM

To evaluate outcome of test-and-scope strategy using 13C-urea breath test, Helicobacter pylori IgG serology, and CagA serology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 100 dyspeptic patients were studied. Biopsies were obtained for histology and rapid urease test (gold standard). Serum samples were obtained for Helicobacter pylori IgG and CagA serology, and 13C-urea breath test was carried out.

RESULTS

If endoscopy had not been performed in Helicobacter pylori patients based on 13C-urea breath test, <45 years, without alarm symptoms, and without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, 15% of endoscopies would have been saved, and one gastric ulcer and two oesophagitis would have been missed. Based on Helicobacter pylori IgG serology, 21% of endoscopies would have been saved. Finally, if endoscopy had been performed only in CagA+ patients, 31% of endoscopies would have been saved, missing one gastric ulcer and two cases of oesophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In our geographical area, the test-and-scope strategy based on 13C-urea breath test or Helicobacter pylori IgG serology would have saved only 15-20% of endoscopies. Although some relevant pathology would have been missed, it is not of a malignant type. 13C-urea breath test is the preferred non-invasive method to be used in this strategy, while Helicobacter pylori IgG serology is of limited value due to its low accuracy. With the use of CagA serology a larger number of unnecessary endoscopic examinations can be avoided.