A Rational Guide to Reducing Fracture Risk in Dialysis Patients

Interventions to reduce falls among dialysis patients: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite all available evidence regarding increased morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients due to falls and their complications, and an increase in risk factors for falls, relatively little attention has been focused on evidence-based interventions that can reduce falls. We evaluated the effectiveness of fall prevention interventions among dialysis patients.

METHODS

We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) from inception to 19 July 2023 for studies that evaluated the effectiveness of fall prevention interventions among dialysis patients. The search, screening and extraction of data followed standardised processes and the methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by two reviewers. Data was analysed using a narrative synthesis approach.

RESULTS

Of the 18 studies that had full text review, five were eligible. Three studies were performed in the USA and one each in UK and Japan. Four studies were conducted in outpatient hemodialysis centres and one in a hospital-based nephrology unit. Reported sample sizes ranged from 51 to 96 participants per study with a follow-up period of 3 to 35 months. There was moderate-quality evidence that exercises reduce the rate of falls compared to usual care and low to moderate quality of evidence that multifactorial falls prevention interventions reduce the rate of falls. However, treatment effects could not be quantitatively estimated for all interventions due to substantial heterogeneity of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review reflects that there is insufficient evidence regarding falls prevention strategies specific to dialysis patients. Available data based on low to moderate quality studies, suggest that among dialysis patients, exercises may reduce falls and the effectiveness of multifactorial interventions such as staff and patient education still need to be explored using high-quality prospective studies.

Risk of Serious Falls Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study

The association between serious falls and dialysis modality [hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)] is unclear. A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study with 127,823 end-stage renal disease patients aged over 18 years was conducted with the unmatched cohort of 101,304 HD and 7,584 PD patients retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database during 2000-2013. A total of 7,584 HD and 7,584 PD patients matched at 1:1 ratio by propensity score were enrolled to the study. Serious falls were defined by the diagnostic codes, E code, and image studies. Cox regression model and competing-risk model were used for statistical analysis. HD patients were older and had more comorbidities at baseline than PD patients. After matching and adjustment, HD patients had a higher risk of serious falls than PD patients [sHR 1.27 (95% CI 1.06-1.52)]. Females, elders, a history of falls before dialysis, comorbidity with stroke or visual problems, using diuretics, α-blockers, and mydriatics were associated with higher risks of serious falls among dialysis patients. The risk of serious falls was higher in HD patients than PD patients. Health professionals should create age-friendly environments, reduce unnecessary medications, and raise patients' awareness of falls in daily life.

Modified Creatinine Index and the Risk of Bone Fracture in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: The Q-Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk for bone fracture and sarcopenia. There is close interplay between skeletal muscle and bone. However, it is still unclear whether lower skeletal muscle mass increases the risk for bone fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study and prospective longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

An independent cohort of 78 hemodialysis patients in the cross-sectional study and 3,030 prevalent patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis prospectively followed up for 4 years.

PREDICTOR

Skeletal muscle mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and modified creatinine index, an estimate of skeletal muscle mass based on age, sex, Kt/V for urea, and serum creatinine level.

OUTCOMES

Bone fracture at any site.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional study, modified creatinine index was significantly correlated with skeletal muscle mass measured by BIA. During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 140 patients had bone fracture. When patients were divided into sex-specific quartiles based on modified creatinine index, risk for bone fracture estimated by a Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazards model with all-cause death as a competing risk was significantly higher in the lower modified creatinine index quartiles (Q1 and Q2) compared to the highest modified creatinine index quartile (Q4) as the reference value in both sexes (multivariable-adjusted HRs for men were 7.81 [95% CI, 2.63-23.26], 5.48 [95% CI, 2.08-14.40], 2.24 [95% CI, 0.72-7.00], and 1.00 [P for trend < 0.001], and for women were 4.44 [95% CI, 1.50-13.11], 2.33 [95% CI, 0.86-6.31], 1.96 [95% CI, 0.82-4.65], and 1.00 [P for trend = 0.007] for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

One-time assessment of modified creatinine index; no data for residual kidney function and fracture sites and causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified creatinine index was correlated with skeletal muscle mass measured by BIA. Lower modified creatinine index was associated with increased risk for bone fracture in male and female hemodialysis patients.

