Comparison of persistence rates with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors used in secondary and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Gender Differences in Non-Persistence with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers among Older Hypertensive Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

The beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) depends on long-term persistence. The aims of our study were to analyse gender differences in non-persistence with ACEIs/ARBs, and to identify the characteristics associated with the likelihood of non-persistence. Our study cohort included 7080 hypertensive patients (4005 women and 3075 men) aged ≥65 years, treated with ACEIs/ARBs, in whom PAD was diagnosed between 1 January and 31 December 2012. Non-persistence was identified according to a treatment gap of 6 months without ACEI/ARB prescriptions. The characteristics associated with non-persistence were identified using the Cox regression model. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, 23.2% of the whole study cohort, 22.3% of men, and 23.9% of women were non-persistent with ACEIs/ARBs, with no significant gender differences in persistence. While a number of characteristics were associated with non-persistence, only three characteristics had consistent, statistically significant associations in both genders: being a new ACEI/ARB user increased the likelihood of non-persistence, and general practitioner as index prescriber and increasing the overall number of medications decreased the likelihood of non-persistence. Information on the differences in characteristics that are associated with non-persistence between genders may help to better identify patients for whom special attention should be paid to improve their persistence.

Prescription patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for various indications: A UK population-based study

AIM

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are widely prescribed for several cardiovascular indications. This study investigated patterns of ACEI use for various indications.

METHODS

A descriptive, retrospective population-based study was conducted using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients starting ACEIs (2007-2014) were selected and ACEI indications were retrieved from electronically recorded medical records. Stratified by indication, we distinguished between persistent and nonpersistent ACEI use, considering a 6-month interval between two prescription periods as a maximum for persistent use. Five-year persistence rates for various indications were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared in a log-rank test. Nonpersistent users were subdivided into three groups: (i) stop; (ii) restart; and (iii) switch to an angiotensin II-receptor blocker. Patients who received ACEIs for hypertension who switched to other classes of antihypertensive medications were further investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 254 002 ACEI initiators were identified with hypertension (57.6%), myocardial infarction (MI; 4.2%), renal disease (RD; 3.7%), heart failure (HF; 1.5%), combinations of the above (17.2%) or none of the above (15.8%). Five-year persistence rates ranged from 43.2% (RD) to 68.2% (MI; P < 0.0001). RD and HF patients used ACEIs for the shortest time (average 23.6 and 25.0 months, respectively). For the nonpersistent group, the percentage of switchers to angiotensin II-receptor blockers ranged from 27.6% (RD) to 42.2% (MI) and the restarters ranged from 15.0% (HF) to 18.1% (group without indication).

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the indication, there are various rates of ACEI nonpersistence. Patients with RD are most likely to discontinue treatment.

Socioeconomic status and nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although conventional wisdom suggests that low socioeconomic status (SES) is a robust predictor of medication nonadherence, the strength of this association remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

1) To estimate the proportion of studies that identified SES as a potential risk indicator of nonadherence, 2) to describe the type of SES measurements, and 3) to quantify the association between SES and nonadherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis research design was used. We searched multiple electronic databases for studies in English or French examining nonadherence to antihypertensive medications measured by electronic prescription databases where explanatory factors were considered. Two authors independently assessed quality, described the SES measure(s), and recorded its association with nonadherence to antihypertensives. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was examined by using the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies with 4,780,293 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four of these studies (43%) did not report any SES measures. When it was reported (n = 32), only seven (13%) examined more than one component but none performed a multidimensional assessment. Most of the studies relied on income or income-related measures (such as prescription-drug benefits or co-payments) (27 of 32 [84%]). Meta-analysis could be quantified in 40 cohorts reported in 30 studies. Overall, the pooled adjusted risk estimate for nonadherence according to SES (high vs. low) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.87-0.92; I(2) = 95%; P < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed in all subgroups examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Published studies have not found a strong association between low SES and nonadherence to antihypertensive medications. However, important limitations in the assessment of SES can be identified in virtually all studies. Future studies are required to ascertain whether a stronger association is observed when SES is determined by comprehensive measures.

