Significant Endothelin Release in Patients Treated with Foam Sclerotherapy

First registry of patients treated with foam sclerotherapy using a new automated microfoam preparation device (2021-2022)

Objectives: To present results for the use of an automated microfoam preparation system (AMPS) in the treatment of varicose veins in a real-world setting.Method: We performed a descriptive study based on a prospective database of patients treated with foam sclerotherapy between February 2021 and December 2022. Polidocanol foam was prepared using a capsule containing sterile air or a low-nitrogen mix. We recorded volume per session, percentage of sclerosing drug, number of sessions, release of thrombus entrapment, complications, and adverse events. A univariate descriptive analysis was performed using Stata V.16.Results: Over a 23-month period, 185 patients (84.9% women, 15.1% men) underwent 685 sessions. Median age was 51.6 years (range, 16-79 years). Thread veins were the condition treated in 68.9% of sessions, tributaries in 7.2%, and truncal veins in 22.6%. The average volume per session was as follows: thread veins, 8 mL; great saphenous vein (GSV), 6.9 mL; and small saphenous vein (SSV), 4.3 mL. The average drug concentration was as follows: thread veins, 0.18%; GSV, 1.49%; and SSV, 1.63%. The average number of sessions was 3.4 for thread veins, 2 for tributaries, 2.7 for the GSV, and 2.9 for the SSV. The occlusion rate at 15 months was 93.2% (41/43) for the great saphenous vein and 86% (13/15) for the small saphenous vein. We recorded a total of 21 complications (3.1% of sessions), 14 of which were minor complications (2% sessions), and 7 moderate adverse events (1% of sessions).Conclusions: This new device is highly versatile and can be used for preparing foam at all concentrations. It contributes to a high rate of occlusion in saphenous trunks, with a minimal number of sessions required for thread veins indicating that the system is a favorable option in the treatment of venous diseases. Additionally, the low frequency of residual pigmentation may be attributed to the system's ability to tailor the foam concentration to the individual case, thus supporting optimal outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Aminaphtone from Pathophysiology to Clinical Applications: Focus on New Rheumatological Acquisitions

Aminaphtone is a chemical drug that has been used for more than thirty years to treat a variety of vascular disorders, with good clinical results and a satisfying safety profile. In the last two decades, multiple clinical studies have reported the efficacy of the drug in different clinical scenarios of altered microvascular reactivity, describing the downregulation of adhesion molecules (i.e., VCAM, ICAM, Selectins), vasoconstrictor peptides (i.e., Endothelin-1), and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (i.e., IL-6, IL-10, VEGF, TGF-beta) by Aminaphtone. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning Aminaphtone, with particular attention to rheumatological conditions in which microvascular disfunction plays a pivotal role, such as Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. These latter conditions may represent a promising field of application for Aminaphtone, due to the growing pre-clinical, clinical, and instrumental reports of efficacy. However, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are lacking and are desirable.

Sclerotherapy of lower limb veins: Indications, contraindications and treatment strategies to prevent complications - A consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology-2023

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is a non-invasive procedure commonly used to treat superficial venous disease, vascular malformations and other ectatic vascular lesions. While extremely rare, sclerotherapy may be complicated by serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

To categorise contraindications to sclerotherapy based on the available scientific evidence.

METHODS

An international, multi-disciplinary panel of phlebologists reviewed the available scientific evidence and developed consensus where evidence was lacking or limited.

