Morning hypertension

Relationship between morning blood pressure variability and cerebral microbleed burden in patients with hypertension

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) can be understood as a type of target organ damage caused by hypertension. We aimed to explore the association of the CMB burden with morning blood pressure (BP) variability in patients with hypertension. We divided patients with hypertension into two groups: a group with 1-10 CMBs and a group with more than 10 CMBs. The duration, grade, medication, and control of hypertension were recorded in all patients. Morning home BP measurements were performed every 3 days for a month. A total of 791 patients were recruited. Full factor model analysis showed that higher morning home diastolic BP variability (standard deviation [SD], OR = 1.080, 95% CI: 1.024-1.140, P = .005; coefficient of variation [CV], OR = 1.076, 95% CI: 1.028-1.128, P = .002) was associated with more than 10 CMBs. Morning home systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability (SD, CV, average real variability) in more than 10 non-lobar CMBs group was significantly higher than that in 1-10 non-lobar CMBs group (P < .05).The multivariate analysis showed higher morning home diastolic blood pressure variability (SD, OR = 1.124, 95% CI: 1.031-1.224, P = .008; CV, OR = 1.099, 95% CI: 1.019-1.186, P = .015; average real variability, OR = 1.055, 95% CI: 0.995-1.120, P = .075) was associated with more than 10 non-lobar CMBs. There was no significant relationship between morning home systolic blood pressure variability and more than 10 non-lobar CMBs (P > .05). Higher morning home diastolic blood pressure variability was associated with more than 10 CMBs and more than 10 non-lobar CMBs.

The association between morning blood pressure and subclinical target organ damage in the normotensive population

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether isolatedly elevated morning blood pressure (BP) is associated with subclinical target organ damage in normotensive individuals.

METHODS

In all, 287 normotensive individuals were included in this cross-sectional study. Each participant underwent anthropometric measurements, serum biochemistry evaluation, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, echocardiography, and carotid ultrasonography. The morning BP and morning surge were defined as: the average BP within 2 h after waking up, and the difference between the mean systolic BP (SBP) within 2 h after waking up and the mean SBP during the hour that included the lowest BP reading during sleep, respectively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of elevated morning BP was 37.3%. Individuals with elevated morning BP had higher left ventricular mass index and morning surge, and also mean 24-h, daytime, and night-time SBP and diastolic BP, BP variability (all P < 0.05). Left ventricular mass index was correlated with 24-h, daytime, night-time, and morning SBP, and morning surge (Pearson's correlation coefficients: 0.271, 0.262, 0.215, 0.368, and 0.415, respectively; all P < 0.05); and standard deviations of 24-h, daytime, and night-time SBP (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.303, 0.234, and 0.309, respectively), and coefficient of variations of 24-h and night-time SBP (Pearson's correlation coefficients: 0.253 and 0.271, respectively). Morning surge had the strongest correlation with left ventricular mass index in multiple regression analysis. Only daytime and morning SBP could discriminate elevated morning surge (≥35 mmHg), with an area under the curve of 0.744 and 0.864, respectively (both P < 0.01), and an optimal threshold of 121.5 mmHg for morning SBP.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that isolated elevation of morning BP in normotensive individuals is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. Home monitoring of morning BP may be suitable for detecting abnormal morning surge.

Early morning-Best time window of hourly 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in relation to hypertensive organ damage: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study

The correlations between organ damage and hourly ambulatory blood pressure (BP) have not been established. The patients were 1464 participants of the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study participants who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. The hourly systolic BP (SBP) at x o'clock was defined as the average of SBP values measured at times x - 30 minutes, x, and x + 30 minutes. The mean age was 64.8 ± 11.6 years. The percentage of male participants was 47.8%. The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was significantly associated with SBP at 6 o'clock (r = 0.166, P < 0.001). The carotid intima-media thickness was significantly associated with SBP at 5 o'clock (r = 0.196, P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, smoking, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive drug use, clinic SBP, and 24-hour ambulatory SBP, the correlations of the LVMI and hourly SBP at 6 o'clock remained significant (beta coefficient = 0.125, P < 0.01). In conclusion, morning ambulatory systolic BP especially at 5 and 6 o'clock was independently associated with organ damage.

Morning blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension

: The aim of the current article is to review the current evidence on the role of morning blood pressure (BP) in the management of hypertension. Morning BP surge had been and will continue to be a hot topic of hypertension research. However, more evidence is needed to prove its clinical usefulness in the management of hypertension. Masked morning hypertension, as the other forms of masked hypertension, requires more research. The concept of morning BP monitoring could be clinically relevant in the therapeutic management of hypertension and in the prevention of cardiovascular complications by defining and treating morning hypertension. Antihypertensive medication is usually taken in the morning. The presence of uncontrolled morning BP during trough effect hours could be a hallmark of inadequate antihypertensive regimen, such as, for instance, the use of short-acting or intermediate-acting drugs, under dosing of drugs, or no or low use of combination therapy. To improve the management of hypertension in general and morning hypertension in particular, long-acting antihypertensive drugs should be used in appropriate often full dosages and in proper combinations. The clinical usefulness of antihypertensive drugs of specific mechanisms against morning BP or split or timed dosing of long-acting drugs in controlling morning BP remains under investigation. In conclusion, there is some evidence that morning BP is critical in the incidence of cardiovascular complications. However, proving its clinical usefulness in the management of hypertension requires further research.

Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is recognized that for the reliable assessment of blood pressure (BP) and the accurate diagnosis of hypertension, out-of-office BP measurement with ambulatory (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM) is often required. The clinical usefulness of ABPM is well established. However, despite the wide use of HBPM, only in the last decade convincing evidence on its usefulness has accumulated.

METHODS

Systematic review of the evidence on applying HBPM in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension (PubMed, Cochrane Library, 1970-2010).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies in untreated and treated subjects assessed the diagnostic ability of HBPM by taking ABPM as reference. Seven randomized studies compared HBPM vs. office measurements or ABPM for treatment adjustment, whereas many studies compared HBPM with office measurements in assessing the antihypertensive drug effects. Several studies with different design investigated the role of HBPM vs. office measurements in improving patients' compliance with treatment and hypertension control rates. The evidence on the cost-effectiveness of HBPM is limited. The studies reviewed consistently showed moderate diagnostic agreement between HBPM and ABPM, and superiority of HBPM compared to office measurements in diagnosing uncontrolled hypertension, assessing antihypertensive drug effects and improving patients' compliance and hypertension control. Preliminary evidence suggests that HBPM has the potential for cost savings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is conclusive evidence that HBPM is useful for the initial diagnosis and the long-term follow-up of treated hypertension. These data are useful for the optimal application of HBPM, which is widely used in clinical practice. More studies on the cost-effectiveness of HBPM are needed.