Proportion and risk indicators of nonadherence to antihypertensive therapy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that poor adherence to treatment is the most important cause of uncontrolled high blood pressure, with approximately 75% of patients not achieving optimum blood pressure control. The WHO estimates that between 20% and 80% of patients receiving treatment for hypertension are adherent. As such, the first objective of our study was to quantify the proportion of nonadherence to antihypertensive therapy in real-world observational study settings. The second objective was to provide estimates of independent risk indicators associated with nonadherence to antihypertensive therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of all studies published between database inception and December 31, 2011 that reviewed adherence, and risk indicators associated with nonadherence, to antihypertensive medications.

RESULTS

In the end, 26 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria and passed our methodological quality evaluation. Of the 26 studies, 48.5% (95% confidence interval 47.7%-49.2%) of patients were adherent to antihypertensive medications at 1 year of follow-up. The associations between 114 variables and nonadherence to antihypertensive medications were reviewed. After meta-analysis, nine variables were associated with nonadherence to antihypertensive medications: diuretics in comparison to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), ACE inhibitors in comparison to ARBs, CCBs in comparison to ARBs, those with depression or using antidepressants, not having diabetes, lower income status, and minority cultural status.

CONCLUSION

This study clarifies the extent of adherence along with determining nine independent risk indicators associated with nonadherence to antihypertensive medications.

BENEFITS OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION: THE CASE OF SIMVASTATIN IN CANADA

Background: The benefits of pharmaceutical innovations are widely diffused; they accrue to the healthcare providers, patients, employers, and manufacturers. We estimate the societal monetary benefits of simvastatin in Canada and its distribution among different beneficiaries overtime.

Methods: Monetary benefits to developing and generic manufacturers were estimated by calculating public and private revenues minus the development costs of simvastatin and the contribution toward further research and development. We used a dynamic Markov model to estimate monetary benefits to healthcare and employment sectors in terms of cost avoidance associated with prevented cardiovascular events, including stroke and myocardial infarction, and lost productivity due to disability and premature death in working population.

Results: Cumulative monetary benefits of simvastatin from 1990 to 2009 were $4.8 billion (2010 CA$), of which developing and generic manufacturers, and healthcare and employment sectors accounted for 32 percent, 27 percent, 32 percent, and 9 percent, respectively. The yearly trend showed that after the patent expired in 2002 the generic manufacturers became dominant in the market. Benefits for the healthcare sector started to decrease from 2003 corresponding to the decreasing population taking simvastatin during the same time period. Sensitivity analysis showed the higher the compliance or the efficacy, the larger the benefits to healthcare and employment sectors, while monetary benefits for manufacturers were unchanged.

Conclusions: Societal monetary benefits of simvastatin are significant and the distributions of the benefits have changed overtime. Patent, compliance, and efficacy play a vital role in the estimation of the benefits. Analysis of all beneficiaries separately overtime is important when assessing the value of pharmaceutical innovation.

Assessing overall duration of cardiovascular medicines in veterans with established cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine persistence, adherence, and time without therapy with cardiovascular medicines over all episodes of use among veterans following hospitalization for ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using Department of Veterans' Affairs database including 9635 veterans with a hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, angina, or ischemic heart disease, and who had been dispensed cardiovascular medicines in the 3 months posthospitalization. The main outcome measures were duration of first treatment episode, duration of overall treatment episode, and adherence with recommended therapies: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), lipid-lowering therapy, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers, and antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

The median duration of overall treatment was 6.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.0-6.4] for lipid-lowering therapy, 5.4 years (95% CI: 5.1-5.5) for ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.8-5.1) for antiplatelets, 3.4 years (95% CI: 3.3-3.6) for beta-blockers, and 2.8 years (95% CI: 2.6-3.0) for CCBs. Adherence was 72% for CCBs, 75% for ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 84% for lipid-lowering therapy, and 84% for antiplatelets other than aspirin. The median time without therapy was 4.5 months or less for ACE inhibitors/ARBs, antiplatelets, and lipid-lowering therapy.

CONCLUSION

Problems with medication adherence can relate to either persistence or compliance during treatment. This novel method provides a way to determine which of these factors is most problematic when considering chronic therapies. We found that Australian veterans with established cardiovascular disease are persistent with their cardiovascular therapy, with only small gaps in therapy.