Focal High-Concentration Trichloroacetic Acid Peeling for Treatment of Atrophic Facial Chickenpox Scar: An Open-Label Study

Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method for atrophic scars: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) applies a high strength acid focally to treat atrophic scars. Although this method has gained popularity over the past two decades, no standardized treatment guideline exists for CROSS method in the treatment of atrophic scars.

AIMS

The purpose of this comprehensive review was to evaluate the indications, detailed techniques, efficacy, and safety of CROSS method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive literature review was conducted to identify articles relating to CROSS method for atrophic scars from 2002 to 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 19 articles meeting criteria. CROSS method has been used for the treatment of acne scars, varicella scars, enlarged pores, and depressed surgical scars. In studies using the quantile grading scale for acne scars, 60%-100% of patients showed >25% improvement. In two studies for varicella scars, 83%-100% of patients showed >25% improvement. CROSS method seems to be effective specifically for ice-pick scars. It is well tolerated and safe in Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I-V. Most reported complications are temporary and include postinflammatory dyspigmentation, erythema, pain, pruritus, infection, and widening of scars.

CONCLUSION

This literature review suggests that CROSS method is a safe and effective treatment for atrophic scars, especially ice-pick scars, in skin types I-V. However, current published works have several limitations, including small sample sizes, lack of control group, different concentrations of acid, different frequency of treatments, and follow-up periods. Larger, randomized, controlled studies are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment protocol of CROSS method.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Cutaneous Scarring after Herpes Zoster

BACKGROUND

About 20% of children have cutaneous scars following chickenpox. In contrast, skin scars are not often reported after herpes zoster (HZ). Risk factors for post-HZ scarring remain undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to prospectively study the incidence of and risk factors for post-HZ scarring.

METHODS

This was a 3-year prospective study of patients with HZ attending a tertiary university hospital. Baseline data, including age, sex, immunosuppression, prior history of scarring, severity and extension of HZ, afflicted HZ dermatome, and antiviral treatment received, were recorded. At 1 month after the HZ skin lesions had healed, patients were screened for skin scars at the prior HZ site. These patients were followed every 2 months for 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 11 (9.7%) of 113 HZ patients still had post-HZ scarring (fair-skinned patients: hypopigmented [n = 3], hyperpigmented [n = 2], atrophic cicatricial [n = 3], and hypertrophic cicatricial [n = 1]; dark-skinned patients: severe hyperpigmented hypertrophic scarring [n = 2]). HZ was extensive and severe in all cases. Nine of the 11 patients were immunocompromised. Three cases had a history of hypertrophic/keloid scarring but no post-varicella scars. The most frequent location was the trunk (n = 5), followed by the cervical region (n = 3) and the face (n = 3). Given the study setting, it is possible that immunocompromized patients with severe HZ were overrepresented in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Scarring after HZ is probably overlooked. The principal risk factors seem to be severe HZ and immunosuppression. Hence, prompt instigation of antiviral treatment for HZ and HZ vaccination could help reduce the incidence of post-HZ scarring.

Therapeutic response of 70% trichloroacetic acid CROSS in atrophic acne scars

BACKGROUND

Acne scarring is a common sequela of acne for which no single treatment method is uniformly effective. The chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) therapy using high-concentration trichloroacetic acid (TCA) has shown promise as a cheap, safe, and effective modality of treatment in acne scars.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the therapeutic response of 70% TCA CROSS on atrophic acne scars and to evaluate the adverse effects of this therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-three patients with postacne atrophic scars were treated with 70% of TCA focal application every 2 weeks by the CROSS technique and results evaluated on 3 parameters: physician assessment, patient assessment, and satisfaction level of patients, after a follow-up of 3 months.

RESULTS

Good or excellent improvement (>50%) was seen in 66% of patients on physician and patient assessments. The patients were either very satisfied or satisfied in 81.1% of cases. Patients with predominantly boxcar scars and higher pretreatment scar severity were associated with better treatment outcomes. Age, sex, duration of scars, or type of skin did not significantly influence the treatment outcome and adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that 70% of TCA is a safe and effective treatment option in all types of atrophic acne scars, especially in severe boxcar scars.

Evaluating evidence for atrophic scarring treatment modalities

Introduction

Atrophic scars cause significant patient morbidity. Whilst there is evidence to guide treatment, there does not appear to be a systematic review to analyse the efficacy of treatment options.

Objectives

To retrieve all evidence relating to atrophic scar treatment and evaluate using the Clinical Evidence GRADE score in order to allow clinicians to make evidence-based treatment choices.

Method

Searches were performed in Medline, EMBASE, CINHL and Cochrane to identify all English studies published evaluating treatment of atrophic scars on adults excluding journal letters. Each study was allocated a GRADE score based on type of study, quality, dose response, consistency of results and significance of results. The end score allowed categorisation of evidence into high, moderate, low or very low quality.

Results

A total of 41 studies were retrieved from searches including randomised controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective analyses and case reports of which 7% were allocated a high-quality score, 10% a moderate score, 7% a low score and 75% a very low score. Treatment modalities included ablative laser therapy, non-ablative laser therapy, autologous fat transfer, dermabrasion, chemical peels, injectables, subcision, tretinoin iontophoresis and combination therapy.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of good-quality clinical evidence evaluating treatment modalities for atrophic scarring. Evidence supports efficacy of laser, surgery and peel therapy. Further biomolecular research is required to identify targeted treatment options and more randomised controlled trials would make the evidence base for atrophic scar treatment more robust.

Chemical reconstruction of skin scars therapy using 100% trichloroacetic Acid in the treatment of atrophic facial post varicella scars: a pilot study

Context:

Chickenpox (varicella) is a common viral disease caused by Varicella zoster virus. Facial atrophic scars after varicella infection are not uncommon and pose a cosmetic problem. Like atrophic scars of other aetiologies, they are a difficult condition to treat. There are not enough references in the literature regarding efficient treatment of post varicella scars. High strength Trichloroacetic acid (TCA), which is known to cause dermal collagen remodelling, was used to treat varicella scars in the present study.

Aims:

The study was undertaken to assess the efficiency of Chemical Reconstruction of Skin Scars (CROSS) technique using 100% TCA in the treatment of atrophic facial post varicella scars. Settings and Design: Open label, pilot study.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 16 patients with atrophic facial post varicella scars were treated by focal application of 100% TCA solution by pressing down upon the scar surface by a toothpick (CROSS technique). Total 4 sittings were given at 2 weekly intervals and the results evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. Statistical analysis was carried out using Fischer's exact t-test.

Results:

All of the 13 patients who completed the study showed good clinical improvement, with 69% patients grading the response as excellent (>75%) improvement, whereas the rest 31% patients reporting good (51-75%) improvement. No significant complications were seen in any patient.

Conclusions:

CROSS technique using 100% TCA is a safe, cheap and effective therapy for the treatment of post varicella scars.