RESULTS

Absolute Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the risk of harm would outweigh any benefits include known hypersensitivity to sclerosing agents; acute venous thromboembolism (VTE); severe neurological or cardiac adverse events complicating a previous sclerotherapy treatment; severe acute systemic illness or infection; and critical limb ischaemia. Relative Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the potential benefits of the proposed treatment would outweigh the risk of harm or the risks may be mitigated by other measures include pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding; hypercoagulable states with risk of VTE; risk of neurological adverse events; risk of cardiac adverse events and poorly controlled chronic systemic illness. Conditions and circumstances where Warnings and Precautions should be considered before proceeding with sclerotherapy include risk of cutaneous necrosis or cosmetic complications such as pigmentation and telangiectatic matting; intake of medications such as the oral contraceptive and other exogenous oestrogens, disulfiram and minocycline; and psychosocial factors and psychiatric comorbidities that may increase the risk of adverse events or compromise optimal treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerotherapy can achieve safe clinical outcomes provided that (1) patient-related risk factors and in particular all material risks are (1a) adequately identified and the risk benefit ratio is clearly and openly discussed with treatment candidates within a reasonable timeframe prior to the actual procedure; (1b) when an individual is not a suitable candidate for the proposed intervention, conservative treatment options including the option of 'no intervention as a treatment option' are discussed; (1c) complex cases are referred for treatment in controlled and standardised settings and by practitioners with more expertise in the field; (1d) only suitable individuals with no absolute contraindications or those with relative contraindications where the benefits outweigh the risks are offered intervention; (1e) if proceeding with intervention, appropriate prophylactic measures and other risk-mitigating strategies are adopted and appropriate follow-up is organised; and (2) procedure-related risk factors are minimised by ensuring the treating physicians (2a) have adequate training in general phlebology with additional training in duplex ultrasound, procedural phlebology and in particular sclerotherapy; (2b) maintain their knowledge and competency over time and (2c) review and optimise their treatment strategies and techniques on a regular basis to keep up with the ongoing progress in medical technology and contemporary scientific evidence.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is safe and effective in the management of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity

BACKGROUND

Superficial venous disease of the lower extremity has a significant impact on quality of life. Both truncal and tributary vein reflux contribute to this disease process. Endovenous foam sclerotherapy is a widely used technique throughout the world for the management of superficial venous reflux and ultrasound guidance improves its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

A PubMed search for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) was conducted and all abstracts were reviewed to identify clinical trials and systematic reviews for a full-text analysis. Additional articles were also identified through searching the references of the selected studies.

RESULTS

The production of foam for sclerotherapy in a 1:3 or 1:4 ratio of air to sclerosant is optimal in a low silicone, low-volume syringe system. Physiologic gas may decrease any side effects, with the trade-off of decreased foam stability. Proper technique with appropriate sterility and cleansing protocols are paramount for safe and effective treatment. The technical success of UGFS for great saphenous vein disease is inferior to endothermal and surgical modalities and retreatment is more common. However, the clinical improvement in patient-reported quality of life is similar between these three modalities. When used for tributary veins in combination with endothermal approaches of the truncal veins, UGFS has high rates of success with excellent patient satisfaction. UGFS has demonstrated an excellent safety profile comparable with or superior to other modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper technique, UGFS is safe and effective for the management of superficial venous disease.

Foam bubble size is significantly influenced by sclerosant concentration for polidocanol but not sodium tetradecyl sulphate

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of liquid gas fraction (LGF), sclerosant type and concentration, and filter use on foam bubble size and count.

METHODS

Sclerosant foam microstructure was investigated using light microscopy for a range of LGFs (1 + 2, 1 + 4 and 1 + 8), for both sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS) and polidocanol (POL), at a range of concentrations (0.5-3%), with and without the addition of micro-filters. Foam was generated using a modified Tessari method and placed into wells for analysis by light microscopy. Foam microscopic morphology was photographically documented, and bubble diameters and counts were quantified.

RESULTS

Spherical bubbles were observed at lower LGF and a trend towards polyhedral morphology was observed at the higher LGF of (1 + 8). The higher gas content in LGF led to larger but fewer bubbles. POL bubble diameters appeared to be more influenced by concentration than STS with smaller bubbles observed at higher concentrations of POL. The mean bubble diameters were slightly larger for STS than POL at the highest concentration of 3% but smaller at lower concentrations of 1% and 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

LGF is the primary determinant of bubble diameter and count. In contrast to STS, POL concentration influences the foam bubble size with smaller bubbles generated at higher concentrations of POL and larger bubbles appearing at low concentrations of this agent.

Clinical dilemma of management: Cardiac arrest after microsclerotherapy for lower limb telangiectasia with liquid 0.3% aethoxysklerol or idiopathic cardiac arrest?

