Projective Personification Approach to the Experience of People With Acne and Acne Scarring-Expressing the Unspoken

Importance

The association of acne with emotional and social well-being is not limited to active acne because acne scarring can extend long after cessation of active lesions.

Objective

To explore the psychosocial burden of facial and truncal acne (FTA) and acne scars (AS) in a spontaneous manner using qualitative research.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This qualitative study recruited participants via local panels. A personification exercise, "Letter to my Disease," was developed for participants of 2 independent arms, FTA and AS, of an international qualitative study in the form of letter completion.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Study outcomes comprised perceptions, psychosocial effects of FTA and AS, and coping behaviors.

Results

A total of 60 participants were recruited for the FTA and AS study. Among participants with FTA, 17 were women (57%), 21 (70%) were aged 13 to 25 years, and 9 (30%) were aged 26 to 40 years. Twenty-six (87%) participants had severe active acne and 4 (13%) had moderate active acne. Among participants with AS, 18 were women (60%), 9 (30%) were aged 18 to 24 years, and 21 (70%) were aged between 25 and 45 years. Of these 60 participants, 56 (FTA, 28 and AS, 28) completed the projective exercise, "Letter to my Disease," the analysis of which is presented in the current study. During completion of the letter exercise, participants spontaneously expressed emotional and physical burden as well as the social stigma associated with their skin condition. Three major themes emerged, namely, (1) burden of the condition, (2) attitudes and beliefs, and (3) relationship to the personified condition.

Conclusions and Relevance

Consistent with their skin condition, participants associated acne, through personification, with the character of an intruder and unwanted companion responsible for their poor self-esteem and emotional impairment. The findings of the joint analyses of letters (FTA and AS), as a catalytic process and free-expression space, outline the continuous burden of active acne starting from adolescence and then continuing into adulthood and beyond active lesions with AS, and highlight the struggle for self-acceptance.

Post-acne symptom complex. Approaches to therapy

Postacne-persistent skin changes that appear as a result of long-term acne, inadequate therapy and manipulations performed in the management of this group of patients. The post-acne symptom complex is stable skin changes that appear as a result of long-term acne inadequate therapy and manipulations performed during the management of this group of patients. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the launch of acne currently look as follows: androgens cause hyperseborrhea, sebum lipids activate innate immunity; pathological keratinization due to the production of IL-1 inflammatory mediator and androgen hyperproduction; Cutibacterium acnes activate innate immune responses through toll-like receptors and metalloproteinases, stimulate the production of antimicrobial peptides and sebum production. The subsequent rupture of the follicles activates the wound healing process. Depending on the genetically determined features of the course of the inflammatory process, various individual postacne changes of the skin will prevail in different patients. The article highlights the main factors influencing the formation of post-acne, pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the formation of these changes, systematizes modern data on the classification, morphological and pathohistological characteristics of scars. Quantitative and qualitative scales of assessment of post-acne scars for determining the severity of the pathological process are presented, differentiated approaches to modern methods of therapy are discussed in detail, including the advantages and disadvantages of the most common methods of treating patients based on the principles of evidence-based medicine using a number of personalized methods.

Evaluation of psychological well-being and social impact of atrophic acne scarring: A multinational, mixed-methods study

Background

Most people with acne are at risk of developing acne scars, but the impact of these scars on patients' quality of life is poorly researched.

Objective

To assess the perspective of patients with acne scars and the impact of these scars on their emotional well-being and social functioning.

Methods

A 60-minute interview of 30 adults with acne scars informed and contextualized the development of a cross-sectional survey of 723 adults with atrophic acne scars.

Results

The main themes identified in the qualitative interviews included acceptability to self and others, social functioning, and emotional well-being. In the cross-sectional survey, 31.6%, 49.6%, and 18.8% of the participants had mild, moderate, and severe/very severe acne scarring. The survey revealed that 25.7% of the participants felt less attractive, 27.5% were embarrassed or self-conscious because of their scars, 8.3% reported being verbally and/or physically abused because of their scars on a regular basis, and 15.9% felt that they were unfairly dismissed from work. In addition, 37.5% of the participants believed that their scars affected people's perceptions about them, and 19.7% of the participants were very bothered about hiding their scars daily. Moreover, 35.5% of the participants avoided public appearances, and 43.2% felt that their scars had negatively impacted their relationships.

Limitations

The temporal evaluation of the impact was not estimated.

Conclusion

Even mild atrophic acne scarring can evoke substantial emotional, social, and functional concerns.

The Treatment of Acne Scars, a 30-Year Journey

Over the past 30 years, the treatment of acne scars has undergone changes that have been significantly influenced by the concurrent development of new devices. The advent of fractional resurfacing lasers was a watershed moment for acne scarring therapy. The author recounts a career history of considerations of acne scarring treatments as well as the literature supporting the experiences causing changes in practice. Fractional ablative and nonablative lasers, sublative radiofrequency, picosecond lasers, microneedling with and without radiofrequency and fillers are the bulk of the treatments covered, along with a discussion of combination therapy. A practical algorithm for acne scarring for selection of treatment modalities is presented.