Geovariation in Fracture Risk among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fractures are a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving dialysis. We sought to determine whether rates of fractures and tendon ruptures vary geographically.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data from the US Renal Data System were used to create four yearly cohorts, 2007-2010, including all eligible prevalent patients on hemodialysis in the United States on January 1 of each year. A secondary analysis comprising patients in a large dialysis organization conducted over the same period permitted inclusion of patient-level markers of mineral metabolism. Patients were grouped into 10 regions designated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and divided by latitude into one of three bands: south, <35°; middle, 35° to <40°; and north, ≥40°. Poisson regression was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted region-level rate ratios for events.

RESULTS

Overall, 327,615 patients on hemodialysis were included. Mean (SD) age was 61.8 (15.0) years old, 52.7% were white, and 55.0% were men. During 716,962 person-years of follow-up, 44,014 fractures and tendon ruptures occurred, the latter being only 0.3% of overall events. Event rates ranged from 5.36 to 7.83 per 100 person-years, a 1.5-fold rate difference across regions. Unadjusted region-level rate ratios varied from 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.85) to 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.23), a 1.45-fold rate difference. After adjustment for a wide range of case mix variables, a 1.33-fold variation in rates remained. Rates were higher in north and middle bands than the south (north rate ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.23; middle rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.17). Latitude explained 11% of variation, independent of region. A complementary analysis of 87,013 patients from a large dialysis organization further adjusted for circulating mineral metabolic parameters and protein energy wasting yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of fractures vary geographically in the United States dialysis population, even after adjustment for known patient characteristics. Latitude seems to contribute to this phenomenon, but additional analyses exploring whether other factors might influence variation are warranted.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorders (CKD-MBDs): What the Endocrinologist Needs to Know

OBJECTIVE

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBDs) are a spectrum of abnormalities involving skeletal hormones, minerals, and bone turnover and mineralization. This paper focuses on what the endocrinologist should know about the assessment and management of skeletal and metabolic disorders in CKD-MBDs.

METHODS

Relevant literature was reviewed to (1) define disturbances of minerals and hormones in the course of CKD; (2) identify the variable radiographic and histomorphometric changes of CKD-MBDs; (3) review the association among CKD-MBDs, vascular calcification, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality; and (4) clarify issues in CKD-MBDs therapy.

RESULTS

Assessment and treatment of CKD-MBDs is complicated by progressive changes in bone minerals and skeletal regulatory hormones as kidney function declines. CKD-MBDs are associated with fracture risk, and studies demonstrate that bone mineral density can be used to assess bone loss and fracture risk in these patients. Treatment of CKD-MBDs continues to evolve. Use of calcium, phosphate binders, vitamin D, vitamin D-receptor analogs, and drugs for osteoporosis and CKD-MBDs treatment are discussed in the context of safety and efficacy for patients with CKD.

CONCLUSION

The association of CKD with bone disease, vascular calcification, CVD, and mortality mandates earlier recognition and treatment of CKD-MBDs. Osteoporosis as a distinct entity can be diagnosed and managed in CKD, although assessment of osteoporosis becomes challenging in late (stage 4 to 5) CKD. Diabetes is common in early (stage 1 to 3) CKD. In addition, 96% of all individuals identified as having CKD have early CKD. The endocrinologist is uniquely positioned to address and treat both diabetes and many of the metabolic and skeletal disorders associated with early CKD-MBDs, including osteoporosis.

Ageing Renal Patients: We Need More Collaboration between Geriatric Services and Nephrology Departments

There has been a significant increase in the number of frail older patients diagnosed with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) over the past thirty years. These elderly patients have high levels of comorbidity, and as a consequence the face of renal medicine is changing—There is an increasing need to focus on traditionally geriatric areas of expertise such as falls prevention and rehabilitation, and to shift our emphasis onto improving patient well-being rather than longevity. Over the past decade, many nephrologists have found that they are already acting as de facto “amateur geriatricians”. This denies patients both the benefits of specialist geriatric assessment, and equally importantly denies them access to the wider geriatric multidisciplinary team. This article describes the prevalence and underlying causes of the so-called “Geriatric Giants” in patients with advanced CKD, and discusses possible improvements in care that closer working with geriatricians could bring.