A 48-year-old woman attended to discuss a dilemma. She had suffered a cardiac arrest immediately following microsclerotherapy of leg telangiectasia with 0.3% aethoxysklerol. She had successful defibrillation and been transferred to hospital. In hospital, despite normal cardiac tests, she was diagnosed as having idiopathic cardiac arrest. The exposure to aethoxysklerol was discounted by her cardiologists as a cause of her arrest. Following the hospital protocol, she was strongly advised to have an implantable defibrillator. Cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction are documented after aethoxysklerol injection with proposed mechanisms being anaphylaxis, direct cardiotoxicity or endothelin-1 release. Before consenting to an implantable defibrillator, which may have its own complications in the long term, doctors and the patient need to be certain that this arrest was not due to a reaction to aethoxysklerol.

Cerebrovascular effects of endothelin-1 investigated using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a highly potent vasoconstrictor peptide released from vascular endothelium. ET-1 plays a major role in cerebrovascular disorders and likely worsens the outcome of acute ischaemic stroke and aneurismal subarachnoid haemorrhage through vasoconstriction and cerebral blood flow (CBF) reduction. Disorders that increase the risk of stroke, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and acute myocardial infarction, are associated with increased plasma levels of ET-1. The in vivo human cerebrovascular effects of systemic ET-1 infusion have not previously been investigated. In a two-way crossover, randomized, double-blind design, we used advanced 3 tesla MRI methods to investigate the effects of high-dose intravenous ET-1 on intra- and extracranial artery circumferences, global and regional CBF, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO₂) in 14 healthy volunteers. Following ET-1 infusion, we observed a 14% increase of mean arterial blood pressure, a 5% decrease of middle cerebral artery (MCA) circumference, but no effects on extracerebral arteries and no effects on CBF or CMRO₂. Collectively, the findings indicate MCA constriction secondarily to blood pressure increase and not due to a direct vasoconstrictor effect of ET-1. We suggest that, as opposed to ET-1 in the subarachnoid space, intravascular ET-1 does not exert direct cerebrovascular effects in humans.

Sclerotherapy – How to Achieve a Spectacular Outcome

When performed correctly, sclerotherapy results in fibrous occlusion that is not amenable to recanalization. Paramount to success is adequate contact time of a sclerosant to the endothelial cells to cause sufficient damage to the vein while minimizing side effects. To optimize sclerotherapy results, one needs to choose the right patient and the right vein and then use the proper sclerosing agent and injection techniques. This paper will review current literature on sclerotherapy, as well as tips and tricks to optimize outcome and minimize complications.

Sirolimus and propranolol inhibit endothelial proliferation while detergent sclerosants induce endothelial activation, microparticle release and apoptosis in vitro

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of detergent sclerosants, sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol, on endothelial cell activation and microparticle release and the effects of detergent sclerosants, sirolimus and propranolol, on apoptosis in vitro.

METHODS

Cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells and murine haemangioendothelioma (EOMA) cell lines were incubated with different concentrations of sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol, as well as sirolimus and propranolol. Endothelial activation was assessed using flow cytometry for CD62e (E-Selectin), CD54 (ICAM-1), CD105 (endoglin), CD144 (VE-Cadherin), CD146 (MCAM) and the release of endothelial microparticles. Cell proliferation was assessed using [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium] and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester assays. Apoptosis was assessed using flow cytometry for lactadherin/propidium iodide staining and for Caspase-3 expression.

RESULTS

Sublytic concentrations of sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol (0.075%-0.3%) increased the expression of the activation markers CD62e and CD54. The expression of CD105 decreased in sclerosant treated cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Both sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol induced the release of endothelial microparticles. All agents inhibited cell proliferation. Sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol-induced apoptosis as evidenced by increased phosphatidylserine exposure and caspase-3 expression, whereas sirolimus and propranolol increased caspase-3 expression only.

CONCLUSION

Sublytic concentrations of detergent sclerosants induce endothelial activation and the release of endothelial microparticles. All agents were anti-proliferative in EOMA cell lines, with sodium tetradecyl sulphate and polidocanol inducing cellular apoptosis.

Intravenous Endothelin-1 Infusion Does Not Induce Aura or Headache in Migraine Patients With Aura

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether intravenously infused provokes migraine aura and migraine headache in migraine patients with aura.

