Nocturnal hemodialysis: analysis following the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trial

Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Home dialysis creates fewer lifestyle disruptions while providing similar or better outcomes than in-center hemodialysis. Socioeconomically advantaged patients are more likely to commence home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) in many developed countries. This study investigated associations between socioeconomic status and uptake of home dialysis in Australia, a country with universal access to health care and comparatively high rates of home dialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This study analyzed 23,281 non-Indigenous adult patients who commenced chronic RRT in Australia from 2000 to 2011 according to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry in a retrospective cohort study. This study investigated the proportion of patients who were ever likely to use home dialysis using nonmixture cure models and followed patients until the end of 2011 (median follow-up time=3.0 years, interquartile range=1.3-5.5 years). The main predictor was area socioeconomic status from postcodes grouped into quartiles using standard indices.

RESULTS

Patients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were less likely to commence peritoneal dialysis (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.69) and more likely to use in-center hemodialysis than patients from the most disadvantaged areas (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.30). Socioeconomic status was not associated with uptake of home hemodialysis. Rural areas were more disadvantaged and had higher rates of peritoneal dialysis, and privately funded hospitals rarely used home dialysis. Patients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were more likely to use private hospitals than patients from the most disadvantaged quartile (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 7.5).

CONCLUSION

The lower incidence of peritoneal dialysis among patients from advantaged areas seems to be multifactorial. Identifying and addressing barriers to home dialysis in Australia could improve patient quality of life and reduce costs.

Nocturnal hemodialysis

Patients receiving conventional hemodialysis have high hospitalisation rates, poor quality of life and survival compared to the general population. Many centres around the world are providing longer hours of hemodialysis - short daily hemodialysis and nocturnal hemodialysis - with a view to improving patient survival and quality of life. Studies have shown that nocturnal haemodiaysis is more effective than conventional hemodialysis in clearing most small, middle and larger molecule toxins and suggest nocturnal dialysis enhances patient survival and quality of life. Concerns include patient acceptance, vascular access related complications and increased cost. The purpose of this review is to examine the advantages and drawbacks of nocturnal dialysis, with a focus on applicability to India where the renal physician has to face cultural and economic barriers, erratic power supply and poor water quality.

Daily ultrafiltration results in improved blood pressure control and more efficient removal of small molecules during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Although prior studies have shown that frequent hemodialysis (HD) can lead to improved control of dry weight in end-stage renal disease patients, there are no clinical studies examining whether this can improve blood pressure (BP) control and can also shorten the dialysis time needed to achieve satisfactory removal of small molecules. Several models of wearable dialysis systems are now under various stages of development. These devices present the possibility of hemodialyzing patients to their dry weights. We have built a prototype of a wearable ultrafiltration (UF) device that can provide daily UF. Apart from better fluid control, we hypothesize that separating HD from UF will result in better BP control, and adequate weekly small molecule removal could be achieved with a decreased duration of dialysis. We tested the hypothesis in current HD patients using conventional dialysis equipment.

METHODS

Thirteen patients were selected from a large urban HD center. The experimental period consisted of 4 weeks of daily UF (4 days/week of UF alone and 2 days/week of HD with UF). The duration of the HD sessions was increased by 15-30 min to maintain weekly standard Kt/V >2.0. The patients were then returned to their conventional 3 days/week of HD with UF and studied for 4 weeks. Predialysis BPs, interdialytic weight gains, and Kt/V results of the experimental and return periods were compared with those of the 3-month control period. No changes were made in antihypertensive or other medication during the study.

RESULTS

During the experimental period, mean arterial pressure decreased from 110 to 95 mm Hg (p < 0.001), systolic BP from 158 to 136 mm Hg (p < 0.001), while interdialytic weight gains were reduced from 3.25 to 1.21 liters (p < 0.0001). During the experimental period, weekly standard Kt/V of 2.16 was achieved in 8.24 h/week of HD, as compared to 11.14 h/week.

CONCLUSIONS

Volume control with daily UF results in improved BP control and, by separating the UF function from HD, adequate weekly standard Kt/V >2 can be achieved with twice weekly HD.