Doxazosin added to single-drug therapy in hypertensive patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy

Pharmacologic management of non-neurogenic functional obstruction in women

INTRODUCTION

Impaired bladder emptying in women without neurologic disease may be related to urethral obstruction and/or impaired bladder contractility. Mechanical obstruction generally requires surgical management and options are limited for impaired bladder contractility. However, functional obstruction from voiding dysfunction or primary bladder neck obstruction may present an opportunity for pharmacologic intervention.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors extensively reviewed available literature regarding the use of off-label medications for functional bladder outlet obstruction in women. In addition, side effect profiles and pharmacology of these medications determined from on-label indications are reviewed. Specific medications reviewed include vaginal diazepam, baclofen, urethral botulinum toxin injection, and alpha-adrenergic blockers.

EXPERT OPINION

Alpha-blockers in particular have demonstrated promise in women with demonstrable or suspected bladder outlet obstruction with side effect profiles similar to those observed in men. However, lack of quality data hinders informed decision making with alpha-blockers or any of the other agents studied in women with non-neurogenic functional outlet obstruction. In the absence of well-designed, placebo-controlled multi-institutional trials, those prescribing these medications must be aware of special considerations and side effects associated with relatively unfamiliar treatments in the context of uncertain benefit.

Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in hypertensive men

As the proportion of the US population over the age of 65 continues to rise, it is likely that the number of individuals with concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension will also increase. To reduce morbidity and mortality, it is important to treat patients with hypertension optimally. Evidence from outcome trials suggests that alpha1 blockers should not be used as first-line antihypertensive therapy. Although some clinicians previously recommended alpha1 blocker monotherapy for patients with both hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia, the most recent American Urologic Association and Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines recommend independent treatment with the most appropriate pharmacologic agents for each condition. When treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, clinicians should be aware of the potential impacts that alpha1 blockers may have on blood pressure and potential adverse events in patients who are normotensive as well as in patients with treated hypertension.

Validity of the "bother score" in the evaluation and treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition that is common among older men. It causes a variety of clinically significant lower urinary tract signs and symptoms. BPH is rarely life-threatening; the decision to seek treatment is frequently based on the degree to which patients find the symptoms bothersome and disruptive of daily activities. Recently developed reliable and valid outcome measures to evaluate treatments for BPH are clinical tools that urologists can use to determine the extent of bother and make treatment decisions. A single question used to determine the "bother score" provides a widely used and statistically valid measure of the need for treatment of BPH. Validation data support the argument that the bother score is a statistically reliable measure of treatment outcome in patients with BPH who view their symptoms as bothersome.

Role of the newer alpha, -adrenergic-receptor antagonistsin the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms

BACKGROUND

Although initially introduced for the management of hypertension, alpha(1)-adrenergic-receptor antagonists (alpha1-blockers) have become the standard of care for the medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, these agents have the potential to produce orthostatic hypotension and other blood pressure-related adverse effects in normotensive patients and in those receiving concurrent treatment with other antihypertensive agents. As a result, more "uroselective," less vasoactive alpha(1)-blockers have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews current information on the role of alpha(1)-blockers in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS. The focus is on tamsulosin and alfuzosin, newer "uroselective" agents in this class that have a decreased potential for cardiovascular adverse effects.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE and the proceedings of scientific meetings from 1976 to 2003. The search terms were benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment, alpha(1)-adrenergic-receptor blocker, uroselectivity, lower urinary tract symptoms, complications, and cardiovascular.

RESULTS

Tamsulosin has selectivity for the a alpha(1) and alpha(1d) receptor subtypes. Alfuzosin, although not receptor subtype selective, is clinically "uroselective" and does not significantly affect vascular alpha-adrenergic receptors. Both agents are efficacious in relieving LUTS and have a decreased potential for such cardiovascular adverse effects as postural hypotension. Common adverse events with these agents include dizziness and asthenia.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available data, "uroselective" alpha(1)-blockers should be considered over older, more vasoactive agents for the medical management of LUTS, particularly in patients with BPH and hypertension.

Doxazosin as combination therapy for patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension

The purpose of this paper is to review the role of doxazosin, a long-acting alpha(1)-blocker, as a component of combination therapy for patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension and for patients with concomitant hypertension and hyperlipidemia or glucose intolerance. Recent studies that evaluated doxazosin as combination therapy in the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled hypertension and patients with concomitant hypertension and other disorders were reviewed. Data extraction was based on the tolerability and efficacy data of doxazosin in patients with hypertension. Compared with placebo, doxazosin combination therapy leads to significant improvements in sitting and standing blood pressure. Doxazosin is well tolerated, with only minor adverse effects (e.g., headache, dizziness) as the most commonly reported treatment-related complications. The studies described demonstrate that doxazosin is effective as combination therapy for patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension. The positive effects of doxazosin on serum lipids make combination therapy with doxazosin an attractive treatment option for patients who have concomitant hyperlipidemia or glucose intolerance.