BACKGROUND

Migraine with aura has been associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased stroke risk. The initiating mechanism of migraine aura symptoms is not known. Experimental provocation of migraine headache using vasoactive peptides has provided tremendous advances in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology but substances that can induce migraine aura have not been identified. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), an endogenous, potent vasoconstrictor peptide released from the vascular endothelium, has been proposed to trigger migraine aura. This hypothesis is based on reports of increased plasma ET-1 levels early during the migraine attacks and the observation that ET-1 applied to the cortical surface potently induces the cortical spreading depolarization, the underlying electrophysiological phenomenon of migraine aura, in animals. Further, endothelial damage due to, for example, carotid puncture and vascular pathology is known to trigger aura episodes.

METHODS

We investigated whether intravascular ET-1 would provoke migraine aura in patients. Using a two-way crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, we infused high-dose (8 ng/kg/minutes for 20 minutes) intravenous ET-1 in patients with migraine with typical aura. The primary end-point was the difference in incidence of migraine aura between ET-1 and placebo. Experiments were carried out at a public tertiary headache center (Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received intravenous ET-1. No patients reported migraine aura symptoms or migraine headache during or up to 24 hours following the ET-1 infusion. Four patients reported mild to moderate headache only on the ET-1 day, 3 patients reported moderate headache on the placebo day, and 1 patient reported mild headache on both days. No serious adverse events occurred during or after infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Provocation of migraine aura by procedures or conditions involving vascular irritation is unlikely to be mediated by ET-1.

Recent developments on foaming mechanical and electronic techniques for the management of varicose veins

Introduction: Varicose veins are a common disease, causing significant impairment of quality of life to afflicted individuals. Conventional surgery has represented the traditional treatment for years, with significant post-operative complications. By the end of the 20^th century, novel approaches had been developed to induce biochemical sclerosis into the treated vein in order to exclude it from blood circulation.Areas covered: Foaming techniques for treatment of varicose veins, both clinically-approved methods and those under experimental studies. A brief description of cavitation, which is the basis of microbubbles formation, and an overview of foam properties have been also provided, including a discussion on clinical efficacy and safety profile.Expert commentary: Foam sclerotherapy has rapidly gained popularity since it represents the most minimally invasive and cost-effective procedure in the short term. Several different methods of foam preparation have been described in literature. In general, the foam generation method may affect characteristics such as stability and bubble size distribution, which in turn affect the therapeutic action of foam itself. Therefore, the selection of a suitable foaming technique is of importance for treatment success. Future developments on foaming techniques are expected to make sclerotherapy, already an effective treatment, even safer and more versatile therapeutic procedure.

The Role of Endothelin in the Pathophysiology of Migraine-a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vasoactive peptides play a key role in the attack-initiating cascade of migraine. Recent studies have highlighted a potentially important role for endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor peptide, in migraine pathophysiology. Here, we review the current data on endothelin's involvement in migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified 23 articles. Nine studies reported on endothelin-1 plasma concentrations in patients with migraine, eight studies investigated relevant genetic associations, five studies investigated endothelin-1 and spreading depression in animals, and one randomized controlled clinical trial tested the efficacy of an endothelin antagonist in the acute treatment of migraine in patients both with and without aura. Elevated endothelin-1 plasma levels have been reported in the early phase of migraine attacks. Genetic abnormalities related to the endothelin type A receptor have been reported in migraineurs. Endothelin-1 potently induces spreading depression in animals, which may explain the connection between endothelial irritation and migraine aura. Endothelin-1 could be a primary factor in the attack-triggering cascade of migraine attacks with and without aura. Additional studies in humans and animal models are needed to further elucidate the role of endothelin-1 in migraine.

Novel developments in foam sclerotherapy: Focus on Varithena® (polidocanol endovenous microfoam) in the management of varicose veins