Acne Scarring Management: Systematic Review and Evaluation of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Modalities for atrophic acne scarring can be classified depending upon the needs they satisfy; that is, resurfacing, lifting/volumization, tightening, or surgical removal/movement of tissue that is required for correction. A plethora of treatment options have resulted from the need to treat various acne scar types, variability of responses noted in various skin types, and increasing popularity of minimally invasive modalities. Still, there is a lack of consensus guidelines on treatment or combination therapies for various clinical scenarios.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review includes a critical evaluation of the evidence relevant to these modalities and various multimodality therapies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and EMBASE databases for studies on acne scar management. Also, we checked the reference lists of included studies and review articles for further studies. A total of 89 studies were included in our quality of evidence evaluation.

RESULTS

The efficacy of lasers and radiofrequency in atrophic acne scarring is confirmed by many comparative and observational studies. Other modalities can be used as an adjunct, the choice of which depends on the type, severity, and number of atrophic scars. Minimally invasive procedures, such as fractional radiofrequency and needling, provide good outcomes with negligible risks in patients with dark or sensitive skin types.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of high-quality data. Fractional lasers and radiofrequency offer significant improvement in most types of atrophic acne scars with minimal risks and can be combined with all other treatment options. Combination therapies typically provide superior outcomes than solo treatments.

Acne Scars: How Do We Grade Them?

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that can lead to permanent scarring. Although grading scales exist for acne scarring, there are many limitations, and there is still a need for a well validated gold standard scale for use in clinical practice or research trials. An objective measure of scar severity should be a component of global acne severity evaluations. This manuscript reviews currently available acne scar grading modalities: lesion counting; subjective self-assessment; Acne Scar Rating Scale (ASRS); evaluator-based qualitative and quantitative scarring grading systems; Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'acne (ECCA); Global Scale for Acne Scar Severity (SCAR-S); and imaging. Despite the varying tools, most of the currently available scales do not account for scar color, depth, or change over time. A new, validated scale is needed that would allow for a more objective and accurate assessment of scar progression over time to assist with effective treatment and research.

Fractional CO2 Laser Resurfacing as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Atrophic Facial Acne Scars

BACKGROUND

While laser resurfacing remains the most effective treatment option for atrophic acne scars, the high incidence of post-treatment adverse effects limits its use. Fractional laser photothermolysis attempts to overcome these limitations of laser resurfacing by creating microscopic zones of injury to the dermis with skip areas in between.

AIM

The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing in atrophic facial acne scars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with moderate to severe atrophic facial acne scars were treated with 3-4 sessions of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing at 6-week intervals. The therapeutic response to treatment was assessed at each follow up visit and then finally 6 months after the last laser session using a quartile grading scale. Response to treatment was labelled as 'excellent' if there was >50% improvement in scar appearance and texture of skin on the grading scale while 25-50% response and <25% improvement were labelled as 'good' and 'poor' response, respectively. The overall satisfaction of the patients and any adverse reactions to the treatment were also noted.

RESULTS

Most of the patients showed a combination of different morphological types of acne scars. At the time of final assessment 6 months after the last laser session, an excellent response was observed in 26 patients (43.3%) while 15 (25%) and 19 patients (31.7%) demonstrated a good and poor response respectively. Rolling and superficial boxcar scars responded the best while pitted scars responded the least to fractional laser monotherapy. The commonest reported adverse effect was transient erythema and crusting lasting for an average of 3-4 and 4-6 days, respectively while three patients developed post-inflammatory pigmentation lasting for 8-12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractional laser resurfacing as monotherapy is effective in treating acne scars especially rolling and superficial boxcar scars with minimal adverse effects.

Which type of atrophic acne scar (ice-pick, boxcar, or rolling) responds to nonablative fractional laser therapy?

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the role of fractional lasers in individual acne scars (ice-pick, box car, rolling) using objective assessment tools in darkly pigmented skin.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 1,540-nm fractional lasers on individual acne scars.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective interventional study was conducted in 35 patients using a 1,540-nm fractional laser. Six sessions were performed with four passes per session and a dose varying from 70 to 100 mJ to maximize the DWR. A self-devised objective assessment tool with dose settings to optimize the depth-to-width ratio (DWR) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to count individual atrophic scars. Final results were assessed 6 months after final laser treatment.

RESULTS

Acne scar reduction efficiency was used to validate the improvement of individual scars, a meaningful difference was considered as 51% or greater improvement. The boxcar scars (52.9%) responded better than the rolling (43.1%) and ice-pick scars (25.9%), with statistically significant improvement (p < .05) seen in boxcar scars after four sessions. Overall VAS scores revealed significant improvement (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Using an objective evaluation tool, an erbium-doped glass laser was found to improve atrophic acne scars, markedly so for boxcar and rolling scars. The VAS score overestimated improvement because of its subjective nature.