Epidemiological study of orthopedic injuries in hemodialysis patients in Taiwan: a fixed cohort survey, 2004-2008

BACKGROUND

The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing concern worldwide. The prevalence of hemodialysis in Taiwan is the highest in the world, and this may increase the prevalence of orthopedic fractures. The aim of this study was to explore the incidences of various orthopedic injuries and the related risk factors.

METHODS

A nationwide prospective study based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance dataset was conducted during 2004-2008. A total of 82,491 CKD patients were selected as the fixed cohort population. The International Classification of Diseases 9-CM diagnosis codes and treatment codes were identified as the inclusion criteria for orthopedic injury.

RESULTS

A total of 82,491 Taiwanese people with CKD were identified in 2004, and 4915 orthopedic injuries occurred during the 5-year follow-up period. The cumulative incidences of orthopedic injuries were 42.56‰ for lower limb fractures, and 12.93‰, 3.27‰, and 1.64‰ for upper limb fractures, vertebrae fractures, and joint dislocations, respectively. All three types of orthopedic fractures were more common in the oldest age stratum (≥65 years old). In the CKD patients, the risk ratio of osteoporosis was 3.47 (95% confidence interval, 3.10-3.89) for all orthopedic injuries. Patients of advanced age, the female gender, and those with high comorbidity were also at significant risk of sustaining orthopedic fractures.

CONCLUSION

The results from this Taiwanese CKD cohort support the strong influence of aging and osteoporosis on all kinds of orthopedic injuries. The postponing of osteoporosis may need to be taken into consideration for the prevention of orthopedic injury among CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound measurements in chronic hemodialysis patients: a 4-year follow-up

In the course of chronic kidney disease, bone metabolism disturbances occur and become aggravated simultaneously with the progression of renal disorder, worsening patients' quality of life. We conducted a 4-year follow-up to assess phalangeal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements in 32 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (17 males and 15 females) whose mean ages were 56.3 ± 15.2 years. The QUSs of hand phalanges were performed using DBM 1200 (IGEA, Carpi, Italy) and are expressed as amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SoS), Z-scores, and T-scores. In comparison with the age-, sex-, and body mass index-adjusted control group, QUS parameters were significantly decreased in all patients undergoing dialysis. During the 4-year follow-up, Ad-SoS and T-scores in all study groups sloped significantly with time. The significant negative relationships between follow-up Ad-SoS results and both baseline and follow-up parathormone values were demonstrated. Our results confirm a high prevalence of bone disturbances in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, and they do not improve during renal replacement therapy. The parathormone level seems to be an important agent in influencing bone status, but further studies are needed to understand the other risk factors in kidney-related bone disease.

[Is there a place for the physical activity in the prevention of the fractures of chronic kidney disease patients?]

The risk of non-traumatic fractures is greatly increased in kidney disease patients and well demonstrated in dialysis patients. If osteoporosis plays a major role in the general population, in chronic kidney disease renal osteodystrophy is associated with neurological and muscular disorders, which probably worsen the risk. The decrease in physical activity is a factor contributing to the loss of bone mass and the initiation of a rehabilitation program improves the prognosis. Despite the association between chronic renal disease and sedentary lifestyle, the relationship between physical inactivity and bones in dialysis patients and the effect of increased activity programs, are not well documented in the literature.

Prophylactic use of omeprazole associated with a reduced risk of peptic ulcer disease among maintenance hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) have a high prevalence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor with proven efficacy in the prevention and treatment of PUD. However, there is little data on the prophylactic use of omeprazole in reducing the risk of PUD among MHD patients.

METHODS

This prospective study included 93 patients undergoing MHD at Zen-Ho Dialysis Center between July 2008 and December 2009. Fifty-three patients were assigned to receive 20 mg of omeprazole daily for 18 months and 40 patients served as control. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate the cumulative incidence of PUD.

RESULTS

The per-protocol population comprised 85 patients (omeprazole group, 49; control group, 36). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The need for endoscopy was found to be significantly less (10.2 vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001) in the omeprazole group than in the control group. Dialysis patients in the omeprazole group required fewer blood transfusions and erythropoietin doses than did the control group patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher cumulative ulcer rate in the control group (log-rank test, p = 0.04). However, omeprazole did not reduce the risk of PUD in MHD patients on regular aspirin or warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that prophylactic use of omeprazole might be effective to lower the incidence of PUD among MHD patients without regular aspirin or warfarin use. Further large-scale controlled trials should be carried out to confirm our findings.