Scope Varithena® is a recently approved commercially available drug/delivery unit that produces foam using 1% polidocanol for the management of varicose veins. The purpose of this review is to examine the benefits of foam sclerotherapy, features of the ideal foam sclerosant and the strengths and limitations of Varithena® in the context of current foam sclerotherapy practices. Method Electronic databases including PubMed, Medline (Ovid) SP as well as trial registries and product information sheets were searched using the keywords, 'Varithena', 'Varisolve', 'polidocanol endovenous microfoam', 'polidocanol' and/or 'foam sclerotherapy/sclerosant'. Articles published prior to 20 September 2016 were identified. Results Foam sclerosants have effectively replaced liquid agents due to their physiochemical properties resulting in better clinical outcomes. Medical practitioners commonly prepare sclerosant foam at the bedside by agitating liquid sclerosant with a gas such as room air, using techniques as described by Tessari or the double syringe method. Such physician-compounded foams are highly operator dependent producing inconsistent foams of different gas/liquid compositions, bubble size, foam behaviour and varied safety profiles. Varithena® overcomes the variability and inconsistencies of physician-compounded foam. However, Varithena® has limited applications due to its fixed sclerosant type and concentration, cost and lack of worldwide availability. Clinical trials of Varithena® have demonstrated efficacy and safety outcomes equivalent or better than physician-compounded foam but only in comparison to placebo alone. Conclusion Varithena® is a promising step towards the creation of an ideal sclerosant foam. Further assessment in independent randomised controlled clinical trials is required to establish the advantages of Varithena® over and above the current best practice physician-compounded foam.

Can migraine aura be provoked experimentally? A systematic review of potential methods for the provocation of migraine aura

Background

The nature of the migraine aura and its role in migraine pathophysiology is incompletely understood. In particular, the mechanisms underlying aura initiation and the causal relation between aura and headache are unknown. The scientific investigation of aura in patients is only possible if aura can be triggered. This paper reviews potential methods for the experimental provocation of migraine aura.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed for studies of experimental migraine provocation, including case reports of patients with aura and reports of the occurrence of aura following exposure to any kind of suspected trigger.

Results

We identified 21 provocation studies, using 13 different prospective provocation methods, and 34 case reports. In the prospective studies, aura were reported following the administration of intravenous and sublingual glyceryl trinitrate, visual stimulation, physical activity, calcitonin gene-related peptide infusion, chocolate ingestion, and the intravenous injection of insulin. In addition, carotid artery puncture has consistently been reported as a trigger of aura.

Conclusions

No safe and efficient method for aura provocation exists at present, but several approaches could prove useful for this purpose.

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Varithena® (polidocanol endovenous microfoam 1%) for symptomatic, visible varicose veins with saphenofemoral junction incompetence

Objectives

A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polidocanol endovenous microfoam (1%, Varithena® [polidocanol injectable foam], BTG International Ltd.).

Methods

Patients (n = 77) with symptomatic, visible varicose veins were randomized to treatment with either Varithena 1% or placebo.

Results

Varithena provided greater mean changes from Baseline in patient-reported assessments of symptoms (e.g., heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, itching [HASTI®] score 30.7 points vs 16.7 points, p = 0.0009, primary endpoint; and modified Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality-of-Life/Symptoms [m-VEINES-QOL/Sym; p < 0.001]), physician-assessed VCSS, and physician- and patient-assessed appearance compared with placebo.

The HASTI score correlated highly with the modified-VEINES-QOL/Sym and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-2 scores (r = 0.7 to > 0.9, p ≤ 0.001). Adverse events included contusion, incision-site hematoma, and limb discomfort. Venous thrombus adverse events were reported as mild and generally resolved without sequelae.

Conclusions

Varithena provided significantly greater symptom relief and improvement in leg appearance compared with placebo. Adverse events were generally mild and transient. (www.clinicaltrials.gov [NCT00758420]).

Benefits of polidocanol endovenous microfoam (Varithena®) compared with physician-compounded foams

OBJECTIVE

To compare foam bubble size and bubble size distribution, stability, and degradation rate of commercially available polidocanol endovenous microfoam (Varithena®) and physician-compounded foams using a number of laboratory tests.

METHODS

Foam properties of polidocanol endovenous microfoam and physician-compounded foams were measured and compared using a glass-plate method and a Sympatec QICPIC image analysis method to measure bubble size and bubble size distribution, Turbiscan™ LAB for foam half time and drainage and a novel biomimetic vein model to measure foam stability. Physician-compounded foams composed of polidocanol and room air, CO2, or mixtures of oxygen and carbon dioxide (O2:CO2) were generated by different methods.

