Actinic Keratoses and the Incidence of Occult Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical?Histopathologic Correlation

Devastating effect of untreated facial squamous cell carcinoma

Skin cancer develops primarily on areas of sun-exposed skin and can typically be treated if caught early. Here, we present a case of a 57-year-old man who presented with an extremely large facial squamous cell carcinoma with resulting perineural invasion and metastasis to parotid lymph nodes because he was unable to obtain timely treatment.

Can the lesions induced with actinic keratosis become an enigma for dermatologists? Results of an open perspective study

Different face skin diseases (basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, rosacea, solar elastosis, etc.) could clinically manifest itself as erythematic patches, pimples or plagues. It is very hard to make the clinical exclusion in some cases of these diseases since their characters can partially overlap or certain lesion can mimic another one especially in the cases of skin areas affected with sun. Therefore, the histopathological analysis remains the “golden standard” of the dermatological diagnosis at skin diseases. Our study has shown that certified dermatologists detect actinic keratosis (AK) of face/head skin of I/II levels very well. Verdicts of dermatologists and pathomorfologists are congruent on account of diagnosis in 90,7% cases. Diseases clinically excluded as AK revealed as malignant neoplasms (basal cell carcinoma) in less than 1% of case lesions.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating Dermytol(®) cream for the treatment of actinic keratoses

Purpose

Actinic keratosis lesions (AKs) have the potential to develop into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and thus therapies to prevent SCC development from AKs are warranted. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a 3 month application of a canola phenolic acid-based cream (CPA) on AK lesions.

Patients and methods

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12 week clinical study conducted at a single-center in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Forty-five subjects (30 CPA and 15 placebo), aged 45–85 years with 3–10 AKs within a 20 cm² treatment area (scalp, forehead, dorsal forearm, neck, or back of hand) were enrolled. The primary outcome was complete or partial lesion clearance and the secondary outcome was safety of CPA.

Results

Although complete AK lesion clearance was not seen in this study, a significant reduction in the mean change from baseline in the average lesion area was observed at weeks 3 (P=0.002), 6 (P<0.001), and 12 (P<0.001) in the CPA group, but only at weeks 6 and 12 in the placebo group (P=0.005 and P=0.002, respectively). Furthermore, the proportion of participants with a $10% decrease in average lesion area was significantly higher in the CPA group than the placebo group at weeks 3 (P=0.05) and 6 (P=0.02), and showed a trend at week 12 (P=0.06). A subset analysis of the change in average lesion area based upon the total lesion area at baseline revealed that CPA elicited a greater reduction than placebo (2×) in participants with a baseline total AK lesion area of 100–500 mm² than in participants with a total area <100 mm² (1.3×).

Conclusion

The results of this study and previous in vitro studies suggest a potential role for CPA in the treatment of AK lesions and the prevention of SCC development.

The importance of early diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis

Chronic, long-term sun exposure results in genetic changes in epidermal keratinocytes and the development of various skin lesions ranging from actinic keratosis (AK) to skin cancer. AK lesions may first appear as rough, scaly spots on sun-exposed skin, and, although most individual AK lesions do not become invasive cancers, the majority of invasive squamous cell carcinomas originate from AK. Genetic analysis demonstrates that ultraviolet radiation-induced mutations and changes in gene expression are present in squamous cell carcinoma, AK, and clinically normal-appearing perilesional sun-exposed skin, which supports the progressive nature of keratinocyte transformation. The presence of certain clinical features, such as large size, ulceration, or bleeding, suggests an increased risk of disease progression. The risk is also increased by evidence of extensive solar damage, advanced age, and immunosuppression. Early diagnosis and consideration for treatment are indicated to clear actinically damaged sites and diminish the risk of invasive squamous cell carcinoma.

Actinic keratosis: facts and controversies

Actinic keratoses are common lesions that are generally clinically diagnosed. Although currently most actinic keratoses are treated, whether this is truly necessary is debated. Treatment of all actinic keratoses is advocated because preliminary evidence indicates that actinic keratoses may progress to squamous cell carcinomas. Some also consider actinic keratoses equivalent to squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinicopathological study of 21 cases of eyelid actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is an intraepidermal malignancy precursor form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which generally occurs in fair-skinned individuals with long-term sun exposure. We present a case series of AKs on the eyelid.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Data of patients seen from 1994 to 2005 were used in the analyses.

RESULTS

There were 21 cases of eyelid AKs in 18 patients, 11 men, and seven women, with a mean age of 70 (range 43-80) years. Most tumors were located on the upper eyelid. The mean size was 0.8 +/- 0.4 cm. The most frequent AK type was type I (76.2%). Men had bigger lesions and more frequent free-margin eyelid involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, tumors were more frequent and had worse clinical and histopathological features in men. AKs are closely related to SCC and need to be removed before they turn into SCC. They can be safely and effectively removed, and therapy is therefore warranted.

Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal for reclassification

The term actinic keratosis (AK) describes a sun-induced, clinical erythematous lesion covered with scale, but does not provide an understanding of the biology or histopathology of the lesion. Consequently, several classification systems for AK have been suggested, but as yet no consensus has been reached. These systems strive to correlate the pathological and clinical features to better provide physicians with the most accurate information to enable correct decisions to be made regarding treatments, Prognosis and metastatic potential. AK is a clinical description that has a histological diagnosis consistent with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in situ. We recommend an AK classification system that describes these lesions as squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), using the terminology 'early in situ SCC Type AK I', 'early in situ SCC type AK II' and 'in situ SCC Type AK III', there by giving clinicians better guidance for diagnosis and specific treatment recommendations.

Actinic keratoses: non-invasive diagnosis for field cancerisation

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are among the most common cutaneous malignancies and have previously been classified as in situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with reported progression rates of up to 20% over 10 years. Since current scientific evidence suggests the presence of multilocular preneoplastic changes in the areas surrounding the affected skin sites, the detection of subclinical AKs remain an ongoing and challenging effort in the clinical and diagnostic management of these lesions. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been used for evaluation of the morphological features of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and RCM evaluation parameters for the diagnosis of AKs have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the RCM-morphology of clinically diagnosed AKs in our study population and to correlate the findings with routine histopathology.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Forty four Caucasians (SPT I-III) with a minimum of one actinic keratosis (AK) lesion were included in this study. Evaluation consisted of clinical examination, RCM and routine histology. Reflectance confocal microscopy evaluation parameters included parakeratosis, architectural disarray and keratinocyte pleomorphism.

RESULTS

A total of 44 AKs were included in the final analysis. Following blinded evaluation by two independent investigators, 97.7% of all skin samples were identified as AK using RCM. 2.3% were incorrectly identified as normal skin by RCM, while routine histology showed features consistent with AK.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflectance confocal microscopy may be a feasible alternative in the diagnosis of AK and may aid in the differentiation against normal skin, as well as in the detection of subclinical disease.