Choosing initial antihypertensive drug therapy for the uncomplicated hypertensive patient

Therapeutic Potential of Reserpine in Metabolic Syndrome: An Evidence Based Study

Reserpine is as old as the scientific diagnosis of hypertension. For many years' clinicians have used it for the treatment of high blood pressure, but with the passage of time and introduction of new anti-hypertensive drugs, the usage of reserpine has gone down drastically most probably due to poorly understood mechanism of action and multiple misleading adverse effects precisely due to high dosing of reserpine. With an aim to elucidate the specific mechanism of action, we screened reserpine against various targets associated with regulation of blood pressure. Surprisingly reserpine showed remarkable inhibitory potential for soluble epoxide hydrolase an enzyme responsible for pathophysiology of not only hypertension but also hyperlipidemia, diabetes and inflammation collectively known as metabolic syndrome. The in-silico, in-vitro and in-vivo results showed that reserpine has the ability to treat metabolic syndrome effectively by inhibiting soluble epoxide hydrolase.

AII antagonists in hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy: focus on losartan

The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to prevent cardiovascular complications of hypertension, such as heart failure, stroke, end stage renal disease, and death, not just to normalize blood pressure. Recently, several clinical trials investigated the beneficial effects of angiotensin II antagonists (AIIAs) in patients with hypertension, heart failure or diabetic nephropathy utilizing proven clinical outcomes (e.g., all-cause mortality) rather than surrogate outcomes (e.g., blood pressure or proteinuria). The AIIAs may offer therapeutic advantages with respect to particular outcomes in certain types of patients. Evidence is also emerging that losartan may possess beneficial pharmacological properties such as effects on uric acid, platelets, sexual dysfunction, and cognitive function, that may set it apart from other members of the AIIA class. However, further studies are needed to delineate fully these potential pharmacological differences among the AIIAs and their possible clinical relevance. This paper reviews recent AIIA outcomes studies in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or diabetic nephropathy and also examines data suggesting that molecular differences exist within the AIIA class, differences that may assist in explaining the outcomes achieved in these recent trials.

Eprosartan for the treatment of hypertension

Antihypertensive agents are proven to reduce the cardiovascular risk of stroke, coronary heart disease and cardiac failure. The ideal antihypertensive agent should control all grades of hypertension and have a placebo-like side effect profile. Angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonists are a relatively new class of antihypertensive agent that block AII Type 1 (AT(1)) receptors, and reduce the pressor effects of AII in the vasculature. By this mechanism, they induce similar pharmacological effects compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, resulting in a lowering of blood pressure. However, AII receptor blockers differ from ACE inhibitors with respect to side effects, and induce less cough, a side effect which may be related to bradykinin or other mediators such as substance P. Within the class of AII blockers, eprosartan differs from other currently available agents in terms of chemical structure, as it is a non-biphenyl, non-tetrazole, non-peptide antagonist with a dual pharmacological mode of action. Eprosartan acts at vascular AT(1) receptors (postsynaptically) and at presynaptic AT(1) receptors, where it inhibits sympathetically stimulated noradrenaline release. Its lack of metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes confers a low potential for metabolic drug interactions and may be of importance when treating elderly patients and those on multiple drugs. In clinical trials, eprosartan has been demonstrated to be at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as the ACE inhibitor enalapril, and has significantly lower side effects. Eprosartan is safe, effective and well-tolerated in long-term treatment, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs such as hydrochlorothiazide.

Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide

The ideal antihypertensive drug should be effective in reducing blood pressure, but have a low incidence of adverse effects. Angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as eprosartan, are as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing blood pressure, but lack the main adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, namely cough. Eprosartan has been shown to be well tolerated with a placebo-like adverse-effect profile. When given as monotherapy it is effective in reducing blood pressure; however, some patients require additional blood pressure control, which may be provided by combination therapy. Indeed, the combination of eprosartan and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in further reducing blood pressure in patients not optimally responding to eprosartan monotherapy. This article reviews the safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide from 17 studies of 1899 patients with hypertension and normotensive volunteers. Of these studies, four were controlled with patients receiving a fixed-dose combination, six were long-term, open-label, and another four were controlled studies with hydrochlorothiazide being given to eprosartan non-responders. The other three studies included healthy subjects receiving the combination of eprosartan and hydrochlorothiazide. There was a high completion rate in all studies evaluated. Most of the patients receiving eprosartan 600mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg daily completed the studies, which supports acceptance of this combination therapy by patients. The most frequently reported adverse events in these combination studies were headache, dizziness, myalgia, and upper respiratory tract infection in patients with hypertension. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and were not considered to be related to study treatment. The adverse event that was more common in patients receiving combination therapy compared with those receiving monotherapy was dizziness. This adverse event may be due to hydrochlorothiazide as it has previously been observed in patients taking thiazide diuretics. In healthy volunteers, the most frequently reported adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory tract infection. However, none of these adverse events were considered related to study medication. In summary, the combination of eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide is well tolerated, both as short- and long-term therapy, with most adverse events occurring early. The most frequent adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory infection, which would be expected based on the safety profile of each of the components. Therefore, the combination of eprosartan with hydrochlorothiazide can be effectively and safely used in patients not adequately responding to eprosartan monotherapy.