RESULTS

Polidocanol endovenous microfoam was found to have a narrow bubble size distribution with no large (>500 µm) bubbles. Physician-compounded foams made with the Tessari method had broader bubble size distribution and large bubbles, which have an impact on foam stability. Polidocanol endovenous microfoam had a lower degradation rate than any physician-compounded foams, including foams made using room air (p < 0.035). The same result was obtained at different liquid to gas ratios (1:4 and 1:7) for physician-compounded foams. In all tests performed, CO2 foams were the least stable and different O2:CO2 mixtures had intermediate performance. In the biomimetic vein model, polidocanol endovenous microfoam had the slowest degradation rate and longest calculated dwell time, which represents the length of time the foam is in contact with the vein, almost twice that of physician-compounded foams using room air and eight times better than physician-compounded foams prepared using equivalent gas mixes.

CONCLUSION

Bubble size, bubble size distribution and stability of various sclerosing foam formulations show that polidocanol endovenous microfoam results in better overall performance compared with physician-compounded foams. Polidocanol endovenous microfoam offers better stability and cohesive properties in a biomimetic vein model compared to physician-compounded foams. Polidocanol endovenous microfoam, which is indicated in the United States for treatment of great saphenous vein system incompetence, provides clinicians with a consistent product with enhanced handling properties.

[Unusual consequences of foam sclerotherapy]

Neurological disorders are rare complications of foam sclerotherapy. Visual disturbances and headache are the most commonly reported events and are thought to be equivalent to migraine with aura. Exceptionally, strokes have been reported. Papillary fibroelastoma is a rare cardiac tumor, which may embolize in cerebral arteries. We report the case of a patient in whom neurological disorders occurred during a session of foam sclerotherapy, and led to the discovery of a cardiac fibroelastoma.

Paradoxical embolism following intralesional sclerotherapy for cervical venous malformation

We present a rare case of a 47-year-old woman admitted to our maxillofacial surgery department for a large cervicofacial venous malformation. The patient underwent fluoroscopy-guided intralesional foam sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate and air under general anaesthesia. On awakening, after 48 h of endotracheal intubation, she displayed dysarthria and dysmetria. Her brain CT scan showed no haemorrhagic lesions. A chest CT scan ruled out a potential pulmonary embolism. Suspicion for a paradoxical embolism was high and echocardiography confirmed a patent foramen ovale, which acted as a passageway for the embolus. Transcranial ultrasound showed mild right-to-left heart shunting. The dysarthria and dysmetria disappeared gradually over 48 h, thus confirming a reversible ischaemic neurological deficit. A brain MRI performed 1 week later showed no ischaemic or haemorrhagic lesions. The patient recovered completely. She was advised cardiosurgical follow-up and discharged.

Should foam made with physiologic gases be the standard in sclerotherapy?

Objectives

The aim of this paper is to look at the pros and cons of using physiologic gas to produce foam for use in sclerotherapy. With the expanding use of foam sclerotherapy, there have been increased reports of transient neurologic adverse events such as visual disturbance. Although rare, increased numbers of serious adverse events such as transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and stroke have been described. These events are seen more often in patients who have migraine with aura and those with a right-to-left shunt.

Methods

A literature search of the databases Ovid and Google Scholar was performed for studies looking specifically at neurologic side effects associated with sclerotherapy and use of physiologic foams. Included studies were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, review articles, observational studies and case studies.

Results

Although physiologic gases have been shown in several studies to reduce the incidence of visual disturbance, increasing evidence from recent studies suggest endothelin, rather than gas bubbles to be the cause of these side effects. The cause of stroke and TIA has not been proven and occlusion of cerebral arterioles from gas emboli should still be considered. Many authors state that only good quality foam be injected and volumes should be kept low in an attempt to prevent these rare, but potentially serious events. Foam made with physiologic gases are more biocompatible compared to air-based foam and have been found to be at least as effective in sclerotherapy as foam made with room air.

Conclusion

The use of physiologic gases should be considered for those at increased risk of neurologic side effects such as migraineurs with aura and those with a known PFO. Additionally, as there are few disadvantages to the use of physiologic foam, the use of CO2 or CO2/O2 foam should be considered in all patients receiving foam sclerotherapy.

Migraine and stroke: in search of shared mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Migraine, particularly with aura, increases the risk for ischemic stroke, at least in a subset of patients. The underlying mechanisms are poorly understood and probably multifactorial.

METHODS

We carried out an extended literature review of experimental and clinical evidence supporting the association between migraine and ischemic stroke to identify potential mechanisms that can explain the association.

RESULTS

Observational, imaging and genetic evidence support a link between migraine and ischemic stroke. Based on clinical and experimental data, we propose mechanistic hypotheses to explain the link, such as microembolic triggers of migraine and enhanced sensitivity to ischemic injury in migraineurs.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the possible practical implications of clinical and experimental data, such as aggressive risk factor screening and management, stroke prophylaxis and specific acute stroke management in migraineurs. However, evidence from prospective clinical trials is required before modifying the practice in this patient population.

Acoustic reflectors are visible in the right heart during radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins

Objective

Cerebrovascular events have been noted after foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. One hypothesis is migration of microemboli to the brain through a cardiac septal defect. The aim of this study was to identify whether acoustic reflectors are found in the right side of the heart during radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins, as neurological events are not reported during these procedures.

Methods

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed during local anaesthetic radiofrequency ablation (VNUS ClosureFast) of the great saphenous vein in 14 patients. An apical view was captured at the start of the procedure, during each cycle of heating and at 1 min post-treatment. Patients were monitored for 1 h. Video loops were read by an independent cardiologist. The presence of acoustic reflectors was classified as: 0 = absent, 1 = occasional, 2 = stream, 3 = complete opacification.

Results

Loops were of diagnostic quality in 11/14 (79%) patients. After the second cycle of heating, acoustic reflectors moving through the right heart were seen in 5/11 (45%) patients. These were classified as grade 1 in four patients and grade 2 in one patient. No acoustic reflectors were seen in the left heart. No neurological symptoms were reported.

Conclusion

Acoustic reflectors in the right heart are a common finding during radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins. Considering the prevalence of cardiac septal defects (17%), more neurological events would be expected if these particles were indeed responsible for these events. Further work is required to elicit the mechanisms underlying neurological complications following sclerotherapy.

Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy of great saphenous veins in combination with pre-treatment reduction of the diameter employing the principals of perivenous tumescent local anesthesia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate occlusion rates of great saphenous veins (GSV) with a diameter between 5-10 mm that received a pre-treatment size reduction via perivenous tumescent application (TA) followed by catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy (CDFS).

METHODS

A prospective blinded randomized clinical trial comparing the occlusion rates of GSV at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Fifty patients were included and randomized into two groups. CDFS was performed accessing the GSV at knee level and applying 8 mL of 2% polidocanol-foam (EasyFoam) while the catheter was withdrawn. Strictly perivenous TA was performed in group 1 before applying the sclerosant agent. Occlusion rates and clinical scores were assessed by blinded examiners.

RESULTS

After 12 months in group 1 full occlusion was achieved in 73.9%, partial occlusion in 8.7%, and 17.4% were classified as treatment failure. In group 2, 75% of the targeted GSV were fully occluded, 20% were partially occluded, and 5% were diagnosed as treatment failure. Both groups showed a significant reduction of the vein diameter. Patient's tolerance and satisfaction with the treatment was high in both groups.

CONCLUSION

No benefit could be found using additional TA to reduce the vein diameter before the treatment.

Neurological and chest symptoms following sclerotherapy: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Documentation and analysis of adverse neurological and chest symptoms in a large single centre series of sclerotherapy treatments.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, patient-reported adverse events occurring during liquid or foam sclerotherapy were recorded over a 30 month period and subsequently analyzed. The relevant patient records were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, treatment details and results of subsequent investigations.

RESULTS

A total of 1744 ultrasound guided sclerotherapy treatments were performed during the study period. Almost all treatments were done with air-based sodium tetradecyl sulphate foam. During the same time period, 6504 direct vision surface vein sclerotherapy treatments were completed. Approximately 1/4 of these utilized air-based foam in varying concentrations. There were 14 adverse events in 14 patients involving neurological or chest symptoms for an incidence of 0.17%. Five patients injected with foam complained of isolated chest discomfort, tightness or shortness of breath. Nine patients reported various brief neurological symptoms. These events occurred with both liquid and foam, although the majority involved foam. More neurological events were associated with direct vision sclerotherapy of smaller superficial veins than with ultrasound guided injection of intrafascial truncular veins. Seven patients who experienced neurological symptoms had a history of migraine. Five of the patients who had neurological events were investigated for right to left shunts and found to be positive.

CONCLUSIONS

These events were uncommon and brief. The incidence of neurological and chest symptoms was higher with foam sclerotherapy than with liquid. A history of migraine with aura was associated with an increased risk of post-treatment neurological symptoms. Events occurred with both large vein and small vein treatment. Some events were associated with liquid sclerotherapy rather than foam and with carbon dioxide based foam as well as air foam. There were no long-term adverse consequences.

European guidelines for sclerotherapy in chronic venous disorders

Aim

Sclerotherapy is the targeted chemical ablation of varicose veins by intravenous injection of a liquid or foamed sclerosing drug. The treated veins may be intradermal, subcutaneous, and/or transfascial as well as superficial and deep in venous malformations. The aim of this guideline is to give evidence-based recommendations for liquid and foam sclerotherapy.

Methods

This guideline was drafted on behalf of 23 European Phlebological Societies during a Guideline Conference on 7–10 May 2012 in Mainz. The conference was organized by the German Society of Phlebology. These guidelines review the present state of knowledge as reflected in published medical literature. The regulatory situation of sclerosant drugs differs from country to country but this has not been considered in this document. The recommendations of this guideline are graded according to the American College of Chest Physicians Task Force recommendations on Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines.

Results

This guideline focuses on the two sclerosing drugs which are licensed in the majority of the European countries, polidocanol and sodium tetradecyl sulphate. Other sclerosants are not discussed in detail. The guideline gives recommendations concerning indications, contraindications, side-effects, concentrations, volumes, technique and efficacy of liquid and foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins and venous malformations.

Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction following foam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy

The objective of the study was to describe a very rare complication of foam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (FUGS). An unusual case of persisting chest discomfort following FUGS in a 61-year-old woman led to a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The patient was found to have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The differential diagnoses of paradoxical embolism, gas embolism or vasospasm are discussed, with reference to relevant literature. A hypothesis of post sclerotherapy release of endothelin-1 (in a patient with a known PFO) leading to sustained coronary artery spasm causing sufficient myocardial damage to be reflected in elevated troponin levels is suggested.

Any episode of chest tightness or pain following FUGS should be considered as possibly cardiac in origin. Sustained symptoms warrant admission to hospital for troponin monitoring and ECG assessment.

Schaumsklerosierungstherapie

Die Anwendung von Aethoxysklerol® in aufgeschäumter Form ist in Deutschland seit 2009 als Behandlungsoption der Varikose zugelassen. Entsprechend der aktuellen Leitlinien ist sie grundsätzlich für alle Formen der Varikose geeignet. Besonders bewährt hat sie sich in der Behandlung der Seitenastvarikose und Perforantes sowie als nicht-operative Alternative bei der Stammvarikose. Voraussetzung für die Planung und Durchführung der Schaumsklerosierungstherapie ist neben Anamnese und klinischer Untersuchung eine sorgfältige Duplexsonographie am stehenden Patienten zur Erstellung eines Venenmappings. Ist die Indikation und Entscheidung zur Sklerosierungstherapie gefallen, so muss der Patient sorgfältig informiert werden und schriftlich der Behandlung zustimmen.

Für die Punktion der Varize sollte der Patient stehen oder sitzen, alternativ kann er bei gut sichtbaren Varizen oder duplexkontrollierter Direktpunktion auch liegen. Die Applikation des Sklerosierungsmittels sollte immer im Liegen erfolgen. Für die Schaumherstellung haben sich das Tessari- und das DSS-System bewährt. Nach der Injektion des Schaums sollten eine exzentrische Kompression, ein lokaler Kompressionsverband und anschließend eine Kompression mittels Kompressionsstrumpf erfolgen.

Die Nebenwirkungen der Schaumsklerosie-rung unterscheiden sich nicht wesentlich von denen der Flüssigsklerosierung. Zur Verlaufskontrolle eignet sich die Duplexsonographie.